In paternity testing, when there are Mendelian errors in the alleles between the child and the parents, a slippage mutation, or silent allele may not fully explain the phenomenon. Sometimes, it is attributed to chromosomal abnormalities, such as uniparental disomy (UPD). Here, we present the investigation of two cases of suspected UPD in paternity testing based on short tandem repeat (STR) detection (capillary electrophoresis platform). Case 1 involves a trio, where all genotypes detected on chromosome 6 in the child are homozygous and found in the father. Case 2 is a duo (mother and child), where all genotypes on chromosome 3 in the child are homozygous and not always found in the mother. At the same time, Mendelian error alleles were also observed at specific loci in these two chromosomes. Furthermore, we used the MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit for sequencing on the massively parallel sequencing platform, which included common autosomal, X and Y chromosomes, and mitochondrial genetic markers used in forensic practice. The results showed that the genotypes of shared STRs on the two platforms were consistent, and STRs and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on these two chromosomes were homozygous. All other genetic markers followed the laws of inheritance. A comprehensive analysis supported the parent-child relationship between the child and the alleged parent, and the observed genetic anomalies can be attributed to UPD. UPD occurrences are rare, and ignoring its presence can lead to erroneous exclusions in paternity testing, particularly when multiple loci on a chromosome exhibit homozygosity.

The Amelogenin sex test included in forensic DNA typing kits has the potential to identify congenital conditions such as differences/disorders of sex development (DSD). It can also reveal mismatches between genotypic sex and gender marker in identity documents of transgender persons who obtained legal gender recognition. In a 13-year case history of paternity/kinship tests, involving n = 962 females and n = 1001 males, two mismatches between Amelogenin sex test (male) and gender marker (female), and three cases of chromosomal DSD (Klinefelter syndrome) were observed. The concrete risk of observing Amelogenin anomalies, their potential causes, and the context in which they occur (forensic, i.e. non-medical) mean that laboratory operators are called to strike a complex balance between privacy interests and individual health rights when providing preliminary information and reporting Amelogenin incidental findings. This case history argues for the need of a more responsible approach towards the Amelogenin sex test in the forensic community.

23年前，某镇一女性被强奸杀害。检验死者阴道擦拭物，获得一男性常染色体STR分型，多年一直未找到嫌疑人。为进一步增加位点信息，当地公安重新检验该样本，获得41个Y-STR分型，比中安徽、江苏、山东、江西、湖北、湖南等地280个家系，其中0个基因座容差家系9个、1个基因座容差家系142个、2个基因座容差家系129个，覆盖9千余人。当地公安先后检验985份血样均未比中嫌疑人及其近亲属。本鉴定中心指导办案单位筛选72份家系样本（其中0个基因座容差14份，1个基因座容差58份），使用法医SNP系谱推断技术进行家系比对。.

因出国公证需要，古甲、古乙和古丙（均为化名）三姐妹要求对两两之间的同胞关系进行鉴定。.

In the early morning a 28-year-old man was found lying on the tracks of a railway station with head injuries and fractures of the cervical spine resulting in permanent quadriplegia. He was in a club about 1 km away until about 2 h earlier and did not have any recollection of what could have happened. Was he the victim of an assault, did he fall down or was he hit by a passing train? The solution to this \"mystery\" came from a forensic evaluation that included the forensic branches of pathology, chemistry, merceology and genetics as well as the scene evaluation. Through these different steps, the role of a railway collision in determining the injuries was ascertained and a possible dynamic was postulated. The presented case is an expression of the importance of the different forensic disciplines and the difficulties the forensic pathologist encounters when analysing such peculiar and rare cases.

Forensic genetics is a rapidly evolving science thanks to the growing variety of genetic markers, the establishment of faster, less error-prone sequencing technologies, and the engineering of bioinformatics models, methods, and structures. In the early 2000s, the need emerged to create an international genetic database for forensic purposes. This paper describes a judicial investigation of skeletal remains to identify the subject using various methods. The anthropological examination of the remains allowed identification of the Caucasoid (European) ethnic group, a height of 156 ± 4 cm, and an age between 47 and 50 years. The genetic profiles obtained from typing several microsatellites made it possible to evaluate the compatibility between the skeletal remains and the suspected decedent. To identify the remains, the two extrapolated genetic profiles were compared. The case described highlights the central role of forensic genetics in identifying skeleton remains by means of comparison.

It has been advocated before that appearance prediction of unknown suspects from crime scene DNA, in the context of Forensic DNA Phenotyping (FDP), is mostly suitable for single source DNA samples, whereas FDP from DNA mixtures to which more than one person contributed, is viewed challenging. With this report on a murder case, we practically demonstrate the feasibility of appearance DNA prediction of an unknown suspect from a mixed crime scene trace, to which the unknown suspect and the known victim had contributed. From this two-person DNA mixture, we successfully predicted eye, hair and skin color of the unknown suspect with the HIrisPlex-S system by applying targeted massively parallel sequencing (MPS). We argue that at least three factors benefit appearance DNA prediction of unknown suspects from mixed crime scene traces, which were met in this murder case: i) SNP genotype knowledge from reference DNA analysis for one of the two persons in the mixture (here the known victim), ii) about equal DNA contributions by both donors to the mixed crime scene stain, and iii) the use of MPS allowing quantitative SNP analysis. Moreover, we show that additionally analyzing animal DNA in this mixed crime scene trace provides further investigative information. We envision that the investigative DNA strategy that we applied here for analyzing a two-person mixed crime scene trace in a murder case, will be applied in the future to more criminal cases with two-person DNA mixtures, for instance sexual assault cases.

On the morning of October 19, 2004, an eight-year-old boy and a 56-year-old woman were stabbed to death on an open street in the city of Linköping, Sweden. The perpetrator left his DNA at the crime scene, and after 15 years of various investigation efforts, including more than 9000 interrogations and mass DNA screening of more than 6000 men, there were still no clues about the identity of the unknown murderer. The successful application of investigative genetic genealogy (IGG) in the US raised the interest for this tool within the Swedish Police Authority. After legal consultations it was decided that IGG could be applied in this double murder case as a pilot case study. From extensive DNA analysis, including whole-genome sequencing and genotype imputation, DNA data sets were established and searched within both GEDmatch and FamilyTree DNA genealogy databases. A number of fairly distant relatives were found from which family trees were created. The genealogy work resulted in two candidates, two brothers, one of whom matched the crime scene samples by routine STR profiling. The suspect confessed the murders at the initial police hearing and was later convicted of the murders. In this paper we describe the successful application of an emerging technology. We disclose details of the DNA analyses which, due to the poor quality and low quantity of the DNA, required reiterative sequencing and genotype imputation efforts. The successful application of IGG in this double murder case exemplifies its applicability not only in the US but also in Europe. The pressure is now high on the involved authorities to establish IGG as a tool for cold case criminal investigations and for missing person identifications. There is, however, a continuous need to accommodate legal, social and ethical aspects as well.

Recently, a method of identifying body fluids using DNA methylation has been developed (Frumkin et al., 2011). An existing multiplex assay using 9 CpG markers could differentiate 5 body fluids: semen, blood, saliva, menstrual blood, and vaginal fluid. To validate this technique, we evaluated the previously described body fluid identification method by means of single base extension (SBE). DNA methylation was applied to 22 samples in 18 forensic cases; seven of these were semen, three were blood, eight were saliva, three were vaginal fluid, and one was menstrual blood. Total of 18 samples were tested, the DNA methylation profiles were coincident from preliminary tests (acid phosphatase (AP), leucomalachite green (LMG, Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and SALIgAE®) except one sample which displayed an all-negative result. After applying the DNA methylation method to forensic samples, we determined that it could be very useful for differentiating vaginal secretions from menstrual blood, for which there is no conventional preliminary testing method.

We report a case study wherein we established the putative cause of the death of three leopards by identifying the species and number of individual prey species from the gut contents using molecular tools. In a National Park within Northern part of India, the suspicious death of three leopards (Panthera pardus) was reported from different localities on the same day. The gut contents from the three leopard carcasses were collected during postmortem and sent to us to confirm the prey species. We used mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b (Cyt b) and control region (CR), and nuclear microsatellites for molecular identification of species and individual identification, respectively, from the gut contents. Mitochondrial sequences confirmed that the undigested remnants collected from the gut contents were of the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Furthermore, the microsatellite analysis of the gut contents highlighted the consumption of the same dog by all the three deceased leopards. Since the National Park was one of the major human-wildlife interaction zones, consuming the same dog by the leopards implies suspicious poisoning for revenge. The use of dog carcass for the possible poisoning for the mass-scale killing of the protected species is a severe wildlife offense.