Multiple techniques describe the management of the open abdomen (OA) and restoration of abdominal wall integrity after damage-control laparotomy (DCL). It is unclear which operative technique provides the best method of achieving primary myofascial closure at the index hospitalization.
A writing group from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature regarding OA management strategies in the adult population after DCL. The group sought to understand if fascial traction techniques or techniques to reduce visceral edema improved the outcomes in these patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was utilized, meta-analyses were performed, and an evidence profile was generated.
Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria. Overall, the use of fascial traction techniques was associated with improved primary myofascial closure during the index admission (relative risk, 0.32) and fewer hernias (relative risk, 0.11.) The use of fascial traction techniques did not increase the risk of enterocutaneous fistula formation nor mortality. Techniques to reduce visceral edema may improve the rate of closure; however, these studies were very limited and suffered significant heterogeneity.
We conditionally recommend the use of a fascial traction system over routine care when treating a patient with an OA after DCL. This recommendation is based on the benefit of improved primary myofascial closure without worsening mortality or enterocutaneous fistula formation. We are unable to make any recommendations regarding techniques to reduce visceral edema.
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; Level IV.

To provide guidelines for all surgical specialists who deal with the open abdomen (OA) or the burst abdomen (BA) in adult patients both on the methods used to close the musculofascial layers of the abdominal wall, and regarding possible materials to be used.
The guidelines were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach including publications up to January 2017. When RCTs were available, outcomes of interest were quantitatively synthesized by means of a conventional meta-analysis. When only observational studies were available, a meta-analysis of proportions was done. The guidelines were written using the AGREE II instrument.
For many of the Key Questions that were researched, there were no high quality studies available. While some strong recommendations could be made according to GRADE, the guidelines also contain good practice statements and clinical expertise guidance which are distinct from recommendations that have been formally categorized using GRADE.
When considering the OA, dynamic closure techniques should be prioritized over the use of static closure techniques (strong recommendation). However, for techniques including suture closure, mesh reinforcement, component separation techniques and skin grafting, only clinical expertise guidance was provided. Considering the BA, a clinical expertise guidance statement was advised for dynamic closure techniques. Additionally, a clinical expertise guidance statement concerning suture closure and a good practice statement concerning mesh reinforcement during fascial closure were proposed. The role of advanced techniques such as component separation or relaxing incisions is questioned. In addition, the role of the abdominal girdle seems limited to very selected patients.

BACKGROUND: The best outcomes following Acute Compartment Syndrome (ACS) are attributed to early diagnosis and treatment. National guidelines were issued in the United Kingdom in 2014 (BOAST 10) to standardise and improve management. We analysed standards of diagnosis and management before and after the introduction of the guidelines.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of all patients with ACS requiring fasciotomy between March 2010 and May 2015 across four Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) in the Northwest of England. We analysed the pooled data for variations between the centres and the effect of BOAST10 implementation.
RESULTS: 75 fasciotomies were recorded, with trauma being the cause in 42 cases (56%). The commonest site was the leg (44, 59%) followed by the forearm (15, 20%). The median time from decision to operate to fasciotomy was 2 h (range 0-6) and thereafter a median of 2 days (1-7) until a second visit. The practice across the four centres was similar up to diagnosis and treatment, but there was significant variation in practice after fasciotomy. The BOAST guidelines did not improve the time to surgery, time to second visit nor the recording of clinical signs. 21 patients had severe complications, including one death and 4 amputations.
CONCLUSIONS: There continues to be significant variability in the definitive management of ACS. National guidelines do not appear to make a discernible impact on practice, and additional methods of ensuring safe management of this critical condition seem warranted.

BACKGROUND: A part of damage-control laparotomy is to leave the fascial edges and the skin open to avoid abdominal compartment syndrome and allow further explorations. This condition, known as open abdomen (OA), although effective, is associated with severe complications. Our aim was to develop evidence-based recommendations to define indications for OA, techniques for temporary abdominal closure, management of enteric fistulas, and methods of definitive wall closure.
METHODS: The literature from 1990 to 2014 was systematically screened according to PRISMA [Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses] protocol. Seventy-six articles were reviewed by a panel of experts to assign grade of recommendations (GoR) and level of evidence (LoE) using the GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation] system, and an international consensus conference was held.
RESULTS: OA in trauma is indicated at the end of damage-control laparotomy, in the presence of visceral swelling, for a second look in vascular injuries or gross contamination, in the case of abdominal wall loss, and if medical treatment of abdominal compartment syndrome has failed (GoR B, LoE II). Negative-pressure wound therapy is the recommended temporary abdominal closure technique to drain peritoneal fluid, improve nursing, and prevent fascial retraction (GoR B, LoE I). Lack of OA closure within 8 days (GoR C, LoE II), bowel injuries, high-volume replacement, and use of polypropylene mesh over the bowel (GoR C, LoE I) are risk factors for frozen abdomen and fistula formation. Negative-pressure wound therapy allows to isolate the fistula and protect the surrounding tissues from spillage until granulation (GoR C, LoE II). Correction of fistula is performed after 6 months to 12 months. Definitive closure of OA has to be obtained early (GoR C, LoE I) with direct suture, traction devices, component separation with or without mesh. Biologic meshes are an option for wall reinforcement if bacterial contamination is present (GoR C, LoE II).
CONCLUSIONS: OA and negative-pressure techniques improve the care of trauma patients, but closure must be achieved early to avoid complications.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: It has been evident for a while that the result after resection for colon cancer may not have been optimal. Several years ago, this was showed by some leading surgeons in the USA but a concept of improving results was not consistently pursued. Later, surgeons in Europe and Japan have increasingly adopted the more radical principle of complete mesocolic excision (CME) as the optimal approach for colon cancer. The concept of CME is a similar philosophy to that of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer and precise terminology and optimal surgery are key factors.
METHODS: There are three essential components to CME. The main component involves a dissection between the mesenteric plane and the parietal fascia and removal of the mesentery within a complete envelope of mesenteric fascia and visceral peritoneum that contains all lymph nodes draining the tumour area (Hohenberger et al., Colorectal Disease 11:354-365, 2009; West et al., J Clin Oncol 28:272-278, 2009). The second component is a central vascular tie to completely remove all lymph nodes in the central (vertical) direction. The third component is resection of an adequate length of bowel to remove involved pericolic lymph nodes in the longitudinal direction.
RESULTS: The oncological rationale for CME and various technical aspects of the surgical management will be explored.
CONCLUSIONS: The consensus conference agreed that there are sound oncological hypotheses for a more radical approach than has been common up to now. However, this may not necessarily apply in early stages of the tumour stage. Laparoscopic resection appears to be equally well suited for resection as open surgery.

Surgical excision remains the gold standard for the management of cutaneous squamous cell cancers (SCC) and national guidelines for operative radial margins predict 95% oncological clearance with a margin of 4 mm for low-risk and 6 mm for high-risk tumours. We retrospectively analysed all cutaneous SCC excisions performed across 4 regional Plastic surgical units in England over a consecutive 24-month period and collected data on tumour characteristics, operative and histological margins and completeness of excision. We identified 633 eligible SCC excisions of which 265 (42%) were over 2 cm in diameter with 37 recurrent tumours (5.8%). The mean radial operative margin was 6.5 mm across all tumours and 8.4 mm for tumours greater than 2 cm. The mean histological tumour diameter was 21 mm. The overall incomplete excision rate was 7.6% (7.9% for tumours >2 cm). Ninety-four percent (45/48) of incomplete excisions involved the deep margin and only 3 out of 633 excisions (0.47%) were incomplete at a radial margin only. No differences were observed in tumour size or excision margin between incompletely and completely excised tumours. Incomplete excisions were most common on the ear, nose and cheek. In summary our analysis demonstrates that despite adherence to recommended surgical margins for cutaneous SCCs the incomplete excision rate remains higher than expected. We believe that this is because most incomplete excisions are incomplete at the deep margin and question the utility of performing increasingly wide excisions, and, the generalisability of the evidence upon which recommendations for radial margins are based.

暂无摘要。

A joint meeting of the Limb Trauma and Wounds Working Groups resulted in the establishment of 29 consensus recommendations for the conduct of initial extremity war wound debridement. Pre-operative, operative and post-operative phases of debridement were considered along with wound irrigation and dressings. Wounds where a different surgical approach is required, such as superficial soft tissue wounds at one end of the spectrum and complex wounds sustained in close proximity to explosions at the other, were also discussed. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of orthopaedic, vascular and plastic surgeons, as well as nursing officers, from across the Defence Medical Services and are intended to provide useful guidance to the deploying surgeon, regardless of their own personal experience.

暂无摘要。