OBJECTIVE: Exome or genome sequencing (ES or GS) can identify genetic causes of otherwise unexplained congenital anomaly and perinatal death (PND) but is not routine practice. The evidence base for \"genomic autopsy\" after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (TOPFA) and PND has been synthesized to determine the value of this investigation.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria and containing ≥10 cases of TOPFA or PND (with or without major congenital abnormality), in which ES or GS was conducted. We determined test performance, including diagnostic yield, accuracy, and reliability. We also reported outcomes associated with clinical utility and harms, where described.
RESULTS: From 2245 potentially eligible studies, 32 publications were eligible and had data extracted, representing 2120 cases that could be meta-analyzed. No diagnostic accuracy or comparative studies were identified, although some analysis of concordance between different ES/GS methodologies could be performed. Studies reporting parent-related outcomes or long-term follow-up did not do so in a systematic or quantifiable manner.
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that approximately one-fourth to one-third of fetal losses associated with TOPFA or unexplained PND are associated with a genetic cause identifiable on ES or GS-albeit this estimate varies depending on phenotypic and background risk factors. Despite the large body of evidence on ES and GS, little research has attempted to validate the accuracy of testing, nor measure the clinical or societal outcomes in families that follow the diagnostic investigation in this context.

Prenatal Exome (pES) or Genome (pGS) Sequencing analysis showed a significant incremental diagnostic yield over karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in fetal structural anomalies. Optimized indications and detection rates in different fetal anomalies are still under investigation. The aim of this study was to assess the incremental diagnostic yield in prenatally diagnosed Central Nervous System (CNS) anomalies. A systematic review on antenatal CNS anomalies was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, including n = 12 paper, accounting for 428 fetuses. Results were pooled in a meta-analysis fitting a logistic random mixed-effect model. The effect of interest was the incremental diagnostic rate of pES over karyotype/CMA in detecting likely pathogenic/pathogenic Single Nucleotide Variants (SNVs). A further meta-analysis adding the available pGS studies (including diagnostic coding SNVs only) and submeta-analysis on three CNS subcategories were also performed. The pooled incremental diagnostic yield estimate of pES studies was 38% (95% C.I.: [29%;47%]) and 36% (95% C.I.: [28%;45%]) when including diagnostic SNVs of pGS studies. The point estimate of the effect resulted 22% (95% C.I.: [15%;31%]) in apparently isolated anomalies, 33% (95% C.I.: [22%;46%]) in CNS-only related anomalies (≥1) and 46% (95% C.I.: [38%;55%]) in non-isolated anomalies (either ≥ 2 anomalies in CNS, or CNS and extra-CNS). Meta-analysis showed a substantial diagnostic improvement in performing Prenatal Genome-Wide Sequencing analysis (Exome or Genome) over karyotype and CMA in CNS anomalies.

BACKGROUND: Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by a range of physical, cognitive, and behavioral abnormalities. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive review of the literature on CdLS and investigate two cases of CdLS with distinct phenotypes that underwent WES to aid in their diagnosis.
METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on CdLS along with performing whole-exome sequencing on two CdLS patients with distinct phenotypes, followed by Sanger sequencing validation and in-silico analysis.
RESULTS: The first case exhibited a classic CdLS phenotype, but the initial WES analysis of blood-derived DNA failed to identify any mutations in CdLS-related genes. However, a subsequent WES analysis of skin-derived DNA revealed a novel heterozygous mutation in the NIPBL gene (NM_133433.4:c.6534_6535del, p.Met2178Ilefs*8). The second case was presented with a non-classic CdLS phenotype, and WES analysis of blood-derived DNA identified a heterozygous missense variant in the SMC1A gene (NM_006306.4:c.2320G>A, p.Asp774Asn).
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows the importance of considering mosaicism in classic CdLS cases and the value of WES for identifying genetic defects. These findings contribute to our understanding of CdLS genetics and underscore the need for comprehensive genetic testing to enhance the diagnosis and management of CdLS patients.

Diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases (NMD) can be challenging because of the heterogeneity of this group of diseases. This review aimed to describe the diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing (WES) for pediatric-onset neuromuscular disease diagnosis, as well as other benefits of this approach in patient management since WES can contribute to appropriate treatment selection in NMD patients. WES increases the possibility of reaching a conclusive genetic diagnosis when other technologies have failed and even exploring new genes not previously associated with a specific NMD. Moreover, this strategy can be useful when a dual diagnosis is suspected in complex congenital anomalies and undiagnosed cases.

Exome and genome sequencing have rapidly transitioned from research methods to widely used clinical tests for diagnosing rare genetic diseases. We sought to synthesize the topics covered and appraise the development processes of clinical guidance documents generated by genetics professional organizations.
We conducted a scoping review of guidance documents published since 2010, systematically identified in peer-reviewed and gray literature, using established methods and reporting guidelines. We coded verbatim recommendations by topic using content analysis and critically appraised documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.
We identified 30 guidance documents produced by 8 organizations (2012-2022), yielding 611 recommendations covering 21 topics. The most common topic related to findings beyond the primary testing indication. Mean AGREE II scores were low across all 6 quality domains; scores for items related to rigor of development were among the lowest. More recently published documents generally received higher scores.
Guidance documents included a broad range of recommendations but were of low quality, particularly in their rigor of development. Developers should consider using tools such as AGREE II and basing recommendations on living knowledge syntheses to improve guidance development in this evolving space.

To determine the incremental diagnostic yield of exome sequencing (ES) after negative chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in cases of prenatally diagnosed agenesis of the corpus callosum (ACC) and to identify the associated genes and variants.
A systematic search was performed to identify relevant studies published up until June 2022 using four databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library. Studies in English reporting on the diagnostic yield of ES following negative CMA in prenatally diagnosed partial or complete ACC were included. Authors of cohort studies were contacted for individual participant data and extended cohorts were provided for two of them. The increase in diagnostic yield with ES for pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants was assessed in all cases of ACC, isolated ACC, ACC with other cranial anomalies and ACC with extracranial anomalies. To identify all reported genetic variants, the systematic review included all ACC cases; however, for the meta-analysis, only studies with ≥ three ACC cases were included. Meta-analysis of proportions was employed using a random-effects model. Quality assessment of the included studies was performed using modified Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria.
A total of 28 studies, encompassing 288 prenatally diagnosed ACC cases that underwent ES following negative CMA, met the inclusion criteria of the systematic review. We classified 116 genetic variants in 83 genes associated with prenatal ACC with a full phenotypic description. There were 15 studies, encompassing 268 cases, that reported on ≥ three ACC cases and were included in the meta-analysis. Of all the included cases, 43% had a P/LP variant on ES. The highest yield was for ACC with extracranial anomalies (55% (95% CI, 35-73%)), followed by ACC with other cranial anomalies (43% (95% CI, 30-57%)) and isolated ACC (32% (95% CI, 18-51%)).
ES demonstrated an incremental diagnostic yield in cases of prenatally diagnosed ACC following negative CMA. While the greatest diagnostic yield was observed in ACC with extracranial anomalies and ACC with other central nervous system anomalies, ES should also be considered in cases of isolated ACC. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Genome sequencing can generate findings beyond the initial test indication that may be relevant to a patient or research participant\'s health. In the decade since the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics published its recommendations for reporting these findings, consensus regarding terminology has remained elusive and a variety of terms are in use globally. We conducted a scoping review to explore terminology choice and the justifications underlying those choices. Documents were included if they contained a justification for their choice of term(s) related to findings beyond the initial genomic test indication. From 3571 unique documents, 52 were included, just over half of which pertained to the clinical context (n = 29, 56%). We identified four inter-related concepts used to defend or oppose terms: expectedness of the finding, effective communication, relatedness to the original test indication, and how genomic information was generated. A variety of justifications were used to oppose the term \"incidental,\" whereas \"secondary\" had broader support as a term to describe findings deliberately sought. Terminology choice would benefit from further work to include the views of patients. We contend that clear definitions will improve ethical debate and support communication about genomic findings beyond the initial test indication.

Variants in PRPH2 are a common cause of inherited retinal dystrophies with high genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. In this study, variants in PRPH2 were selected from in-house exome sequencing data, and all reported PRPH2 variants were evaluated with the assistance of online prediction tools and the comparative validation of large datasets. All variants were classified based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines. Individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants of PRPH2 were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Clinical characteristics were summarized. Ten pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants of PRPH2 were identified in 14 families. In our cohort, the most frequent variant was p.G305Afs*19, accounting for 33.3% (5/15) of alleles, in contrast to the literature, where p.R172G (11.6%, 119/1028) was the most common variant. Nine in-house families (63.8%) were diagnosed with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), distinct from the phenotypic spectrum in the literature, which shows that RP accounts for 27.9% (283/1013) and macular degeneration is more common (45.2%, 458/1013). Patients carrying missense variants predicted as damaging by all seven prediction tools and absent in the gnomAD database were more likely to develop RP compared to those carrying missense variants predicted as damaging with fewer tools or with more than one allele number in the gnomAD database (p = 0.001). The population-specific genetic and phenotypic spectra of PRPH2 were explored, and novel insight into the genotype-phenotype correlation of PRPH2 was proposed. These findings demonstrated the importance of assessing PRPH2 variants in distinct populations and the value of providing practical suggestions for the genetic interpretation of PRPH2 variants.

BACKGROUND:  Biallelic pathogenic variants in AIMP1 gene cause hypomyelinating leukodystrophy type 3, a severe neurodegenerative disorder with early onset characterized by microcephaly, axial hypotonia, epilepsy, spasticity, and developmental delay.
METHODS:  Clinical exome sequence was performed on patient\'s DNA and Sanger sequencing was used to confirm the candidate variant. To better characterize the effect of the genetic variant, functional analysis based on Sanger sequencing of the proband\'s complementary DNA (cDNA) was performed.
RESULTS:  We report a case of 2-year-old girl with microcephaly, significant global developmental delay, refractory epilepsy, flaccid paralysis, hypomyelination, leukodystrophy, and cerebral atrophy on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical exome sequencing revealed a novel splice site variant c.603 + 1G > A in homozygosity in the AIMP1 gene. Studies on patient\'s cDNA showed that the variant disrupts the canonical donor splice site of intron 5, with the recognition of a cryptic splice site within exon 5, leading to the skipping of the last 24 nucleotides of this exon together with the flanking intron. This alteration is predicted to cause an in-frame deletion of eight amino acids (p.Val194_Gln201del) belonging to the tRNA-biding domain of the protein.
CONCLUSIONS:  To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a splice site variant in the AIMP1 gene causing hypomyelinating leukodystrophy. The description of this patient not only expands the mutational spectrum of AIMP1 but also provides deeper insights on genotype-phenotype correlation by comparing the clinical features of our patient with previously reported affected individuals.

UNASSIGNED: Genetic disorders are a major cause of death in critically ill infants. Several studies have assessed the diagnostic yield of rapid genomic sequencing in critically ill infants. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the diagnostic utility of rapid genomic sequencing in critically ill infants.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched before 1 July 2022. Studies reported diagnostic rate of rapid genomic sequencing in critically ill infants were selected. Two authors screened and extracted data regarding the method of genetic test, total number of patients, and number of diagnosed patients.
UNASSIGNED: Twenty-three studies, comprising 1567 critically ill infants were included in the meta-analysis. In the overall analysis, the pooled diagnostic utility of rapid genomic sequencing was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.37-0.49, I2 = 79%, P < 0.1). Moreover, the pooled diagnostic rates of rapid whole-exome and rapid whole-genome sequencing were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.41-0.61; I2 = 74%; P < 0.01) and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.30-0.46; I2 = 77%; P < 0.01), respectively. Sensitive analysis showed that the results were stable in the overall analysis. Additionally, publication bias was not observed in the overall analysis.
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis proved that rapid genomic sequencing has a good diagnostic utility for critically ill infants.