BACKGROUND: Although it is generally accepted that physical activity and flares of low back pain (LBP) are related, evidence for the directionality of this association is mixed. The Flares of Low back pain with Activity Research Study (FLAReS) takes a novel approach to distinguish the short-term effects of specific physical activities on LBP flares from the cumulative effects of such activities, by conducting a longitudinal case-crossover study nested within a cohort study. The first aim is to estimate the short-term effects (≤ 24 h) of specific physical activities on LBP flares among Veterans in primary care in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system. The second aim is to estimate the cumulative effects of specific activities on LBP-related functional limitations at 1-year follow-up.
METHODS: Up to 550 adults of working age (18-65 years) seen for LBP in primary care complete up to 36 \"Scheduled\" surveys over 1-year follow-up, and also complete unscheduled \"Flare Window\" surveys after the onset of new flares. Each survey asks about current flares and other factors associated with LBP. Surveys also inquire about activity exposures over the 24 h, and 2 h, prior to the time of survey completion (during non-flare periods) or prior to the time of flare onset (during flares). Other questions evaluate the number, intensity, duration, and/or other characteristics of activity exposures. Other exposures include factors related to mood, lifestyle, exercise, concurrent treatments, and injuries. Some participants wear actigraphy devices for weeks 1-4 of the study. The first aim will examine associations between 10 specific activity categories and participant-reported flares over 1-year follow-up. The second aim will examine associations between the frequency of exposure to 10 activity categories over weeks 1-4 of follow-up and long-term functional limitations at 12 months. All analyses will use a biopsychosocial framework accounting for potential confounders and effect modifiers.
CONCLUSIONS: FLAReS will provide empirically derived estimates of both the short-term and cumulative effects of specific physical activities for Veterans with LBP, helping to better understand the role of physical activities in those with LBP.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04828330 , registered April 2, 2021.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral inflammation can exacerbate pre-existing lesions in the Central Nervous System (CNS) in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, including Multiple Sclerosis (MS).
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical effect of COVID-19 infection, as a generator of peripheral inflammation, in a MS patients group.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 400 medical records of MS patients from a referral center was carried out. MS patients who presented COVID-19 were surveyed about symptoms exacerbation: type, duration and onset of exacerbation, previous vaccination against COVID-19 and MS severity. Clinical and demographic information from the medical records were included. Descriptive and inferential analysis were performed using the GraphPad Prism V6.
RESULTS: 41 patients were included, 61% (n = 25) reported neurological worsening, 9.7% (n = 4) as relapses, and 7.3% (n = 3) required corticosteroids. We found significant differences in the EDSS between patients who exacerbated their MS symptoms and those who did not (p = 0.03). When performing a multivariate regression analysis, we found that EDSS was independently associated with the presence of exacerbations of MS in the context of SARS-CoV2 infection (OR = 2.44, p = 0.022).
CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that COVID-19 infection could trigger exacerbations of MS symptoms. New studies are needed to elucidate the relationship between COVID-19 and MS.

Preliminary results from the SABINA (SABA use IN Asthma) program showed lower overuse of short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) in Italy compared to other European countries. The aim of the present study was to ascertain whether SABINA\'s results might have been affected by the Italian National Health System and pharmaceutical market dynamics, by examining patients\' characteristics in relation to SABA prescription/purchase habits.
Multiple approaches were used: (1) a retrospective study using the General Practitioners\' (GPs) Italian IQVIA Longitudinal Patient Database (LPD) to assess SABA overuse (more than two canisters/year) and its association with exacerbation risk; (2) a survey conducted across 200 Italian pharmacies to calculate the proportions of SABA purchases without a prescription; (3) a cross-sectional study on the specialists\' IQVIA Patient Analyzer database to understand the SABA prescription habits of specialists.
Among SABA users identified through IQVIA LPD, the proportion of patients having more than two SABA canisters/year was 32%. Overall, patients prescribed more than two SABA canisters/year by GPs had 30% higher risk of exacerbations than patients with a maximum of two SABA canisters/year. The joint evaluation of IQVIA LPD and survey\'s findings revealed that IQVIA LPD tracks three out of four SABA canisters dispensed. The survey showed that, on average, SABA users purchased four canisters/year. Patients prescribed SABA by specialists were more frequently men, younger, thinner, and had higher spirometry values.
SABA overuse is common in Italy, with a share of consumption not regulated by medical prescriptions. Because SABA overuse increases exacerbation risk, changes to national guidelines should be encouraged to ensure implementation of global recommendations.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate telemedicine adoption, emergency department avoidance, and related characteristics of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with and without exacerbations since the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted the second of a series of online surveys via SurveyMonkey.com of people with COPD between May 1, 2020 and May 31, 2020. Frequency, percentage, and Fisher\'s exact test (2-sided) were calculated using SPSS version 26.
UNASSIGNED: More than half of respondents (157, 64%), indicated that they started using telemedicine in 2020. A total of 47% of respondents reported having had at least 1 exacerbation since January 1, 2020. Respondents who had at least 1 exacerbation in 2020 were more likely to start using telemedicine in 2020 than respondents who did not report any exacerbation in 2020 (75.7% versus 54.3%, p < 0.001). Respondents reporting a 2020 exacerbation indicated having a significantly higher avoidance of emergency health care since the pandemic began (27.8%) as compared to those who did not have an exacerbation in 2020 (10.1%), p < 0.001.
UNASSIGNED: In response to social distancing and other COVID-19 precautions, people with COPD are avoiding traditional, in-person health care environments and turning to telemedicine to prevent and manage exacerbations. Further investigation is needed to identify best practices in and barriers to telemedicine in this population.

Cystic fibrosis is a genetic disease typically characterized by progressive lung damage and premature mortality. Pulmonary exacerbations, or flare-ups of the lung disease, often require hospitalization for intensive treatment. Approximately 25% of patients with cystic fibrosis do not recover their baseline lung function after pulmonary exacerbations. There is a relative paucity of evidence to inform treatment strategies for exacerbations. Compounding this lack of evidence, there are a large number of treatment options already as well as becoming available. This results in significant variability between medication regimens prescribed by different physicians, treatment centers and regions with potentially adverse impact to patients. The conventional strategy is to undertake essential randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions and improve outcomes for patients with exacerbations. However, over the past several decades, clinical trials have generally failed to provide information critical to improved treatment and management of exacerbations. Bayesian adaptive platform trials hold the promise of addressing clinical uncertainties and informing treatment. Using modeling and response adaptive randomization, they allow for the evaluation of multiple treatments across different management domains, and progressive improvement in patient outcomes throughout the course of the trial. Bayesian adaptive platform trials require substantial amounts of preparation. Basic preparation includes extensive stakeholder involvement including elicitation of consumer preferences and clinician understanding of the research topic, defining the research questions, determining the best outcome measures, delineating study sub-groups, in depth statistical modeling, designing end-to-end digital solutions seamlessly supporting clinicians, researchers and patients, constructing randomisation algorithms and importantly, defining pre-determined intra-study end-points. This review will discuss the motivation and necessary steps required to embark on a Bayesian adaptive platform trial to optimize medication regimens for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis.