Event-free survival

无事件生存
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    要了解治疗模式,医疗保健资源利用(HCCU),美国老年人弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的经济负担。
    此回顾性数据库分析利用了美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心2015年至2020年的医疗保险按服务收费的行政索赔数据来描述DLBCL患者特征,治疗模式,HCCU,以及66岁以上患者的费用。在DLBCL诊断时对患者进行索引,并要求从索引前12个月到索引后3个月连续入组。HCRU和费用(2022年美元)报告为每个患者每月(PPPM)估计。
    共有11,893名患者接受≥1线(L)治疗;1633和391名患者接受≥2L和≥3L治疗,分别。中位数(Q1,Q3)年龄为1L,2L,和3L启动,分别,是76(71,81),77(72,82),77(72,82)年。最常见的治疗是R-CHOP(70.9%)用于1L,苯达莫司汀±利妥昔单抗用于2L(18.7%)和3L(17.4%)。3L中有14.8%的患者使用了CART。总的来说,39.6%(1L),42.1%(2L),47.8%(3L)的患者有全因住院。在1L中,每行的所有原因平均值(中位数[Q1-Q3])成本PPPM为22,060美元(20,121美元[16,676-24,597美元]),2L$30,027($20,868[$13,416-$31,016]),3L和47,064美元(25,689美元[15,555-44,149美元]),增加的成本主要是由住院费用驱动的。有和没有CART的患者的全因3L平均(中位数[Q1-Q3])总费用PPPM为$153,847($100,768[$26,534-$253,630])和$28,466($23,696[$15,466-$39,107]),分别。
    对于患有复发性/难治性DLBCL的老年人,3L治疗没有明确的护理标准。DLBCL的经济负担随着治疗的每个进展而加剧,因此强调需要额外的治疗选择。
    UNASSIGNED: To understand treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and economic burden of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in elderly adults in the US.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective database analysis utilized US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data from 2015 to 2020 to describe DLBCL patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HCRU, and costs among patients aged ≥66 years. Patients were indexed at DLBCL diagnosis and required to have continuous enrollment from 12 months pre-index until 3 months post-index. HCRU and costs (USD 2022) are reported as per-patient per-month (PPPM) estimates.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 11,893 patients received ≥1-line (L) therapy; 1633 and 391 received ≥2L and ≥3L therapy, respectively. Median (Q1, Q3) age at 1L, 2L, and 3L initiation, respectively, was 76 (71, 81), 77 (72, 82), and 77 (72, 82) years. The most common therapy was R-CHOP (70.9%) for 1L and bendamustine ± rituximab for 2L (18.7%) and 3L (17.4%). CAR T was used by 14.8% of patients in 3L. Overall, 39.6% (1L), 42.1% (2L), and 47.8% (3L) of patients had all-cause hospitalizations. All-cause mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM during each line were $22,060 ($20,121 [$16,676-$24,597]) in 1L, $30,027 ($20,868 [$13,416-$31,016]) in 2L, and $47,064 ($25,689 [$15,555-$44,149]) in 3L, with increasing costs driven primarily by inpatient expenses. Total all-cause 3L mean (median [Q1-Q3]) costs PPPM for patients with and without CAR T were $153,847 ($100,768 [$26,534-$253,630]) and $28,466 ($23,696 [$15,466-$39,107]), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: No clear standard of care exists in 3L therapy for older adults with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. The economic burden of DLBCL intensifies with each progressing line of therapy, thus underscoring the need for additional therapeutic options.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通过常规临床预测小儿低度胶质瘤(pLGGs)的术后复发风险具有挑战性,射线照相,和基因组因素。我们调查了对MRI肿瘤特征的深度学习是否可以改善术后pLGG风险分层。
    方法:我们使用为pLGG分割设计的预训练深度学习(DL)工具,从接受手术的患者的术前T2加权MRI中提取pLGG成像特征(DL-MRI特征)。患者来自两个机构:DanaFarber/波士顿儿童医院(DF/BCH)和儿童脑肿瘤网络(CBTN)。我们训练了三个DL逻辑风险模型,以预测具有1)临床特征的术后无事件生存(EFS)概率,2)DL-MRI特征,和3)多模态(临床和DL-MRI特征)。我们使用时间依赖性一致性指数(Ctd)和KaplanMeier图和对数秩检验评估了风险组分层模型。我们开发了一种自动管道,将pLGG分割和EFS预测与最佳模型集成在一起。
    结果:在分析的396例患者中(中位随访时间:85个月,范围:1.5-329个月),214例(54%)进行了全切除,110例(28%)复发。与DL-MRI和临床模型相比,多模态模型改善了EFS预测(Ctd:0.85(95%CI:0.81-0.93),0.79(95%CI:0.70-0.88),和0.72(95%CI:0.57-0.77),分别)。多模式模型改善了风险组分层(预测高风险的3年EFS:31%与低风险:92%,p<0.0001)。
    结论:DL提取的影像特征可以预测pLGG术后复发。多模式DL可改善pLGG的术后风险分层,并可指导术后决策。较大,可能需要多中心训练数据来提高模型的泛化性。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative recurrence risk for pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) is challenging to predict by conventional clinical, radiographic, and genomic factors. We investigated if deep learning of MRI tumor features could improve postoperative pLGG risk stratification.
    METHODS: We used pre-trained deep learning (DL) tool designed for pLGG segmentation to extract pLGG imaging features from preoperative T2-weighted MRI from patients who underwent surgery (DL-MRI features). Patients were pooled from two institutions: Dana Farber/Boston Children\'s Hospital (DF/BCH) and the Children\'s Brain Tumor Network (CBTN). We trained three DL logistic hazard models to predict postoperative event-free survival (EFS) probabilities with 1) clinical features, 2) DL-MRI features, and 3) multimodal (clinical and DL-MRI features). We evaluated the models with a time-dependent Concordance Index (Ctd) and risk group stratification with Kaplan Meier plots and log-rank tests. We developed an automated pipeline integrating pLGG segmentation and EFS prediction with the best model.
    RESULTS: Of the 396 patients analyzed (median follow-up: 85 months, range: 1.5-329 months), 214 (54%) underwent gross total resection and 110 (28%) recurred. The multimodal model improved EFS prediction compared to the DL-MRI and clinical models (Ctd: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.93), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88), and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.57-0.77), respectively). The multimodal model improved risk-group stratification (3-year EFS for predicted high-risk: 31% versus low-risk: 92%, p<0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: DL extracts imaging features that can inform postoperative recurrence prediction for pLGG. Multimodal DL improves postoperative risk stratification for pLGG and may guide postoperative decision-making. Larger, multicenter training data may be needed to improve model generalizability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的目的是评估全反式维甲酸(ATRA)三氧化二砷(ATO)蒽环类药物的诱导和巩固以及ATRA的疗效和安全性
    分析了2012年至2021年间21例接受ATRA+ATO+蒽环类药物诱导和巩固治疗和接受ATRA+RIF维持治疗的高危APL患者。终点包括形态学完全缓解(CR)和分子完全缓解(CMR),早期死亡(ED)和复发,生存和不良事件(AE)。
    诱导治疗后,所有21例患者(100%)均达到形态学CR,14例(66.7%)达到CMR。21例患者中有5例在诱导后未进行免疫微小残留病(MRD)检查;然而,其余16例患者中有14例MRD阴性(87.5%)。达到CR和CMR的中位时间为26天(范围:16-44)和40天(范围:22-75),分别。在45天内实现CR和CMR的累积概率为100%和76.2%(95%CI:56.9-91.3%),分别。经过三个疗程的巩固治疗,所有患者均达到CMR和MRD阴性。中位随访时间为66个月(25-142),到目前为止,没有中枢神经系统复发和骨髓形态或分子复发,所有患者均存活,总生存率为100%,无事件生存率为100%.4级不良事件(AE)观察到3例患者(14.3%)在诱导期,包括心律失常(n=1),肺部感染(n=1)和呼吸衰竭(n=1);最常见的3级AEs是肺部感染,占62.0%和28.6%,分别,在诱导和巩固治疗期间,接着是中性粒细胞减少症,占42.9%和38.1%,分别。
    对于新诊断的高危APL患者,用ATRA+ATO+蒽环类药物诱导和巩固和用ATRA+RIF维持是一种高度治愈的治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction and consolidation with all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) +arsenic trioxide (ATO) +anthracyclines and maintenance with ATRA +Realgar-Indigo naturalis formula (RIF) for high-risk APL.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-one patients with high-risk APL treated with ATRA+ATO+ anthracyclines for induction and consolidation and ATRA+RIF for maintenance from 2012 to 2021 were analyzed. Endpoints include morphological complete remission (CR) and complete molecular remission (CMR), early death (ED) and relapse, survival and adverse events (AEs).
    UNASSIGNED: After induction treatment, all 21 patients (100%) achieved morphological CR and 14 people (66.7%) achieved CMR. Five of the 21 patients did not undergo immunological minimal residual disease (MRD) examination after induction; however, 14 of the remaining 16 patients were MRD negative (87.5%). The median time to achieve CR and CMR was 26 days (range: 16-44) and 40 days (range: 22-75), respectively. The cumulative probability of achieving CR and CMR in 45 days was 100% and 76.2% (95% CI: 56.9-91.3%), respectively. All patients achieved CMR and MRD negativity after the three courses of consolidation treatment. The median follow-up was 66 months (25-142), with no central nervous system relapse and bone marrow morphological or molecular relapse until now, and all patients survived with 100% overall survival and 100% event-free survival. Grade 4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 3 patients (14.3%) during the induction period including arrhythmia (n = 1), pulmonary infection (n = 1) and respiratory failure (n = 1); and the most frequent grade 3 AEs were pulmonary infection, accounting for 62.0% and 28.6%, respectively, during induction and consolidation treatment, followed by neutropenia, accounting for 42.9% and 38.1%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: For newly diagnosed high-risk APL patients, induction and consolidation with ATRA+ATO+anthracyclines and maintenance with ATRA+RIF is a highly curative treatment approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究进展,包括新的生物标志物识别和患者分层,显着改善了儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的治疗方法,尽管获得改善的医疗保健服务的机会因地理区域而异。为了评估治疗方法的进展,我们对科索沃儿童ALL进行了回顾性分析.我们的回顾性分析包括2008年至2023年诊断的225例病例,占429例诊断的儿童癌症的52%。年平均发病率为14,中位年龄诊断为7岁,男性占比(59.54%)。患者被分为风险组,大多数(43%)属于标准风险类别。我们确定了本研究期间的五种不同的治疗方案。超过61%的患者在第一个化疗周期后获得缓解,我们观察到20%的死亡率。生存分析显示,55%和40%的患者实现了2年和5年无事件生存(EFS),分别,不同风险组之间存在显著差异。治疗进展与生存率的提高显着相关,在目前使用的标准化AIEOP-BFM-2009协议中,5年总生存率(OS)为88%。我们的研究强调需要持续的研究和定制的护理策略,以提高临床结果。
    Advances in research, including novel biomarker identification and patient stratification, have significantly improved the therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), though access to improved healthcare services varies across geographical regions. In an effort to evaluate the advances in therapeutic approaches, we performed a retrospective analysis of childhood ALL in Kosovo. Our retrospective analysis included 225 cases diagnosed between 2008 and 2023, representing 52% of 429 diagnosed childhood cancers. The average annual incidence was 14, with a median age diagnosis of seven years, and a male predominance (59.54%). Patients were categorized into risk groups, with the majority (43%) in the standard-risk category. We identified five different treatment protocols for this study period. Over 61% of patients achieved remission after the first chemotherapy cycle and we observed a 20% mortality rate. Survival analysis showed that 55% and 40% of patients achieved 2-year and 5-year event-free survival (EFS), respectively, with significant differences across risk groups. Treatment advancements significantly correlated with improved survival rates, achieving a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 88% in the currently used standardized AIEOP-BFM-2009 protocol. Our study emphasizes the need for continued research and customized care strategies to enhance clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们观察到弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的大型随机临床试验的终点定义缺乏清晰度和一致性。这些不一致之处在于审判可能,事实上,解决不同的临床问题。它们使结果的解释复杂化,包括跨研究的比较。随机分组后发生的事件的解释方式不同,包括疾病状态没有改善,停止治疗或开始新疗法。我们呼吁利益相关者之间进行更多对话,以明确定义感兴趣的问题和相应的终点。我们说明,在一系列合理的患者旅程中评估不同的终点规则可以成为促进此类讨论的强大工具,并有助于更好地理解与患者相关的终点。
    这篇文章是关于什么?这篇文章讨论了在研究弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤新疗法的临床试验中使用的结果定义缺乏清晰度和一致性。这主要是由于这些不同的结果定义如何处理事件,例如疾病状态没有改善,停止治疗或开始新的治疗。作者讨论了这些不一致如何难以解释单个临床试验的结果以及比较临床试验的结果。为什么重要?定义上述事件并因此定义结果会影响我们从试验中学到的东西,并可能导致不同的结果。一些方法可能不能适当地反映患者的好的和坏的结果。这对患者来说具有挑战性,医师,卫生当局和付款人了解正在调查的治疗的真正好处,哪一种更好。关键的选择是什么?本文呼吁在参与药物开发和与药物评估有关的决策过程的所有利益相关者之间进行更多对话。迫切需要对临床试验进行更清晰和一致性的设计,以便解决患者和处方医生的相关问题。了解患者的旅程将是成功了解对患者真正重要的事情以及如何衡量新疗法的益处的关键。这样的讨论将有助于在评估新疗法时更加清晰和一致。
    We observed lack of clarity and consistency in end point definitions of large randomized clinical trials in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. These inconsistencies are such that trials might, in fact, address different clinical questions. They complicate interpretation of results, including comparisons across studies. Problems arise from different ways to account for events occurring after randomization including absence of improvement in disease status, treatment discontinuation or the initiation of new therapy. We call for more dialogue between stakeholders to define with clarity the questions of interest and corresponding end points. We illustrate that assessing different end point rules across a range of plausible patient journeys can be a powerful tool to facilitate such a discussion and contribute to better understanding of patient-relevant end points.
    What is this article about? This article talks about the lack of clarity and consistency in the definitions of outcomes used in clinical trials that investigate new treatments for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This is mainly due to how these different outcome definitions handle events such as absence of improvement in disease status, treatment discontinuation or initiation of new treatment. The authors discuss how these inconsistencies make it hard to interpret the results of individual clinical trials and to compare results across clinical trials.Why is it important? Defining the above events and consequently defining outcomes affects what we can learn from the trials and can lead to different results. Some approaches may not reflect good and bad outcomes for patients appropriately. This makes it challenging for patients, physicians, health authorities and payors to understand the true benefit of treatments under investigation and which one is better.What are the key take-aways? This article serves as a call-to-action for more dialogue among all stakeholders involved in drug development and the decision-making process related to drug evaluations. There is an urgent need for clinical trials to be designed with more clarity and consistency on what is being measured so that relevant questions for patients and prescribing physicians are addressed. Understanding patient journeys will be key to successfully understand what truly matters to patients and how to measure the benefit of new treatments. Such discussions will contribute toward more clarity and consistency in the evaluation of new treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)的新辅助化疗(NACT)方案主要由蒽环类和紫杉烷类组成,铂类药物的加入可以进一步提高疗效。然而,它还伴随着更多的不良事件,考虑到蒽环类药物潜在的严重和不可逆的毒性,越来越多的研究正在探索结合紫杉烷类药物和铂类药物的非蒽环类治疗方案.
    方法:回顾性研究包括273例接受NACT治疗的II-III期TNBC患者。AT组,由195名(71.4%)患者组成,接受了蒽环类和紫杉烷类的组合,而TCB组,由78名(28.6%)患者组成,接受了紫杉烷和卡铂的组合。采用Logistic回归分析评价病理完全缓解(pCR)和残留肿瘤负荷(RCB)的影响因素。使用对数秩检验评估不同治疗组之间无事件生存率(EFS)和总生存率(OS)的差异。对影响EFS和OS的因素进行Cox回归分析。
    结果:在NACT和手术后,TCb组pCR率较高,为44.9%,与AT组相比为31.3%。两组间差异为13.6%(OR=0.559,95%CI0.326~0.959,P=0.035)。TCb组的RCB0-1发生率为57.7%,高于AT组的42.6%。两组间差异为15.1%(OR=0.543,95%CI0.319~0.925,P=0.024),中位随访时间为40个月,TCB组的EFS更好(对数秩,P=0.014)和OS(对数秩,与AT组相比,P=0.040)。临床TNM分期和RCB分级是影响EFS和OS的独立因素,而治疗组被确定为影响EFS的独立因素,对操作系统有接近重大的影响。
    结论:在II-III期三联TNBC患者中,与蒽环类和紫杉烷类药物联合方案相比,联合紫杉烷类药物和卡铂的NACT方案产生更高的pCR率和EFS和OS的显著改善.
    OBJECTIVE: The neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) regimen for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) primarily consists of anthracyclines and taxanes, and the addition of platinum-based drugs can further enhance the efficacy. However, it is also accompanied by more adverse events, and considering the potential severe and irreversible toxicity of anthracyclines, an increasing number of studies are exploring nonanthracycline regimens that combine taxanes and platinum-based drugs.
    METHODS: The retrospective study included 273 stage II-III TNBC patients who received NACT. The AT group, consisting of 195 (71.4%) patients, received a combination of anthracyclines and taxanes, while the TCb group, consisting of 78 (28.6%) patients, received a combination of taxanes and carboplatin. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors influencing pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB). The log-rank test was used to assess the differences in event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) among the different treatment groups. Cox regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the factors influencing EFS and OS.
    RESULTS: After NACT and surgery, the TCb group had a higher rate of pCR at 44.9%, as compared to the AT group at 31.3%. The difference between the two groups was 13.6% (OR = 0.559, 95% CI 0.326-0.959, P = 0.035). The TCb group had a 57.7% rate of RCB 0-1, which was higher than the AT group\'s rate of 42.6%. The difference between the two groups was 15.1% (OR = 0.543, 95% CI 0.319-0.925, P = 0.024), With a median follow-up time of 40 months, the TCb group had better EFS (log-rank, P = 0.014) and OS (log-rank, P = 0.040) as compared to the AT group. Clinical TNM stage and RCB grade were identified as independent factors influencing EFS and OS, while treatment group was identified as an independent factor influencing EFS, with a close-to-significant impact on OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: In stage II-III triple TNBC patients, the NACT regimen combining taxanes and carboplatin yields higher rates of pCR and significant improvements in EFS and OS as compared to the regimen combining anthracyclines and taxanes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    小儿急性髓系白血病(AML)预后差,复发率和死亡率高,和探索新的治疗方案仍然是至关重要的。
    为了总结我们对小儿AML的新治疗策略的结果,其特征是双重诱导和急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)元件巩固。
    回顾性,单臂研究。
    从2012年7月至2019年12月,对新诊断的AML患儿采用强化化疗方案,其中包含双重感应,基于高剂量阿糖胞苷的三个疗程的巩固,和两个由大剂量甲氨蝶呤组成的巩固疗程,长春新碱,天冬酰胺酶,和巯基嘌呤(ALL样元素)。间隔进行骨髓涂片监测,化疗期间进行了两次腰椎穿刺。我们回顾性分析了这项研究的有效性和安全性。最后一次随访是2023年5月26日。
    共包括70个儿科AMLs。诊断时的中位年龄为6.7(0.5-16.0)岁。初始白细胞计数中位数为23.74×109/L,11人100×109/L经过双重诱导,完全缓解(CR)62例,5例部分缓解,3例未缓解。CR率为88.57%。中位随访时间为5.8(0.2-9.4)年,5年总生存率为78.2%±5%,无事件生存率(EFS)为71.2%±5.6%,累积复发率为27.75%。初始WBC<100×109/L(n=59)和100×109/L(n=11)的患者的5年EFS分别为76.4%±5.7%和45.5%±15%(p=0.013),分别。共发生650例医院感染。主要感染原因为呼吸道感染(26.92%),败血症(18.46%),口腔炎(11.85%),皮肤和软组织感染(10.46%)。
    这种具有双重诱导和ALL样元素的强化治疗方案对儿童AML有效且安全。初始白细胞100×109/L是该队列中唯一的独立危险因素。
    这是一项回顾性研究,并且没有在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册。
    UNASSIGNED: Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has poor prognosis and high rate of relapse and mortality, and exploration of new treatment options is still critically needed.
    UNASSIGNED: To summarize the outcome of our new treatment strategies for pediatric AML, which is characterized by dual induction and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) elements consolidation.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective, single-arm study.
    UNASSIGNED: From July 2012 to December 2019, an intensive chemotherapy protocol was used for newly diagnosed children with AML, which contains dual induction, three courses of consolidations based on high-dose cytarabine, and two courses of consolidations composed of high-dose methotrexate, vincristine, asparaginase, and mercaptopurine (ALL-like elements). Blasts were monitored by bone marrow smears at intervals, and two lumbar punctures were performed during chemotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of this study. The last follow-up was on 26 May 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 70 pediatric AMLs were included. The median age at diagnosis was 6.7 (0.5-16.0) years. The median initial WBC count was 23.74 × 109/L, 11 of whom ⩾100 × 109/L. After dual induction, there were 62 cases of complete remission (CR), 5 cases of partial remission, and 3 cases of nonremission. The CR rate was 88.57%. The median follow-up time was 5.8 (0.2-9.4) years, the 5-year overall survival was 78.2% ± 5%, the event-free survival (EFS) was 71.2% ± 5.6%, and the cumulative recurrence rate was 27.75%. The 5-year EFS of patients with initial WBC < 100 × 109/L (n = 59) and ⩾100 × 109/L (n = 11) were 76.4% ± 5.7% and 45.5% ± 15% (p = 0.013), respectively. A total of 650 hospital infections occurred. The main causes of infection were respiratory tract infection (26.92%), septicemia (18.46%), stomatitis (11.85%), and skin and soft-tissue infection (10.46%).
    UNASSIGNED: This intensive treatment protocol with dual induction and ALL-like elements is effective and safe for childhood AML. Initial WBC ⩾ 100 × 109/L was the only independent risk factor in this cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: It is a retrospective study, and no registration on ClinicalTrials.gov.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小儿急性髓系白血病(AML)是非洲和其他发展中大陆儿童癌症发病率和死亡率的主要原因。在发达国家,全身化疗和有效的支持治疗显著提高了小儿AML的存活率,达到约70%。发展中国家和非洲大多数中心提供姑息治疗的急性髓细胞性白血病儿童的总体和无事件生存结果的背景数据很少。这项研究的目的是评估总生存期,无事件生存,在埃塞俄比亚接受治疗的儿童AML患者的相关因素。
    方法:这项回顾性研究是对2015年1月1日至2022年5月30日在TikurAnbessa医院接受治疗的小儿AML患者进行的。患者的社会人口统计学特征,临床特征,使用SPSS25版分析AML的生化和形态学亚型.Kaplan-Meier生存曲线用于估计总体生存和无事件生存的概率。统计学显著性设定为p<0.05。
    结果:本研究共纳入92名AML儿童。诊断时的中位年龄为7岁(四分位距:5-10岁),男性占主导地位。症状的中位持续时间为一个月。中性粒细胞减少症(56,86.2%)是治疗期间最常见的并发症。约29.3%的患者死于早期死亡。相应的1年和3年OS概率分别为28.2%和23%。所有儿科AML患者的中位无事件生存时间为1个月(95%CI:0.77-1.23)。生存结果较差的决定因素是FAB亚型,使用的协议类型,和中枢神经系统受累的迹象(p<0.05)。
    结论:在研究环境中,AML患儿的生存率较低。超过25%的AML患者死于早期死亡,发热性中性粒细胞减少是最常见的并发症。应采取有效的支持和治疗措施来控制AML患者的发热性中性粒细胞减少和预防早期死亡。
    BACKGROUND: Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children with cancer in Africa and other developing continents. Systemic chemotherapy and effective supportive care have significantly contributed to increased survival rates of pediatric AML in developed countries reaching approximately 70%. There is a paucity of contextual data regarding overall and event-free survival outcomes in children with acute myeloid leukemia in developing countries and most centers in Africa provide palliative care. The objective of this study was to assess the overall survival, event-free survival, and associated factors in pediatric AML patients treated in Ethiopia.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on Pediatric AML patients treated at Tikur Anbessa Hospital between January 1, 2015, and May 30, 2022. The socio-demographic profile of patients, the clinical characteristics, the biochemical and morphological subtypes of AML were analyzed using SPSS version 25. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to estimate the probabilities of overall and event-free survival. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
    RESULTS: A total of 92 children with AML were included in this study. The median age at diagnosis was 7 years (interquartile range: 5-10 years) with a slight male predominance. The median duration of symptoms was one month. Neutropenic fever (56, 86.2%) was the most common complication during treatment. About 29.3% of the patients succumbed to early death. The corresponding 1-year and 3-year OS probabilities were 28.2% and 23% respectively. The median event-free survival time for all pediatric AML patients was one-month (95% CI: 0.77-1.23). The determinants of poorer survival outcomes were FAB subtype, type of protocol used, and signs of CNS involvement (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates of children from AML were low in the study setting. More than 25% of AML patients succumbed to early death, and febrile neutropenia was the most common complication. Effective supportive and therapeutic measures should be taken to manage febrile neutropenia and to prevent early death in AML patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已证明完全病理反应(pCR)和主要病理反应(MPR)与接受化疗或放化疗的患者的无事件生存期(EFS)和总生存期(OS)改善密切相关。然而,针对新辅助免疫疗法的进一步研究有限.在这里,我们提供了新辅助免疫治疗的病理反应与患者水平和试验水平的长期生存结果之间的关系的最新和全面评估。
    方法:我们系统地搜索和评估了PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆和相关会议摘要从成立到2023年6月1日。研究报告通过pCR/MPR状态的EFS/OS结果合格。
    结果:43项研究共4100名患者符合分析条件,其中包括39项用于患者水平分析的研究和5项用于试验水平分析的随机对照试验.我们的结果强调pCR与改善的EFS(HR,0.48[95%CI,0.39-0.60])和OS(HR,0.55[95%CI,0.41-0.74])。通过MPR状态的HR的大小与通过pCR状态的结果相似(EFSHR,0.31[95%CI,0.18-0.53])和OSHR,0.43[95%CI,0.19-0.96])。然而,在试验水平未发现pCR和EFS之间存在相关性(P=0.8,R2=0).
    结论:我们的荟萃分析表明,在大多数实体瘤中应用新辅助免疫疗法的研究中,病理反应与患者水平的长期生存结果之间存在很强的关联,但我们未能在试验水平上验证这种关系。因此,同时应用于患者和试验水平的已接受替代终点等待进一步搜索.
    BACKGROUND: Complete pathological response (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) have been proven to have a close association with improved event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients accepting chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, further study focusing on neoadjuvant immunotherapy is limited. Here we provided an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level and trial level for neoadjuvant immunotherapy.
    METHODS: We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and relevant conference abstracts from inception to June 1, 2023. Studies reported EFS/OS results by pCR/MPR status were eligible.
    RESULTS: Forty-three studies comprising a total of 4100 patients were eligible for the analysis, which included 39 studies for the patient-level analysis and 5 randomized controlled trials for the trial-level analysis. Our results highlighted that pCR was associated with improved EFS (HR, 0.48 [95 % CI, 0.39-0.60]) and OS (HR, 0.55 [95 % CI, 0.41-0.74]). The magnitude of HRs by MPR status were similar to the results by pCR status (EFS HR, 0.31 [95 % CI, 0.18-0.53]) and OS HR, 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.19-0.96]). However, no association between pCR and EFS at trial level was found (P = 0.8, R2 = 0).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis demonstrates a strong association between pathological response and long-term survival outcomes at patient level across studies applying neoadjuvant immunotherapy in most solid tumors but we fail to validate the relationship at trial level. Therefore, an accepted surrogate endpoint applied to both patient and trial levels are waited for further search.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去,前列腺癌(PCa)试验中的中间临床终点(ICE)的选择很大程度上取决于定性评估;然而,不断提高的研究质量需要与总生存期(OS)有密切的相关性.这篇综述总结了一些高质量的荟萃分析的结果,这些分析探讨了ICE作为OS替代的有效性。我们发现强有力的证据表明,无转移生存可以作为局部PCa的ICE。在晚期疾病中,仅在转移性激素敏感性PCa的背景下确定有效的ICE,包括放射学和临床无进展生存期;然而,由于用于验证其代孕的数据的普遍性有限,因此对其使用仍存在担忧。患者总结:中间临床终点可以降低试验成本,并允许更早地引入新的治疗方法。本文总结了验证这些终点作为总生存期替代指标有效性的研究结果。
    In the past, selection of intermediate clinical endpoints (ICEs) in prostate cancer (PCa) trials largely depended on qualitative assessments; however, the advancing quality of research necessitates a robust correlation with overall survival (OS). This review summarises the results from several high-quality meta-analyses that explored the validity of ICEs as surrogates for OS. We found strong evidence that metastasis-free survival can serve as an ICE in localized PCa. In advanced disease, valid ICEs were identified only within the context of metastatic hormone-sensitive PCa, including radiological and clinical progression-free survival; however, concerns remain regarding their use owing to the limited generalisability of the data used to validate their surrogacy. PATIENT SUMMARY: Intermediate clinical endpoints can reduce the costs of trials and allow earlier introduction of new treatment methods. This article summarises results from studies verifying the validity of these endpoints as surrogates for overall survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号