European Association of Urology

  • 文章类型: Guideline
    背景:肌肉浸润性(MIBC)和转移性(mBC)膀胱癌的不同组织学可以定义癌症治疗方式和肿瘤结局。
    目的:确定尿路上皮和非尿路上皮组织学变异的治疗对MIBC和mBC肿瘤预后的影响和影响。
    方法:Medline,Embase,Cochrane对照试验数据库,和ClinicalTrials.gov进行了系统搜索。纳入了2000年以后发表的前瞻性和回顾性比较研究以及单臂病例系列中具有MIBC或/和mBC组织学变异的患者。治疗结果(总体,无复发,和疾病特异性存活率)被提取并报告。使用预后研究质量工具进行偏倚风险(RoB)评估。
    结果:搜索产生了2450篇独特的文章,其中41篇文章涉及27672例组织学变异患者。28项研究进行了比较研究设计。看到了两种不同的研究设置:没有集中病理审查的大型数据库研究和由泌尿病理学家重新审查的小型系列研究。尽管大多数组织学变异在根治性膀胱切除术(RC)后显示相似的肿瘤学结果,印戒细胞,梭形细胞,与纯尿路上皮膀胱癌(PUC)相比,神经内分泌肿瘤的生存率较低。由于潜在的误导性解释和报告以及研究之间的巨大异质性,使用叙述性综合方法代替亚组分析.大多数研究都有适度的RoB。
    结论:关于变异型组织学的预后和治疗的数据仍然不成熟,主要在膀胱切除术患者中进行评估。在此系统回顾的基础上,所有MIBC患者均应接受RC治疗.新辅助化疗对微乳头状瘤患者可能有益,浆细胞样细胞,肉瘤样,和混合变体,尤其是神经内分泌肿瘤患者。转移性膀胱癌应作为PUC治疗。
    在本报告中,我们观察了不同膀胱癌组织学的预后和治疗。我们发现,结果随组织学差异而变化,适当的治疗应基于组织学发现。
    BACKGROUND: Variant histology of muscle-invasive (MIBC) and metastatic (mBC) bladder cancer may define the cancer treatment modality and oncological outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic effect and impact of therapy of urothelial and nonurothelial histological variants on the oncological outcomes of MIBC and mBC.
    METHODS: Medline, Embase, Cochrane controlled trial databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched. Patients with histological variants of MIBC or/and mBC from prospective and retrospective comparative studies and single-arm case series published after the year of 2000 were included. Treatment outcomes (overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival) were extracted and reported. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment was performed using Quality in Prognosis Studies tool.
    RESULTS: The search yielded 2450 unique articles, of which 41 articles involving a total of 27 672 patients with histological variants were included. Twenty-eight studies had a comparative study design. Two different study settings were seen: large database studies without centralised pathological review and small series with re-review by uropathologists. Although most of the histological variants show similar oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy (RC), signet ring cell, spindle cell, and neuroendocrine tumours showed inferior survival compared with pure urothelial bladder cancer (PUC). Owing to potential misleading interpretations and reporting as well as large heterogeneity between studies, a narrative synthesis approach instead of subgroup analyses was used. Most studies had a moderate RoB.
    CONCLUSIONS: The data about prognosis and treatment of the variant histology are still immature and assessed mostly in cystectomy patients. Based on this systematic review, all patients with MIBC should be treated with RC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be beneficial for patients with micropapillary, plasmacytoid, sarcomatoid, and mixed variants, and especially for patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Metastatic bladder cancer should be treated as PUC.
    UNASSIGNED: In this report, we looked at the prognosis and treatment of different bladder cancer histologies. We found that outcomes varied with divergent histologies and appropriate treatment should be based on the histological finding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在患有前列腺癌(PCa)的男性中,关于生化复发(BCR)对肿瘤结局的影响存在争议.
    对现有文献中关于非转移性PCa治疗后BCR的系统评价。目标1是调查有或没有BCR的患者之间的肿瘤结局是否不同。目标2是研究BCR患者的哪些临床因素和肿瘤特征对肿瘤预后具有独立影响。
    Medline,Medline正在进行中,Embase,并搜索了Cochrane中央控制试验登记册。对于目标1,包括前瞻性和回顾性研究,比较根治性前列腺切除术(RP)或根治性放疗(RT)后有或没有BCR的患者的生存结果。对于目标2,包括至少100名参与者的所有研究以及BCR患者的预后患者和肿瘤特征的报告。根据预后研究质量工具进行偏倚风险和混杂评估。进行了叙述性综合和荟萃分析。
    总的来说,77项研究被纳入分析,其中14人完成了目标1,招募了20.406名患者。目标2通过71项研究解决,其中29.057、11.301和4272例患者接受RP,RT,和混合人群(接受RP或RT作为主要治疗的患者的混合),分别。参与研究的偏倚风险较低,混杂因素,和统计分析。对于大多数研究,减员偏差,预后和结果测量没有明确报告.BCR与更低的生存率相关,主要是前列腺特异性抗原倍增时间短(PSA-DT)和RP后最终Gleason评分高的患者,或在RT后短暂的生化衰竭(IBF)和高活检Gleason评分。
    BCR对生存有影响,但这种效应似乎仅限于具有特定临床危险因素的患者亚组.短PSA-DT和RP后高的最终格里森评分,RT后IBF短和活检Gleason评分高是对生存率有负面影响的主要因素。这些因素可能构成新的BCR风险分层(欧洲泌尿外科协会BCR风险组)的基础。这需要正式验证。
    本综述着眼于在根治性手术或放疗后进行的血液检查中显示前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高的男性死亡风险。对很多男人来说,从长远来看,PSA升高并不意味着他们有很高的死于前列腺癌的风险。接受放射治疗后不久PSA升高或手术后PSA迅速升高以及两种治疗方式的肿瘤分级均较高的男性死亡风险最高。这些因素可能构成新风险分层的基础(欧洲泌尿外科生化复发风险组协会),这需要正式验证。
    In men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with curative intent, controversy exists regarding the impact of biochemical recurrence (BCR) on oncological outcomes.
    To perform a systematic review of the existing literature on BCR after treatment with curative intent for nonmetastatic PCa. Objective 1 is to investigate whether oncological outcomes differ between patients with or without BCR. Objective 2 is to study which clinical factors and tumor features in patients with BCR have an independent prognostic impact on oncological outcomes.
    Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. For objective 1, prospective and retrospective studies comparing survival outcomes of patients with or without BCR following radical prostatectomy (RP) or radical radiotherapy (RT) were included. For objective 2, all studies with at least 100 participants and reporting on prognostic patient and tumor characteristics in patients with BCR were included. Risk-of-bias and confounding assessments were performed according to the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Both a narrative synthesis and a meta-analysis were undertaken.
    Overall, 77 studies were included for analysis, of which 14 addressed objective 1, recruiting 20 406 patients. Objective 2 was addressed by 71 studies with 29 057, 11 301, and 4272 patients undergoing RP, RT, and a mixed population (mix of patients undergoing RP or RT as primary treatment), respectively. There was a low risk of bias for study participation, confounders, and statistical analysis. For most studies, attrition bias, and prognostic and outcome measurements were not clearly reported. BCR was associated with worse survival rates, mainly in patients with short prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSA-DT) and a high final Gleason score after RP, or a short interval to biochemical failure (IBF) after RT and a high biopsy Gleason score.
    BCR has an impact on survival, but this effect appears to be limited to a subgroup of patients with specific clinical risk factors. Short PSA-DT and a high final Gleason score after RP, and a short IBF after RT and a high biopsy Gleason score are the main factors that have a negative impact on survival. These factors may form the basis of new BCR risk stratification (European Association of Urology BCR Risk Groups), which needs to be validated formally.
    This review looks at the risk of death in men who shows rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the blood test performed after curative surgery or radiotherapy. For many men, rising PSA does not mean that they are at a high risk of death from prostate cancer in the longer term. Men with PSA that rises shortly after they were treated with radiotherapy or rapidly rising PSA after surgery and a high tumor grade for both treatment modalities are at the highest risk of death. These factors may form the basis of new risk stratification (European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence Risk Groups), which needs to be validated formally.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最新的欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)泌尿外科创伤指南于2014年发表。
    目的:总结2014版EAU关于上尿路损伤的指南,重点是诊断和治疗。
    方法:EAU创伤指南小组通过Medline搜索对上尿路损伤进行了文献综述;截至2013年12月的发表日期均被接受。重点是更新的出版物和评论,尽管可以包括较旧的关键参考文献。
    结果:指南的完整版有印刷版和在线版。钝性创伤是肾损伤的主要原因。肾损伤的首选诊断方式是计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描。保守管理是稳定患者的最佳方法。血管造影和选择性栓塞是一线治疗。手术探查主要用于控制出血(可能需要进行肾切除术)和肾脏抢救。尿外渗可通过腔内或经皮技术进行治疗。并发症可能需要额外的成像或干预。随访的重点是肾功能和血压。穿透性创伤是非医源性输尿管损伤的主要原因。通常通过CT扫描或剖腹手术进行诊断,治疗的主体是开放式修复。修复的类型取决于损伤的严重程度和位置。
    结论:肾损伤最好采用保守治疗或微创治疗。在大多数情况下,保留肾脏单位是可行的。这次审查,由EAU创伤指南小组执行,总结了上尿路损伤的当前管理。
    结果:创伤患者受益于正确诊断和适当治疗,根据他们受伤的性质和严重程度。
    BACKGROUND: The most recent European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on urological trauma were published in 2014.
    OBJECTIVE: To present a summary of the 2014 version of the EAU guidelines on upper urinary tract injuries with the emphasis upon diagnosis and treatment.
    METHODS: The EAU trauma guidelines panel reviewed literature by a Medline search on upper urinary tract injuries; publication dates up to December 2013 were accepted. The focus was on newer publications and reviews, although older key references could be included.
    RESULTS: A full version of the guidelines is available in print and online. Blunt trauma is the main cause of renal injuries. The preferred diagnostic modality of renal trauma is computed tomography (CT) scan. Conservative management is the best approach in stable patients. Angiography and selective embolisation are the first-line treatments. Surgical exploration is primarily for the control of haemorrhage (which may necessitate nephrectomy) and renal salvage. Urinary extravasation is managed with endourologic or percutaneous techniques. Complications may require additional imaging or interventions. Follow-up is focused on renal function and blood pressure. Penetrating trauma is the main cause of noniatrogenic ureteral injuries. The diagnosis is often made by CT scanning or at laparotomy, and the mainstay of treatment is open repair. The type of repair depends upon the severity and location of the injury.
    CONCLUSIONS: Renal injuries are best managed conservatively or with minimally invasive techniques. Preservation of renal units is feasible in most cases. This review, performed by the EAU trauma guidelines panel, summarises the current management of upper urinary tract injuries.
    RESULTS: Patients with trauma benefit from being accurately diagnosed and treated appropriately, according to the nature and severity of their injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号