UNASSIGNED: Correctly holding the endotracheal tube (ETT) is essential for successful tracheal intubation. The study\'s primary objective was to compare the between-the-fingers grip with the conventional pen-holding grip regarding the number of attempts required for orotracheal intubation and usage of external aids.
UNASSIGNED: Three hundred patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomised according to the method to hold the ETT to Group C (conventional grip) and Group M (modified, between-the-fingers grip) during oro-tracheal intubation. A designated anaesthetist blinded to the groups performed laryngoscopy in all the patients, and difficult Cormack-Lehane grade 3b and 4 (n = 24) were excluded. Then, the group was revealed to the anaesthetist, and intubation was done accordingly; the number of attempts, use of backward upward rightward pressure (BURP), and time taken were noted. The sample size was estimated using the software G*Power version 3.1.9.2. Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 23 (SPSS-23, IBM, Chicago, USA) was used for data analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Single-attempt intubation was comparable between the groups (99.3% versus 97.2%, P = 0.197). In contrast, the external assistance as BURP (0.75% versus 6.99%, P = 0.009) and the time taken for intubation (P = 0.008) were reduced in group M significantly.
UNASSIGNED: The between-the-fingers grip seems as effective as the standard grip to hold the ETT during intubation. However, it proved to be better as it can reduce the requirement for external assistance in BURP.

UNASSIGNED: During endoscopic sinus surgery, anaesthetic conditions significantly impact the intraoperative surgical field and bleeding during emergence. While the endotracheal tube (ETT) has been traditionally used in sinus surgery, a reinforced laryngeal mask airway (RLMA) that produces less upper airway stimulation may result in smoother emergence.
UNASSIGNED: A randomised controlled trial of 72 patients undergoing elective sinus surgery was conducted, with the allocation of airway technique to either ETT with a throat pack or RLMA. The primary outcome measure was emergence time, measured by time to opening eyes on commands at the cessation of anaesthesia, and the secondary outcomes were time to removal of airway device, remifentanil use, procedure times, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the RLMA grade of blood contamination. The continuous variables were analysed using Student\'s t-tests and discrete variables, count tables were analysed using Fisher\'s exact tests.
UNASSIGNED: There was no significant difference in the emergence time between the ETT and RLMA groups (P = 0.83). Remifentanil use was significantly higher in the ETT group than in the RLMA group (P = 0.022). The ETT group showed a significantly increased total anaesthetic time (P = 0.01). MAP was not significant during preinduction, maintenance or post-RMLA removal. The highest grade of contamination was grade 2 in RLMA. RLMA had lower rates of postoperative adverse events.
UNASSIGNED: RLMA comparable to ETT in terms of emergence time. The RMLA group had lower remifentanil use, anaesthesia duration and fewer postoperative adverse events such as cough and throat pain.

To evaluate the effects of our self-developed endotracheal tube fixation device in mechanically ventilated patients.
In a dual-centre randomised controlled trial, patients who were expected to require mechanical ventilation for over 48 h were assigned to the observation group (using self-developed device) or the control group (using the traditional device). The primary endpoint was the incidence of endotracheal intubation-related pressure injury (EIRPI).
Fifty-one patients in the observation group and 54 patients in the control group were analysed. The incidence of EIRPI was 7.8% in the observation group and 33.3% in the control group (p = 0.001). Lip pressure injury (PI) occurred in 0 versus 14 (25.9%) patients in the observation versus control groups (p < 0.001). Both oral-mucosal and facial PIs were similar between the two groups.
The use of the novel device reduced the incidence of EIRPI, especially lip PI. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300078132. Registered on 29 November 2023.

Objective This study aims to evaluate and compare the suitability and safety of palpation and pressure control ventilation (PCV) methods for the accurate positioning of an endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff. Methods We conducted a pilot simulation randomized crossover study using a medical manikin. Twenty junior resident physicians who had completed anesthesiology training participated in the study. Airway management was performed using a modified manikin designed to simulate palpation and PCV methods. Participants performed both methods in a randomized order. The primary outcome was the number of successful ETT placements. The secondary outcomes were procedure duration and the perceived difficulty of each procedure. Results Five successful procedures were observed in the palpation method group (PALG), while 19 were observed in the PCV method group (PCVG). The duration of the trial was 98 s (standard deviation [SD], 41) in the PALG and 93 s (SD, 49) in the PCVG. The visual analog scale score for difficulty encountered during the trial was 30 (SD, 21) in the PALG and 69 (SD, 19) in the PCVG. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the PCV method had a higher success rate than the palpation method. Thus, the PCV method may be more suitable for inexperienced physicians to perform the procedure with greater confidence.

Aim This study aimed to investigate the appropriate endotracheal tube (ETT) position during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). Methods This single-center observational study included hospitalized patients who underwent surgical tracheostomy (ST) between August 2021 and October 2022. During ST, the trachea was opened, and the ETT was pulled out visually. It stopped when the ETT was no longer visible, and the tracheostomy tube was placed in the trachea. The ETT position was measured by considering the ETT position during ST to be the appropriate position during PDT. The correlation between the measured ETT position and patient characteristics was evaluated. A prediction equation for the ETT position was derived from the derivation group, and validation of the prediction equation was evaluated by the validation group. Results Forty-six and 15 patients were in the derivation and validation groups, respectively. Weight, duration of intubation, and in-hospital mortality were significantly different between the two groups. The measured ETT position correlated with body height (r=0.60, p<0.001) and sex (r=0.45, p=0.002), while the ETT position before ST showed a weak correlation (r=0.34, p=0.020). The predicted and measured values in the validation group correlated with each other (r=0.58, p=0.024). Conclusion The appropriate ETT position for PDT correlates with body height, and the equation \"body height×0.112-0.323 cm\" was derived. This predictive equation may be useful as a guide for ETT positioning during PDT puncture.

Neonates in intensive care units often require endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. During this intubation procedure, a stylet is frequently used along with an endotracheal tube. Despite the widespread use of a stylet, it is still not known whether its use increases the intubation success rate. This study examined the association between stylet use and the intubation success rate in surgical neonates.
This single-center study was conducted between December 2021 and December 2022 in the Neonatal surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care center in Northern India. Infants were randomized to have the endotracheal intubation procedure performed using either an endotracheal tube alone or with a stylet. The primary outcome of the study was to assess the successful first-attempt neonatal endotracheal intubation rate with and without using a stylet. Apart from the rate of successful intubation, the duration of the intubation and complications during the intubation procedures as measured by bradycardia, desaturation episodes, and local trauma were also recorded. Both groups were thus compared on above mentioned outcomes.
The total number of neonates enrolled were 200, and the overall success rate (81% in the stylet group vs. 73% in the non-stylet group) was not statistically significant. Intubation time was however less, when stylet was used (16.2 ± 4.3 vs. 17.5 ± 5.0 s, p = .046). When the endotracheal tube size was 3 or less, the success rate was substantially higher in the stylet group (80%) than the non-stylet group (63%), p = .03. No statistical difference was recorded for bleeding and local trauma, though the esophageal intubation rate was higher when intubation was attempted without the stylet.
Endotracheal intubation using a stylet did not significantly improve the success rate of the procedure, however, intubation time significantly varied between groups and in different conditions. The rigidity and curvature provided by the stylet may facilitate the process of intubation when smaller caliber endotracheal tubes are used.

Overinflation of cuffed endotracheal tubes and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe causes increased intracuff pressure (CP) compromising tracheal perfusion pressure (TPP). Primary objective of the study was to assess CP, TPP on TEE probe insertion and examination during pediatric cardiac surgeries. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of the probe on peak airway pressures (Ppeak), mean airway pressures (Pmean) and to monitor CP, TPP on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
This prospective observational study included fifty patients, aged 1-5 years undergoing cardiac surgeries using CPB. Following induction, TEE probe was introduced. CP, TPP, Ppeak, Pmean were measured before insertion of TEE probe (T1), during probe insertion (T2) and examination at mid-esophageal (T3), transgastric level (T4), and on removing probe (T6). CP, TPP were monitored on CPB (T5). Statistical analysis was done using paired t-test.
CP, Ppeak and Pmean increased significantly, while TPP decreased significantly from T1 to T2, T3, T4 (P < 0.001). CP, TPP decreased significantly at T5 in comparison to T6 (P < 0.001). In 48% of the patients CP increased above 30 cm H2O at T2.
TEE probe causes an increase in CP and decreases TPP. Constant monitoring and maintaining CP, TPP in optimum range is recommended.

Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common, unpleasant, and upsetting complication of tracheal intubation that increases postoperative morbidity and causes patient dissatisfaction after general anaesthesia.
UNASSIGNED: To determine the prevalence and risk factors of POST following endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.
UNASSIGNED: From 20 April to 20 May 2021, a multicenter prospective cohort study design and systematic random sampling were used to select study participants from patients over the age of 18 who underwent anaesthesia-assisted surgery with endotracheal intubation. A structured questionnaire was developed after reading some of the relevant literature. SPSS version 20 was used to enter and analyze the data, and binary logistic regression was used to select a variable for multivariable logistic regression. To identify statistically significant factors, a P value of 0.05 for the association between the independent and dependent variables was used in multivariable analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Sore throat occurred in 94 (61.8%) of the 152 patients who had undergone surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. The size of the endotracheal intubation was found to have a p value of 0.04, (adjusted odds ratio 0.04, 95% CI 0.002-0.79), and the duration of the anaesthesia was found to have a p value of 0.003, (adjusted odds ratio 4.5, 95% CI 1.66-12.18). The POST was associated with a large endotracheal tube, patient age, and an extended period of anaesthesia in this study, with a prevalence of 94 (61.8%) cases.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, the incidence of POST was high 94 (61.8%), large size endotracheal tube, patient age, and duration of anaesthesia were associated factors for POST. Awareness creation through training based on research findings should be made about the problem for all health professionals who were involved in postoperative patient care.

UNASSIGNED: Inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff is needed for providing ventilation. Cuff pressure should be maintained inside the appropriate range to prevent critical airway complications. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pressure changes in the endotracheal tube cuff during otorhinolaryngologic surgery.
UNASSIGNED: This single-center observational study was conducted at Severance Hospital in Korea between April 2020 and November 2020. Patients aged >20 years scheduled to undergo otorhinolaryngological surgical procedures were enrolled. Patients undergoing planned tracheostomy and those who were slated for uncuffed endotracheal tube use were excluded. Intubation was performed after the induction of general anesthesia. A pressure transducer was connected to the pilot balloon of the endotracheal tube, and cuff pressure was continuously monitored until extubation. If the cuff pressure was not appropriate for more than 5 min, it was adjusted to the appropriate range by injecting or removing air. The percentage of time for which the cuff pressure remained within the appropriate range was calculated and defined as the time in the therapeutic range (TTR). The presumed cause for the rise or fall in cuff pressure was identified.
UNASSIGNED: In total 199 patients, alterations in cuff pressure outside the appropriate range occurred in 191 patients (96.0%). The mean TTR was 79.7% (SD 25.0%), and head and neck surgery had the lowest mean TTR of 69.0% compared to ear and nose surgeries (94.2 and 82.1%, respectively). Sixty-eight patients (34.2%) demonstrated inadequate endotracheal tube cuff pressure for more than 20% of the total anesthesia time. Twenty-six patients (13.1%) demonstrated optimal endotracheal tube cuff pressure for less than 50% of the total anesthesia time. The causative factors inducing inappropriate cuff pressure were found to vary, including positional changes, surgical procedure, anatomical manipulation, and anesthetic procedure.
UNASSIGNED: In otorhinolaryngologic surgery, cuff pressure increased or decreased outside the appropriate range due to various factors. Therefore, we suggest close continuous monitoring of cuff pressure during anesthesia for otorhinolaryngologic surgery.
UNASSIGNED: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03938493.

BACKGROUND: Facemask ventilation is routinely used to preoxygenate patients before endotracheal intubation during anesthesia induction or to secure ventilation in patients with respiratory insufficiency. Occasionally, facemask ventilation cannot be performed adequately. The placement of a regular endotracheal tube through the nose into the hypopharynx may be a valid alternative to improve ventilation and oxygenation before endotracheal intubation (nasopharyngeal ventilation). We tested the hypothesis that nasopharyngeal ventilation is superior in its efficacy compared to traditional facemask ventilation.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, crossover trial, we enrolled surgical patients requiring either nasal intubation (cohort #1, n = 20) or patients who met \"difficult to mask ventilate\" criteria (cohort #2, n = 20). Patients in each cohort were randomly assigned to receive pressure-controlled facemask ventilation followed by nasopharyngeal ventilation or vice versa. The ventilation settings were kept constant. The primary outcome was tidal volume. The secondary outcome was the difficulty of ventilation, measured using the Warters grading scale.
RESULTS: Tidal volume was significantly increased by nasopharyngeal ventilation in cohort #1 (597 ± 156 ml vs.462 ± 220 ml, p = 0.019) and cohort #2 (525 ± 157 ml vs.259 ± 151 ml, p < 0.01). Warters grading scale for mask ventilation was 0.6 ± 1.4 in cohort #1, and 2.6 ± 1.5 in cohort #2.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients at risk for difficult facemask ventilation may benefit from nasopharyngeal ventilation to maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation before endotracheal intubation. This ventilation mode may offer another option for ventilation at induction of anesthesia and during the management of respiratory insufficiency, especially in the setting of \"unexpected\" ventilation difficulty.