BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic pseudoaneurysms arising from the internal carotid artery subsequent to carotid endarterectomy are exceptionally infrequent. Herein, we present a case detailing an internal carotid artery pseudoaneurysm that manifested subsequent to a hybrid carotid endarterectomy and endovascular therapy intervention. Our approach to managing this condition involved a novel technique wherein thrombin was directly injected into the luminal cavity of the pseudoaneurysm under the guidance of a C-arm.
METHODS: A 66-year-old male patient of Chinese ethnicity exhibited a 4-month history of headache and a 20-day history of gait disturbance. Digital subtraction angiography revealed occlusion in the cervical region of the left carotid artery. Following a hybrid surgical procedure, the patient reported mild pain and bruising surrounding the incision site of the left internal carotid artery endarterectomy. Subsequent angiography identified the presence of a carotid artery pseudoaneurysm. Utilizing C-arm guidance, thrombin was then directly injected into the luminal cavity of the pseudoaneurysm, resulting in complete healing during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: For the management of pseudoaneurysms arising post carotid endarterectomy, the direct injection of thrombin into the aneurysm cavity under the guidance of a C-arm is deemed both safe and efficacious.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative symptomatic carotid artery occlusion after carotid endarterectomy is a rare complication. In this study, we present a case of symptomatic acute carotid artery occlusion that occurred after carotid endarterectomy in a patient with coexistent subclavian artery steal phenomenon, which was successfully treated with subclavian artery stenting.
METHODS: A 57-year-old East Asian female presented with stenosis in the left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery along with subclavian steal. The proximal segment of the left anterior cerebral artery was hypoplastic, and the posterior communicating arteries on both sides were well-developed. Left internal carotid artery stenosis progressed during the follow-up examination; therefore, left carotid endarterectomy was performed. On the following day, symptoms of cerebral perfusion deficiency appeared due to occlusion of the left carotid artery. The stenotic origin of the left common carotid artery and the suspected massive thrombus in the left carotid artery posed challenges to carotid revascularization. Therefore, left subclavian artery stenting for the subclavian steal phenomenon was determined to be the best option for restoring cerebral blood flow to the whole brain. Her symptoms improved after the procedure, and the postprocedural workup revealed improved cerebral blood flow.
CONCLUSIONS: Subclavian artery stenting is safe and may be helpful in patients with cerebral perfusion deficiency caused by intractable acute carotid occlusion coexisting with the subclavian steal phenomenon. Revascularization of asymptomatic subclavian artery stenosis is generally not recommended. However, cerebral circulatory insufficiency as a comorbidity may be worth considering.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hematoma after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a devastating complication and may be more likely in patients with uncontrolled hypertension and coughing on emergence from anesthesia. We sought to determine if intubation with a nasal endotracheal tube (ETT)-instead of an oral ETT-is associated with \"smoother\" (i.e., less hemodynamic instability) emergence from general anesthesia for CEA.
METHODS: Patients receiving CEA between December 2015 and September 2021 at a single tertiary academic medical center were included. We examined the electronic anesthesia records for 323 patients who underwent CEA during the 6-year study period and recorded consecutive systolic blood pressure (SBP) values during the 10 minutes before extubation as a surrogate for \"smoothness\" of the emergence.
RESULTS: Intubation with a nasal ETT, when compared with intubation with an oral ETT, was not associated with any difference in maximum, minimum, average, median, or standard deviation of serial SBP values in the 10 minutes before extubation. The average SBP on emergence for patients with an oral ETT was 141 mm Hg and with a nasal ETT was 144 mm Hg (P = 0.562). The maximum SBP for patients with oral and nasal ETTs were 170 mm Hg and 174 mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.491). There were also no differences in the qualitative \"smoothness\" of emergence or in the percentage of patients who required an intravenous dose of 1 or more antihypertensive medications. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: When SBP is used as a surrogate for smoothness of emergence from general anesthesia for CEA, intubation with a nasal ETT was not associated with better hemodynamic stability compared to intubation with an oral ETT.

OBJECTIVE: Little guidance exists on the conduct of randomised clinical trials (RCT) that seek to randomise patients away from standard of care. We sought to test the technique of network meta-analysis (NMA) to ascertain best available evidence for the purposes of informing the ethical evaluation of RCTs under these circumstances. We used the example of RCTs for patients with symptomatic, moderate to severe carotid stenosis that seek to compare surgical intervention plus medical therapy (standard of care) versus medical therapy (less than standard of care).
METHODS: Network meta-analysis of RCTs of adults with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of 50%-99% who were treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA), carotid artery stenting (CAS), or medical therapy (MT). The primary outcome was any stroke or death until end of follow-up, and secondary outcome was 30-day risk of ipsilateral stroke/death.
RESULTS: We analysed eight studies, with 7187 subjects with symptomatic moderate/severe stenosis (50%-99%). CEA was more efficacious than MT (HR = 0.82, 95% credible intervals [95% CrI] = 0.73-0.92) and CAS (HR 0.73, 95% CrI = 0.62-0.85) for the prevention of any stroke/death. At 30 days, the odds of experiencing an ipsilateral stroke/death were significantly lower in the CEA group compared to both MT (OR = 0.58, 95% CrI = 0.47-0.72) and CAS (OR = 0.68, 95% CrI = 0.55-0.83).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the feasibility of using NMA to assess best available evidence to inform the ethical evaluation of RCTs seeking to randomise patients away from standard of care. Our results suggest that a strong argument is required to ethically justify the conduct of RCTs that seek to randomise patients away from standard of care in the setting of symptomatic moderate to severe carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the intraoperative use of bivalirudin during lower extremity revascularization in the setting of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).
METHODS: A 65 year-old man presented with left common iliac, external iliac, and femoral artery occlusion necessitating revascularization with left femoral endarterectomy and common and external iliac stent angioplasty. Three months before the femoral endarterectomy, the patient was hospitalized for a coronary artery bypass procedure. During this admission, the patient tested positive for the presence of heparin-PF4 antibody complexes. With the patient\'s recent history of HIT, bivalirudin was selected as the optimal agent for intraoperative anticoagulation. Bivalirudin was administered as a 50 mg bolus, followed by a continuous infusion initiated at 1.75 mg/kg/hr. Repeated bivalirudin boluses were necessary to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) necessary for the revascularization procedures and recurrent subacute thrombi despite appropriate ACT values.
CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin has been utilized for cardiopulmonary bypass and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but data for dosing in lower extremity revascularization are lacking. As the risk for thrombosis with HIT continues for months after diagnosis, it is important to elucidate optimal dosing of non-heparin anticoagulant options, such as the direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin. The absence of validated dosing strategies for bivalirudin can result in prolonged operative times, increased risk of bleeding, and inadequate anticoagulation.
CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin is an appropriate agent for intraoperative anticoagulation in lower extremity revascularization. However, further investigation into the optimal intraoperative bivalirudin dosing regimen is necessary.

Timely diagnosis of perioperative stroke is challenging, and therapeutic interventions are infrequently offered. The cortical hand syndrome is a rare stroke presentation that results from infarction of the precentral gyrus leading to variable neurologic deficits mimicking peripheral nerve injuries, with no prior reports in the perioperative setting. To raise awareness of this complication among anesthesiologists, we present a case of cortical hand syndrome in a surgical patient initially suspected to have a peripheral neuropathy.
A 68-yr-old male with multiple stroke risk factors underwent a nephroureterectomy under general anesthesia and thoracic epidural analgesia for urothelial carcinoma. The patient noted right-hand numbness and weakness to digits 3-5 immediately after surgery and notified his bedside nurse the following day. His symptoms were initially presumed to be a peripheral neuropathy secondary to surgical positioning. Computed tomography of the head the following day revealed an acute cortical infarct in the precentral gyrus consistent with cortical hand stroke syndrome. Subsequent neurologic consultation revealed additional subtle right-sided weakness. Further workup revealed moderate (60-80%) stenosis of the left carotid artery and he underwent a successful carotid endarterectomy one week later. His symptoms had mostly resolved six weeks later.
Cortical hand stroke syndrome is a rare presentation of perioperative stroke that may be misdiagnosed as a peripheral neuropathy. Our case presentation highlights that perioperative stroke should be considered for patients presenting with neurologic deficits of the hand, particularly those with deficits in multiple peripheral nerve territories and stroke risk factors.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Le diagnostic rapide de l’accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC) périopératoire est difficile, et les interventions thérapeutiques sont rarement proposées. Le syndrome de la main corticale est une présentation rare de l’AVC qui résulte d’un infarctus du gyrus précentral entraînant des déficits neurologiques variables imitant les lésions nerveuses périphériques, sans avoir été préalablement rapporté dans le cadre périopératoire. Afin de sensibiliser les anesthésiologistes à cette complication, nous présentons un cas de syndrome de la main corticale chez un patient chirurgical chez lequel une neuropathie périphérique était initialement suspectée. CARACTéRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: Un homme de 68 ans présentant de multiples facteurs de risque d’AVC a subi une néphro-urétérectomie sous anesthésie générale et une analgésie péridurale thoracique pour un carcinome urothélial. Le patient a remarqué un engourdissement et une faiblesse de la main droite du majeur à l’auriculaire immédiatement après la chirurgie et a avisé le personnel infirmier à son chevet le lendemain. On a d’abord présumé que ses symptômes indiquaient une neuropathie périphérique secondaire au positionnement chirurgical. La tomodensitométrie de la tête réalisée le lendemain a révélé un infarctus cortical aigu dans le gyrus précentral, compatible avec un syndrome d’AVC de la main corticale. Une consultation neurologique ultérieure a révélé une faiblesse subtile supplémentaire du côté droit. Un examen plus approfondi a révélé une sténose modérée (60 à 80 %) de l’artère carotide gauche et le patient a bénéficié d’ une endartériectomie carotidienne réussie une semaine plus tard. Ses symptômes avaient pour la plupart disparu six semaines plus tard. CONCLUSION: Le syndrome de l’AVC de la main corticale est une présentation rare d’AVC périopératoire qui peut être diagnostiqué à tort comme une neuropathie périphérique. Notre présentation de cas souligne que l’AVC périopératoire devrait être envisagé chez les patient·es présentant des déficits neurologiques de la main, en particulier chez les personnes présentant des déficits dans plusieurs territoires nerveux périphériques et des facteurs de risque d’AVC.

We present a case of a 41-year-old female presenting with recurrence of ischemic stroke on subtherapeutic doses of dabigatran. She had a history of embolic stroke of undetermined sources at the age of 40, and underwent implantable cardiac monitor implantation and had started dabigatran. One year after the first ischemic stroke, she presented with sudden dysarthria and left hemiparesis and was admitted to our hospital. An MRI of the head revealed acute cerebral infarction in the right corona radiata, and an MR angiography revealed right M2 occlusion. Cervical 3D-CTA revealed a protruding structure on the posterior wall of the carotid artery bulb, which was diagnosed as carotid web. She underwent carotid endarterectomy, and the specimen was pathologically confirmed to be vascular malformation due to fibromuscular dysplasia.

BACKGROUND A persistent primitive hypoglossal artery (PPHA) is a rare congenital anomaly leading to persistent carotid-basilar anastomosis. This is a report of an 83-year-old man with a PPHA presenting with amaurosis fugax of the left eye requiring carotid endarterectomy under regional anesthesia. CASE REPORT An 83-year-old man presented with 2 weeks of intermittent self-resolving visual disturbances, followed by an episode of left eye amaurosis fugax. The patient had been referred to the hospital for further investigation of symptoms 1 day following the amaurosis fugax event. Carotid Doppler ultrasound demonstrated a greater than 90% stenosis of the left internal carotid artery. Computed tomography carotid and Circle of Willis angiography confirmed a mixed, ulcerated plaque and revealed a persistent left hypoglossal artery originating from the left internal carotid artery and continuing as the basilar artery. On day 3 of admission, left carotid endarterectomy was performed under conscious sedation and regional anesthesia to permit continuous monitoring of neurological status and avoid the need for intraoperative shunting. \"Permissive hypertension\" by targeting a systolic blood pressure of 190 to 200 mmHg was sought for the duration of clamp time. There was no deterioration of neurological function during clamping of the carotid vessels. The patient recovered well and was discharged 2 days after surgery, with no residual neurology. CONCLUSIONS This report has presented a rare case of PPHA to highlight awareness of this congenital vascular anomaly when undertaking carotid endarterectomy.

Pseudoaneurysm (PA) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a rare and dangerous complication. In recent years endovascular approach has been preferred to open surgery as it is less invasive and reduces complications in an already operated neck, especially cranial nerve injuries. We report a case of large post-CEA PA causing dysphagia, successfully treated by deployment of two balloon-expandable covered stents and coil embolization of the external carotid artery. A literature review dealing with all cases of post-CEA PAs since 2000 treated by endovascular means is also reported. The research was conducted on Pubmed database using keywords \"carotid pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy,\" \"false aneurysm after carotid endarterectomy,\" \"postcarotid endarterectomy pseudoaneurysm,\" and \"carotid pseudoaneurysm.\"

BACKGROUND: During carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery, blood pressure management is particularly important to prevent cerebrovascular and cardiac complications. Ephedrine is a commonly used vasopressor, however, we report the case of a patient with unusually severe blood pressure elevation following intravenous ephedrine administration during CEA.
METHODS: A 72-year-old man diagnosed with right proximal internal carotid artery stenosis underwent CEA under general anesthesia. After declamping the common carotid artery, blood pressure rapidly increased by 125 mm Hg (from 90 to 215 mm Hg) after ephedrine (4 mg) was administered, but the heart rate was stable.
METHODS: There was an ordinal increase in blood pressure after the same small dose of ephedrine was administered at the early stage of the surgery. And the surgical approach was difficult because he had a high location of carotid bifurcation and a prominent mandibular angle. Because of the anatomical proximity of the cervical sympathetic trunk to the carotid bifurcation and the particularly complicated surgical process in the present case, we postulate the reason for this adverse reaction as transient sympathetic denervation supersensitivity.
METHODS: Perdipine (0.5 mg) was administered repeatedly to reduce blood pressure.
RESULTS: After surgery, he was diagnosed with right hypoglossal nerve palsy, and no other abnormal signs were found.
CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the need for caution in the use of ephedrine, which is commonly used in CEA surgery, wherein blood pressure management is particularly important. Although it is a rare and unpredictable case, α-agonists are considered safer in situations where sympathetic supersensitivity is possible.