Empyema, Pleural

脓胸,胸膜
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    脓胸构成了一个重大的全球健康问题,然而,确定负责任的细菌仍然难以捉摸。最近的研究质疑常规胸腔积液培养在准确识别脓胸细菌中的功效。这项研究的目的是比较下一代测序(NGS)与常规胸膜液培养在鉴定引起脓胸的细菌方面的诊断能力。五个数据库(谷歌学者,科学直接,科克伦,研究门,和PubMed)用于搜索比较常规胸水培养与NGS的研究,以使用关键词识别引起脓胸的细菌。提取通过常规胸膜液培养和NGS鉴定的阳性结果。此外,还记录了由NGS鉴定的细菌谱。采用Joanna-Briggs研究所(JBI)关键评估工具来评估纳入研究的质量。描述性分析被用来呈现利益的结果。来自五个数据库,三项研究,有354名患者,包括在内。三项研究的结果表明,即使在培养阴性样品中,NGS在检测引起脓胸的细菌方面也优于常规胸膜液培养。此外,通过NGS鉴定的优势细菌谱包括肺炎链球菌,金黄色葡萄球菌,和厌氧细菌。总之,NGS在检测脓胸细菌方面优于常规胸水培养,与传统胸膜液培养相比,还需要对更大样本和更广泛的细菌谱进行进一步研究,以提高其应用的信心和紧迫性.
    Empyema poses a significant global health concern, yet identifying responsible bacteria remains elusive. Recent studies question the efficacy of conventional pleural fluid culture in accurately identifying empyema-causing bacteria. The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic capabilities of next-generation sequencing (NGS) with conventional pleural fluid culture in identifying empyema-causing bacteria. Five databases (Google Scholar, Science Direct, Cochrane, Research Gate, and PubMed) were used to search studies comparing conventional pleural fluid culture with NGS for identifying empyema-causing bacteria using keywords. Positive results identified through conventional pleural fluid culture and NGS were extracted. In addition, bacterial profiles identified by NGS were also documented. Joanna-Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool was employed to assess quality of included studies. Descriptive analysis was employed to present outcome of interests. From five databases, three studies, with 354 patients, were included. Findings from three studies showed that NGS outperformed conventional pleural fluid culture in detecting empyema-causing bacteria even in culture-negative samples. Moreover, dominant bacterial profiles identified through NGS included Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and anaerobic bacteria. In conclusion, NGS outperforms conventional pleural fluid culture in detection empyema-causing bacteria, yet further studies with larger samples and broader bacterial profiles are needed to increase confidence and urgency in its adoption over conventional pleural fluid culture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:慢性脓胸伴胸壁窦是一种由多种致病因素引起的疑难复杂疾病。由于其可能合并支气管胸膜瘘(BPF)和残留骨,因此很难控制局部感染。相关文献强调了肺切除术后脓胸进展的一些危险因素,而肺切除术后脓胸和BPF之间的相关性通过感染剩余的肺而增加死亡率。肺切除术后,对侧的肺功能尤为重要。
    方法:本文报告1例62岁男性患者,12年前因肺部鳞状细胞癌行右肺切除术,3年前开始出现胸壁前窦脓胸。入院后,胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)显示右侧胸腔积液和胸壁窦形成。根据他的临床症状和影像学检查,他被诊断为慢性脓胸伴胸壁窦。由于患者巨大的残余腔,游离股外侧肌皮瓣联合带蒂胸大肌肌皮瓣填充脓肿腔的临床效果满意,但术后左肺吸入性肺炎导致急性呼吸衰竭。
    结论:经过气管插管等一系列治疗措施,气管切开术,抗感染,维持循环稳定性,和康复训练,病人最终获救并治愈。术后随访显示,肌皮瓣成活,脓胸消除。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic empyema with chest wall sinus is a difficult and complex disease caused by multiple causative factors. It is difficult to control local infection due to its possible combination of bronchopleural fistula (BPF) and residual bone.The relevant literature emphasizes some risk factors for empyema progression after pneumonectomy, while the correlation between empyema and BPF after pneumonectomy increases mortality by infecting the remaining lungs. After pneumonectomy, the lung function of the contralateral side is particularly important.
    METHODS: This paper reports a 62-year-old male patient who underwent right pneumonectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the lung 12 years ago and began to develop empyema with anterior chest wall sinus 3 years ago. After admission, chest computed tomography (CT) showed right pleural effusion and formation of chest wall sinus. According to his clinical symptoms and imaging examination, he was diagnosed as chronic empyema with chest wall sinus.Due to the huge residual cavity of the patient,the clinical effect of using free vastus lateralis myocutaneous flap combined with pedicled pectoralis major muscle flap to fill the abscess cavity was satisfactory,but acute respiratory failure occurred due to left lung aspiration pneumonia after operation.
    CONCLUSIONS: After a series of treatment measures such as tracheal cannula, tracheotomy, anti-infection, maintenance of circulatory stability, and rehabilitation training, the patient was ultimately rescued and cured. Postoperative follow-up showed that the muscle flaps survived and empyema was eliminated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:由厌氧细菌引起的感染经常发生,并且可能严重且危及生命。厌氧菌是社区获得性肺炎的罕见原因,肺炎链球菌和呼吸道病毒是最常见的病原体。我们,在这里,报告1例无吸入性肺炎危险因素的患者肺炎副梭杆菌/肽链球菌积液伴脓胸。此病例提供了一个机会,可以讨论一个不寻常的患者继发于厌氧菌感染的社区获得性脓胸,而没有常见的误吸危险因素。
    方法:一名59岁的男性患者,除了25年的吸烟史外,没有明显的既往病史,原因是左侧腹疼痛和呼吸急促。在成像中发现了复杂的肺炎旁积液,导致手术剥皮和长期的抗生素治疗。
    结论:肺炎旁积液和脓胸是比较常见的肺炎并发症。重要的是要注意,由于更现代的培养技术,厌氧脓胸的发生率一直在上升。
    结论:该病例突出了一个不寻常的表现,即继发于厌氧菌的社区获得性脓胸,没有任何吸入性肺炎的危险因素。因此,临床医生应考虑在适当环境下治疗社区获得性脓胸时采用无氧覆盖的可能性.

    Background: Infections caused by anaerobic bacteria occur frequently and can be serious and life-threatening. Anaerobes are a rare cause of community-acquired pneumonia with Streptococcus pneumonia and respiratory viruses being the most frequently detected pathogens. We, herein, report a case of Fusobacterium/Peptostreptococcus parapneumonic effusion with empyema in a patient without risk factors for aspiration pneumonia. This case presents an opportunity to discuss an unusual case of community-acquired empyema secondary to anaerobic infection in a patient without the common risk factors for aspiration.

    Case Presentation: A 59-year-old male patient without significant past medical history apart from a twenty-five-year history of smoking presented due to left flank pain and shortness of breath. Findings of a complicated parapneumonic effusion were found on imaging, resulting in surgical decortication and prolonged antibiotic therapy.

    Discussion: Parapneumonic effusions and empyema are relatively common complications of pneumonia. It is important to note that the incidence of anaerobic empyema has been on the rise due to more modern culturing techniques.

    Conclusion: This case highlights an unusual presentation of community-acquired empyema secondary to anaerobes without any risk factors for aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, clinicians should consider the possibility of anaerobic coverage in the treatment of community-acquired empyema in the appropriate setting.

    .
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:由星座链球菌引起的脓胸(S.constellatus)在HIV患者中很少见。分析1例HIV感染者(PLHIV)的临床资料,他得了由S.constellatus引起的脓胸,通过文献复习探讨本病的诊断和治疗方法,提高临床对本病的认识。
    方法:我们在这里报道了一名58岁的男性PLHIV咳嗽,喘息,发烧20天他有2型糖尿病病史,酗酒,拔掉了一颗牙齿。胸部计算机断层扫描显示多个包裹性胸腔积液,肺炎,右肺部分压迫性肺不张.及时提交胸膜灌注,然后文化揭示了星座。经过综合治疗,包括抗生素,闭式胸腔引流,胸膜内注射尿激酶,胸膜回流被吸收,胸部计算机断层扫描也证实了这一改善。
    结论:S.constellatus作为HIV患者的脓液病原体不容忽视。综合治疗是治疗星座脓胸的重要手段。
    Empyema caused by Streptococcus constellatus (S. constellatus) is rare in patients with HIV. To analyze the clinical data of a patient living with HIV (PLHIV), who got empyema caused by S. constellatus, investigating the diagnosis and treatment of this disease through literature review to improve the clinical understanding of this disease.
    We have reported here a 58-year-old male PLHIV with cough, wheezing, and fever for 20 days. He has a history type 2 diabetes, alcohol abuse, and a teeth extracted. Chest computed tomography revealed multiple encapsulated pleural effusions, pneumatosis, and partial compressive atelectasis in the right lung. Submission of pleural efusions timely, and then cultures revealed S. constellatus. After comprehensive treatment, including antibiotics, closed pleural drainage, and intrapleural injection of urokinase, the pleural efusion was absorbed, and chest computed tomography also confirmed the improvement.
    S. constellatus should not be neglected as a pus pathogen in patients with HIV. comprehensive treatment is important for empyema of S. constellatus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童社区获得性肺炎并发脓胸的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。
    目的:肺炎旁积液或脓胸患儿,住院时间和其他关键临床结果是否根据所使用的治疗方式而有所不同?
    方法:通过搜索Cochrane中央对照试验登记册,对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价,Embase,拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献,OvidMEDLINE,和WebofScience核心收藏数据库。符合条件的RCT包括年龄<18岁的患者,并比较了以下两种治疗方式:单独使用抗生素,有或没有纤维蛋白溶解剂的胸管插入,电视胸腔镜手术(VATS),和开胸手术。进行了网络荟萃分析(NMA)来评估治疗效果对住院时间(LOS)、主要结果。
    结果:选择了11项试验,包括590名患者。与单独的胸管相比,带有纤维蛋白溶解剂的胸管,开胸手术,和VATS都与较短的LOS有关,平均差为5.05天(95%CI,2.46-7.64),6.33天(95%CI,3.17-9.50),和5.86天(95%CI,3.38-8.35),分别。后三种干预措施之间的LOS没有实质性差异。11项RCT中没有一项将单独的抗生素与其他类型的治疗进行比较。大多数试验报告围手术期并发症和需要再干预,但是两次试验的描述有很大不同,防止荟萃分析。在报告医疗保健相关费用的试验中,与VATS相比,纤维蛋白溶解剂具有成本优势.短期和长期发病率和死亡率都很低,无论治疗方式如何。
    结论:该NMA的结果表明,与其他治疗方式相比,单独使用胸管与更长的LOS相关。在选择治疗方案时,与胸管加纤维蛋白溶解剂相关的较低成本值得考虑。考虑到与其他模式相比相似的LOS和临床结局。
    The optimal treatment for community-acquired childhood pneumonia complicated by empyema remains unclear.
    In children with parapneumonic effusion or empyema, do hospital length of stay and other key clinical outcomes differ according to the treatment modality used?
    A living systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Eligible RCTs included patients aged < 18 years and compared two of the following treatment modalities: antibiotics alone, chest tube insertion with or without fibrinolytics, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), and decortication via thoracotomy. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate treatment effects on hospital length of stay (LOS), the primary outcome.
    Eleven trials including a total of 590 patients were selected for the network meta-analysis. Compared with a chest tube alone, a chest tube with fibrinolytics, thoracotomy, and VATS were all associated with shorter LOS, with a mean difference of 5.05 days (95% CI, 2.46-7.64), 6.33 days (95% CI, 3.17-9.50), and 5.86 days (95% CI, 3.38-8.35), respectively. No substantial differences in LOS were observed between the latter three interventions. None of the 11 RCTs compared antibiotics alone vs other types of treatment. Most trials reported peri-procedural complications and the need for reintervention, but the descriptions differed significantly between trials, preventing meta-analysis. In trials reporting health care-associated costs, fibrinolytics had cost advantages compared with VATS. Short- and long-term morbidity and mortality were very low, regardless of the treatment modality.
    The results of this network meta-analysis showed that a chest tube alone was associated with a longer LOS compared with other treatment modalities. The lower cost associated with a chest tube plus fibrinolytics warrants consideration when choosing between treatment options, given similar LOS and clinical outcomes compared with the other modalities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:放线菌(Aa),以前称为放线菌放线杆菌,是一种生长缓慢的革兰氏阴性球菌,HACEK细菌定植口腔菌群组的成员。除了在口腔中引起感染性疾病,如龋齿和牙周炎,它是严重的口外感染继发于血行扩散或误吸,比如心内膜炎,软组织脓肿和骨髓炎。诊断取决于通过活检获得的生物材料的长期细菌培养。Aa对大多数抗生素敏感,但完全根除通常需要长期治疗。
    方法:我们报告了一例15岁以前健康的男孩,诊断为由Aa引起的肺脓胸和膈下胸壁脓肿。他被纳入我们的儿科急诊科,以评估与明显的虚弱和干咳相关的正确肿块。放射学发现后,通过培养胸腔脓胸的引流液进行病因诊断。他开始静脉注射哌拉西林/他唑巴坦经验性抗生素治疗,其敏感性被抗菌谱证实,然后,对于肝病的发生,患者改用环丙沙星:治疗6个月后,患者几乎完全康复。
    结论:由Aa引起的口腔外感染极为罕见,尤其是在儿童中,还没有很好的描述。据我们所知,文献中只有另一个类似的案例。然而,我们的手稿中描述的病例是唯一一例出现肺脓胸但未累及肺实质的儿童病例.我们还对儿科人群中已发表的Aa感染病例进行了简要回顾。此病例报告提醒我们在检查儿科患者时准确检查口腔的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), previously known as Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, is a slow-growing Gram-negative coccobacillus, member of the HACEK group of bacteria colonizing oral flora. Besides causing infectious diseases in the oral cavity such as dental caries and periodontitis, it is responsible for severe extra-oral infections secondary to hematogenous spread or aspiration, such as endocarditis, soft tissue abscesses and osteomyelitis. The diagnosis depends on prolonged bacterial culture of biological material obtained through biopsy. Aa is susceptible to most antibiotics but complete eradication often requires a long term treatment.
    METHODS: We report the case of a 15-year-old previously healthy boy diagnosed with both pulmonary empyema and subphrenic chest wall abscess caused by Aa. He was admitted to our Pediatric Emergency department for evaluation of a right mass associated with marked asthenia and dry cough. After radiological findings etiological diagnosis was made by culture of fluid drainage of pleural empyema. He started empirical antibiotic therapy with intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam, whose sensibility was confirmed by the antibiogram, then, for occurrance of hepatopathy it was switched to ciprofloxacin: the patient almost completely recovered after 6-month therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Extra-oral infections caused by Aa are extremely rare, especially in children, and not well described yet. To our knowledge, there is only another similar case described in literature. However, the case described in our manuscript represents the only one presenting with pulmonary empyema without involvement of lung parenchyma in children. We also conducted a brief review of published cases of Aa infection in the pediatric population. This case report reminds us the importance of an accurate inspection of the oral cavity during the examination of pediatric patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:胸膜脓胸是肠外艰难梭状芽孢杆菌感染的罕见表现,文献中只报道了8例。
    方法:我们报告一例70岁男性新病例,无合并症或合并胃肠道疾病的证据,并回顾文献中报道的以前的病例。
    结果:该分离株对所有测试的抗微生物剂敏感,对A+B毒素呈阴性。患者在引流和使用阿莫西林-克拉维酸和强力霉素进行抗菌治疗后完全康复。
    结论:与先前报道的病例一样,误吸是我们患者感染机制最合理的假设。艰难梭菌样脓胸是一个诊断挑战,因为有必要排除胸膜液中这种微生物的分离不是污染。此外,由于有关该实体的数据仍然很少,因此需要更多的证据来进行治疗。
    Pleural empyema is an infrequent manifestation of extraintestinal Clostridioidesdifficile infection, with just eight cases reported in literature.
    We report a new case in a 70-year-old male without comorbidities or evidence of concomitant gastrointestinal disease, and review the previous cases reported in the literature.
    The isolate was susceptible to all antimicrobial tested and was negative for A+B toxins. The patient fully recovered after drainages and antimicrobial therapy with amoxicillin-clavulanate and doxycycline.
    As in the previously reported cases, aspiration was the most plausible hypothesis of mechanism of infection in our patient. Empyema by Clostridioidesdifficile is a diagnostic challenge, since it is necessary to rule out that the isolation of this microorganism in pleural fluid is not a contamination. Furthermore, more evidence is needed for its treatment since data regarding this entity are still scarce.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:胸膜感染是全球范围内的重大临床挑战。尽管胸腔积液的及时引流被认为在胸膜感染管理中起关键作用,胸膜导管的最佳尺寸尚未确定.
    目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是总结小口径引流(SBD)的疗效和并发症的数据,定义为≤14F,与胸膜感染患者的大口径引流(LBD)相比。
    方法:我们在MEDLINE和Embase中搜索了截至2021年10月发表的所有报告感兴趣结局的研究。两位作者回顾了选定的全文,以根据预定义的资格标准确定研究。摘要估计值是使用随机效应模型得出的。
    结果:包括12项原始研究进行定性分析,其中7项进行定量分析。SBD和LBD的手术转诊率分别为,分别,0.16(95%置信区间[CI],0.12-0.21)和0.20(95%CI,0.10-0.32),合并死亡率为0.12(95%CI,0.05-0.21)和0.20(95%CI,0.10-0.32),两组的住院时间均为24天。有关并发症的数据表明,导管移位的比例相似。仅在一项研究中评估了疼痛的强度,报告LBD得分较高。
    结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析提供了有关SBD和LBD在胸膜感染管理中的表现的首次综合数据,and,总的来说,临床结局和并发症没有实质性差异,尽管研究数量有限且缺乏专门的随机试验确实限制了结果的可靠性.
    Pleural infection represents a significant clinical challenge worldwide. Although prompt drainage of pleural fluid is thought to play a key role in pleural infection management, the optimal size of intrapleural catheter has yet to be defined.
    The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize data on efficacy and complications of small-bore drain (SBD), defined as ≤14F, in comparison to large-bore drain (LBD) in patients with pleural infection.
    We searched MEDLINE and Embase for all studies reporting outcomes of interest published up to October 2021. Two authors reviewed selected full text to identify studies according to predefined eligibility criteria. Summary estimates were derived using the random-effects model.
    Twelve original studies were included for qualitative analysis and 7 of these for quantitative analysis. The surgical referral rate of SBD and LBD were, respectively, 0.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.21) and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.32), the pooled mortality were 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.21) and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.32), and the length of hospital stay was 24 days in both groups. Data on complications suggest similar proportions of tube dislodgement. Intensity of pain was evaluated in one study only, reporting higher scores for LBD.
    This systematic review and meta-analysis provide the first synthesis of data on performance of SBD and LBD in management of pleural infection, and, overall, clinical outcomes and complications did not substantially differ, although the limited number of studies and the absence of dedicated randomized trials does limit the reliability of results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胸膜脓胸(PE)是一种常见的疾病,与高发病率和死亡率相关。手术方法是大多数II-III期PE患者的护理标准。在过去的几年里,微创外科革命还涉及胸外科手术,在安全性和有效性方面均可获得相同的结果,并结合更好的疼痛管理和早期出院。这项研究的目的是通过我们在单孔视频辅助胸腔镜(u-VATS)上的经验来证明其治疗II期PE的方法的有效性和安全性。作为次要端点,我们将通过文献综述评估成人和老年患者的u-VATS适应症的不同模式。
    我们回顾性审查了我们从2018年11月至2022年2月在我们的区域转诊中心进行的前瞻性收集的u-VATS程序数据库。Cardarelli\"医院,在坎波巴索,莫利塞,意大利。
    共有29例患者接受了U-VATS治疗II期PE。年龄小于70岁的患者有15例(51.72%),被认定为“成年人”,“14名(48.28%)患者年龄在70岁以上,被认定为“老年人”。“没有发现死亡。平均手术时间为104.68±39.01分钟。老年组手术时间较长(115±53.15min)(p=0.369)。成人的胸管拔除时间早于老年组(5.56±2.06vs.10.14±5.58p=0.038)。成人组的住院时间(LOS)较短(6.44±2.35vs.12.29±6.96p=0.033)。通过仪器日常生活活动(IADL)量表评估患者术后恢复到正常的日常生活活动。
    此外,在老年患者中,u-VATS方法似乎安全有效,可确保降低进展至III期PE的风险,同时降低复发风险和脓毒症并发症.提倡进一步比较多中心分析,以确定u-VATS方法在成人和老年患者PE治疗中的作用。
    Pleural empyema (PE) is a frequent disease, associated with a high morbidity and mortality. Surgical approach is the standard of care for most patients with II-III stage PE. In the last years, the minimally invasive surgical revolution involved also thoracic surgery allowing the same outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness combined to better pain management and early discharge. The aim of this study is to demonstrate through our experience on uniportal-video-assisted thoracoscopy (u-VATS) the effectiveness and safety of its approach in treatment of stage II PE. As secondary endpoint, we will evaluate the different pattern of indication of u-VATS in adult and elderly patients with literature review.
    We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively collected database of u-VATS procedures from November 2018 to February 2022, in our regional referral center for Thoracic Surgery of Regione Molise General Surgery Unit of \"A. Cardarelli\" Hospital, in Campobasso, Molise, Italy.
    A total of 29 patients underwent u-VATS for II stage PE. Fifteen (51.72%) patients were younger than 70 years old, identified as \"adults,\" 14 (48.28%) patients were older than 70 years old, identified as \"elderly.\" No mortality was found. Mean operative time was 104.68 ± 39.01 min in the total population. The elderly group showed a longer operative time (115 ± 53.15 min) (p = 0.369). Chest tube was removed earlier in adults than in elderly group (5.56 ± 2.06 vs. 10.14 ± 5.58 p = 0.038). The Length of Stay (LOS) was shorter in the adults group (6.44 ± 2.35 vs. 12.29 ± 6.96 p = 0.033). Patients evaluated through Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale returned to normal activities of daily living after surgery.
    In addition, the u-VATS approach seems to be safe and effective ensuring a risk reduction of progression to stage III PE with a lower recurrence risk and septic complications also in elderly patients. Further comparative multicenter analysis are advocated to set the role of u-VATS approach in the treatment of PE in adults and elderly patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺切除术后脓胸是严重的并发症之一,死亡率和致死率高。在本文中,作者描述了在一名恶性胸膜间皮瘤手术患者中,通过真空疗法治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的肺切除术后脓胸。
    方法:一名64岁的患者在我们的诊所接受了右胸膜腔上皮样间皮瘤的手术。我们进行了胸膜外肺切除术,术中胸腔内热化疗。术后7周,患者因耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的右胸膜腔脓胸再次入院。胸膜腔清创术和网片移植后,我们应用了真空疗法。总的来说,我们进行了4次换药,最后将抗生素溶液应用于胸膜腔并闭合伤口。在随后的12个月随访中,患者没有发现复发性脓胸的证据,并接受了化疗。
    结论:真空疗法是治疗无支气管胸膜瘘患者肺切除术后脓胸的有效方法,需要特定的肺切除术后患者护理。
    BACKGROUND: Postpneumonectomy empyema is one of serious complications with high mortality and lethality. In this paper, the authors describe the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced postpneumonectomy empyema by vacuum therapy in a patient operated on for malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    METHODS: A 64-year-old patient was operated on at our clinic for epithelioid mesothelioma of the right pleural cavity. We performed extrapleural pneumonectomy with intraoperative hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy. Seven weeks after surgery the patient was readmitted for right pleural cavity empyema caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Following pleural cavity debridement and mesh explantation we applied vacuum therapy. In total, we performed 4 dressing changes with final application of an antibiotic solution into the pleural cavity and wound closure. The patient showed no evidence of recurrent empyema during subsequent 12-month follow-up and underwent chemotherapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Vacuum therapy is an effective treatment of postpneumonectomy empyema in patients without a bronchopleural fistula; nevertheless, specific postpneumonectomy patient care is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号