Angiolipomas have been well described in patients with HIV exposed to protease inhibitors with possible resolution after switching to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens. Resolution of symptoms have occurred with switches to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimens; however, little is known regarding the development of angiolipomas when switching from NNRTI- to modern, integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based regimens. We describe a patient who underwent switch therapy from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine/efavirenz (TDF/FTC/EFV) to tenofovir alafenamide/FTC/bictegravir (TAF/FTC/BIC) who later developed angiolipomas.
A 55-year-old male had been on TDF/FTC/EFV for 8 years before switching to TAF/FTC/BIC. Nineteen months after antiretroviral switch, the patient presented with multiple lesions in the upper extremities and abdomen. Diagnostic biopsies revealed non-encapsulated angiolipomas and HHV-8 and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease was ruled out. New lesions continued to appear 29 months after ART switch, after which now lesions appeared and prior lesions remained stable with no increase in size noted. No surgical intervention or change in antiretroviral therapy was needed.
Angiogenesis may have been suppressed with TDF/FTC/EFV treatment, however when switched to TAF/FTC/BIC, promoted the growth of angiolipomas. Clinicians should be aware of the impact of switching to modern ART therapies resulting in possible adipogenesis.

Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has long deemphasized mechanistic reasoning and pathophysiological rationale in assessing the effectiveness of interventions. The EBM+ movement has challenged this stance, arguing that evidence of mechanisms and comparative studies should both be seen as necessary and complementary. Advocates of EBM+ provide a combination of theoretical arguments and examples of mechanistic reasoning in medical research. However, EBM+ proponents have not provided recent examples of how downplaying mechanistic reasoning resulted in worse medical results than would have occurred otherwise. Such examples are necessary to make the case that EBM+ responds to a problem in clinical practice that urgently demands a solution. In light of this, we examine the failed rollout of efavirenz as a first-line HIV treatment in Zimbabwe as evidence of the importance of mechanistic reasoning in improving clinical practice and public health policy decisions. We suggest that this case is analogous to examples commonly given to support EBM.

Although the most frequent presentation of adverse drug events amongst HIV- infected individuals is skin rash, photosensitivity is uncommon. We herein described an HIV-infected female who presented with photo-distributed annular target-like eruptions and small tense blisters. Our patient had objectively reduced erythemal thresholds on broadband UV phototesting, to both UVA and UVB. Resolution of the abnormal responses on retesting undertaken after cessation of the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and efavirenz in mixed formulation for five months confirmed a diagnosis of drug-induced photosensitivity. Given the preferred first-line anti-retroviral therapy which usually contains both TDF and EFV, photoprotection from broad-band ultraviolet wavelengths should be emphasized for the patients receiving this antiretroviral regimen.

Long-term antiretroviral treatment (cART) increases the risk of glucose metabolism disorders (GMDs). Genetic variation in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters may influence susceptibility to cART-associated GMDs. We conducted a case-control study to investigate the association of pharmacogenetic variations with cART-induced GMDs. A total of 240 HIV patients on long-term efavirenz-based cART (75 GMD cases and 165 controls without GMDs) were genotyped for CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5 (*3,*6), CYP2B6*6, UGT2B7*2, ABCB1 (c.3435C>T, c.4036A>G), and SLCO1B1 (*1b, *5). GMD cases were defined as the presence of impaired fasting glucose, insulin resistance, or diabetes mellitus (DM). Case-control genotype/haplotype association and logistic regression analysis were performed by adjusting for age, sex, and BMI. The major CYP3A haplotype were CYP3A5*3 (53.8%), CYP3A4*1B (17.3%), combinations of CYP3A4*1B, and CYP3A5*6 (10.9%), and CYP3A wild type (7%). CYP3A5*6 allele (p = 0.005) and CYP3A5*6 genotype (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with GMD cases. Multivariate analysis indicated CYP3A haplotype as a significant predictor of GMD (p = 0.02) and IFG (p = 0.004). CYP2B6*6 significantly predicted DM (p = 0.03). CYP3A haplotype and CYP2B6*6 genotype are independent significant predictors of GMD and DM, respectively, among HIV patients on long-term EFV-based cART.

This report describes three cases of tumour-like pulmonary tuberculosis: two patients had stage C3 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (with uncontrolled HIV-1 in one case) and one patient was immunocompetent. All patients initially presented with general and respiratory symptoms, with radiological findings simulating lung carcinoma. Tuberculosis was diagnosed from microbiological testing and/or histological examination results. A disseminated form was described in one case. All patients were treated successfully with antimycobacterial therapy, with control of HIV infection in both cases.

Although reports of neuropsychiatric side effects have been reported with efavirenz, these have been limited in comparison with regard to the now recommended dolutegravir regimens. We present a patient with new onset neuropsychiatric manifestations secondary to dolutegravir that resulted in significant physical injuries. The patient was initiated on risperidone for symptomatic control which was subsequently weaned and discontinued following reverting to an original efavirenz antiretroviral regimen, with resolution of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Neuropsychiatric side effects are increasingly noted with dolutegravir, and these should be monitored for on initiation and switching of treatment regimens.

HIV-infected patients have a higher risk of developing cutaneous reactions to drugs than the general population. Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are not uncommon in patients taking antiretroviral therapy (HAART]. To evaluate HLA class I and II allele frequencies in HIV patients on HAART who develop SCARs due to nevirapine (NVP] or efavirenz (EFZ] containing regime and compare this genotype composition with HAART tolerant patients and healthy organ donors. A case-control study for 4 years was conducted with four subsets of patients hailing from north-east India:Cohort 1- HIV seropositive patients who developed SCARs due to EFZ (n = 8];Cohort 2 - HIV seropositive patients who developed SCARs due to NVP (n = 15]; Cohort 3 -HIV seropositive NVP/EFZ-tolerant patients (n = 18]; Cohort 4 - Healthy HIV seronegative organ donors (n = 169].Cohort 3 & 4 acted as control-group. These patients were genotyped for the HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DPB1 by a sequence-based HLA typing method. HLA-DRB1*03:01 allele revealed a significant association with EFZ regimen-induced SCARs in 62.5% patients compared with only 5.56% observed in HAART-tolerant patients and 4.14% in healthy organ. HLA-B*3505was found to be significantly associated with NVP induced SCARs. We found significant novel association of HLA-DRB1*03:01 with EFZ induced SCARs in North-East Indian HIV patients. Thus, HLA-DRB*03:01 may be useful as a genetic marker to avoid EFZ induced serious cutaneous rashes. The molecular HLA characterization of these alleles may provide a novel insight into the immunological basis of the antiretroviral drug reactions.

Although Nexplanon is one of the most effective and most utilized long-acting reversible contraceptives in Ghana. We report a rare event of Nexplanon failure in a woman with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in rural Ghana.

Maternofoetal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models integrating multi-compartmental maternal and foetal units were developed using Simbiology® to estimate prenatal drug exposure. Processes governing drug disposition were described using differential equations with key system and drug-specific parameters. Transplacental drug transfer was modelled as bidirectional passive diffusion and benchmarked against those for thalidomide as a control. Model-predictions for pharmacokinetic parameters during pregnancy were within acceptable ranges for qualification (two-fold difference of clinically-observed values). Predicted foetal exposure to thalidomide was higher than efavirenz, with median (range) foetal-to-maternal plasma ratios of 4.55 (3.06-9.57) for 400 mg thalidomide versus 0.89 (0.73-1.05) for 400 mg efavirenz at third trimester. Model-predictions indicated foetal exposure consistently above 300% of maternal plasma concentration for thalidomide throughout pregnancy, while exposure to efavirenz increased from under 20% at second trimester to above 100% at third trimester. Further qualification of this approach as a tool in evaluating drug exposure and safety during pregnancy is warranted.

UNASSIGNED: Efavirenz (Sustiva®) is used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 infection. Hepatoxicity is a known potential adverse drug event with efavirenz; however, to our knowledge, vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS), a type of liver injury, has not been reported with this therapy.
UNASSIGNED: We report the case of a 48-year-old male with HIV and VBDS secondary to antiretroviral therapy. The patient was started on efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Atripla®). Four weeks later, the patient presented with complaints of poor appetite, nausea with emesis, dark urine, and malaise. Labs obtained supported the diagnosis of acute hepatitis, and a liver biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of VBDS. The Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale showed that it was probable (score of 7) that the VBDS was related to drug therapy. Efavirenz was assessed to be the most likely cause of VBDS, end-stage liver disease, and the eventual need for liver transplantation.
UNASSIGNED: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of probable efavirenz-induced VBDS in a patient living with HIV. Recognition and awareness of this adverse drug reaction by clinicians for quick diagnosis, discontinuation of therapy, and management are important in patients receiving this regimen.