UNASSIGNED: Ectopic pregnancy is a term used to describe pregnancies outside of the uterus. If ruptured, persistent trophoblastic tissue can be present at the site of an ectopic pregnancy, which is an unusual complication. In rare cases, the patients may present with primary implants.
UNASSIGNED: A 23-year-old woman who was pregnant for the first time complained of abdominal pain and was diagnosed with a 10-week tubal ectopic pregnancy. During laparotomy, trophoblastic implants were discovered in the rectum; however, the pregnancy did not rupture.
UNASSIGNED: The presented case report highlights a rare and late diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in a 23-year-old primigravida woman with no known risk factors. The patient experienced sudden abdominal pain in the tenth week of gestation, leading to the surgical approach of salpingectomy. Notably, trophoblastic tissue was found in the rectum, indicating local invasion. It was then treated with methotrexate therapy. However, the low-resource setting in Syria limited the use of laparoscopy and resulted in the use of laparotomy.
UNASSIGNED: This case emphasizes the importance of considering trophoblastic implantation in the management plan for ectopic pregnancies, even in cases in which the pregnancy has not ruptured. It is crucial to evaluate all possible complications of this disease to ensure proper treatment and care of the patient.

A cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy. Proper diagnosis and management of CSP are incredibly important secondary to the risk of uterine rupture and life-threatening hemorrhage. Various medical and surgical management have been described previously. This report looks at two cases of CSP diagnosed at an urban hospital in Atlanta, Georgia. The first woman was 30 years old with a history of five prior CS. She was referred from an abortion clinic for CSP at 6 weeks 2 days gestation. She did not desire future fertility and opted for a hysterectomy. The second woman was 38 years old with a history of three prior CS presenting with vaginal bleeding and abdominal pain and found to have a CSP with a gestation sac measuring 5 weeks 1 day. Given the patient\'s desires for future fertility, she was treated with a two-dose regimen of systemic intramuscular methotrexate (MTX) at 1 mg/kg with successful resolution of CSP and subsequent intrauterine pregnancy. Due to the high risk of uterine rupture and hemorrhage with CSP, it is important to have a high index of suspicion for diagnosis. Due to the rarity of CSP, and thus difficulty creating quality prospective trials, there is no consensus on the best management yet. Although conservative treatment carries high failure risk, shared decision-making incorporating future fertility desires should be considered when determining management of CSP, and when surgical management is considered a minimally invasive approach should be the standard of care in surgical management.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy (BTP) is a rare and potentially life-threatening condition that is, often challenging to diagnose preoperatively.
METHODS: We present a case of BTP in a 25-year-old primigravid woman with a history of infertility due to polycystic ovarian syndrome. She was receiving letrozole when she presented with severe abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding. Initial evaluation revealed a ruptured ectopic pregnancy in the right fallopian tube, prompting an emergency laparotomy. During surgery, a second intact ectopic mass was discovered in the left fallopian tube, highlighting the diagnostic complexity of BTP. Management involved a salpingectomy on the right side and salpingostomy on the left to preserve fertility.
CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of considering BTP in the differential diagnosis of ectopic pregnancies and the necessity for thorough preoperative imaging studies, namely ultrasonography and surgical exploration, to prevent missed diagnoses.
CONCLUSIONS: BTP is a rare and challenging clinical entity that requires a comprehensive approach to diagnosis and management. Early recognition, prompt intervention, and close surveillance are essential to mitigate the risk of maternal morbidity and mortality associated with this condition.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the ultrasound diagnostic features and surgical management procedures for patients with an interstitial ectopic pregnancy in our tertiary institution and associated peripheral hospital over a ten-year period.
METHODS: A retrospective audit of all surgically managed cases of interstitial pregnancies over a ten-year period at a tertiary hospital and one associated peripheral hospital in New South Wales.
RESULTS: Sixteen cases of surgically managed interstitial pregnancy were identified. In 43.8% of these cases, patients had previously undergone an ipsilateral salpingectomy. No cases required hysterectomy, post-operative methotrexate or return to theatre. Ten patients underwent diagnostic ultrasound prior to operative management, seven of which were correctly identified to be an interstitial ectopic pregnancy at the time. The proportion of cornuostomies being performed for interstitial pregnancy compared to wedge resection has increased over the period of this review from 33 to 60% between the two five-year periods.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of expert ultrasound and sophisticated laparoscopic techniques at our institution has facilitated earlier diagnosis and greater use of minimally invasive management of interstitial pregnancy.

UNASSIGNED: Abdominal pregnancy is a rare and potentially fatal variant of ectopic pregnancy, presenting unique clinical challenges. This report discusses an unusual case of abdominal pregnancy associated with uterine and high rectal perforations, complications that are rarely reported in clinical practice.
METHODS: We report a case involving a 31-year-old woman from a rural area, with a psychiatric history, presenting severe abdominal pain, vomiting, and constipation. Initial investigations revealed a hemopneumoperitoneum and a fetal skeleton in the pelvic area by CT, leading to a diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy. Surgical findings included a nonviable fetus, approximately 5 months gestational age, and perforations in both the rectum and the posterior uterine wall.
UNASSIGNED: The patient underwent extensive surgery, including placental dissection, anterior rectal resection, Hartmann\'s colostomy, hysterorrhaphy, and drainage of the peritoneal cavity. The complexity of managing abdominal pregnancy, especially with additional complications such as organ perforations, poses significant surgical challenges. This case emphasizes the need to consider abdominal pregnancy in differential diagnoses of abdominal pain in women, due to the risk of misdiagnosis and complex surgical requirements.
CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the critical importance of prompt diagnosis and comprehensive care in managing rare and life-threatening presentations of abdominal pregnancy. It underscores the need to increase awareness among clinicians for timely intervention and provides information on the complexities of surgical management in cases with additional organ perforations.

Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is the coexistence of living or dead intrauterine pregnancy, single or multiple, and extrauterine pregnancy located in the oviduct, ovary, uterine corner, cervix or peritoneal cavity. This condition is very rare (1:30 000 pregnancies). HP constitutes a rare obstetric condition. Its occurrence after natural conception is sparsely documented in the literature. Here in, we present a case of a 27-year-old primeparous women who presented at 18 weeks with features of ruptured ectopic pregnancy. Initial ultrasonographic imaging showed an intrauterine pregnancy corresponding to 18 weeks. It also revealed a floating fetus with significant collection of fluid in the pouch of Douglas, retroceacal recess and both hepatocellular recess. An emergency explorative laparotomy was done where right salpingectomy was performed. She was later followed up to term and delivered by elective cesarean section successfully. A brief narrative of the challenges in the management, clinical presentation and limitation in the management is highlighted in the present case report. Key message: Heterotopic pregnancy can occur in natural conception irrespective of usage of ovulation induction. Routine early pregnancy ultrasound can promote early detection with prompt surgical intervention to mitigate its complications.

Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is the rarest form of ectopic pregnancy. Nowadays, with the rise in caesarean deliveries, along with better awareness and improvement in ultrasound diagnosis, there is an increase in the number and detection of caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. A 28-year-old female patient with one previous caesarean delivery and a spontaneous abortion at three months visited the obstetrics emergency department due to three months of amenorrhea, abdominal pain, and vaginal bleeding on and off for two days. The patient was noticed to have severe anemia. After stabilizing the patient with blood transfusion, a laparotomy was performed with the presentation of hemoperitoneum and caesarean scar rupture. Fetus and soft vascular mass seen protruding from the previous scar were extracted. The caesarean scar site was repaired in layers.

Intrauterine device is a widely used contraceptive method. However, it may translocate to other sites within the pelvic cavity, including the intestines and the bladder. This contraceptive method has failure rate between 1 and 3 out of 100 women/year. The use of intrauterine device also slightly increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy upon its failure. The combination of intrauterine device translocation and contraceptive failure is rare. We present such a case. A 29-year-old woman (Gravida 4, Para 2) presented with a complaint of abdominal pain and presence of blood spotting over the last 7 h. She tested positive for pregnancy. Upon arrival, her vital signs were normal, but she was moderately obese with a body mass index (BMI) of 38.8 kg/m2. She displayed tenderness during abdominal examination and cervical motion tenderness. Her blood test results showed no significant abnormalities. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a translocated part of intrauterine device to the cervix and transvaginal ultrasound confirmed the presence of a hypoechoic complex structure in the left adnexa, measuring 53 mm, alongside free fluid in Morrison\'s pouch. An emergency laparotomy was performed, revealing a normal uterus and a ruptured left fallopian tube with approximately 800 cc of blood in the abdomen.

Abdominal pregnancy is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy (accounting for 1% of all ectopic pregnancies). Depending on gestational age and its location various symptoms and signs may be exhibited. This study aimed to report a case of abdominal pregnancy occurring in the Morrison Pouch with a primary presentation of right upper quadrant pain and to highlight complications that may arise in the management of abdominal pregnancy located in the Morrison Pouch. A 22-year pregnant woman at gestation of 22 weeks presented with a right upper quadrant mass and pain. Ultrasound examination revealed a live extrauterine singleton at Morrison Pouch, full blood count showed severe anemia. The patient received a blood transfusion in seven days and underwent emergency laparotomy after experiencing sudden acute internal hemorrhage but died a few hours post laparotomy due to hemorrhagic shock. Abdominal pregnancy carries a high risk of maternal hemorrhage as described in this case.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal pregnancy is an extremely rare form of ectopic gestation, and it presents with pelvic pain, severe bleeding, or remain asymptomatic. Its Risk factors include previous ectopic pregnancies, cesarean section, smoking, pelvic inflammatory disease, using intrauterine devices (IUD), and assisted reproductive techniques (ARTs). Accurate diagnosis of rectal ectopic pregnancy remains challenging due to the lack of well-established diagnostic criteria.
METHODS: A 25-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a 2-day history of unresponsive lower abdominal pain and nausea. Ultrasound imaging revealed a normal-sized uterus with endometrial thickness, fluids, and clots in the abdominal cavity, but no intrauterine gestational sac was detected. Based on the clinical presentation, ectopic pregnancy was suspected. During laparotomy, the placenta and fetal tissue remnants were found on the anterior wall of the upper third of the rectum.
CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal ectopic pregnancy is a high-risk condition that can manifest with gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, as well as abdominal and pelvic pain. These variable symptoms underscore the importance of considering rectal ectopic pregnancy as a differential diagnosis and ruling it out to prevent life-threatening complications, including severe bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to its rarity, diverse presentation, and similarity to other conditions, diagnosing rectal ectopic pregnancy and determining the appropriate management can be challenging. Physicians should be aware of this specific type of ectopic pregnancy to enable early-stage diagnosis and provide optimal care.