Early-stage

早期
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:2016年,ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO共识包括LVSI(淋巴管间隙侵犯,LVSI)状态是I期子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌(EEC)患者的危险分层因素,也是辅助治疗的适应症之一。此外,LVSI包括在2023年子宫内膜癌(EC)的新FIGO分期中。然而,中国人口在这方面的数据贡献有限。本研究旨在通过一项为期15年的回顾性中国队列研究,进一步证实LVSI对早期低度EEC预后的影响。
    方法:该回顾性分析队列包括702例接受TAH/BSO手术的EEC患者,经腹全子宫切除术,2006年至2020年北京大学人民医院双侧输卵管切除术。根据LVSI表达状态将患者分层为:LVSI阴性组和LVSI阳性组。与LVSI相关的临床结果测量,用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归模型进行评估。
    结果:分析了702例I期和1-2级的EEC患者。58例(8.3%)LVSI阳性,14例(2.0%)复发。LVSI阴性和LVSI阳性的复发率分别为1.6%和6.9%,分别。LVSI阴性和LVSI阳性的5年无病生存率(DFS)分别为98.4%和93.1%,分别。LVSI阴性的5年总体(OS)生存率为98.9%,而LVSI阳性的为94.8%。多因素分析显示LVSI是5年DFS的独立危险因素(HR=4.60,p=0.010)。LVSI对于5年OS具有相似的结果(HR=4.39,p=0.028)。
    结论:在中国队列中,LVSI是早期低级别子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌复发和预后不良的独立预测因子。
    OBJECTIVE: In 2016, the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus included LVSI (Lymph-vascular space invasion, LVSI) status as a risk stratification factor for stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients and as one of the indications for adjuvant therapy. Furthermore, LVSI is included in the new FIGO staging of endometrial cancer (EC) in 2023. However, the data contribution of the Chinese population in this regard is limited. The present study aimed to further comfirm the influence of LVSI on the prognosis of early-stage low-grade EEC in a fifteen-year retrospective Chinese cohort study.
    METHODS: This retrospective analysis cohort included 702 EEC patients who underwent TAH/BSO surgery, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingooophorectomy in Peking University People\'s Hospital from 2006 to 2020. Patients were stratified based on LVSI expression status as: LVSI negative group and LVSI positive group. Clinical outcome measures related to LVSI, assessed with a univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model.
    RESULTS: 702 EEC patients with stage I and grade 1-2 were analyzed. 58 patients (8.3%) were LVSI-positive and 14 patients (2.0%) was relapse. Recurrence rates in LVSI-negative and LVSI-positive were 1.6% and 6.9%, respectively. 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate in LVSI-negative and LVSI-positive were 98.4% and 93.1%, respectively. These rates for 5-year overall (OS) survival in LVSI-negative were 98.9% while it was 94.8% in LVSI-positive. Multivariate analysis showed that LVSI is an independent risk factor for 5-year DFS (HR = 4.60, p = 0.010). LVSI has a similar result for 5-year OS(HR = 4.39, p = 0.028).
    CONCLUSIONS: LVSI is an independent predictor of relapse and poor prognosis in early-stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer in the Chinese cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管局部前列腺癌(LPC)和局部晚期前列腺癌(LAPC)的患病率很高,关于患者特征的证据,按疾病风险分层的治疗和临床结局有限.进行了PEarlC研究,以表征包括真实世界临床结果的早期前列腺癌患者队列。分析了2015年至2017年间诊断为LPC/LAPC的患者队列的回顾性数据,并在葡萄牙综合癌症中心(IPOPorto)随访至2020年12月。根据欧洲泌尿外科协会指南,患者被分类为LPC(高危或非高危)或LAPC。如果在I-III期诊断并在泌尿科随访,首次公开募股波尔图的内科肿瘤科或放射肿瘤科门诊。从医疗/管理记录数据库收集数据。临床结果包括前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)无进展生存期,无转移生存率,无病生存,无进展生存期,总生存期(OS),PSA反应(姑息性)和没有残留肿瘤的证据(前列腺切除术)。使用对数秩检验比较亚组之间的事件发生时间结果。共纳入790例患者(54.8%非高危LPC,30.9%高风险LPC,14.3%LAPC),中位随访时间为46.7个月。患者的中位年龄为68.0岁。大多数患者为II期(52.9%)和东部合作肿瘤学组0-1(99.9%),并接受治愈性治疗(85.4%)。中位数仅在无进展生存期(29.9个月;95%CI,26.5-41.0个月)中实现,在姑息患者中评估。在第5年,82.9%没有PSA进展(治愈),87.5%无转移,83.7%为无病,所有接受姑息治疗的患者均进展,5年OS率为92.9%(CI95%,90.2-95.7%)。在LPC患者中,操作系统在高风险和非高危患者(5年OS率,88.8%vs.96.8%;危险比=3.34,CI95%,1.64-7.05;P=0.001)。在姑息治疗中,PSA反应率为81.4%。在接受前列腺切除术的61.6%的患者中,没有残留肿瘤的证据。尽管大多数在IPO波尔图接受治疗的早期前列腺癌患者显示出积极的5年真实世界结果,与非高危LPC患者相比,高危LPC患者的OS更差,因此预后更差.目前的大样本真实世界研究是减少前列腺癌证据差距的重要贡献。
    Despite the high prevalence of localised prostate cancer (LPC) and locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC), evidence on the characteristics of patients, treatments and clinical outcomes stratified by disease risk is limited. The PEarlC study was conducted to characterise a cohort of patients with early-stage prostate cancer that included real-world clinical outcomes. Retrospective data from a cohort of patients diagnosed with LPC/LAPC between 2015 and 2017 and followed up until December 2020 at a Portuguese comprehensive cancer centre (IPO Porto) was analysed. Patients were classified as LPC (high- or non-high-risk) or LAPC according to European Association of Urology guidelines, were eligible if diagnosed at stage I-III and followed up in Urology, Medical Oncology or Radiation Oncology outpatient clinics of IPO Porto. Data was collected from the medical/administrative records database. Clinical outcomes included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), PSA response (palliative) and no evidence of residual tumour (prostatectomy). Time-to-event outcomes were compared between subgroups using the log-rank test. A total of 790 patients were included (54.8% non-high-risk LPC, 30.9% high-risk LPC, 14.3% LAPC) and the median follow-up was 46.7 months. Patients had a median age of 68.0 years. The majority of patients were stage II (52.9%) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-1 (99.9%) and received treatment with curative intent (85.4%). The median was only achieved in progression-free survival (29.9 months; 95% CI, 26.5-41.0 months), as evaluated in palliative patients. At year 5, 82.9% were free of PSA progression (curative), 87.5% were metastasis-free, 83.7% were disease-free, all patients in palliative treatment progressed and the 5-year OS rate was 92.9% (CI 95%, 90.2-95.7%). Among patients with LPC, OS was worse in high-risk vs. non-high-risk patients (5-year OS rate, 88.8% vs. 96.8%; hazard ratio=3.34, CI 95%, 1.64-7.05; P=0.001). PSA response rate was 81.4% in the palliative setting. There was no evidence of residual tumour in 61.6% of patients who underwent prostatectomy. Although most patients with early-stage prostate cancer treated at IPO Porto showed positive 5-year real-world outcomes, patients with high-risk LPC showed worse OS compared with patients with non-high-risk LPC and therefore a poorer prognosis. The present large-sample real-world study is an important contribution to reducing the evidence gap on prostate cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期痴呆(PwESD)患者面临的一个心理社会问题是对个人尊严的威胁。深入了解其动态对于了解痴呆症如何随着痴呆症的发展而变化并制定适当的干预措施非常重要。然而,缺乏对PwESD这种变化的纵向研究。
    目的:确定在家庭居住的PwESD中,对尊严的看法和选定的临床和社会因素在1年内如何变化,以及与对尊严的看法在1年内变化相关的预测因素。
    方法:进行纵向研究。样本包括258个家庭居住的捷克PwESD。使用患者尊严量表(PDI-CZ)收集数据,迷你精神状态检查,布里斯托尔日常生活活动量表,老年抑郁量表和与社会参与相关的项目。PwESD在基线和1年后完成问卷调查。
    方法:本研究得到伦理委员会的批准,参与者提供知情同意。
    结果:患有早期痴呆症的人将对尊严的威胁评为轻度,并且在1年后等级没有显着变化。认知功能,自给自足,愿景,听力恶化,更多的PwESD在1年后与他人一起生活,而不是与伴侣一起生活。抑郁症恶化是1年后个人尊严改变的唯一预测因素,整体和每个PDI-CZ域。自给自足和疼痛的预测因子仅影响某些PDI-CZ域。
    结论:在PwESD中,1年后对尊严受到威胁的感知是轻微的,尽管恶化的临床因素代表了对尊严的潜在威胁。我们的发现使我们假设,对个人尊严的感知威胁并不直接受到健康状况的影响,而是社会背景。
    BACKGROUND: A psychosocial problem faced by people with early-stage dementia (PwESD) is the perception of threats to personal dignity. Insights into its dynamics are important for understanding how it changes as dementia advances and to develop suitable interventions. However, longitudinal studies on this change in PwESD are lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine how perceptions of dignity and selected clinical and social factors change over 1 year in home-dwelling PwESD and the predictors associated with changes in perceptions of dignity over 1 year.
    METHODS: A longitudinal study was conducted. The sample included 258 home-dwelling Czech PwESD. Data were collected using the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI-CZ), Mini-Mental State Examination, Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale and items related to social involvement. Questionnaires were completed by the PwESD at baseline and after 1 year.
    METHODS: The study was approved by the ethics committee and informed consent was provided by the participants.
    RESULTS: People with Early-Stage Dementia rated the threat to dignity as mild and the ratings did not change significantly after 1 year. Cognitive function, self-sufficiency, vision, and hearing worsened, and more PwESD lived with others rather than with a partner after 1 year. Worsened depression was the only predictor of change in perceived personal dignity after 1 year, both overall and in each of the PDI-CZ domains. Predictors of self-sufficiency and pain affected only some PDI-CZ domains.
    CONCLUSIONS: Perceptions of threat to dignity were mild in PwESD after 1 year, although worsened clinical factors represented a potential threat to dignity. Our findings lead us to hypothesise that perceived threats to personal dignity are not directly influenced by health condition, but rather by the social context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)由于经常发生侵袭性乳腺癌,异源性,和转移性肿瘤。传统疗法缺乏治疗靶标是建立TNBC标准化疗法的障碍。关于波兰TNBC治疗方案的TNBC流行病学和真实世界数据有限。我们回顾性分析了2015年和2020年我们医院注册的临床数据。共有8103例乳腺癌患者被纳入MSCI,而856例(10.6%)被诊断为TNBC。大多数早期或局部晚期TNBC个体都有潜在的疾病,主要表现为低分化(G3)II期肿瘤,并具有双模态年龄分布。平均而言,所有受检TNBC中有三分之一携带BRCA突变,其鉴定影响手术偏好.我们观察到TNBC中全身治疗的使用显着增加,而卡铂和剂量密集方案在新辅助治疗中表现出最突出的高潮.此外,新佐剂的使用与侵入性较小的乳腺和淋巴结手术呈正相关。提供的数据与其他国家观察到的总体趋势一致,将有助于扩大治疗方案及其结果规划方面的知识。
    Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses a serious therapeutic challenge due to the occurrence of frequently aggressive, heterogenic, and metastatic tumours. The absence of therapeutic targets for traditional therapies is a hindrance to establishing a standardised therapy for TNBC. There is limited TNBCs epidemiological and real-world data about TNBC treatment regimens in Poland. We retrospectively analysed clinical data from our hospital registry from 2015 and 2020. A total of 8103 individuals with breast cancer were admitted to the MSCI, while 856 (10.6%) were diagnosed with TNBC. Most of the early-stage or locally advanced TNBC individuals had underlying conditions, presented mostly poorly differentiated (G3) stage II tumours and featured a bi-modal age distribution. On average, one-third of all tested TNBCs carried BRCA mutations and its identification impacted surgery preference. We observed a significant increase in the use of systemic therapy among TNBCs, whereas carboplatin and dose-dense regimens showed the most prominent upsurge in the neoadjuvant setting. Moreover, the use of neoadjuvants was positively correlated with less invasive breast and lymph node surgeries. The presented data align with general trends observed in other countries and will contribute to expanding knowledge in the planning of treatment regimens and their outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    背景:STK11/LKB1突变与PD-1轴抑制剂的原发性耐药和晚期KRAS突变型肺腺癌的不良预后相关。本研究旨在评估STK11/LKB1改变在局部非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(非sNSCLC)中的预后意义。
    方法:IIa期完全切除患者的手术样本,IIb,对随机辅助II期试验(NCT00775385IFCT-1801TASTE试验)中的IIIa(N2除外)非sqNSCLC进行了检查.患者接受标准化疗(培美曲塞顺铂)或基于EGFR突变(厄洛替尼)和ERCC1表达的个性化治疗。使用靶向NGS分析肿瘤分子谱,并与总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)相关。调整相关临床变量。此外,治疗组之间的相互作用和OS上的分子改变,PD-L1表达,术后血浆样本中的肿瘤循环DNA进行了评估。
    结果:在134名患者(主要是男性吸烟者患有腺癌)中,KRAS突变与较短的DFS(HR:1.95,95%CI:1.1-3.4,p=0.02)和OS(HR:2.32,95%CI:1.2-4.6,p=0.014)相关。分离的STK11/LKB1突变(n=18)没有显著影响DFS或OS。然而,在KRAS突变的样品中(n=53),同时发生STK11/LKB1突变的患者(n=10)的DFS显著缩短(HR:3.85,CI:1.5~10.2,p=0.006),OS有缩短的趋势(HR:1.80,CI:0.6~5.3,p=0.28).PD-L1表达之间没有发现关联,其他基因突变,无进展生存期(PFS),或操作系统。
    结论:该分析加强了KRAS突变作为局部非sNSCLC复发和生存不良的预测因素。此外,同时存在的STK11/LKB1突变加重了KRAS突变亚组的预后.这些发现强调了这些分子标志物的临床相关性及其对非sqNSCLC治疗策略的潜在影响。
    STK11/LKB1 mutations have been associated with primary resistance to PD-1 axis inhibitors and poor prognosis in advanced KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of STK11/LKB1 alterations in localized non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (non-sq NSCLC).
    Surgical samples from patients undergoing complete resection for stage IIa, IIb, or IIIa (N2 excluded) non-sq NSCLC in the randomized adjuvant phase II trial (NCT00775385 IFCT-1801 TASTE trial) were examined. Patients received either standard chemotherapy (Pemetrexed Cisplatin) or personalized treatment based on EGFR mutation (Erlotinib) and ERCC1 expression. Tumor molecular profiles were analyzed using targeted NGS and correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), adjusting for relevant clinical variables. Additionally, interactions between treatment groups and molecular alterations on OS, PD-L1 expression, and tumor-circulating DNA in post-operative plasma samples were evaluated.
    Among 134 patients (predominantly male smokers with adenocarcinoma), KRAS mutations were associated with shorter DFS (HR: 1.95, 95 % CI: 1.1-3.4, p = 0.02) and OS (HR: 2.32, 95 % CI: 1.2-4.6, p = 0.014). Isolated STK11/LKB1 mutations (n = 18) did not significantly impact DFS or OS. However, within KRAS-mutated samples (n = 53), patients with concurrent STK11/LKB1 mutations (n = 10) exhibited significantly shorter DFS (HR: 3.85, CI: 1.5-10.2, p = 0.006) and a trend towards shorter OS (HR: 1.80, CI: 0.6-5.3, p = 0.28). No associations were found between PD-L1 expression, other gene mutations, progression-free survival (PFS), or OS.
    This analysis reinforces KRAS mutations as predictive factors for relapse and poor survival in localized non-sq NSCLC. Furthermore, the presence of concomitant STK11/LKB1 mutations exacerbated the prognosis within the KRAS-mutated subset. These findings emphasize the clinical relevance of these molecular markers and their potential impact on treatment strategies in non-sq NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    淋巴结清扫术是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)完整外科手术的重要组成部分。这次回顾,多中心队列研究旨在确定影响淋巴结清扫质量的因素。数据来自波兰肺癌研究组数据库。主要终点是肺叶特异性纵隔淋巴结清扫术(L-SMLND)。该研究包括4271例接受VATS肺叶切除术治疗IA期非小细胞肺癌的患者,在2007年至2022年之间运营。在1190例患者中进行了L-SMLND(27.9%)。其余3081例患者(72.1%)不符合L-SMLND标准。多因素logistic回归分析显示,PET-CT患者(OR3.238,95%CI:2.315~4.529;p<0.001),与较大的肿瘤(pT1a与pT1bvs.pT1c)(OR1.292;95%CI:1.009至1.653;p=0.042),由经验丰富的外科医生进行手术的患者(OR1.959,95%CI:1.432至2.679;p<0.001)接受L-SMLND的可能性更高。随着时间的推移,淋巴结清扫质量下降(OR0.647,95%CI:0.474至0.884;p=0.006)。对倾向匹配组的分析表明,更广泛的淋巴结清扫与住院死亡率无关。并发症发生率,和住院时间。需要采取行动来提高非小细胞肺癌淋巴结清扫术的质量。
    Lymphadenectomy is an essential part of complete surgical operation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to identify factors that influence the lymphadenectomy quality. Data were obtained from the Polish Lung Cancer Study Group Database. The primary endpoint was lobe-specific mediastinal lymph node dissection (L-SMLND). The study included 4271 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC, operated between 2007 and 2022. L-SMLND was performed in 1190 patients (27.9%). The remaining 3081 patients (72.1%) did not meet the L-SMLND criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients with PET-CT (OR 3.238, 95% CI: 2.315 to 4.529; p < 0.001), with larger tumors (pT1a vs. pT1b vs. pT1c) (OR 1.292; 95% CI: 1.009 to 1.653; p = 0.042), and those operated on by experienced surgeons (OR 1.959, 95% CI: 1.432 to 2.679; p < 0.001) had a higher probability of undergoing L-SMLND. The quality of lymphadenectomy decreased over time (OR 0.647, 95% CI: 0.474 to 0.884; p = 0.006). An analysis of propensity-matched groups showed that more extensive lymph node dissection was not related to in-hospital mortality, complication rates, and hospitalization duration. Actions are needed to improve the quality of lymphadenectomy for NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase III
    目的:探讨化疗前和化疗前CA-125在高危早期上皮性卵巢癌患者中的临床意义。
    方法:所有IA/IB期和3级IC期患者,透明细胞,或完全切除的II期癌症纳入一项III期试验,并接受化疗.采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型进行统计分析。
    结果:纳入427例高风险早期卵巢癌患者。213例术前CA-125数据,79%的患者CA-125升高。术前CA-125水平中位数为103U/mL。≤10、11-15和>15cm肿瘤的患者术前CA-125水平中位数为62、131和158U/mL,分别(p=0.002)。对于具有化疗前CA-125水平数据的350名患者,69%的患者化疗前CA-125升高到35U/mL以上,中位值为65U/mL。然而,年龄,种族,舞台,手术前后的细胞类型和疾病分级与CA-125水平无关。在多变量分析中,化疗前CA-125升高独立地预测了更差的无复发生存率(HR=2.13,95%CI:1.23-3.69;p=0.007)和总生存率(HR=1.99,95%CI:1.10-3.59;p=0.022)。舞台,细胞类型和疾病等级。与CA-125正常的患者相比,化疗前CA-125升高的患者的无复发生存率较低(RFS,87%vs.75%;p=0.007)和总生存率(OS,88%vs.82%;p=0.02)。然而,术前CA-125与RFS(p=0.699)或OS(p=0.701)无关.
    结论:术前CA-125在近80%的高危早期卵巢癌患者中升高。化疗前CA-125与无复发生存率和总生存率相关;术前CA-125对预后无影响.
    To determine clinical significance of preoperative and pre-chemotherapy CA-125 in high-risk early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer patients.
    All patients with stage IA/IB and grade 3, stage IC, clear cell, or completed resected stage II cancer were enrolled in a phase III trial and treated with chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for statistical analyses.
    427 patients with high-risk early-stage ovarian cancer were enrolled. Of 213 patients with preoperative CA-125 data, 79% had elevated CA-125. Median preoperative CA-125 level was 103 U/mL. Patients with ≤10, 11-15, and > 15 cm tumors had median preoperative CA-125 levels of 62, 131 and 158 U/mL, respectively (p = 0.002). For the 350 patients with data for pre-chemotherapy CA-125 level, 69% had elevated pre-chemotherapy CA-125 above 35 U/mL with median value of 65 U/mL. However, age, race, stage, cell type and grade of disease were not correlated with CA-125 levels before and after surgery. On multivariate analysis, elevated pre-chemotherapy CA-125 independently predicted worse recurrence-free survival (HR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.23-3.69; p = 0.007) and overall survival (HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.10-3.59; p = 0.022) after adjusting for age, stage, cell type and grade of disease. Compared to those with normal CA-125, patients with elevated pre-chemotherapy CA-125 had lower recurrence-free survival (RFS, 87% vs. 75%; p = 0.007) and overall survival (OS, 88% vs. 82%; p = 0.02). However, preoperative CA-125 was not prognostic of RFS (p = 0.699) or OS (p = 0.701).
    Preoperative CA-125 was elevated in nearly 80% of high-risk early-stage ovarian cancer patients. Pre-chemotherapy CA-125 was associated with recurrence-free and overall survival; however, preoperative CA-125 was not prognostic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,抗PD-1抗体在复发性和难治性(R/R)经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)中显示出惊人的效果。然而,评估抗PD-1抗体单一疗法在早期cHL中的作用的实际数据仍然有限.在这个回顾性分析中,我们报道了tisleizumab单药在早期cHL一线治疗中的有效性和安全性.包括23例先前未经治疗的IA-IIBcHL连续患者(10例男性和13例女性)。在2剂tislelizumab单药治疗后的中期评估,23例患者中有11例(47.8%)达到完全缓解(CR)。在tislelizumab单一疗法(EOTM)结束时,23例患者中有22例(95.7%)观察到客观反应,16例患者CR(69.6%)。在6例PR-EOTM患者中,2例患者接受了4个周期的ABVD化疗,1例患者接受了4个周期的tislelizumab联合AVD化疗.一名在4剂tislelizumab后发展为进行性疾病(PD)的患者随后接受了4个周期的ABVD化疗。除4例CR-EOTM患者外,19例患者接受了巩固性放疗。所有患者在所有治疗结束时获得CR。中位随访时间为21.3个月(范围,6.9-32.7个月),估计2年PFS率和2年OS率分别为95.65%和100%,分别。除3级淋巴细胞计数下降外,未观察到其他3/4级TRAE。此外,没有严重的AE报告。我们的初步数据观察到tislelizumab单药治疗在先前未治疗的早期cHL中是安全且高度有效的。
    The anti-PD-1 antibodies have been reported to show a striking effect in relapsed and refractory(R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), however, there is still limited real-world data assessing the role of anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy in early-stage cHL. In this retrospective analysis, we reported the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab monotherapy in the first-line therapy of early-stage cHL. Twenty-three consecutive patients (10 males and 13 females) with previously untreated stage I A-II B cHL were included. At interim evaluation after 2 doses of tislelizumab monotherapy, 11 of 23 patients (47.8%) achieved complete response (CR). At the end of tislelizumab monotherapy (EOTM), objective response was observed in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%), with CR in 16 patients (69.6%). Among six patients with PR-EOTM, two patients underwent 4 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy and one patient underwent 4 cycles of tislelizumab plus AVD. One patient who developed progressive disease (PD) after 4 doses of tislelizumab subsequently underwent 4 cycles of ABVD chemotherapy. Except for four patients with CR-EOTM, consolidative radiotherapy was given to 19 patients. All patients obtained CR at the end of all treatments. With a median follow-up time of 21.3 months (range, 6.9-32.7 months), the estimated 2-year PFS rate and 2-year OS rate were 95.65% and 100%, respectively. Except for grade 3 lymphocyte count decreased, no other grade 3/4 TRAE was observed. In addition, no serious AE was reported. Our preliminary data observed that tislelizumab monotherapy was safe and highly effective in previously untreated early-stage cHL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase II
    背景:奥希替尼是一种中枢神经系统(CNS)活性药物,第三代,不可逆转的,表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI),有效和选择性地抑制EGFR-TKI致敏和EGFRT790M耐药突变,在EGFR突变(EGFRm)的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中具有明显的疗效。我们介绍了TARGET(NCT05526755)的基本原理和设计,这将评估5年的奥希替尼辅助治疗在完全切除的II期EGFRm至IIIBNSCLC患者中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:目标是第二阶段,跨国公司,开放标签,单臂研究。成年人年龄≥18岁(台湾≥20岁),切除的II期至IIIB期非小细胞肺癌符合资格;允许进行辅助化疗。符合条件的患者必须有局部证实的常见(外显子19缺失或L858R)或不常见(G719X,L861Q,和/或S768I)EGFR-TKI致敏突变,单独或组合。患者将接受奥希替尼80mg,每天一次,持续5年或直至疾病复发,停止或死亡。主要终点是研究人员评估的5年无病生存期(DFS)(常见EGFR突变队列)。次要终点包括:研究者评估的3年和4年的DFS;3年、4年和5年的总生存期(常见EGFR突变队列);3年、4年和5年的DFS(不常见EGFR突变队列);安全性和耐受性,复发类型和中枢神经系统转移(两个队列)。探索性终点包括:组织/血浆一致性;使用不同的谱分析方法分析血浆样品中的循环分子以检测微小残留病;偶然肺结节的发生率和随时间的变化。
    结果:TARGET目前正在招募,预计2029年完工。
    Osimertinib is a central nervous system (CNS)-active, third generation, irreversible, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations, with demonstrated efficacy in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present the rationale and design for TARGET (NCT05526755), which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5 years of adjuvant osimertinib in patients with completely resected EGFRm stage II to IIIB NSCLC.
    TARGET is a phase II, multinational, open-label, single-arm study. Adults aged ≥18 years (Taiwan ≥20 years), with resected stage II to IIIB NSCLC are eligible; prior adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed. Eligible patients must have locally confirmed common (exon 19 deletion or L858R) or uncommon (G719X, L861Q, and/or S768I) EGFR-TKI sensitizing mutations, alone or in combination. Patients will receive osimertinib 80 mg once daily for 5 years or until disease recurrence, discontinuation or death. The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort). Secondary endpoints include: investigator-assessed DFS at 3 and 4 years; overall survival at 3, 4, and 5 years (common EGFR mutations cohort); DFS at 3, 4, and 5 years (uncommon EGFR mutations cohort); safety and tolerability, type of recurrence and CNS metastases (both cohorts). Exploratory endpoints include: tissue/plasma concordance; analysis of circulating molecules in plasma samples using different profiling approaches to detect minimal residual disease; incidence and change over time of incidental pulmonary nodules.
    TARGET is currently recruiting, and completion is expected in 2029.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号