Durvalumab consolidation

Durvalumab 巩固
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:放化疗(CRT)后Durvalumab巩固是局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方法。然而,预测无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的免疫学和营养标志物研究不足.全身性炎症会导致癌症恶病质,并对免疫治疗效果产生负面影响。这也反映了生存结果。
    方法:我们回顾性调查了来自日本7个研究所的126例患者。
    结果:修改后的格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)值,在CRT之前和之后,是评价指标中的基本预测因子。通过结合CRT之前的mGPS值来创建基于全身炎症的预后风险分类,CRT后C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,区分肿瘤源性炎症和CRT诱导的炎症。患者分为高风险组(n=31)和低风险组(n=95)。与低危组相比,高危组的中位PFS为7.2个月,OS为19.6个月.PFS和OS的风险比为2.47(95%置信区间[CI]:1.46-4.19,p<0.001)和3.62(95%CI:1.79-7.33,p<0.001),分别。在程序性细胞死亡配体1表达≥50%的亚组中也观察到这种关联。但在<50%亚组中没有。此外,高危组的durvalumab停药频率高于低危组.
    结论:结合局部晚期NSCLC患者CRT前mGPS值和CRT后CRP水平,有助于预测CRT后durvalumab巩固的PFS和OS。
    BACKGROUND: Durvalumab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies on immunological and nutritional markers to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are inadequate. Systemic inflammation causes cancer cachexia and negatively affects immunotherapy efficacy, which also reflects survival outcomes.
    METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 126 patients from seven institutes in Japan.
    RESULTS: The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) values, before and after CRT, were the essential predictors among the evaluated indices. A systemic inflammation-based prognostic risk classification was created by combining mGPS values before CRT, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels after CRT, to distinguish tumor-derived inflammation from CRT-induced inflammation. Patients were classified into high-risk (n = 31) and low-risk (n = 95) groups, and the high-risk group had a significantly shorter median PFS of 7.2 months and an OS of 19.6 months compared with the low-risk group. The hazard ratios for PFS and OS were 2.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.46-4.19, p < 0.001) and 3.62 (95% CI: 1.79-7.33, p < 0.001), respectively. This association was also observed in the subgroup with programmed cell death ligand 1 expression of ≥50%, but not in the <50% subgroup. Furthermore, durvalumab discontinuation was observed more frequently in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combining pre-CRT mGPS values with post-CRT CRP levels in patients with locally advanced NSCLC helps to predict the PFS and OS of durvalumab consolidation after CRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:目前,调强放疗(IMRT)比三维适形放疗更常用于明确的胸部放疗。我们检查了durvalumab临床可用后同步放化疗(CCRT)和IMRT的疗效。
    UNASSIGNED:我们回顾了日本七个中心接受CCRT和IMRT治疗的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的临床记录,并调查了2018年5月至2019年12月的复发和生存率。该报告的主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。
    未经证实:在参与研究的107名患者中,87例患者依次服用durvalumab。从CCRT开始,患者的中位随访时间为29.7个月.CCRT结束时的中位PFS为20.7个月。在87名患者中,58次经历疾病复发,其中36例(62.1%)有远处转移。多因素Cox回归分析显示,对CCRT的反应良好,辐射剂量≥62Gy,和IIIA期NSCLC与延长的PFS相关(所有P=0.04)。多因素logistic回归分析显示死亡危险因素为durvalumab治疗时间≤11.7个月,免疫相关不良事件的最高等级较低,FEV1<2805mL,和辐射剂量<62Gy(分别为P=0.01、0.01、0.03和0.04)。
    未经批准:在接受使用IMRT的CCRT的NSCLC患者中,长PFS与更好的CCRT反应相关,IIIA期NSCLC,和增加的辐射剂量。durvalumab巩固的持续时间在接受CCRT和IMRT的患者的生存中也起着重要作用。(250字)
    UNASSIGNED: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is currently used more commonly than 3-dimensional conformal radiation for definitive thoracic radiation. We examined the efficacy profiles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with IMRT after durvalumab became clinically available.
    UNASSIGNED: We reviewed the clinical records of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with CCRT and IMRT at seven centers in Japan and investigated relapse and survival from May 2018 to December 2019. The primary endpoint of this report was progression-free survival (PFS).
    UNASSIGNED: Among 107 patients enrolled in the study, 87 were sequentially administered durvalumab. From CCRT commencement, patients were followed up for a median period of 29.7 months. The median PFS at the end of the CCRT was 20.7 months. Among the 87 patients, 58 experienced disease relapses, of whom 36 (62.1 %) had distant metastases. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a favorable response to CCRT, a radiation dose ≥ 62 Gy, and stage IIIA NSCLC were associated with prolonged PFS (all P = 0.04). Multivariate logistic regression by landmark analysis revealed that mortality risk factors were durvalumab treatment duration ≤ 11.7 months, a lower maximum grade of immune-related adverse events, FEV1 < 2805 mL, and radiation dose < 62 Gy (P = 0.01, 0.01, 0.03, and 0.04, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with NSCLC receiving CCRT using IMRT, long PFS was associated with a better response to CCRT, stage IIIA NSCLC, and an increased radiation dose. The duration of durvalumab consolidation also played an essential role in the survival of patients receiving CCRT with IMRT. (250 words).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号