BACKGROUND: Anticancer agents are responsible for a majority of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in cancer patients. ADR reporting with anticancer drugs is very rare in India due to the lack of awareness and knowledge about the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India. Hence, this study was done to assess the pattern of ADRs with anticancer agents in cancer patients and to increase awareness about ADR monitoring among healthcare professionals.
METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective and non-interventional study conducted in an ADR monitoring centre (AMC) in Govt. Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot, Punjab, North India. Voluntarily reported ADR forms with anticancer drugs as suspected drugs over a period of seven years from January 2016 to December 2022 were analyzed. Various parameters were analyzed, which include demographic details of the patients, type of ADR, department reporting ADR and suspected drug. Causality assessment, severity assessment and preventability assessment were done according to the World Health Organization Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale, modified Hartwig and Siegel scale and modified Schumock and Thornton scale, respectively.
RESULTS: The maximum numbers of ADRs were reported in the age group of 41-60 years (68.29%) and in females (59.75%). The maximum number of ADRs was reported with the use of taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel) (24.39%), targeted drugs (geftinib, imatinib, bortezomib, bevacizumab, rituximab and pazopanib) (24.39%) and platinum co-ordination complexes (cisplatin, oxaliplatin and carboplatin) (17.07%). Majority of the ADRs reported were shivering and ADRs on the skin. Majority of the ADRs were probable (64.70%), mild in nature (85.29%), definitely preventable (45.58%) and probably preventable (45.58%).
CONCLUSIONS: ADR monitoring is needed to increase the outcome of anticancer drug treatment in cancer patients. The quality of treatment in cancer patients can be improved through the timely management of these ADRs. It is a need of the present era to inform healthcare professionals about the Pharmacovigilance Programme to increase the reporting of ADRs due to anticancer drugs.

Introduction Multiple risk factors, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and immunosuppressive therapies, increase the odds of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) reactivation and progression to active tuberculosis. A six-to-nine-month preventive treatment with isoniazid (INH) decreases the risk of LTBI reactivation, but its effectiveness can be limited by its long duration and adverse events (AEs), including liver toxicity. Due to comorbidities and polypharmacy, people living with HIV (PLHIV) may be at increased risk of INH-associated AEs. Our study aimed to assess the prevalence of AEs among patients receiving INH treatment for LTBI, to identify risk factors for their occurrence, and to evaluate whether PLHIV have higher odds of developing INH-associated AEs. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective case-control study, including 130 outpatients with LTBI treated with INH between July 2019 and March 2022. Participants who developed AE (cases) were compared to controls, and a subgroup of PLHIV was compared to HIV-negative participants. Demographics, socioeconomic variables, comorbidities, and clinical variables were compared between study groups. Patient data were obtained from institutional electronic medical records, and outcomes were measured at regularly scheduled appointments. Results We included 130 participants, of which 54 were PLHIV. The PLHIV subgroup was significantly younger (p = 0.01) and demonstrated significantly higher prevalences of chronic liver disease, previous viral hepatitis, daily alcohol consumption, and intravenous drug use (IDU). One-third of the participants had an AE (45 cases, 34.6%), with liver toxicity being the most common (22.3%). Participants who developed AEs were significantly older (p = 0.030) and had a higher prevalence of economic hardship (p = 0.037), as well as higher scores of the Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.002) than the controls. INH withdrawal occurred in 17 participants (13.1%) and was mainly associated with liver toxicity (p < 0.01) and gastrointestinal symptoms (p = 0.022). In the adjusted effect model, an age ≥ 65 years, economic hardship, and excessive alcohol consumption were significantly associated with higher odds of AEs, while HIV infection decreased the odds by 68.4% (p = 0.033). Conclusions In our study, INH-associated AEs were common, with liver toxicity being the most frequent. Older age, economic hardship, and excessive alcohol consumption increased the odds of INH-associated AEs, while PLHIV had lower odds of developing INH-associated AEs, even when adjusting for other variables in the multivariate analysis. Further studies should be conducted to assess if these results are replicable in a larger population and in different settings.

TAS-102 is effective for treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study determined whether combining bevacizumab (Bmab) with TAS-102 improves clinical outcomes in refractory mCRC.
We retrospectively analyzed data from Japanese patients with refractory mCRC who received TAS-102 (35 mg/m2 , twice a day) with (T-B group) or without Bmab (TAS-102 monotherapy; T group) between July 2014 and December 2018. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were median time to treatment failure, overall response rate, and the incidence of adverse events. Clinical outcomes were compared using propensity score matched analysis.
Data from 57 patients were analyzed (T-B group: 21 patients, T group: 36 patients). Median OS was significantly longer in the T-B group than the T group (14.4 months vs. 4.5 months, p < .001). Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that combination therapy with Bmab was significantly correlated with OS. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed that the median OS was significantly longer in the T-B group than the T group (14.4 months vs. 6.1 months, p = .006) and that there was a significant correlation between Bmab and OS. The incidence of hypertension (grade ≥2) as an adverse event was significantly higher in the T-B group than the T group (23.8% vs. 0.0%, p = .005), whereas other adverse events were comparable between the two groups.
Treatment with Bmab in combination with TAS-102 is significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC refractory to standard therapies.
Combining bevacizumab (Bmab) with TAS-102 significantly improved overall survival and several prognostic indicators in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies, with manageable toxicities. Treatment with Bmab in combination with TAS-102 is significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC.

Objective: We sought to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and patterns of use for the once-daily oral, narrow-spectrum antibiotic sarecycline in patients with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris during a 40-week Phase III, multicenter, open-label extension study. Participants: Patients aged nine years or older with moderate-to-severe acne who completed one of two prior Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trials in which they received sarecycline 1.5mg/kg/day or placebo were included. Measurements: The primary assessment was the safety of sarecycline 1.5mg/kg/day for 40 weeks as indicated by adverse events (AEs), vital signs, electrocardiograms, clinical laboratory tests, and physical examinations. Patterns of sarecycline use were a secondary assessment. Results: The safety population included 483 patients; 354 patients (73.3%) completed the study. The most common reasons for premature discontinuation were withdrawal by the patient (14.5%), lost to follow-up (7.9%), and AEs (2.5%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were nasopharyngitis (3.7%), upper-respiratory-tract infection (3.3%), headache (2.9%), and nausea (2.1%). Clinical laboratory evaluations suggested no clinically meaningful differences between the treatment sequences. Rates of TEAEs commonly associated with other tetracycline antibiotics include dizziness (0.4%) and sunburn (0.2%), and for gastrointestinal TEAEs, nausea (2.1%), vomiting (1.9%), and diarrhea (1.0%). Also reported herein are the results of a Phase I phototoxicity study. Conclusion: Patients aged nine years or older with moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris who received sarecycline once daily for up to 40 weeks showed low rates of TEAEs, with nasopharyngitis, upper-respiratory-tract infection, headache, and nausea being the only TEAEs reported by 2% or more of patients. No clinically meaningful safety findings were noted. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT02413346.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of low-dose ketamine versus ketorolac in pain control in patients with acute renal colic presenting to the emergency department (ED).
METHODS: This is a double-blind randomized clinical trial. The initial pain severity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Then, ketamine or ketorolac was administered intravenously at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg and 30 mg respectively. The pain severity and adverse drug reactions were recorded 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min thereafter.
RESULTS: The data of 62 subjects in the ketamine group and 64 patients in the ketorolac group were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 34.2 ± 9.9 and 37.9 ± 10.6 years in the ketamine and ketorolac group, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean NRS scores at each time point, except for the 5 min, between the two groups. Despite a marked decrease in pain severity in the ketamine group from drug administration at the 5 min, a slight increase in pain was observed from the 5 min to the 15 min. The rate of adverse drug reactions, including dizziness (P = 0.001), agitation (P = 0.002), increased systolic blood pressure (> 140 mmHg), and diastolic blood pressure (> 90 mmHg) was higher in the ketamine group.
CONCLUSIONS: Low dose ketamine is as effective as ketorolac in pain management in patients with renal colic presenting to the ED. However, it is associated with a higher rate of adverse drug reactions.