Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models were utilized to investigate potential interactions between aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and efavirenz (EFV), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor drug and inducer of several CYP enzymes, including CYP3A4. PBPK simulations were conducted in a North European Caucasian and Black South African population, considering different dosing scenarios. The simulations predicted the impact of EFV on AFB1 metabolism via CYP3A4 and CYP1A2. In vitro experiments using human liver microsomes (HLM) were performed to verify the PBPK predictions for both single- and multiple-dose exposures to EFV. Results showed no significant difference in the formation of AFB1 metabolites when combined with EFV (0.15 µM) compared to AFB1 alone. However, exposure to 5 µM of EFV, mimicking chronic exposure, resulted in increased CYP3A4 activity, affecting metabolite formation. While co-incubation with EFV reduced the formation of certain AFB1 metabolites, other outcomes varied and could not be fully attributed to CYP3A4 induction. Overall, this study provides evidence that EFV, and potentially other CYP1A2/CYP3A4 perpetrators, can impact AFB1 metabolism, leading to altered exposure to toxic metabolites. The results emphasize the importance of considering drug interactions when assessing the risks associated with mycotoxin exposure in individuals undergoing HIV therapy in a European and African context.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of how people search and \"navigate\" the internet to obtain health-related information and how they communicate and share this information can provide valuable knowledge about the disease patterns behaviour and health habits of populations.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the population\'s interest in drug-related problems through information search trends.
METHODS: A descriptive ecological correlational study, based on obtaining Google Trends data.
METHODS: relative search volume (RSV), evolution over time, milestones and seasonality.
RESULTS: The most searched topic was drug overdose, with mean RSV of 56.25 ± 0.65. The highest increase occurred in the contraindication topic (R2 = 0.87, p < 0.001). The main milestone was observed in the drug overdose topic in July 2018 (RSV = 100). A very close relationship was found between adverse drug reaction and contraindication (R = 0.89, p < 0.001). Slight seasonality was noted in the adverse drug reaction (augmented Dickey-Fuller test [ADF] = -1.96), contraindication (ADF = -2.66) and drug interaction (ADF = -1.67) topics, but did not show an epidemiological trend.
CONCLUSIONS: The greatest public interest was found in the drug overdose and contraindication topics, which showed a stronger upward trend, although the seasonality study did not show any very notable data or demonstrate epidemiological information search behaviour. The main milestone observed was due to media factors related to the consumption of narcotics. There was a clear difference in English-speaking countries in the use of the drug overdose topic. A correlation between the adverse drug reaction and contraindication topics was confirmed.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on associations between drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and health outcomes in the older community-dwelling population is limited.
OBJECTIVE: We estimate potentially clinically important DDI prevalence and examine the association between DDIs and (1) adverse drug events (ADEs), (2) emergency hospital attendance and (3) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in an older community-dwelling population in Ireland.
METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of community-dwelling older adults (N = 904) aged ≥ 70 years from 15 general practices in Ireland recruited in 2010 (wave-1) and followed-up over 2 years (wave-2; 2012-2013), with linked national pharmacy claims data. Individuals dispensed two or more drugs (wave-1: N = 842; wave-2: N = 763) were included. DDI prevalence at baseline, follow-up and 6 months prior to each health outcome was estimated. Multi-level regression was used to model the association between DDI-exposure and health outcomes at follow-up. DDI prevalence, adjusted incidence-rate ratios (aIRR), adjusted odds ratios (aOR), β coefficients and robust standard error (RSE) from multi-level regression analyses, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported.
RESULTS: At wave-1, n = 196 (23.3% [95% CI 20.5-26.3]), individuals were potentially exposed to ≥ 1 DDI, increasing to n = 345 (45.2% [41.7-48.9]) at wave-2. At 2-year follow-up, the median number of ADEs was 3 (interquartile range [IQR 2-5]); 229 (30.1%) had ≥ 1 emergency hospital attendance, and the mean EQ-5D was 0.74 (± 0.23). Evidence for the association between DDI-exposure and emergency hospital attendance at follow-up was lacking (aOR = 1.38 [0.42-4.53]). DDI-exposure was associated with an increasing number of ADEs (aIRR = 1.26 [1.03-1.55]), and decreasing EQ-5D utility (β = - 0.07, [-0.11 to -0.04], RSE = 0.02). Aspirin-warfarin, clarithromycin-prednisolone, amiodarone-furosemide, clarithromycin-salbutamol, rosuvastatin-warfarin, amiodarone-bisoprolol, and aspirin-nicorandil were common DDIs 6 months preceding these health outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: We found a two-fold increase in DDI prevalence between wave 1 and 2. DDI exposure was associated with increasing ADEs and declining HRQoL at 2-year follow-up. Common DDIs involved anticoagulants, cardiovascular and antimicrobial drugs, which should be targeted for medicine optimisation.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common in older adults with psychiatric disorders, but no consensus has reached about the reliable indicators evaluating the benefits and risks of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in polypharmacy. We aimed to identify indicators suitable for evaluating the clinical significance of DDIs in polypharmacy in older adults with psychiatric disorders.
METHODS: The online tools were used to distribute and collect the questionnaires. The Delphi method was applied to analyze experts\' opinions. The degree of authority and coordination of experts were analyzed using the coefficient of variation, coefficient of coordination, expert\'s judgment factor, familiarity with the study content factor, and Kendall coordination coefficient. Statistical analysis was conducted using the IBM SPSS® Statistics Package version 26.0.
RESULTS: After three rounds of expert consultation, five primary and eleven secondary indicators were identified. The primary \"pharmacodynamic indicator\" included \"severity of adverse drug reactions\", \"duration of adverse drug reaction\", \"symptom relief\", \"time to onset of symptomatic relief\", \"number of days in hospital\", and \"duration of medication\". The secondary \"pharmacokinetic indicator\" contained \"dosage administered\" and \"dosing intervals\". The primary \"patient tolerance indicator\" contained one secondary indicator of \"patient tolerability\". The primary indicator \"patient adherence\" contained one secondary indicator of \"patient adherence to medication\". The primary indicator \"cost of drug combination\" contained one secondary indicator of \"readmission\". These indicators were used to determine the clinical significance of DDIs during polypharmacy.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical significance of drug combinations should be taken into account when polypharmacy is used in the elderly. The five primary indicators and eleven secondary indicators might be preferred to evaluate their risks and benefits. Medication management in this population requires a multidisciplinary team, in which nurses play a key role. Future research should focus on how to establish efficient multidisciplinary team workflows and use functional factors to assess DDIs in polypharmacy for psychiatric disorders.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate interaction effect of various augmentation strategies with clozapine in patients with Treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
METHODS: Data was extracted for change in positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) or brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) scores for monotherapy with various antipsychotic agents alone and their combination with clozapine. Individual patient data was generated using simulation of data (factorial trial framework) from published clinical trials for sample sizes from eight to 400 to evaluate interaction effect through linear modeling. Dose equivalents were calculated, and best fit models were determined for simulated data.
RESULTS: The polynomial model was found to be the best fit for the simulated data to determine interaction effect of combination. The clozapine augmentation with risperidone and ziprasidone was found to be antagonistic, whereas it was additive for haloperidol, aripiprazole, and quetiapine. A synergistic effect was observed for ECT combined with clozapine (Interaction effect: -7.62; p <0.001). A sample size of 250-300 may be sufficient to demonstrate a clinically significant interaction in future trials.
CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine may be augmented with electroconvulsive therapy, leading to the enhancement of antipsychotic effect. Though some antipsychotics like aripiprazole demonstrate additive effects, they may also add to the adverse effects.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is effective and used as a kind of routine anesthetics in procedure sedative anesthesia (PSA) for ureteroscopy. However, respiratory depression and unconscious physical activity always occur during propofol-based PSA, especially in elderly patients. Esketamine has sedative and analgesic effects but without risk of cardiorespiratory depression. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether esketamine can reduce the propofol median effective dose (ED50) for successful ureteroscope insertion in elderly male patients.
METHODS: 49 elderly male patients undergoing elective rigid ureteroscopy were randomly divided into two groups: SK Group (0.25 mg/kg esketamine+propofol) and SF Group (0.1 µg/kg sufentanil+propofol). Patients in both two groups received propofol with initial bolus dose of 1.5 mg/kg after sufentanil or esketamine was administered intravenously. The effective dose of propofol was assessed by a modified Dixon\'s up-and-down method and then was adjusted with 0.1 mg/kg according to the previous patient response. Patients\' response to ureteroscope insertion was classified as \"movement\" or \"no movement\". The primary outcome was the ED50 of propofol for successful ureteroscope insertion with esketamine or sufentanil. The secondary outcomes were the induction time, adverse events such as hemodynamic changes, hypoxemia and body movement were also measured.
RESULTS: 49 patients were enrolled and completed this study. The ED50 of propofol for successful ureteroscope insertion in SK Group was 1.356 ± 0.11 mg/kg, which was decreased compared with that in SF Group, 1.442 ± 0.08 mg/kg (P = 0.003). The induction time in SK Group was significantly shorter than in SF Group (P = 0.001). In SK Group, more stable hemodynamic variables were observed than in SF Group. The incidence of AEs between the two groups was not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: The ED50 of propofol with esketamine administration for ureteroscope insertion in elderly male patients is 1.356 ± 0.11 mg/kg, significantly decreased in comparsion with sufentanil.
BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No: ChiCTR2300077170. Registered on 1 November 2023. Prospective registration. http://www.chictr.org.cn .

BACKGROUND: Intranasal esketamine is an approved drug for treatment‐resistant depression (TRD); however, it is costly and may result in specific adverse effects. In this single case study, we explored if oral esketamine can be a suitable alternative.
METHODS: In collaboration with a 39‐year‐old female with TRD, we compared plasma concentration curves of intranasal (84 mg) and oral (1, 2 and 4 mg/kg) esketamine. Because oral esketamine has a relatively low bioavailability, it results in a different ratio between esketamine and its primary metabolite noresketamine. To increase the bioavailability of oral esketamine, we co‐administered a single dose of the cytochrome P‐450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitor cobicistat (150 mg).
RESULTS: For all doses administered, oral esketamine resulted in lower esketamine but higher noresketamine peak plasma concentrations compared with intranasal treatment. Using oral esketamine it was not possible to generate a similar esketamine plasma concentration curve as with the intranasal treatment, except when combined with cobicistat (esketamine 2 mg/kg plus cobicistat 150 mg).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that cobicistat effectively increases the bioavailability of oral esketamine. Further research is required in a larger population, especially to investigate the clinical benefit of cobicistat as a booster drug for oral esketamine.

UNASSIGNED: People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) are getting older. Age-related comorbidities in PLWH result in polypharmacy and increase the risk for potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). This study aimed to evaluate how the rate of pDDIs would change if the treatment of patients receiving different combined antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) were theoretically changed with dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG+3TC) or cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB+RPV).
UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted at the infectious disease outpatient clinic of a university hospital as a follow-up of a previous study. The data of PLWH receiving at least 1 comedication other than antiretrovirals (ARVs) were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The Drugs.com/Drug Interactions Checker and University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interactions Checker databases were used to identify pDDIs and their severities.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 75 PLWH, of whom 83% were male, with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 46.5 (±12.98) years were included. Polypharmacy was observed in 59 (79%) of the participants; however, with dual ARV options, the probability of polypharmacy was 35 (47%) (p < 0.001). In the Drugs.com database, no significant difference was found in terms of pDDIs between the treatment of current ARTs (64%) and DTG/3TC (%44) (p = 0.06) or CAB/RPV (%64) (p = 0.521). However, in the University of Liverpool database, the current rate of pDDIs (55%) was significantly higher compared to the theoretical treatment of DTG/3TC (40%) (p = 0.029), oral CAB/RPV (48%) (p = 0.003), and injectable CAB/RPV (31%) use (p = 0.006).
UNASSIGNED: The results suggest that dual treatment regimens can reduce pDDIs, resulting in better tolerance and probably higher quality of life among PLWH.

OBJECTIVE: Polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions (DDI) and related adverse drug reaction (ADR) are understudied in SSc. The aim of this work was to determine the prevalence and determinants of DDI and ADR in a real-life prospective cohort of SSc patients.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the drug prescriptions of SSc patients admitted to the daily scleroderma clinic between January 2020 and April 2022. DDI were identified using 2 prescription analysis applications, and adjudicated related ADRs occurring during a one-year follow-up were reported. Risk factors for DDI and ADR were identified using multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: One hundred and eight SSc patients were included. The median number of medications per patient was 6 [4-9]. Seventy-one (65.7 %) patients had 5 or more medications, and 23 (21.3 %) had 10 or more. Seventy-two (66.7 %) patients had DDIs on their prescriptions at inclusion. Patients with DDIs had more medications than patients without DDIs (7 [5-10] versus 3 [2-5], p < 0.0001). Six (8.3) patients experienced ADRs during the one-year follow-up. Patients with ADRs had more medications (14 [10-18] versus 7 [5-10] p < 0.001) and more DDIs (12 [7-32] versus 3 [1-6]; p < 0.001) than patients without ADRs. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the number of prescribed medications was independently positively associated with DDIs (OR: 2.25 [1.52-3.32], p < 0.0001) as well as with ADRs (OR: 1.68 [1.17-2.40], p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: SSc patients are significantly exposed to polypharmacy, DDIs and related ADRs, particularly in cases of severe illness, and especially if 5 or more medications are prescribed.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric patients are especially prone to experiencing adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and the surgical environment gathers many conditions for such reactions to occur. Additionally, little information exists in the literature on ADRs in the paediatric surgical population. We aimed to quantify the ADR frequency in this population, and to investigate the characteristics and risk factors associated with ADR development.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted in a cohort of 311 paediatric patients, aged 1-16 years, admitted for surgery at a tertiary referral hospital in Spain (2019-2021). Incidence rates were used to assess ADR frequency. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to evaluate the influence of potential risk factors on ADR development.
RESULTS: Distinct ADRs (103) were detected in 80 patients (25.7%). The most frequent being hypotension (N = 32; 35%), nausea (N = 16; 15.5%), and emergence delirium (N = 16; 15.5%). Most ADRs occurred because of drug-drug interactions. The combination of sevoflurane and fentanyl was responsible for most of these events (N = 32; 31.1%). The variable most robustly associated to ADR development, was the number of off-label drugs prescribed per patient (OR = 2.99; 95% CI 1.73 to 5.16), followed by the number of drugs prescribed per patient (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.41), and older age (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.49). The severity of ADRs was assessed according to the criteria of Venulet and the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System. According to both methods, only four ADRs (3.9%) were considered serious.
CONCLUSIONS: ADRs have a high incidence rate in the paediatric surgical population. The off-label use of drugs is a key risk factor for ADRs development.