Double-Blind Method

双盲法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在日间手术中最佳的疼痛缓解对于患者的舒适和及时出院至关重要。短效阿片类药物是现代麻醉中常用的镇痛药物,允许在手术后快速恢复。短效阿片类药物重复给药的血浆浓度波动可导致患者在镇痛之间振荡,并产生潜在的不良反应。镇痛不足,需要抢救剂量。美沙酮独特的药理学可以提供有效和持续的镇痛与较少的阿片类药物消耗,可能减少不利影响。使用双盲,随机对照试验,我们比较了接受静脉注射美沙酮(10mg)的日间妇科腹腔镜检查患者的麻醉后护理单元阿片类药物用量,术中使用短效阿片类药物。主要结果是麻醉后护理单元阿片类药物在口服吗啡等效物中的消耗。次要结果包括阿片类药物总消费量,排放阿片类药物的消耗,疼痛评分(0-10)直到出院,不良反应(呼吸抑制,术后恶心呕吐,过度镇静),和录取率。随机分配70例患者。与短效组相比,接受美沙酮治疗的患者在麻醉后护理单元中平均消耗9.44mg的口服吗啡当量(18.02mgvs27.46mg,分别,95%置信区间0.003至18.88,P=0.050),并且在每个时间点都经历了较低的术后疼痛评分,虽然绝对差异很小。没有证据表明住院或出院时使用阿片类药物。美沙酮和短效组之间在其他结局方面没有显着差异:呼吸抑制41.2%对31.4%,Padjusted>0.99;术后恶心呕吐分别为29.4%和42.9%,调整后>0.99;隔夜入场17.7%对11.4%,调整后>0.99;过度镇静8.82%对8.57%,Padjusted>0.99。这项研究提供了证据,虽然谦虚,美沙酮可以减少日常妇科腹腔镜检查后麻醉护理单元阿片类药物的消耗和术后疼痛评分。任何次要结果均无显著差异。
    Optimal pain relief in day-case surgery is imperative to patient comfort and timely discharge from hospital. Short-acting opioids are commonly used for analgesia in modern anaesthesia, allowing rapid recovery after surgery. Plasma concentration fluctuations from repeated dosing of short-acting opioids can cause patients to oscillate between analgesia with potential adverse effects, and inadequate analgesia requiring rescue dosing. Methadone\'s unique pharmacology may offer effective and sustained analgesia with less opioid consumption, potentially reducing adverse effects. Using a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, we compared post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption between day-case gynaecological laparoscopy patients who received either intravenous methadone (10 mg), or short-acting opioids intraoperatively. The primary outcome was post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption, discharge opioid consumption, pain scores (0-10) until discharge, adverse effects (respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, excess sedation), and rate of admission. Seventy patients were randomly assigned. Patients who received methadone consumed on average 9.44 mg fewer oral morphine equivalents in the post-anaesthesia care unit than the short-acting group (18.02 mg vs 27.46 mg, respectively, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 18.88, P = 0.050) and experienced lower postoperative pain scores at every time point, although absolute differences were small. There was no evidence of lower hospital or discharge opioid consumption. No significant differences between the methadone and short-acting groups in other outcomes were identified: respiratory depression 41.2% versus 31.4%, Padjusted >0.99; postoperative nausea and vomiting 29.4% versus 42.9%, Padjusted >0.99; overnight admission 17.7% versus 11.4%, Padjusted >0.99; excess sedation 8.82% versus 8.57%, Padjusted >0.99. This study provides evidence that, although modestly, methadone can reduce post-anaesthesia care unit opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores after day-case gynaecological laparoscopy. There were no significant differences in any secondary outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:观察火针治疗斑块型银屑病的临床疗效,探索其合适的证候类型,为了达到更好的治疗效果,加速牛皮癣皮肤病变恢复的可能性,并为临床治疗提供帮助。
    方法:共招募8名年龄在18至60岁之间的PP患者,每周一次接受FA治疗,和病变面积和严重程度指数(PASI),之前测量视觉模拟量表和瘙痒,治疗后2、4和8周以及随访期(第12周),分别。视觉模拟量表,和皮肤镜检查用于评估。
    结果:所有患者经1次FA治疗后瘙痒得到改善,2周后病灶均有不同程度的缩小。除了患者5和8,由于严重疾病而仅取得有效效果,所有其他银屑病患者在治疗后8周均取得显著疗效.
    结论:FA可以显著控制病变的发展,减少PP病变和瘙痒的症状,并有助于防止牛皮癣复发。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of fire acupuncture (FA) on plaque psoriasis (PP), exploring its suitable syndrome types, in order to achieve better therapeutic effects, accelerate the possibility of psoriasis skin lesion recovery, and provide assistance for clinical treatment.
    METHODS: A total of 8 patients with PP aged between 18 and 60 years were recruited and treated with FA once a week, and the lesion area and severity index (PASI), visual analog scale and pruritus were measured before, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after treatment and at the follow-up period (week 12), respectively. Visual analog scale, and dermoscopy were used for assessment.
    RESULTS: All patients showed improvement in pruritus after 1 FA treatment, and lesions were reduced to varying degrees after 2 weeks. Except for patients 5 and 8, who only achieved effective results due to severe disease, all other patients with psoriasis achieved significant results at 8 weeks after treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: FA can significantly control the development of lesions, reduce the symptoms of PP lesions and pruritus, and help prevent psoriasis recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    产后抑郁症(PPD)损害母婴互动,对孩子的情绪有负面影响,行为,和认知技能。有大量证据表明炎症在抑郁症的发病机理中起作用。对照试验表明,塞来昔布对重度抑郁症患者具有抗抑郁作用。一名34岁的女性患有轻度至中度PPD,每天两次接受塞来昔布胶囊。这种治疗在以前的研究中没有报道,在临床实践中是新颖的。使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)评估患者。此外,在基线和塞来昔布治疗结束时测量脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)和炎性细胞因子的水平.该病例表明塞来昔布可以改善轻度至中度PPD患者的抑郁症状。随访期间无不良反应发生。
    Postpartum depression (PPD) impairs mother-infant interaction and has negative effects on the child\'s emotional, behavioral, and cognitive skills. There is considerable evidence to suggest that inflammation plays a role in the pathogenesis of depression. Controlled trials indicate that celecoxib has antidepressant effects in patients with major depressive disorder. A 34-year-old woman with mild to moderate PPD received a celecoxib capsule twice a day. This treatment has not been reported in previous studies and is novel in clinical practice. The patient was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Moreover, levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and inflammatory cytokines were measured at baseline and at the end of celecoxib therapy. This case suggests that celecoxib can improve depressive symptoms in patients with mild to moderate PPD. No adverse effects occurred during follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:描述了先前未报道的对Galcanezumab(Emgality)的全身反应。Galcanezumab是一种人源化单克隆抗体,旨在与降钙素基因相关肽结合,偏头痛发作期间与神经源性炎症相关的神经肽。尽管临床试验显示Galcanezumab几乎没有不良反应(注射部位相关的红斑,瘙痒,和肿胀),未发现全身药物反应.
    方法:一名50岁女性,患有慢性偏头痛,肥大细胞疾病,桥本病,在多次偏头痛治疗失败后,抗核抗体阳性和不在免疫调节剂上的抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体阳性接受了初始剂量240mg的galcanezumab.第二天,她出现了注射部位反应,黄斑红斑和流感样症状。注射后第二天症状进展,她的嘴唇和喉咙出现了肿胀。静脉类固醇和抗组胺药改善了气道症状,口服类固醇一个疗程后,其余症状有所改善。
    结论:可能发生需要紧急干预的Galcanezumab延迟系统过敏反应。自身免疫性疾病的病史可能是诱发因素。
    BACKGROUND: A previously unreported systemic reaction to Galcanezumab (Emgality) is described. Galcanezumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to bind to calcitonin gene-related peptide, a neuropeptide associated with neurogenic inflammation during migraine attacks. Although clinical trials showed that Galcanezumab had few adverse reactions (injection site related erythema, pruritus, and swelling), no systemic drug reactions have been noted.
    METHODS: A 50-year-old female with chronic migraine, mast cell disorder, Hashimoto\'s disease, positive antinuclear antibody and positive anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody not on immune modulators received the initial dose of galcanezumab 240 mg after failing multiple migraine treatments. The following day, she developed injection site reaction, malar erythema and flu-like symptoms. Symptoms progressed the second day after injection, and she developed swelling in her lips and throat. Intravenous steroid and antihistamines improved airway symptoms, and the remaining symptoms improved after a course of oral steroids.
    CONCLUSIONS: Delayed system allergic reaction to Galcanezumab requiring emergency intervention may occur. A history of autoimmune disorder may be a predisposing factor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:绝经后妇女患乳腺癌的风险增加与高血清雌二醇和睾酮浓度有关,但人们对这些激素如何影响乳腺癌预防或治疗内分泌治疗的反应知之甚少。我们旨在评估血清雌二醇和睾酮浓度对芳香化酶抑制剂阿那曲唑预防绝经后高危女性乳腺癌疗效的影响。
    方法:在这项病例对照研究中,我们使用了IBIS-II预防试验的数据,一个随机的,控制,在40-70岁的绝经后女性中进行双盲试验,在18个国家的153个乳腺癌治疗中心进行。在审判中,女性被随机分配(1:1)接受阿那曲唑(1毫克/天,口服)或每天安慰剂,持续5年。在这项预先计划的病例对照研究中,主要分析是基线雌二醇与性激素结合球蛋白(SHBG)比值(雌二醇-SHBG比值)对所有乳腺癌发展的影响,包括导管原位癌(试验的主要终点)。病例是在进入试验后和2019年10月22日截止日期之前报告乳腺癌的参与者,并且在进入试验后3个月内或在试验期间有有效的血液样本且未使用激素替代疗法。对于每种情况,随机选择了两个没有乳腺癌的对照,与治疗组相匹配,年龄(2年内),和随访时间(至少是匹配情况的时间)。对于每个治疗组,我们应用多项logistic回归似然比趋势检验,以评估何种病例比例的变化与激素比值的1四分位数变化相关.对照仅用于确定四分位数截断值。轮廓似然95%CI用于指示估计的精度。二次分析还研究了基线睾酮-SHBG比率对乳腺癌发展的影响。我们还评估了阿那曲唑与安慰剂的相对益处(计算为1-阿那曲唑组乳腺癌病例与安慰剂组乳腺癌病例的比率)。该试验在ISRCTN(编号ISRCTN31488319)注册,并于2012年1月31日完成招募,但长期随访仍在进行中。
    结果:在2003年2月2日至2012年1月31日之间招募了3864名女性参加试验,并随机分配接受阿那曲唑(n=1920)或安慰剂(n=1944)。中位随访时间为131个月(IQR106-156),在此期间,阿那曲唑组乳腺癌85例(4·4%),安慰剂组乳腺癌165例(8·5%).没有性别数据,种族,或种族被收集。排除后,病例对照研究包括来自阿那曲唑组的212名参与者(72例,140名对照)和416名来自安慰剂组(142例,274个控件)。在安慰剂组中发现随着雌二醇-SHBG比率的增加而增加乳腺癌风险的趋势(每四分位数1·25的趋势[95%CI1·08至1·45],p=0·0033),但非阿那曲唑组(1·06[0·86至1·30],p=0·60)。安慰剂组的睾酮-SHBG比值效应较弱(趋势1·21[1·05至1·41],p=0·011),但同样不是阿那曲唑组(趋势1·18[0·96至1·46],p=0·11)。阿那曲唑的相对益处见于四分位数2(0·55[95%CI0·13至0·78]),四分位数3(0·54[0·22至0·74],雌二醇-SHBG比的四分位数4(0·56[0·23至0·76]),但不在四分位数1(0·18[-0·60至0·59])中。
    结论:这些结果表明,应更常规地测量血清激素,并将其纳入风险管理决策。测量血清激素浓度是廉价的,并且可能有助于临床医生区分哪些女性将从芳香化酶抑制剂中受益最大。
    背景:英国癌症研究中心,国家健康和医学研究委员会(澳大利亚),乳腺癌研究基金会,和DaCosta基金。
    BACKGROUND: An increased risk of breast cancer is associated with high serum concentrations of oestradiol and testosterone in postmenopausal women, but little is known about how these hormones affect response to endocrine therapy for breast cancer prevention or treatment. We aimed to assess the effects of serum oestradiol and testosterone concentrations on the efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole for the prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women at high risk.
    METHODS: In this case-control study we used data from the IBIS-II prevention trial, a randomised, controlled, double-blind trial in postmenopausal women aged 40-70 years at high risk of breast cancer, conducted in 153 breast cancer treatment centres across 18 countries. In the trial, women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive anastrozole (1 mg/day, orally) or placebo daily for 5 years. In this pre-planned case-control study, the primary analysis was the effect of the baseline oestradiol to sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) ratio (oestradiol-SHBG ratio) on the development of all breast cancers, including ductal carcinoma in situ (the primary endpoint in the trial). Cases were participants in whom breast cancer was reported after trial entry and until the cutoff on Oct 22, 2019, and who had valid blood samples and no use of hormone replacement therapy within 3 months of trial entry or during the trial. For each case, two controls without breast cancer were selected at random, matched on treatment group, age (within 2 years), and follow-up time (at least that of the matching case). For each treatment group, we applied a multinominal logistic regression likelihood-ratio trend test to assess what change in the proportion of cases was associated with a one-quartile change in hormone ratio. Controls were used only to determine quartile cutoffs. Profile likelihood 95% CIs were used to indicate the precision of estimates. A secondary analysis also investigated the effect of the baseline testosterone-SHBG ratio on breast cancer development. We also assessed relative benefit of anastrozole versus placebo (calculated as 1 - the ratio of breast cancer cases in the anastrozole group to cases in the placebo group). The trial was registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN31488319) and completed recruitment on Jan 31, 2012, but long-term follow-up is ongoing.
    RESULTS: 3864 women were recruited into the trial between Feb 2, 2003, and Jan 31, 2012, and randomly assigned to receive anastrozole (n=1920) or placebo (n=1944). Median follow-up time was 131 months (IQR 106-156), during which 85 (4·4%) cases of breast cancer in the anastrozole group and 165 (8·5%) in the placebo group were identified. No data on gender, race, or ethnicity were collected. After exclusions, the case-control study included 212 participants from the anastrozole group (72 cases, 140 controls) and 416 from the placebo group (142 cases, 274 controls). A trend of increasing breast cancer risk with increasing oestradiol-SHBG ratio was found in the placebo group (trend per quartile 1·25 [95% CI 1·08 to 1·45], p=0·0033), but not in the anastrozole group (1·06 [0·86 to 1·30], p=0·60). A weaker effect was seen for the testosterone-SHBG ratio in the placebo group (trend 1·21 [1·05 to 1·41], p=0·011), but again not in the anastrozole group (trend 1·18 [0·96 to 1·46], p=0·11). A relative benefit of anastrozole was seen in quartile 2 (0·55 [95% CI 0·13 to 0·78]), quartile 3 (0·54 [0·22 to 0·74], and quartile 4 (0·56 [0·23 to 0·76]) of oestradiol-SHBG ratio, but not in quartile 1 (0·18 [-0·60 to 0·59]).
    CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that serum hormones should be measured more routinely and integrated into risk management decisions. Measuring serum hormone concentrations is inexpensive and might help clinicians differentiate which women will benefit most from an aromatase inhibitor.
    BACKGROUND: Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia), Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and DaCosta Fund.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:Dupilumab被美国食品和药物管理局和加拿大卫生部批准用于≥6个月的中重度特应性皮炎(AD)患者;然而,实际数据很少,因为提供者对这种最近批准的疗法的实践经验有限.
    目的:描述目前正在接受或以前接受过dupilumab的年龄<12岁的中重度AD患者的真实世界有效性和安全性。
    方法:在六个加拿大地点进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。病例分为1组≤2岁,第2组>2至<6岁,第3组≥6至<12岁。收集dupilumab治疗的病史和细节。主要结果是测量湿疹面积和严重程度指数的改善。次要结果包括儿童皮肤病学生活质量指数/婴儿皮炎生活质量,峰值瘙痒数值评定量表,对于由于年龄原因被认为是dupilumab的非标签患者,延迟使用dupilumab。
    结果:纳入63例患有中度至重度AD的儿科患者(37例男性);当dupilumab开始治疗时,平均年龄为6.4岁(范围:2-11)。总的来说,75%(36/48)达到EASI-75%,71%(34/48)达到EASI-90。EASI-75和EASI-90在90%(17/19)和73%(12/19)在<6岁的患者中实现,76%(22/29)和59%(17/29)在>6岁的患者中,分别。未报告严重不良事件。
    结论:Dupilumab对12岁以下患者安全有效。然而,即使是有经验的供应商,获得药物是具有挑战性的。
    BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is approved for moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients aged ≥6 months by the US Food and Drug Administration and Health Canada; however, there are little real-world data because providers have limited practical experience with this recently approved therapy.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the real-world effectiveness and safety in patients aged <12 years with moderate-severe AD currently receiving or previously having received dupilumab.
    METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted at six Canadian sites. Cases were divided into Group 1 ≤2 years old, Group 2 >2 to <6 years old, and Group 3 ≥6 to <12 years old. Medical history and details of dupilumab treatment were collected. The primary outcome was to measure the improvement in eczema area and severity index. Secondary outcomes examined included the children\'s dermatology life quality index/infant\'s dermatitis quality of life, peak pruritus numerical rating scale, and delay to dupilumab access for patients who were considered off-label for dupilumab due to their age.
    RESULTS: Sixty three pediatric patients (37 males) with moderate-to-severe AD were included; the mean age was 6.4 years old (range: 2-11) when dupilumab treatment was started. Overall, 75% (36/48) achieved EASI-75% and 71% (34/48) achieved EASI-90. EASI-75 and EASI-90 were achieved in 90% (17/19) and 73% (12/19) in patients <6 years old, and 76% (22/29) and 59% (17/29) in patients >6 years old, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dupilumab is safe and effective for patients under the age of 12. However, even for experienced providers, access to the medication was challenging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:认知症状是抑郁症的核心特征,干扰完全功能恢复,在难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者中表现突出,特别是在严重的慢性病例中。鼻内(IN)艾氯胺酮最近被批准用于治疗TRD;然而,其对认知症状的影响尚不清楚.在这篇文章中,我们描述了8例接受IN给予艾氯胺酮治疗的慢性TRD患者的认知变化.
    方法:8名慢性TRD门诊患者接受了超过3个月的伊司氯胺酮,并在基线和治疗4、8和12周后使用蒙哥马利-奥斯贝格抑郁量表(MADRS)进行评估,数字符号替换测试(DSST),跟踪测试-B(TMT-B),抑郁症患者赤字问卷5项(PDQ-D5),汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HARS),和临床整体印象量表(CGI)。
    结果:根据DSST,我们观察到认知症状的减轻,TMT-B,在使用IN艾氯胺酮治疗的前2个月内的PDQ-D5评分。这些改善在患者达到临床反应之前观察到(基线MADRS评分下降≥50%),而且它们也比HARS分数的降低更早发生。
    结论:治疗3个月后,在患有慢性TRD的重症患者中检测到了IN艾氯胺酮的临床反应。有趣的是,在患者达到抗抑郁反应之前,观察到认知症状的改善.这些初步观察表明IN艾氯胺酮的抗抑郁特性具有附加价值。有必要进行专门研究认知作为TRD中IN艾氯胺酮的主要结果指标的临床研究。
    Cognitive symptoms are a core feature of depressive disorders, interfere with full functional recovery and are prominent in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), particularly in severe chronic cases. Intranasal (IN) esketamine was recently approved for the treatment of TRD; however, its effects on cognitive symptoms are unclear. In this article, we describe cognitive changes in 8 patients with chronic TRD who were treated with IN administration of esketamine.
    Eight outpatients with chronic TRD received IN esketamine over 3 months and were assessed at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Trail Making Test-B (TMT-B), the Patient Deficits Questionnaire for Depression 5-item (PDQ-D5), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), and the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI).
    We observed reductions in cognitive symptoms according to DSST, TMT-B, and PDQ-D5 scores within the first 2 months of treatment with IN esketamine. These improvements were observed before patients achieved clinical response (≥50% decrease in baseline MADRS scores), and they also occurred earlier than reductions in HARS scores.
    A clinical response to IN esketamine was detected in severely ill patients with chronic TRD after 3 months of treatment. Interestingly, improvements on measures of cognitive symptoms were observed before patients achieved antidepressant response. These preliminary observations suggest an additional value to the antidepressant properties of IN esketamine. Clinical studies specifically investigating cognition as a primary outcome measure of IN esketamine in TRD are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号