Myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) represent an etiologically heterogeneous group of (very) rare chronic diseases. MG and LEMS have an autoimmune-mediated etiology, while CMS are genetic disorders. A (strain dependent) muscle weakness due to neuromuscular transmission disorder is a common feature. Generalized MG requires increasingly differentiated therapeutic strategies that consider the enormous therapeutic developments of recent years. To include the newest therapy recommendations, a comprehensive update of the available German-language guideline \'Diagnostics and therapy of myasthenic syndromes\' has been published by the German Neurological society with the aid of an interdisciplinary expert panel. This paper is an adapted translation of the updated and partly newly developed treatment guideline. It defines the rapid achievement of complete disease control in myasthenic patients as a central treatment goal. The use of standard therapies, as well as modern immunotherapeutics, is subject to a staged regimen that takes into account autoantibody status and disease activity. With the advent of modern, fast-acting immunomodulators, disease activity assessment has become pivotal and requires evaluation of the clinical course, including severity and required therapies. Applying MG-specific scores and classifications such as Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis, and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America allows differentiation between mild/moderate and (highly) active (including refractory) disease. Therapy decisions must consider age, thymic pathology, antibody status, and disease activity. Glucocorticosteroids and the classical immunosuppressants (primarily azathioprine) are the basic immunotherapeutics to treat mild/moderate to (highly) active generalized MG/young MG and ocular MG. Thymectomy is indicated as a treatment for thymoma-associated MG and generalized MG with acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab)-positive status. In (highly) active generalized MG, complement inhibitors (currently eculizumab and ravulizumab) or neonatal Fc receptor modulators (currently efgartigimod) are recommended for AChR-Ab-positive status and rituximab for muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-Ab-positive status. Specific treatment for myasthenic crises requires plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, or IVIG. Specific aspects of ocular, juvenile, and congenital myasthenia are highlighted. The guideline will be further developed based on new study results for other immunomodulators and biomarkers that aid the accurate measurement of disease activity.

Family planning is essential for establishing Multiple Sclerosis (MS) prognosis, treatment decision, and disease monitoring. We aimed to generate an expert consensus addressing recommendations for family planning in MS patients of childbearing age. Initially, a committee comprising seven neurologists, experts in the MS field, identified the topics to be addressed. Then, the committee elaborated on different evidence-based preliminary statements. Next, using the Delphi methodology, a panel of neurologists manifested their level of agreement on the different statements using a Likert-type scale. Consensus was reached when ⩾70% of respondents expressed an agreement or disagreement using a five-point scale. Consensus was achieved on 47 out of 63 recommendations after three rounds of evaluations. The panel considered it essential to address family planning in all patients of childbearing age. There was also consensus that treatment should not be delayed due to the patient\'s desire for pregnancy. Additionally, in highly active patients, planning the pregnancy in the medium to long term using depletory drugs such as cladribine or alemtuzumab might represent a useful strategy. However, risks of adverse effects on the fetus due to drug-associated secondary autoimmunity should be addressed when alemtuzumab is considered. Moreover, the maintenance of natalizumab during pregnancy in very active patients reached expert consensus. Also, the panel supported the use of certain disease-modifying treatment (DMT) during lactation in selected cases. Our results identified specific areas of pregnancy planning in MS patients, where different treatment strategies might be considered to facilitate a safe and successful pregnancy while maintaining clinical and radiological stability.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to gain consensus from experienced physicians and caregivers regarding optimal diagnosis and management of Dravet syndrome (DS), in the context of recently approved, DS-specific therapies and emerging disease-modifying treatments.
METHODS: A core working group was convened consisting of six physicians with recognized expertise in DS and two representatives of the Dravet Syndrome Foundation. This core group summarized the current literature (focused on clinical presentation, comorbidities, maintenance and rescue therapies, and evolving disease-modifying therapies) and nominated the 31-member expert panel (ensuring international representation), which participated in two rounds of a Delphi process to gain consensus on diagnosis and management of DS.
RESULTS: There was strong consensus that infants 2-15 months old, presenting with either a first prolonged hemiclonic seizure or first convulsive status epilepticus with fever or following vaccination, in the absence of another cause, should undergo genetic testing for DS. Panelists agreed on evolution of specific comorbidities with time, but less agreement was achieved on optimal management. There was also agreement on appropriate first- to third-line maintenance therapies, which included the newly approved agents. Whereas there was agreement for recommendation of disease-modifying therapies, if they are proven safe and efficacious for seizures and/or reduction of comorbidities, there was less consensus for when these should be started, with caregivers being more conservative than physicians.
CONCLUSIONS: This International DS Consensus, informed by both experienced global caregiver and physician voices, provides a strong overview of the impact of DS, therapeutic goals and optimal management strategies incorporating the recent therapeutic advances in DS, and evolving disease-modifying therapies.

BACKGROUND: Today, there are no recommendations on switching disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS).
OBJECTIVE: To establish guidelines on switching DMTs MS.
METHODS: A Steering Committee composed of seven MS experts from the French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) defined 15 proposals. These proposals were then submitted to a Rating Group, composed of 48 French MS experts, for evaluation. The proposals were classified as \'appropriate\', \'inappropriate\' or \'uncertain\'.
RESULTS: Switching from a first-line therapy to another first-line therapy or a second-line therapy could be done without a washout period. Switching from a second-line therapy to a first-line therapy could be done without a washout period with fingolimod or natalizumab, after 3 months with ocrelizumab or mitoxantrone, and, if disease activity occurs with alemtuzumab or cladribine. The switch from a second-line therapy to another second-line therapy could be done after a washout period of 1 month with fingolimod or natalizumab, after 3 months with ocrelizumab, after 6 months with mitoxantrone, and, if disease activity occurs, with alemtuzumab or cladribine.
CONCLUSIONS: This expert consensus approach provides physicians with some guidelines on optimizing the benefit/risk ratio when switching DMTs in patients with MS.

In this consensus statement, we provide updated recommendations on multiple sclerosis (MS) management during the COVID-19 crisis and the post-pandemic period applicable to neurology services around the world. Statements/recommendations were generated based on available literature and the experience of 13 MS expert panelists using a modified Delphi approach online. The statements/recommendations give advice regarding implementation of telemedicine; use of disease-modifying therapies and management of MS relapses; management of people with MS at highest risk from COVID-19; management of radiological monitoring; use of remote pharmacovigilance; impact on MS research; implications for lowest income settings, and other key issues.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease of the central nervous system. As new drugs are becoming available, knowledge on diagnosis and treatment must continuously evolve. There is therefore a need for a reference tool compiling current data on benefit and safety, to aid professionals in treatment decisions and use of resources across Europe. The European Committee of Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) have joined forces to meet this need. The objective was to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of people with MS to guide healthcare professionals in the decision-making process.
This guideline has been developed using the GRADE methodology and following the recently updated EAN recommendations for guideline development. Clinical questions were formulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) and outcomes were prioritized according to their relevance to clinical practice. An exhaustive literature search up to December 2016 was performed for each question and the evidence is presented narratively and, when possible, combined in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The quality of evidence for each outcome was rated into four categories - very high, high, low and very low - according to the risk of bias. GRADE evidence profiles were created using GRADEprofiler (GRADEpro) software (Version 3.6). The recommendations with assigned strength (strong, weak) were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance. Consensus between the panellists was reached by use of the modified nominal group technique.
A total of 10 questions have been agreed, encompassing treatment efficacy, response criteria, strategies to address suboptimal response and safety concerns and treatment strategies in MS and pregnancy. The guideline takes into account all disease-modifying drugs approved by the European Medicine Agency at the time of publication. A total of 20 recommendations were agreed by the guideline working group members after three rounds of consensus.