Diabetes mellitus, type 1

糖尿病, 1 型
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用MedtronicMiniMed780G(MM780G)AHCL的1型糖尿病(T1D)患者的多个临床医生可调节参数对血糖的影响。这些包括葡萄糖目标,碳水化合物比率(CR),和活性胰岛素时间(AIT)。基于算法的决策支持建议在潜在的设置调整可以增强临床决策。
    方法:单臂,两阶段探索性研究开发决策支持,以开始和维持AHCL。参与者开始调查MM780G,然后8周阶段1-初始优化工具评估,涉及基于算法的决策支持,每周AIT和CR建议。临床医生根据每个方案的感知安全性批准或拒绝CR和AIT建议。共同设计导致在进一步相同配置的阶段2中评估的优化算法。第2阶段参与者也在“QuickStart”(使用每日胰岛素剂量和体重确定初始AHCL设置的算法衍生工具)之后过渡到商用MM780G。我们评估了疗效,安全,以及使用血糖指标的决策支持的可接受性,以及每个阶段接受的CR和AIT设置的比例。
    结果:53名参与者开始第一阶段(平均年龄24.4;Hba1c为61.5mmol/7.7%)。临床医生接受的CR和AIT比例分别在第1阶段和第2阶段之间增加:CR89.2%与98.6%,p<0.01;AIT95.2%vs.99.3%,p<0.01。在阶段之间,平均葡萄糖百分比时间<3.9mmol(<70mg/dl)减少(2.1%vs.1.4%,p=0.04);平均TIR3.9-10mmol/L(70-180mg/dl)的变化无统计学意义:72.9%±7.8和73.5%±8.6。快速启动导致稳定的TIR,和血糖指标与国际指南的比较。
    结论:共同设计的决策支持工具能够提供安全有效的治疗。它们可以潜在地减轻医疗保健从业人员和患者的糖尿病管理相关决策的负担。
    背景:于2021年3月30日在澳大利亚/新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)进行了前瞻性注册,作为研究ACTRN12621000360819。
    BACKGROUND: Multiple clinician adjustable parameters impact upon glycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using Medtronic Mini Med 780G (MM780G) AHCL. These include glucose targets, carbohydrate ratios (CR), and active insulin time (AIT). Algorithm-based decision support advising upon potential settings adjustments may enhance clinical decision-making.
    METHODS: Single-arm, two-phase exploratory study developing decision support to commence and sustain AHCL. Participants commenced investigational MM780G, then 8 weeks Phase 1-initial optimization tool evaluation, involving algorithm-based decision support with weekly AIT and CR recommendations. Clinicians approved or rejected CR and AIT recommendations based on perceived safety per protocol. Co-design resulted in a refined algorithm evaluated in a further identically configured Phase 2. Phase 2 participants also transitioned to commercial MM780G following \"Quick Start\" (algorithm-derived tool determining initial AHCL settings using daily insulin dose and weight). We assessed efficacy, safety, and acceptability of decision support using glycemic metrics, and the proportion of accepted CR and AIT settings per phase.
    RESULTS: Fifty three participants commenced Phase 1 (mean age 24.4; Hba1c 61.5mmol/7.7%). The proportion of CR and AIT accepted by clinicians increased between Phases 1 and 2 respectively: CR 89.2% vs. 98.6%, p < 0.01; AIT 95.2% vs. 99.3%, p < 0.01. Between Phases, mean glucose percentage time < 3.9mmol (< 70mg/dl) reduced (2.1% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.04); change in mean TIR 3.9-10mmol/L (70-180mg/dl) was not statistically significant: 72.9% ± 7.8 and 73.5% ± 8.6. Quick start resulted in stable TIR, and glycemic metrics compared to international guidelines.
    CONCLUSIONS: The co-designed decision support tools were able to deliver safe and effective therapy. They can potentially reduce the burden of diabetes management related decision making for both health care practitioners and patients.
    BACKGROUND: Prospectively registered with Australia/New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry(ANZCTR) on 30th March 2021 as study ACTRN12621000360819.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在比较T1DM女性在怀孕期间和之后的认知功能,以及交付后一年。此外,目的探讨瘦素和体重指数对认知功能的影响。
    方法:对64例T1DM孕妇进行了前瞻性纵向队列研究。在妊娠早期,使用认知评估电池评估认知功能,交货后立即,产后一年进行最后评估。该计划评估了广泛的认知能力,并提供了全面的认知幸福感得分(高-中-低),找出推理的优点和缺点,记忆,注意,协调,和感知。
    结果:参与者的平均年龄为30.9岁,平均糖尿病病程为14.9年。BMI为30kg/m2或更高的孕妇面临认知功能下降的风险增加,记忆,和推理。此外,总体认知功能和记忆水平较低的母亲血液中的瘦素浓度明显较高.
    结论:T1DM患者在妊娠期间和分娩后不久的认知功能-尤其是推理和注意力-受到不利影响。BMI和瘦素水平升高可能与该人群的认知结果较差有关。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the cognitive function of women with T1DM during and after pregnancy, as well as one year post-delivery. Additionally, it aims to investigate the impacts of leptin and body mass index on cognitive function.
    METHODS: A prospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted involving 64 pregnant women with T1DM. Cognitive function was assessed using a cognitive assessment battery during the first trimester, immediately after delivery, and one year postpartum for the final assessment. This program evaluates a wide range of cognitive abilities and provides a comprehensive cognitive well-being score (high-moderate-low), identifying strengths and weaknesses in reasoning, memory, attention, coordination, and perception.
    RESULTS: The average age of the participants was 30.9 years, with a mean diabetes duration of 14.9 years. Pregnant women with a BMI of 30 kg/m2 or higher faced an increased risk of reduced cognitive function, memory, and reasoning. Additionally, mothers with lower overall cognitive function and memory levels had significantly higher concentrations of leptin in their blood.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive functions-particularly reasoning and attention-are adversely affected in women with T1DM during pregnancy and shortly after delivery. Elevated BMI and leptin levels can be linked to worse cognitive outcomes in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们使用2016年至2022年西班牙国家医院出院数据,根据糖尿病(DM)状态(非糖尿病,非糖尿病,1-DM型或2-DM型)。
    方法:我们建立了STEMI/NSTEMI按DM状态分层的逻辑回归模型,以确定与住院死亡率(IHM)相关的变量。我们分析了DM对IHM的影响。
    结果:西班牙医院报告了201,950个STEMIs(72.7%非糖尿病,0.5%1型DM,和26.8%的2型糖尿病;26.3%的女性)和167,285NSTEMIs(61.6%的非糖尿病,0.6%类型1-DM,和37.8%的2型糖尿病;30.9%的女性)。在STEMI中,非糖尿病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的频率增加(60.4%vs.68.6%;p<0.001)和2型糖尿病患者(53.6%vs.66.1%;p<0.001)。在NSTEMI,非糖尿病患者的PCI频率增加(43.7%vs.45.7%;p<0.001)和2型糖尿病患者(39.1%vs.42.8%;p<0.001)。在NSTEMI,非糖尿病人群中冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的频率增加(2.8%vs.3.5%;p<0.001)和2型糖尿病患者(3.7%vs.5.0%;p<0.001)。在整个人口中,较低的IHM与PCI相关(STEMI的比值比[OR][95%置信区间]=0.34[0.32-0.35];NSTEMI的比值比为0.24[0.23-0.26])或CABG(STEMI的比值比为0.33[0.27-0.40];NSTEMI的比值比为0.45[0.38-0.53]).在STEMI中,IHM随时间降低(OR=0.86[0.80-0.93])。2型DM与STEMI患者较高的IHM相关(OR=1.06[1.01-1.11])。
    结论:PCI和CABG与STEMI/NSTEMI患者IHM降低相关。2型DM与STEMI患者的IHM相关。
    BACKGROUND: We used the Spanish national hospital discharge data from 2016 to 2022 to analyze procedures and hospital outcomes among patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status (non-diabetic, type 1-DM or type 2-DM).
    METHODS: We built logistic regression models for STEMI/NSTEMI stratified by DM status to identify variables associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM). We analyzed the effect of DM on IHM.
    RESULTS: Spanish hospitals reported 201,950 STEMIs (72.7% non-diabetic, 0.5% type 1-DM, and 26.8% type 2-DM; 26.3% female) and 167,285 NSTEMIs (61.6% non-diabetic, 0.6% type 1-DM, and 37.8% type 2-DM; 30.9% female). In STEMI, the frequency of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) increased among non-diabetic people (60.4% vs. 68.6%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (53.6% vs. 66.1%; p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, the frequency of PCI increased among non-diabetic people (43.7% vs. 45.7%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (39.1% vs. 42.8%; p < 0.001). In NSTEMI, the frequency of coronary artery by-pass grafting (CABG) increased among non-diabetic people (2.8% vs. 3.5%; p < 0.001) and people with type 2-DM (3.7% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001). In the entire population, lower IHM was associated with undergoing PCI (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval] = 0.34 [0.32-0.35] in STEMI; 0.24 [0.23-0.26] in NSTEMI) or CABG (0.33 [0.27-0.40] in STEMI; 0.45 [0.38-0.53] in NSTEMI). IHM decreased over time in STEMI (OR = 0.86 [0.80-0.93]). Type 2-DM was associated with higher IHM in STEMI (OR = 1.06 [1.01-1.11]).
    CONCLUSIONS: PCI and CABG were associated with lower IHM in people admitted for STEMI/NSTEMI. Type 2-DM was associated with IHM in STEMI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:1型糖尿病患者的危险因素与血管损害的关系似乎比2型糖尿病患者更为复杂。因此,我们分析了T1D患者中传统和新的心血管危险因素和血管参数之间的关联,并根据性别和遗传因素对这些关联进行了修改.
    方法:在一项横断面研究中,我们使用血管参数分析了65岁以下T1D个体的危险因素之间的关系,如踝肱指数(ABI)和趾肱指数(TBI),双工超声,测量颈动脉和股动脉斑块的存在(Belcaro评分)和颈动脉内膜中层厚度(CIMT)。我们还使用了光电体积描记术,以Oliva-Roztocil指数(ORI)表示的分支间指数,并分析了肾脏参数,如尿白蛋白/肌酐比值(uACR)和肾小球滤过率(GFR)。我们使用多元回归分析评估了这些关联,包括与性别的相互作用和连接蛋白37基因(Cx37)多态性(rs1764391)。
    结果:在235名男性和227名女性中(平均年龄43.6±13.6岁;平均糖尿病持续时间22.1±11.3年),脉压与研究中的大多数血管参数的不利值密切相关(ABI,TBI,Belcaro得分,UACR和ORI),而血浆脂质,以残余胆固醇(胆固醇-LDL-HDL胆固醇)为代表,血浆动脉粥样硬化指数(log(甘油三酯/HDL胆固醇)和Lp(a),主要与肾功能损害相关(uACR,GFR和脂蛋白(a))。血浆非HDL胆固醇与研究中的任何血管参数无关。与脉压相反,根据性别和Cx37基因改变了脂质因子与肾脏和血管参数的相关性.
    结论:除了已知信息,容易获得的风险因素,比如脉压,无论性别和遗传背景如何,都应在患有T1D的个体中考虑。血脂与肾功能的关系很复杂,与性别和遗传因素有关。决定是否有脉压,残余脂蛋白,Lp(a)和其他决定血管毁伤的身分应成为T1D的医治目标,应以将来临床试验的成果为依据。
    BACKGROUND: The associations of risk factors with vascular impairment in type 1 diabetes patients seem more complex than that in type 2 diabetes patients. Therefore, we analyzed the associations between traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors and vascular parameters in individuals with T1D and modifications of these associations according to sex and genetic factors.
    METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we analyzed the association of risk factors in T1D individuals younger than 65 years using vascular parameters, such as ankle brachial index (ABI) and toe brachial index (TBI), duplex ultrasound, measuring the presence of plaques in carotid and femoral arteries (Belcaro score) and intima media thickness of carotid arteries (CIMT). We also used photoplethysmography, which measured the interbranch index expressed as the Oliva-Roztocil index (ORI), and analyzed renal parameters, such as urine albumin/creatinine ratio (uACR) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We evaluated these associations using multivariate regression analysis, including interactions with sex and the gene for connexin 37 (Cx37) polymorphism (rs1764391).
    RESULTS: In 235 men and 227 women (mean age 43.6 ± 13.6 years; mean duration of diabetes 22.1 ± 11.3 years), pulse pressure was strongly associated with unfavorable values of most of the vascular parameters under study (ABI, TBI, Belcaro scores, uACR and ORI), whereas plasma lipids, represented by remnant cholesterol (cholesterol - LDL-HDL cholesterol), the atherogenic index of plasma (log (triglycerides/HDL cholesterol) and Lp(a), were associated primarily with renal impairment (uACR, GFR and lipoprotein (a)). Plasma non-HDL cholesterol was not associated with any vascular parameter under study. In contrast to pulse pressure, the associations of lipid factors with kidney and vascular parameters were modified by sex and the Cx37 gene.
    CONCLUSIONS: In addition to known information, easily obtainable risk factor, such as pulse pressure, should be considered in individuals with T1D irrespective of sex and genetic background. The associations of plasma lipids with kidney function are complex and associated with sex and genetic factors. The decision of whether pulse pressure, remnant lipoproteins, Lp(a) and other determinants of vascular damage should become treatment targets in T1D should be based on the results of future clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    观察性研究和临床试验表明,多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)可能会预防糖尿病微血管并发症。尽管如此,由于不同研究的结果相互矛盾,这些关系的因果性质仍然不明确.这项研究采用孟德尔随机化(MR)来评估PUFA对糖尿病微血管并发症的因果影响。
    我们确定了PUFA的工具变量,特别是omega-3和omega-6脂肪酸,使用英国生物库数据。关于糖尿病微血管并发症的结果数据来自FinnGen研究。我们的分析涵盖了1型和2型糖尿病的微血管结局,即糖尿病神经病变(DN),糖尿病视网膜病变(DR),糖尿病肾病(DKD)。进行了逆MR分析以检查糖尿病微血管并发症对PUFA的影响。进行敏感性分析以验证结果的稳健性。最后,我们进行了多变量MR(MVMR)分析,以确定PUFA是否对糖尿病微血管并发症有直接影响.
    该研究表明,遗传预测的omega-6脂肪酸水平升高大大降低了2型糖尿病患者的DN风险(比值比(OR):0.62,95%置信区间(CI):0.47-0.82,p=0.001)。还建议在2型糖尿病中对DR具有保护作用(OR:0.75,95%CI:0.62-0.92,p=0.005)。MVMR分析证实了在调整潜在混杂因素后这些结果的稳定性。未观察到omega-6脂肪酸对2型糖尿病的DKD或1型糖尿病的任何并发症的显著影响。相比之下,omega-3脂肪酸与所评估的任何糖尿病微血管并发症均无显著因果关系.
    我们的MR分析揭示了ω-6脂肪酸与2型糖尿病的某些糖尿病微血管并发症之间的因果关系。可能为糖尿病微血管并发症的进一步机制和临床研究提供新的见解。
    UNASSIGNED: Observational studies and clinical trials have implicated polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in potentially safeguarding against diabetic microvascular complication. Nonetheless, the causal nature of these relationships remains ambiguous due to conflicting findings across studies. This research employs Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the causal impact of PUFAs on diabetic microvascular complications.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified instrumental variables for PUFAs, specifically omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, using the UK Biobank data. Outcome data regarding diabetic microvascular complications were sourced from the FinnGen Study. Our analysis covered microvascular outcomes in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, namely diabetic neuropathy (DN), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). An inverse MR analysis was conducted to examine the effect of diabetic microvascular complications on PUFAs. Sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the robustness of the results. Finally, a multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis was conducted to determine whether PUFAs have a direct influence on diabetic microvascular complications.
    UNASSIGNED: The study indicates that elevated levels of genetically predicted omega-6 fatty acids substantially reduce the risk of DN in type 2 diabetes (odds ratio (OR): 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.82, p = 0.001). A protective effect against DR in type 2 diabetes is also suggested (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62-0.92, p = 0.005). MVMR analysis confirmed the stability of these results after adjusting for potential confounding factors. No significant effects of omega-6 fatty acids were observed on DKD in type 2 diabetes or on any complications in type 1 diabetes. By contrast, omega-3 fatty acids showed no significant causal links with any of the diabetic microvascular complications assessed.
    UNASSIGNED: Our MR analysis reveals a causal link between omega-6 fatty acids and certain diabetic microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes, potentially providing novel insights for further mechanistic and clinical investigations into diabetic microvascular complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于1型糖尿病之间的因果关系一直存在争议和不确定性,其后果,肝纤维化,和肝硬化。为了确定因果关系,我们进行了孟德尔随机化研究(MR).
    第一次,我们对多个糖尿病数据进行分析,以分析其与肝纤维化进展的关系.一旦工具变量被提取出来,我们使用Cochran的Q多元分析对他们进行了评估,逆方差加权,MR-Egger,MR-PRESSO,加权模式,和加权中位数。
    遗传预测的1型糖尿病(OR=1.13,95%CI:1.04-1.23,**P=3.42×10-3),无并发症的1型糖尿病(OR=1.12,95%CI:1.03-1.23,*P=1.26×10-2),1型糖尿病昏迷(OR=1.09,95%CI:1-1.18,*P=4.74×10-2),1型糖尿病酮症酸中毒(OR=1.07,95%CI:1.01-1.13,*P=1.3×10-2),1型糖尿病合并神经系统并发症(OR=1.18,95%CI:1.11-1.26,***P=4.05×10-7),1型糖尿病合并眼科并发症(OR=1.16,95%CI:1.05-1.28,**P=3.06×10-3),1型糖尿病合并肾脏并发症(OR=1.07,95%CI:1-1.13,*P=3.45×10-2),1型糖尿病合并其他特定/多重/未特定并发症(OR=1.12,95%CI:1.02~1.23,*P=1.41×10-2)均与肝纤维化进展风险增加相关.
    根据我们的MR调查,1型糖尿病及其急性和慢性影响可能增加肝纤维化继续发展的可能性.此外,1型糖尿病合并神经和眼部问题更有可能加速肝纤维化和炎症的发展,这为基因研究提供了新的见解。
    UNASSIGNED: There has been controversy and uncertainty regarding the causal relationship between type 1 diabetes, its consequences, liver fibrosis, and cirrhosis. In order to determine the causal relationship, we conducted a Mendelian randomization study (MR).
    UNASSIGNED: For the first time, we subjected multiple diabetes data to analyze its relationship with the progression of liver fibrosis. Once the instrumental variables had been extracted, we assessed them employing Cochran\'s Q multi-analysis, inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO, weighted mode, and weighted median.
    UNASSIGNED: Genetically predicted type 1 diabetes (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.04-1.23, ** P = 3.42 × 10-3), type 1 diabetes without complications (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.23, * P = 1.26 × 10-2), type 1 diabetes with coma (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1-1.18, * P = 4.74 × 10-2), type 1 diabetes with ketoacidosis (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13, * P = 1.3 × 10-2), type 1 diabetes with neurological complications (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.11-1.26, *** P = 4.05 × 10-7), type 1 diabetes with ophthalmic complications (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.05-1.28, ** P = 3.06 × 10-3), type 1 diabetes with renal complications (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1-1.13, *P = 3.45 × 10-2), type 1 diabetes with other specified/multiple/unspecified complications (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23, * P = 1.41 × 10-2) were all associated with an increased risk of liver fibrosis progression.
    UNASSIGNED: According to our MR investigation, type 1 diabetes and both its acute and chronic implications may increase the likelihood that liver fibrosis could continue to develop. Additionally, type 1 diabetes with neurological and ocular problems is more likely to accelerate the development of liver fibrosis and inflammation, which offers new insights for genetic investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    1型糖尿病(T1D)需要苛刻的自我管理健康行为,患有T1D的青少年有不良社会心理和医疗结果的风险。发展韧性技能可以帮助患有T1D和高度困扰的青少年度过常见的压力源并取得积极的结果。
    为了测试促进压力管理(PRISM)干预措施对血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)水平的疗效,糖尿病困扰,自我管理行为,弹性,以及青少年的生活质量。
    此阶段3,并行,从2020年1月1日至2022年11月30日,在2家儿童医院中的每一家进行了1:1随机临床试验,对172名参与者进行了12个月的随访,在西雅图,华盛顿,还有休斯顿,德克萨斯州。参与者年龄为13至18岁,患有T1D至少12个月,并且糖尿病困扰升高。
    PRISM,一个手工的,基于技能,教授压力管理的个人干预计划,目标设定,重构,和意义的创造,由教练协助,并伴随着一个数字应用程序,在三个30到60分钟的会议中交付,大约间隔2周。
    两个主要结果,糖尿病困扰和HbA1c水平,和3个次要结果,弹性,生活质量,参与自我管理行为,在基线和基线后6个月和12个月进行评估。线性混合效应回归模型用于评估意向治疗人群在两个时间点的PRISM或常规治疗(UC)与这些结果之间的关联。
    在172名青少年中(平均[SD]年龄,15.7[1.6]年),96人是女性(56%),基线平均(SD)HbA1c水平为8.7%(2.0%).PRISM和UC接受者的HbA1c水平无明显差异(β,-0.21[95%CI,-0.65至0.22];P=0.33)或糖尿病困扰(β,-2.71[95%CI,-6.31至0.90];P=.14)或任何参与者报告的结果(例如,β,6个月时的2.25[95%CI,-0.30至4.80];自我管理行为P=.08)。12个月时,两组间HbA1c水平无统计学差异(β,-0.26[95%CI,-0.72至0.19];P=0.25);然而,PRISM接受者报告糖尿病困扰的改善明显更大(β,-4.59[95%CI,-8.25至-0.94];P=0.01)和自我管理行为的改善(β,3.4[95%CI,0.9至5.9];P=0.01)与UC接受者相比。
    这项12个月时与PRISM相关的社会心理和行为改善的随机临床试验的结果说明了基于优势的干预的价值。将韧性技能建设与传统糖尿病护理相结合可能是改善患有T1D和糖尿病恶化的青少年预后的有希望的方法。
    ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT03847194。
    UNASSIGNED: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) requires demanding self-management health behaviors, and adolescents with T1D are at risk for poor psychosocial and medical outcomes. Developing resilience skills may help adolescents with T1D and elevated distress navigate common stressors and achieve positive outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: To test the efficacy of the Promoting Resilience in Stress Management (PRISM) intervention on levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), diabetes distress, self-management behaviors, resilience, and quality of life among adolescents.
    UNASSIGNED: This phase 3, parallel, 1:1 randomized clinical trial that followed up 172 participants for 12 months was conducted from January 1, 2020, to November 30, 2022, at each of 2 children\'s hospitals, in Seattle, Washington, and Houston, Texas. Participants were ages 13 to 18 years with T1D for at least 12 months and elevated diabetes distress.
    UNASSIGNED: PRISM, a manualized, skills-based, individual intervention program that teaches stress management, goal setting, reframing, and meaning-making, facilitated by a coach and accompanied by a digital app, was delivered in three 30- to 60-minute sessions approximately 2 weeks apart.
    UNASSIGNED: The 2 primary outcomes, diabetes distress and HbA1c levels, and 3 secondary outcomes, resilience, quality of life, and engagement in self-management behaviors, were assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months after baseline. Linear mixed-effects regression models were used to evaluate associations between PRISM or usual care (UC) and these outcomes at both time points for the intention-to-treat population.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 172 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 15.7 [1.6] years), 96 were female (56%), and their baseline mean (SD) HbA1c level was 8.7% (2.0%). No differences were evident between PRISM and UC recipients in HbA1c levels (β, -0.21 [95% CI, -0.65 to 0.22]; P = .33) or diabetes distress (β, -2.71 [95% CI, -6.31 to 0.90]; P = .14) or any participant-reported outcome (eg, β, 2.25 [95% CI, -0.30 to 4.80]; P = .08 for self-management behaviors) at 6 months. At 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference between arms in HbA1c levels (β, -0.26 [95% CI, -0.72 to 0.19]; P = .25); however, PRISM recipients reported significantly greater amelioration of diabetes distress (β, -4.59 [95% CI, -8.25 to -0.94]; P = .01) and improvement in self-management behaviors (β, 3.4 [95% CI, 0.9 to 5.9]; P = .01) compared with UC recipients.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings in this randomized clinical trial of psychosocial and behavioral improvements associated with PRISM at 12 months illustrate the value of a strengths-based intervention. Integrating resilience skills-building with traditional diabetes care may be a promising approach for improving outcomes among adolescents with T1D and elevated diabetes distress.
    UNASSIGNED: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03847194.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病(DM)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)之间的关系仍然存在争议。本研究旨在通过双向孟德尔随机化(MR)分析不同类型DM和ASD之间的因果关系。
    1型糖尿病(T1DM)的单核苷酸多态性,2型糖尿病(T2DM),妊娠期糖尿病(GDM),ASD来自全基因组关联研究。随后,逆方差加权,MR-Egger,和加权中位数用于检验暴露-结局因果关系.最后,MR-Egger的拦截,Cochran\'sQ,采用留一法评估水平多效性,异质性,以及结果的敏感性,分别。
    阳性分析显示,T2DM与ASD风险增加相关,而T1DM和GDM均不与ASD风险相关。反向分析表明,ASD与T2DM的风险增加有关,而与T1DM或GDM的风险无关。MR-Egger截距显示这些结果没有水平多效性(p>0.05)。Cochran'sQ显示T1DM对ASD风险的预期结果没有异质性,留一法敏感性分析显示这些结果是稳健的。
    这项MR分析表明,T2DM和ASD是相互的危险因素,它们可能在女性患者中产生代际风险循环。积极预防和治疗T2DM和ASD有助于打破这种风险循环的陷阱。此外,这项研究不支持T1DM和ASD之间的因果关系,以及GDM和ASD。未来需要更多的研究来继续探索不同类型DM和ASD之间的相互作用和潜在机制。
    UNASSIGNED: The relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the causal relationship between different types of DM and ASD by bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR).
    UNASSIGNED: Single nucleotide polymorphisms for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and ASD were obtained from genome-wide association studies. Subsequently, inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger, and weighted median were used to test the exposure-outcome causality. Finally, MR-Egger\'s intercept, Cochran\'s Q, and leave-one-out method were used to assess horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity, and sensitivity of the results, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The positive analysis showed that T2DM was associated with an increased risk of ASD, whereas neither T1DM nor GDM was associated with the risk of ASD. The reverse analysis showed that ASD was associated with an increased risk of T2DM, while it was not associated with the risk of either T1DM or GDM. MR-Egger intercept showed no horizontal pleiotropy (p > 0.05) for these results. Cochran\'s Q showed no heterogeneity expect for the results of T1DM on the risk of ASD, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis showed these results were robust.
    UNASSIGNED: This MR analysis suggests that T2DM and ASD are reciprocal risk factors and that they may create an intergenerational risk cycling in female patients. Aggressive prevention and treatment of T2DM and ASD help to break the trap of this risk cycling. Additionally, this study does not support a causal relationship between T1DM and ASD, as well as GDM and ASD. And more studies are needed in the future to continue to explore the interactions and underlying mechanisms between different types of DM and ASD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:1型糖尿病(T1D)管理的进展,如连续血糖监测(CGM),帮助人们达到更窄的血糖范围,但CGM与糖尿病困扰之间的关联尚不清楚.尽管较高的HbA1c与较高的痛苦有关,与其他血糖指标的关联未知.为了更好地理解这种关系,我们在CGM使用者的样本中表征了糖尿病困扰,并比较了困扰较高和较低的患者之间的血糖指标差异(通过CGM测量).
    方法:来自T1DExchangeRegistry的具有T1D的CGM用户完成了一项在线调查,包括糖尿病困扰(DDS-2)和共享CGM数据(N=199)。CGM指标是根据调查完成前3个月内的所有可用数据计算的。参与者按痛苦水平分组:较低(DDS-2<3,n=120)或更高(DDS-2≥3,n=79)。Welcht检验用于比较组间CGM指标的平均差异,MANCOVA用于进一步探测平均差异。
    结果:大约39.7%的参与者报告了更高的糖尿病困扰。韦尔奇的t检验显示,痛苦程度较高的参与者在较高的血糖范围内(高于180mg/dL和高于250mg/dL)花费的时间明显更多。目标血糖范围内的时间较少(70~180mg/dL和70~140mg/dL),并且与较低痛苦的患者相比,血糖管理指数值较高(p<0.01).MANCOVA模型显示类似的结果。
    结论:CGM使用者继续经历糖尿病困扰。此外,较高的痛苦似乎与高血糖有关。这些发现为更广泛的糖尿病困扰筛查工作提供了支持。
    OBJECTIVE: Advancements in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), have helped people achieve narrower glucose ranges, but associations between CGM and diabetes distress are unclear. Although higher HbA1c is associated with higher distress, associations with other glucose metrics are unknown. To better understand this relationship, we characterized diabetes distress in a sample of CGM users and compared differences in glucose metrics (measured via CGM) between those with higher versus lower distress.
    METHODS: CGM users with T1D from the T1D Exchange Registry completed an online survey including diabetes distress (DDS-2) and shared CGM data (N = 199). CGM metrics were computed from all available data within 3 months prior to survey completion. Participants were grouped by distress level: lower (DDS-2 < 3, n = 120) or higher (DDS-2 ≥ 3, n = 79). Welch\'s t-tests were used to compare mean differences in CGM metrics between groups and MANCOVA was used to further probe mean differences.
    RESULTS: Approximately 39.7% participants reported higher diabetes distress. Welch\'s t-tests revealed participants with higher distress spent significantly more time in higher glucose ranges (above 180 mg/dL and above 250 mg/dL), less time in target glucose ranges (between 70 and 180 mg/dL and between 70 and 140 mg/dL) and had higher glucose management index values compared to those with lower distress (p < 0.01). MANCOVA models showed similar results.
    CONCLUSIONS: CGM users continue to experience diabetes distress. Moreover, higher distress appears to be associated with hyperglycaemia. These findings provide support for broader screening efforts for diabetes distress.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:职业治疗师有能力改善自我管理1型糖尿病(T1D)的年轻人的预后。对青少年发展糖尿病自我管理(DSM)责任感的经验了解不足。
    目的:调查青少年对学校T1D管理分担责任的看法。
    方法:本研究采用描述性定性设计,并使用半结构化访谈和主题分析。这是混合方法研究的第二阶段,采用顺序的解释性设计,研究了学校的责任分担机制。
    方法:澳大利亚的中学。
    方法:患有T1D(N=11)的青少年(15-16岁)的目的样本。
    结果:青少年主要与父母合作,接触以学校为基础的DSM的复杂职业,每个青少年都有独特的责任,同时分享他人。据报道,卫生保健专业人员和教师的参与很少。青少年描述拥有大多数DSM任务,他们对建立独立性的看法限制了这一责任的分担。风险意识的增强意味着青少年在血糖读数错误的情况下可能会与他人交流。当前的过程通常导致学校参与减少。
    结论:青少年重视与父母一起工作,在学校管理T1D,这符合共同职业的职业治疗模式。有效的责任分担有赖于明确,频繁,自治-支持,基于团队的沟通。我们的结果表明,确定基于学校的DSM过程的沟通模式是分散的,风险集中的,在青少年参与有限的情况下,导致策略导致学生有时被排除在学校活动之外。摘要:这是第一项使用职业镜头来检查青少年在学校分担糖尿病护理责任的方式的研究。当青少年与父母相互依赖地管理糖尿病时,中学的糖尿病自我管理更经常发生。青少年参与正式的学校进程以及更明确地分配团队角色和责任将更好地支持促进健康的习惯和学校参与。
    OBJECTIVE: Occupational therapists have the proven capacity to improve outcomes for young adults who are self-managing Type 1 diabetes (T1D). There is insufficient understanding of adolescents\' experiences of developing responsibility for diabetes self-management (DSM).
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate adolescents\' perceptions of sharing responsibility for T1D management at school.
    METHODS: This study had a descriptive qualitative design and used semistructured interviews and thematic analysis. It is the second phase of a mixed-methods study with a sequential explanatory design that investigated mechanisms of responsibility-sharing at school.
    METHODS: Secondary school in Australia.
    METHODS: Purposive sample of adolescents (age 15-16 yr) with T1D (N = 11).
    RESULTS: Adolescents approached the complex occupation of school-based DSM primarily in partnership with their parents, with each adolescent having unique responsibilities while sharing others. Health care professionals and teachers reportedly had minimal involvement. Adolescents described owning most DSM tasks, with their perceptions of building independence limiting the sharing of this responsibility. A heightened sense of risk meant that adolescents were likely to communicate with others in cases of errant blood glucose readings. Current processes commonly resulted in reduced school participation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents valued working responsively and interdependently with their parents to manage T1D at school, which aligns with the occupational therapy model of co-occupation. Effective responsibility-sharing depends on clear, frequent, autonomy-supportive, team-based communications. Our results showed that patterns of communication for determining school-based DSM processes were fragmented and risk focused, with limited adolescent involvement, resulting in strategies that led to students at times being excluded from school activities. Plain-Language Summary: This is the first study to use an occupational lens to examine the way in which adolescents share their responsibility for diabetes care at school. Diabetes self-management in secondary schools occurs more often when adolescents work interdependently with their parents to manage their diabetes. Adolescent involvement in formal school processes and a clearer allocation of team roles and responsibilities would better support health-promoting habits and school participation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号