Atezolizumab, a humanized antiprogrammed death ligand 1 monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody, is a targeted therapeutic drug known as an immune checkpoint inhibitor. It is currently used to treat various types of cancer, including unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), nonsmall cell lung cancer, urothelial cancer, and breast cancer, and is becoming a therapeutic option in the forefront of oncology treatment. However, it may sometimes lead to undesirable adverse reactions owing to the activation of immune responses in various organs. Cutaneous adverse reactions to atezolizumab are well known; however, cases of anaphylaxis are very rare. In this report, we present the first case of HCC who experienced near-fatal anaphylaxis to atezolizumab in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: When deferasirox is used in iron chelation therapy, maculopapular rash occurs in 10% of patients, but there is no accepted and implemented protocol for the management of these drug reactions in adults.
METHODS: A 23-year-old woman diagnosed with thalassemia major is presented. She had taken 1,500 mg oral deferasirox for 1 week. Five hours after the last dose, a pruritic maculopapular rash developed on the body, face, and hands. The rash spread to the whole body within 3 days. The absolute necessity for the patient to take the drug was clarified by the hematology department. The patient\'s history was evaluated. A delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction due to deferasirox was considered.
RESULTS: The slow desensitization protocol described in the literature and applied on a case-by-case basis in pediatric patients was modified to shorten the duration by determining appropriate doses for the current preparation. The desensitization process was started with 1/100,000 of the total dose and the therapeutic dose was reached with a 2- to 2.5-fold increase in dose. No pre-medication was applied. During the procedure, at a low dose of 0.1 mg, local flushing and erythema was observed around the auricle on the face. The reaction did not progress.
CONCLUSIONS: Slow desensitization protocol for oral deferasirox was successfully applied in an adult patient.

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD); however, ABO incompatibility (ABOi) poses challenges due to increased graft rejection risk. Desensitization strategies, including immunoadsorption (IA), aim to overcome ABOi barriers. The objective of this case report was to present the initial findings and patient outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation (KT) using two different brands of IA columns (Glycosorb® ABO and SECORIM®-ABO) in reducing isoagglutinin titers to the desired target level. We present a case report of a 51-year-old male with ESRD secondary to diabetic kidney disease who underwent desensitization for ABOi KT, involving rituximab administration followed by IA using Glycosorb® and Vitrosorb SECORIM®-ABO columns and plasmapheresis (PP). Glycosorb® ABO column decreased anti-B titers from an initial level of 1:128/1:128 to 1:64/1:64 (target range ≤1:8); however, the titers rebounded to 1:64 following the fourth session of PP. Subsequent use of Vitrosorb SECORIM®-ABO column achieved target titers of 1:4, enabling successful transplantation with satisfactory graft function. Monitoring included anti-B IgG/IgM titer levels post IA columns, IA column reuse, kidney function, and adverse events. The IA columns were well tolerated. Desensitization using IA columns effectively reduced anti-B titers, facilitating successful ABOi KT.

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare, life-threatening adverse reaction caused by certain medications. Clinical findings usually include rash, fever, lymphadenopathy, and eosinophilia, and in some cases, they may affect major organs. This reaction caused by antituberculosis (TB) medication poses a public health risk due to treatment discontinuation, adherence, or success in cure. We present a 23-year-old female patient who developed DRESS syndrome as a result of group A anti-TB drugs (ATDs), an exceedingly rare occurrence. The patient\'s medication was successfully retrieved using a re-desensitization protocol.

UNASSIGNED: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammation of the esophagus, characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction, resulting from severe eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. It is common in atopic subjects and food antigens have been identified as the most common triggers. However, a seasonal variation in EoE prevalence, correlated with air pollen levels, is reported, suggesting that also aeroallergens may play a role. Little is known about the interplay between EoE and concomitant atopy treatment for aeroallergens.
UNASSIGNED: We describe the case of an 11-year-old boy who presented dysphagia, vomiting, drooling, and chest pain while eating meat, developed 15 months after receiving sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Alternaria (SUBLIVAC®). He underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealing severe eosinophilic predominant inflammation (100 eos/HPF), consistent with the diagnosis of EoE, not improving at the EGDs performed after both omeprazole and topical corticosteroids treatment, despite symptom improvement. Afterward, immunotherapy was switched from sublingual to injective form. At the EGD performed 1 month later, macroscopic examination of the esophageal mucosa was normal and eosinophilic infiltration was significantly decreased (5-10 eos/HPF).
UNASSIGNED: SLIT may induce EoE by chronic antigenic exposure of oral mucosa in patients with a robust allergic susceptibility: while attenuating the IgE-mediated immune reactions, the progressive contact with the causative allergen might induce a chronic stimulation of the immune system with the consequent activation of tissue eosinophils. Our data suggest monitoring patients receiving SLIT for EoE symptoms and to discontinue SLIT on their earlier appearance, possibly as a first-line treatment.

•Incidence of cancer in pregnancy is rising and successful treatment of these patients requires expert multidisciplinary care.•Platinum hypersensitivity reactions in ovarian cancer are commonly treated with desensitization protocols.•To our knowledge, chemotherapy desensitization in pregnant patients has not been previously reported.•Oxaliplatin desensitization during pregnancy may be safe and feasible.

DRESS related to first-line antituberculosis drugs (ATD) is a challenging diagnosis. With a long-lasting combined treatment of 4-concomitantly administrated drugs, identification of the culprit drug remains difficult and may expose patients to treatment interruption and affect their outcome. A 42-year-old female, treated with isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol for multifocal tuberculosis, developed, 40 days later, hyperthermia, facial edema, cervical lymphadenopathy and generalized exanthema. Biological test results revealed eosinophilia, atypical lymphocytes, and liver injury. DRESS was suspected, and ATD were withdrawn. As patch tests for the 4 ATD showed negative results, we decided to reintroduce pyrazinamide, ethambutol and rifampicin separately with a 3-day interval. Pyrazinamide and rifampicin were tolerated. However, after receiving ethambutol, she developed fever and generalized rash, with no biological abnormalities. Since ethambutol was claimed to be the culprit drug, isoniazid was added, and 10 hours later, the patient developed fever, facial edema, generalized rash, eosinophilia and liver injury. This clinical and biological pattern resolved 2 weeks later. This report suggests a hypersensitivity relapse to ethambutol after isoniazid-induced DRESS.

Albendazole is a benzimidazole group drug used alone or in combination with surgery in the treatment of many helminthiasis, especially hydatid cysts. Type 1 hypersensitivity reaction has been reported rarely. Treatment with desensitization has been successfully applied in a few adult patients, however literature information on pediatric patients was not available. Here, we present a pediatric case in which Type 1 reaction occurred due to the use of albendazole during hydatid cyst treatment and undergone desensitization.

Tepotinib is one of the key drugs for MET exon 14-skipping mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main adverse event of tepotinib treatment is edema. Rash is a rare adverse event, affecting only 0.7% of patients. We report a case of successful desensitization after skin rash caused by tepotinib. A 61-year-old male was treated with tepotinib 500 mg as second-line therapy for NSCLC with MET exon 14-skipping mutation. Treatment was discontinued on day 12 due to grade 3 erythema throughout the body. After improvement of the skin rash, he was started on 250 mg tepotinib with an oral antihistamine and topical steroid. Treatment was discontinued on day 11 due to skin rash exacerbation. One month of treatment-free follow-up showed skin rash improvement but lung carcinoma growth. Tepotinib desensitization therapy was started at a dose of 12.5 mg and gradually increased to 250 mg/day. The patient has since continued tepotinib treatment without skin rashes. Desensitization therapy may be effective for managing skin rash due to tepotinib.

UNASSIGNED: Allergic reactions to insulin have become very rare with the introduction of human insulin. Anaphylaxis is a life-threatening condition that results from immediate IgE-mediated hypersensitivity. Desensitization to human insulin was reported to control immediate hypersensitivity reactions to insulin. Here, we describe the history and challenges of managing our patient and the development of an insulin desensitization protocol in a resource-limited setup.
UNASSIGNED: A 42-year-old Sudanese woman with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes on maximum antidiabetic medications required insulin therapy to achieve reasonable glycemic control. She developed progressive and severe immediate hypersensitivity reactions to insulin, including anaphylaxis. Serum sample analysis demonstrated insulin-specific IgE antibodies. The patient\'s poor glycemic control and the need for breast surgery indicated insulin desensitization. A 4-day desensitization protocol was delivered in an ICU bed for close observation. Following successful desensitization and 24-h observation, our patient was discharged on pre-meal human insulin, which was tolerated well to the current date.
UNASSIGNED: Although insulin allergy is rare, once encountered, it is very challenging in patients who have no other treatment options available. Different protocols for insulin desensitization are described in the literature; the agreed protocol was implemented successfully in our patient despite the limited resources.