Objective Although patients with neuroimmunological disorders often need to be treated with glucocorticoids and are at risk of developing glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, no research has focused on the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in such patients. Methods We compared the efficacy of denosumab and bisphosphonates in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in neuroimmunological diseases. In 57 patients with neuroimmunological disorders treated with corticosteroids (34 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, 16 with myasthenia gravis, and 7 with others), we retrospectively studied the long-term effects of denosumab (n=23) and bisphosphonates (n=34) on spine and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results There were no significant differences in the age, lumbar spine BMD, or mean dose or duration of prednisolone administration at baseline between the denosumab and bisphosphonate groups. During the follow-up period of up to 6 years, the increase in the lumbar spine and total hip BMD was greater in the denosumab group than in the bisphosphonate group (p<0.01). Insufficient bone fractures were observed in 2 (9%) of the 23 patients in the denosumab group and in 2 (6%) of the 34 patients in the bisphosphonate group (not significant). Conclusion Denosumab is more effective than bisphosphonates in increasing the BMD of patients with neuroimmunological disorders receiving glucocorticoids.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates and receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-inhibitors are amongst the bone-modifying agents used as supportive treatment in women with breast cancer who do not have bone metastases. These agents aim to reduce bone loss and the risk of fractures. Bisphosphonates have demonstrated survival benefits, particularly in postmenopausal women.
OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the effects of different bone-modifying agents as supportive treatment to reduce bone mineral density loss and osteoporotic fractures in women with breast cancer without bone metastases and generate a ranking of treatment options using network meta-analyses (NMAs).
METHODS: We identified studies by electronically searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase until January 2023. We searched various trial registries and screened abstracts of conference proceedings and reference lists of identified trials.
METHODS: We included randomised controlled trials comparing different bisphosphonates and RANKL-inihibitors with each other or against no further treatment or placebo for women with breast cancer without bone metastases.
METHODS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Outcomes were bone mineral density, quality of life, overall fractures, overall survival and adverse events. We conducted NMAs and generated treatment rankings.
RESULTS: Forty-seven trials (35,163 participants) fulfilled our inclusion criteria; 34 trials (33,793 participants) could be considered in the NMA (8 different treatment options). Bone mineral density We estimated that the bone mineral density of participants with no treatment/placebo measured as total T-score was -1.34. Evidence from the NMA (9 trials; 1166 participants) suggests that treatment with ibandronate (T-score -0.77; MD 0.57, 95% CI -0.05 to 1.19) may slightly increase bone mineral density (low certainty) and treatment with zoledronic acid (T-score -0.45; MD 0.89, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.16) probably slightly increases bone mineral density compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Risedronate (T-score -1.08; MD 0.26, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.84) may result in little to no difference compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). We are uncertain whether alendronate (T-score 2.36; MD 3.70, 95% CI -2.01 to 9.41) increases bone mineral density compared to no treatment/placebo (very low certainty). Quality of life No quantitative analyses could be performed for quality of life, as only three studies reported this outcome. All three studies showed only minimal differences between the respective interventions examined. Overall fracture rate We estimated that 70 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo had fractures. Evidence from the NMA (16 trials; 19,492 participants) indicates that treatment with clodronate or ibandronate (42 of 1000; RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.92; 40 of 1000; RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86, respectively) decreases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (high certainty). Denosumab or zoledronic acid (51 of 1000; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.01; 55 of 1000; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.11, respectively) probably slightly decreases the number of fractures; and risedronate (39 of 1000; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.16) probably decreases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Pamidronate (106 of 1000; RR 1.52, 95% CI 0.75 to 3.06) probably increases the number of fractures compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Overall survival We estimated that 920 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo survived overall. Evidence from the NMA (17 trials; 30,991 participants) suggests that clodronate (924 of 1000; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.17), denosumab (927 of 1000; HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.21), ibandronate (915 of 1000; HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.34) and zoledronic acid (925 of 1000; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.14) may result in little to no difference regarding overall survival compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). Additionally, we are uncertain whether pamidronate (905 of 1000; HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.78) decreases overall survival compared to no treatment/placebo (very low certainty). Osteonecrosis of the jaw We estimated that 1 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo developed osteonecrosis of the jaw. Evidence from the NMA (12 trials; 23,527 participants) suggests that denosumab (25 of 1000; RR 24.70, 95% CI 9.56 to 63.83), ibandronate (6 of 1000; RR 5.77, 95% CI 2.04 to 16.35) and zoledronic acid (9 of 1000; RR 9.41, 95% CI 3.54 to 24.99) probably increases the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Additionally, clodronate (3 of 1000; RR 2.65, 95% CI 0.83 to 8.50) may increase the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw compared to no treatment/placebo (low certainty). Renal impairment We estimated that 14 of 1000 participants with no treatment/placebo developed renal impairment. Evidence from the NMA (12 trials; 22,469 participants) suggests that ibandronate (28 of 1000; RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.88) probably increases the occurrence of renal impairment compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty). Zoledronic acid (21 of 1000; RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.58) probably increases the occurrence of renal impairment while clodronate (12 of 1000; RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.39) and denosumab (11 of 1000; RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.19) probably results in little to no difference regarding the occurrence of renal impairment compared to no treatment/placebo (moderate certainty).
CONCLUSIONS: When considering bone-modifying agents for managing bone loss in women with early or locally advanced breast cancer, one has to balance between efficacy and safety. Our findings suggest that bisphosphonates (excluding alendronate and pamidronate) or denosumab compared to no treatment or placebo likely results in increased bone mineral density and reduced fracture rates. Our survival analysis that included pre and postmenopausal women showed little to no difference regarding overall survival. These treatments may lead to more adverse events. Therefore, forming an overall judgement of the best ranked bone-modifying agent is challenging. More head-to-head comparisons, especially comparing denosumab with any bisphosphonate, are needed to address gaps and validate the findings of this review.

The activins-follistatins-inhibins (AFI) hormonal system affects bone metabolism. Treatments that alter bone metabolism may also alter the AFI molecules. In this non-randomized, open-label, head-to-head comparative study, circulating levels of the AFI system were evaluated in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated for 12 months with either teriparatide (n = 23) or denosumab (n = 22). Τeriparatide treatment increased activin B (p = 0.01) and activin AB (p = 0.004) and the ratios activin A/follistatin (p = 0.006), activin B/follistatin (p = 0.007), activin AB/follistatin (p < 0.001) and activin AB/FSTL3 (p = 0.034). The significant p for trend in group*time interactions of activins B and AB and of the ratio activin AB/FSTL3 remained robust after adjustment for body mass index (BMI) and lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) but it was lost for activin B after adjustment for previous antiresorptive treatment. The effect of teriparatide on BMD was attenuated when it was adjusted for baseline activins levels or their 12-month changes. No changes were observed after denosumab treatment. In conclusion, activins B and AB, as well as the ratios of all activins to follistatin and of activin AB to FSTL3 increased with teriparatide treatment, possibly in a compensatory manner. Future studies are needed to study the potentially important role activins may play in bone biology and any associations with the effect of teriparatide on BMD.
Bone and the muscle, comprise two tissues that are considered to interact with each other, not only through mechanical but also through endocrine signals. Several components of the activins-follistatins-inhibins (AFI) hormonal system have been shown to be secreted by the muscle and affect the bone possibly contributing to this interplay. We have previously investigated levels of the AFI molecules in case–control studies and reported differences between osteoporotic versus osteopenic versus postmenopausal and premenopausal women with normal bone mineral density (BMD). In this 12-month, non-randomized, open-labeled, head-to-head comparative study, we prospectively compared the effect of antiosteoporotic agents with opposite effect on bone metabolism, i.e., teriparatide versus denosumab, on the circulating concentrations of all known molecules of the AFI system in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. We observed increases of activins after teriparatide treatment, but no effect after denosumab treatment on any of the AFI molecules studied. Since activins are mainly acting in an autocrine way and since activin B and AB have not been extensively studied, further studies in the basic research, preclinical and clinical research fields are required to expand these observations and fully elucidate physiology and any therapeutic potential.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal Stem Cells (SSCs) are required for skeletal development, homeostasis, and repair. The perspective of their wide application in regenerative medicine approaches has supported research in this field, even though so far results in the clinic have not reached expectations, possibly due also to partial knowledge of intrinsic, potentially actionable SSC regulatory factors. Among them, the pleiotropic cytokine RANKL, with essential roles also in bone biology, is a candidate deserving deep investigation.
METHODS: To dissect the role of the RANKL cytokine in SSC biology, we performed ex vivo characterization of SSCs and downstream progenitors (SSPCs) in mice lacking Rankl (Rankl-/-) by means of cytofluorimetric sorting and analysis of SSC populations from different skeletal compartments, gene expression analysis, and in vitro osteogenic differentiation. In addition, we assessed the effect of the pharmacological treatment with the anti-RANKL blocking antibody Denosumab (approved for therapy in patients with pathological bone loss) on the osteogenic potential of bone marrow-derived stromal cells from human healthy subjects (hBMSCs).
RESULTS: We found that, regardless of the ossification type of bone, osteochondral SSCs had a higher frequency and impaired differentiation along the osteochondrogenic lineage in Rankl-/- mice as compared to wild-type. Rankl-/- mice also had increased frequency of committed osteochondrogenic and adipogenic progenitor cells deriving from perivascular SSCs. These changes were not due to the peculiar bone phenotype of increased density caused by lack of osteoclast resorption (defined osteopetrosis); indeed, they were not found in another osteopetrotic mouse model, i.e., the oc/oc mouse, and were therefore not due to osteopetrosis per se. In addition, Rankl-/- SSCs and primary osteoblasts showed reduced mineralization capacity. Of note, hBMSCs treated in vitro with Denosumab had reduced osteogenic capacity compared to control cultures.
CONCLUSIONS: We provide for the first time the characterization of SSPCs from mouse models of severe recessive osteopetrosis. We demonstrate that Rankl genetic deficiency in murine SSCs and functional blockade in hBMSCs reduce their osteogenic potential. Therefore, we propose that RANKL is an important regulatory factor of SSC features with translational relevance.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of osteoporosis medications on opportunistic CT-based Hounsfield units (HU).
METHODS: Spine and nonspine surgery patients were retrospectively identified who had been treated with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for 3 to 12 months, teriparatide for > 12 months, denosumab for > 12 months, or alendronate for > 12 months. HU were measured in the L1-4 vertebral bodies. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean change in HU among the five treatment regimens.
RESULTS: In total, 318 patients (70% women) were included, with a mean age of 69 years and mean BMI of 27 kg/m2. There was a significant difference in mean HU improvement (p < 0.001) following treatment with romosozumab for 3 to 12 months (n = 32), teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (n = 30), teriparatide for > 12 months (n = 44), denosumab for > 12 months (n = 123), and alendronate for > 12 months (n = 100). Treatment with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months significantly increased the mean HU by 26%, from a baseline of 85 to 107 (p = 0.012). Patients treated with teriparatide for > 12 months (mean 23 months) experienced a mean HU improvement of 25%, from 106 to 132 (p = 0.039). Compared with the mean baseline HU, there was no significant difference after treatment with teriparatide for 3 to 12 months (110 to 119, p = 0.48), denosumab for > 12 months (105 to 107, p = 0.68), or alendronate for > 12 months (111 to 113, p = 0.80).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with romosozumab for a mean of 10.5 months and teriparatide for a mean of 23 months experienced improved spinal bone mineral density as estimated by CT-based opportunistic HU. Given the shorter duration of effective treatment, romosozumab may be the preferred medication for optimization of osteoporotic patients in preparation for elective spine fusion surgery.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive intermediate bone tumor. Denosumab has shown effectiveness in GCTB treatment; however, the benefits of denosumab de-escalation for unresectable GCTB have not been well discussed. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of denosumab de-escalation for GCTB. The medical records of 9 patients with unresectable GCTB or resectable GCTB not eligible for resection, who received de-escalated denosumab treatment at Okayama University Hospital (Okayama, Japan) between April 2014 and December 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. The denosumab treatment interval was gradually extended to every 8, 12 and 24 weeks. The radiographic changes and clinical symptoms during standard and de-escalated denosumab therapy were assessed. The denosumab interval was de-escalated after a median of 12 months of a standard 4-weekly treatment. Imaging showed that the re-ossification of osteolytic lesions obtained with the 4-weekly treatment were sustained with 8- and 12-weekly treatments. The extraskeletal masses reduced significantly with standard treatment, while tumor reduction was sustained during de-escalated treatment. During the 24-weekly treatment, 2 patients remained stable, while 2 patients developed local recurrence. The clinical symptoms improved significantly with standard treatment and remained improved during de-escalated treatment. There were severe adverse events including osteonecrosis of the jaw (2 patients), atypical femoral fracture (1 patient) and malignant transformation of GCTB (1 patient). In conclusion, 12-weekly de-escalated denosumab treatment showed clinical benefits as a maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable GCTB, in addition to sustained stable tumor control and improved clinical symptoms with standard treatment. A 24-weekly treatment can also be administered, with careful attention paid to detecting local recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of anti-osteoporotic agents and refracture incidence in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) following percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) and to evaluate the real-world treatment of patients using denosumab following PVA. This study aims to provide spine surgeons with empirical insights derived from real-world scenarios to enhance the management of bone health in OVCF patients.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was based on data from the MarketScan and Optum databases from the USA. Female patients aged 55-90 years who underwent PVA for OVCF between January 2013 and March 2020 were included and followed up from the day after surgery. Patients who received at least one dose of denosumab were included in the denosumab cohort and were further divided into the on-treatment and off-treatment groups according to whether they received a second dose of denosumab, with follow-up beginning on the index day (225 days after the first denosumab dose). In this study, the off-treatment group was considered as the control group. Refracture incidence after PVA, the proportion of patients using anti-osteoporotic agents in the total study population, and refracture incidence after the index day in the denosumab cohort were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 13,451 and 21,420 patients from the MarketScan and Optum databases, respectively, were included. In the denosumab cohort, the cumulative incidence of clinical osteoporotic fractures within 3 years after the index day was significantly lower in the on-treatment group than in the off-treatment group (MarketScan database: 23.0% vs 39.0%, p = 0.002; Optum database: 28.2% vs 40.0%, p = 0.023). The cumulative incidence of clinical vertebral fractures was also lower in the on-treatment group than in the off-treatment group, with a significant difference in the MarketScan database (14.4% vs 25.5%, p = 0.002) and a numerical difference was found in the Optum database (20.2% vs 27.5%, p = 0.084).The proportion of patients using anti-osteoporotic agents was low at 6 months postoperatively, with only approximately 7% using denosumab and 13%-15% taking oral bisphosphonates.
CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women have a high refracture rate and a low proportion of anti-osteoporotic drug use after PVA. Continued denosumab treatment after PVA is associated with a lower risk of osteoporotic and clinical vertebral fractures. Therefore, denosumab may be a treatment option for patients with osteoporosis after PVA.

Objective: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of denosumab (DENOS) versus zoledronic acid (ZOL) in the bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Methods: The clinical data of 80 patients with myeloma bone disease (MBD) at the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital between March 1, 2021 and June 30, 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighteen patients with severe renal impairment (SRI, endogenous creatinine clearance rate<30 ml/min) were treated with DENOS, and 62 non-SRI patients were divided into DENOS (30 patients) and ZOL group (32 patients) . Results: Hypocalcemia was observed in 26 (33%) patients, and 22 patients developed hypocalcemia during the first treatment course. The incidence of hypocalcemia in the non-SRI patients of DENOS group was higher than that in the ZOL group [20% (6/30) vs 13% (4/32), P=0.028]. The incidence of hypocalcemia in SRI was 89% (16/18). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that endogenous creatinine clearance rate<30 ml/min was significantly associated with hypocalcemia after DENOS administration (P<0.001). After 1 month of antiresorptive (AR) drug application, the decrease in the serum β-C-terminal cross-linked carboxy-telopeptide of collagen type I concentrations of SRI and non-SRI patients in the DENOS group were significantly higher than that in the ZOL group (68% vs 59% vs 27%, P<0.001). The increase in serum procollagen type Ⅰ N-terminal propeptide concentrations of patients with or without SRI in the DENOS group were significantly higher than that in the ZOL group (34% vs 20% vs 11%, P<0.05). The level of intact parathyroid hormone in each group increased after AR drug treatment. None of the patients developed osteonecrosis of the jaw and renal adverse events, and no statistically significant differences in the overall response rate, complete remission and stringent complete remission rates were found among the groups (P>0.05), and the median PFS and OS time were not reached (P>0.05) . Conclusions: In the treatment of MBD, DENOS minimizes nephrotoxicity and has strong AR effect. Hypocalcemia is a common adverse event but is usually mild or moderate and manageable.
目的： 探讨地舒单抗（DENOS）与唑来膦酸（ZOL）治疗新诊断多发性骨髓瘤骨病（MBD）的疗效及安全性。 方法： 回顾性分析2021年3月1日至2023年6月30日解放军总医院第五医学中心血液病医学部收治的80例新诊断MBD患者的临床资料。18例伴重度肾损害（SRI）患者[内生肌酐清除率（CrCl）<30 ml/min]均接受DENOS治疗，62例非SRI患者分为DENOS组（30例）和ZOL组（32例）。 结果： 80例MBD患者中26例（33%）发生低钙血症，22例发生于第1次用药后。非SRI患者中DENOS组低钙血症发生率高于ZOL组[20%（6/30）对13%（4/32），P=0.028]，SRI患者低钙血症发生率为89%（16/18）。多因素分析显示，CrCl<30 ml/min与DENOS治疗后低钙血症相关（P<0.001）。抗骨吸收药物治疗1个月后，DENOS组SRI、非SRI患者血清Ⅰ型胶原交联羧基端肽β特殊序列降低率大于ZOL组（68%对59%对27%，P<0.001），DENOS组SRI、非SRI患者血清Ⅰ型原胶原氨基端前肽升高率大于ZOL组（34%对20%对11%，P<0.05）。抗骨吸收药物治疗后各组全段甲状旁腺激素升高。所有患者均未发生抗骨吸收药物相关颌骨坏死及肾脏不良事件，各组血液学总有效率、完全缓解率、严格意义的完全缓解率差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05），中位无进展生存及总生存时间均未达到。 结论： DENOS治疗MBD具有较强的抗骨吸收作用和低肾毒性，低钙血症是常见不良反应，多为轻中度且可控。.