Solid organ transplantation is distinguished from other high-risk surgical procedures by the fact that it utilizes an extremely limited and precious resource and requires a multidisciplinary team approach. For several decades, institutional experience, as quantified by center volume, has been shown to be strongly associated with patient outcomes and graft survival after solid organ transplantation. The United States has implemented a minimum case volume requirement and performance standards for accreditation as a validated transplantation center. Solid organ transplantation in Europe is also governed by the European Union, which monitors patient outcomes and organ allocation. The number of solid organ transplantation cases in Korea is increasing, with patient outcomes comparable to international standards. However, Korea has outdated regulations regarding hospital facilities, and performance indicators including patient outcomes after transplantation are not monitored. Therefore, centers perform solid organ transplantation with no meaningful oversight. In this review, data regarding the impact of institutional case volume of kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplantation are summarized, followed by a description of current transplantation center regulations in the United States and Europe. The basis for the necessity of adequate transplantation center regulations in Korea is presented.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous kidney allograft rupture (KAR) is a severe complication of kidney transplant. KAR occurs when no identifiable injuries noted at the time of the organ retrieval are present. KAR is associated with acute rejection, renal vein thrombosis, severe acute tubular necrosis, or trauma. In recent years, the introduction of hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has provided an excellent option for kidney allograft preservation reducing the incidence of delayed graft function. On the other hand, HMP can also represent a potentially traumatic event for a fragile graft, especially one belonging to expanded criteria donor.
METHODS: Here, to our knowledge, we report the first case of KAR after the use of HMP, which occurred in 60-year-old women undergoing a single kidney transplant from a donation after brain death donor belonging to the expanded criteria donor category. The allograft was perfused for 240 minutes with HMP with passive oxygenation. The post-transplant course was unremarkable with early graft function, but on post operatory day 14 the patient complained of severe pain over the transplant site. A computed tomography scan showed a massive fluid collection in the perigraft region. Immediate surgical exploration showed 2 lacerations of 10 cm and 5 cm length at the upper and midpole of the kidney, requiring transplantectomy. Histologically, the graft did not show features of acute rejection.
CONCLUSIONS: In the presented case, the repair and salvage of the kidney allograft was not possible. However, the review of the pertinent literature does not report another case linking HMP to KAR.

BACKGROUND Delayed graft function (DGF) is defined as failure of the transplanted kidney to function in the early -post-transplant period. DGF is a rare complication after living donor kidney transplant and is most common after deceased donor kidney transplant, probably due to prolonged warm and cold ischemia times during retrieval. Most cases of DGF resolve spontaneously within days to weeks. There are very few reported cases in the literature of DGF lasting over 4 weeks. We present a case that resolved after 55 days. The recipient subsequently achieved normal renal function. CASE REPORT Our patient was a 52-year-old man with end-stage renal disease who underwent a second living donor renal transplant. The donor was his son, with whom he had 1 antigen mismatch. Postoperative day 1, the patient developed anuria and failed to improve with fluids and diuretics. Investigations ruled out common causes of renal dysfunction (rejection, ischemia), but failed to disclose the cause of this condition. After an extended period of watchful waiting, the graft function returned, reaching normal creatinine and urine output levels. CONCLUSIONS DGF after living donor kidney transplantation is rare, and few cases lasting more than a month have been reported. Before diagnosing DGF, other causes of renal dysfunction (rejection, ischemia, medication adverse effects) must be ruled out. In the absence of these, expectant management is appropriate and full graft recovery can be expected, even with anuria and hemodialysis.

Delayed graft function is a manifestation of acute kidney injury unique to transplantation usually related to donor ischemia or recipient immunological causes. Ischemia also considered the most important trigger for innate immunity activation and production of non-HLA antibodies. While ischemia is inevitable after deceased donor transplantation, this complication is rare after living transplantation. Heterologous Immunity commonly used to describe the activation of T cells recognizing specific pathogen-related antigens as well unrelated antigens is common post-viral infection. In transplant-setting induction of heterologous immunity that cross-react with HLA-antigens and subsequent reactivation of memory T cells can lead to allograft rejection.
Here we describe a non-sensitized child with ESRD secondary to lupus nephritis and recent history of COVID-19 infection who experienced 17 days of anuria after first kidney living transplantation from her young HLA-haploidentical uncle donor. Graft histology showed acute cellular rejection, evidence of mild antibody-mediated rejection and vascular wall necrosis in some arterioles suggesting possibility of intraoperative graft ischemia. Both pre- and post-transplant sera showed very high level of several non-HLA antibodies.
The patient was treated for cellular and antibody-mediated rejection while maintained on hemodialysis before her graft function started to improve on day seventeen post transplantation.
The cellular rejection likely trigged by ischemia that activated T-cells-mediated immunity. The high level of non- HLA-antibodies further aggravated the damage and the rapid onset of rejection may be partly related to memory T-cell activation induced by heterologous immunity.

暂无摘要。

Constrictive pericarditis is easily overlooked and can lead to severe problems in hemodynamics and end-organ perfusion, in our patient leading to 98 days of anuria after living kidney transplantation. This was completely reversible after pericardectomy.
A 43-year-old female caucasian patient received a living kidney donation from her mother. She had developed end-stage renal disease 2 years prior due to nephrotic syndrome linked to graft-versus-host disease after allogenic stem-cell transplantation for aplastic anemia. The graft showed insufficient function already in the early postoperative phase. Dialysis was paused after surgery, but the patient developed hypervolemia with ascites and edema in the lower extremities. Doppler ultrasonography showed scarce perfusion, with intrarenal arterial waveforms without end-diastolic flow. The venous perfusion profiles showed pulsatile retrograde flow. There was no identifiable reason for a primary vascular perfusion problem on ultrasonography or transplant kidney angiography. Kidney transplant biopsy revealed no rejection but extensive acute tubular necrosis. Three weeks after transplantation, the patient developed an acute anuric graft failure caused by severe cardiac decompensation. Echocardiography revealed a previously unnoticed constrictive pericarditis, which could be confirmed in a cardio computed tomography scan. The constrictive pericarditis had not been apparent on previous x-rays, computed tomography scans, or echocardiographies, including those for transplantation evaluation. Conservative management of the constrictive pericarditis was not successful and the graft remained anuric. Eventually, the patient underwent pericardectomy 16 weeks after kidney transplantation. Shortly after surgery, the graft started urine production again, which significantly increased within a few days. The clearance improved and 2 weeks later, the patient was free from dialysis.
This case illustrates that special attention should be given to the pericardium during transplant evaluation, especially for patients who previously underwent stem-cell transplantations, chemotherapy or radiation.

The organ shortage has induced many transplant centers to use suboptimal grafts, such as those from expanded criteria donors and donors after cardiac death. Acute renal failure donors, sometimes present in intensive therapy units, have been used in a very low number of cases due to the fear of primary nonfunction of this type of graft. There are few published studies about the utilization of donors with severe acute renal failure and there is no general consensus identifying unequivocal criteria for their use by different transplant centers. We transplanted 2 kidneys from a 67-year-old donor who suffered from acute renal failure as a consequence of extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery and died of a massive cerebral edema with cistern obliteration. The kidneys were discarded by other transplant centers due to the patient\'s acute renal failure, treated by continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Both transplants were successful and both grafts showed very good renal function after 6 months. One recipient suffered from delayed graft function and renal drug toxicity, which resolved 1 month post transplant. The long-term graft function at 10 years is acceptable, with very low proteinuria. As a growing gap between the inadequate supply and constantly high demand for kidney transplantation has led doctors to explore novel policies to increase the number of available organs over the last 2 decades, acute renal failure treated by continuous venovenous hemofiltration does not seem to be a contraindication for the utilization of grafts.

Cholesterol embolization (CE) is a rare and alarming post-transplant complication, responsible for primary non-function (PNF) or delayed graft function (DGF). Its incidence is expected to rise due to increasingly old donors and recipients and the extended criteria for donation. Therapy with statins and steroids has not been shown to be effective, while agonism of prostaglandin I2 has been reported to be useful in systemic CE. We report two cases of acute post-transplant CE in which intravenous iloprost (0.05 mg/kg/day) was added to standard statin and steroid therapy. In the first instance, CE was due to embolization from the kidney artery resulting in embolization of the small vessels; after a long DGF and 15 days of iloprost therapy, renal function recovered. The second instance is a case of embolization from the iliac artery of the recipient, where CE manifested as a partial renal infarction. After 5 days of iloprost administration, creatinine levels improved. Iloprost acts on vasodilation and on different inflammatory pathways, improving the anti-inflammatory profile. Post-transplant CE is difficult to diagnose and, if not treated, can lead to loss of function. Iloprost added to standard therapy could be beneficial in accelerating renal function recovery immediately after transplant.

BACKGROUND: Due to a shortage of donor kidneys, many centers have utilized graft kidneys from brain-dead donors with expanded criteria. Kidney transplantation (KT) from donors on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been identified as a successful way of expanding donor pools. However, there are currently no guidelines or recommendations that guarantee successful KT from donors undergoing ECMO treatment. Therefore, acceptance of appropriate allografts from those donors is solely based on clinician decision.
METHODS: We report a case of successful KT from a brain-dead donor supported by ECMO for the longest duration to date. A 69-year-old male received a KT from a 63-year-old brain-dead donor who had been on therapeutic ECMO treatment for the previous three weeks. The recipient experienced slow recovery of graft function after surgery but was discharged home on post-operative day 17 free from hemodialysis. Allograft function gradually improved thereafter and was comparatively acceptable up to the 12 mo follow-up, with serum creatinine level of 1.67 mg/dL.
CONCLUSIONS: This case suggests that donation even after long-term ECMO treatment could provide successful KT to suitable candidates.

BACKGROUND: Normothermic and hypothermic oxygenated perfusion for donation after circulatory death in kidney transplantation are becoming popular in Italy, with the purpose of reducing the risk of primary non function and delayed graft function due to the prolonged warm ischemia time. Potential complications related to these procedures are currently under investigation and are continuously emerging with the increasing experience. Post-operative infections - in particular graft arteritis - are a rare complication but determine high risk of mortality and of graft loss. The acute onset of the arterial complications makes it very difficult to find an effective treatment, and early diagnosis is crucial for saving both patient and graft. Prevention of such infections in this particular setting are advisable.
METHODS: We present a patient with an acute arterial rupture after transplantation of a DCD graft treated in-vivo hypothermic oxygenated perfusion. The cause was a severe arteritis of the renal artery caused by Candida krusei and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We discussed our treatment and we compared it to the other reported series.
CONCLUSIONS: Fungal infections in DCD transplant may be treacherous and strategies to prevent them should be advocated.