Dabrafenib

Dabrafenib
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    十溴二苯醚(BDE209)作为一种广泛使用的溴化阻燃剂,已被证明与甲状腺功能障碍和甲状腺癌风险有关。虽然dabrafenib已被证实是一种有前途的治疗甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)有BRAFV600E突变的药物,快速获得的dabrafenib耐药性给临床改善带来了巨大挑战,基础机制仍然不明确。通过用BDE209处理PTC来源的和正常的滤泡上皮细胞系,我们评估了其对MAPK通路激活的影响,并评估了其对细胞活力和信号通路的影响。利用蛋白质印迹等方法,IF染色,和RNA-seq生物信息学分析。我们的研究结果表明,BDE209会加剧MAPK激活,通过触发EGFR通路破坏dabrafenib的抑制作用,从而突出了BDE209降低dabrafenib治疗BRAF突变PTC的药理功效的潜力。这项研究强调了在有效管理甲状腺癌治疗策略中考虑BDE209暴露等环境因素的重要性。
    Decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE209) has been demonstrated to be associated with thyroid dysfunction and thyroid carcinoma risk as a widely used brominated flame retardants. Although dabrafenib has been confirmed to be a promising therapeutic agent for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) harboring BRAFV600E mutation, the rapid acquired dabrafenib resistance has brought a great challenge to clinical improvement and the underpinning mechanisms remain poorly defined. By treating PTC-derived and normal follicular epithelial cell lines with BDE209, we assessed its impact on the MAPK pathway\'s activation and evaluated the resultant effects on cell viability and signaling pathways, utilizing methods such as Western blot, IF staining, and RNA-seq bioinformatic analysis. Our findings reveal that BDE209 exacerbates MAPK activation, undermining dabrafenib\'s inhibitory effects by triggering the EGFR pathway, thereby highlighting BDE209\'s potential to diminish the pharmacological efficacy of dabrafenib in treating BRAF-mutated PTC. This research underscores the importance of considering environmental factors like BDE209 exposure in the effective management of thyroid carcinoma treatment strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:BRAF+MEK抑制剂可延长BRAFV600突变晚期黑色素瘤患者的预期寿命。获得性抵抗限制了受益的持续时间,但临床前和病例研究表明,间歇性给药可以克服这一局限性.INTERIM是一项评估间歇性给药方案的2期试验。
    方法:由于开始dabrafenib+trametinib而导致的BRAFV600突变晚期黑色素瘤患者随机接受连续(CONT),或间歇(INT;dabrafenibd1-21,曲美替尼d1-14每28天)给药。复合主要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和生活质量(QoL)。次要终点包括反应率(ORR),总生存期(OS)和不良事件(AE)。通过液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)测量突变体BRAFV600EctDNA,使用>1%的突变等位基因频率作为检测阈值。
    结果:79例患者(39INT,40CONT)被招募;中位年龄67岁,65%AJCC(第7版)IV期M1c,29%有脑转移。中位随访19个月,所有疗效指标的INT均较差:中位PFS8.5vs10.7mo(HR1.39,95CI0.79-2.45,p=0.255);中位OS18.1movs未达到(HR1.69,95CI0.87-3.28,p=0.121),ORR57%vs77%。INT患者经历了较少的治疗相关的AE(76%vs88%),但更多的是>3级不良事件(53%对42%)。QoL赞成CONT。治疗前BRAFV600EctDNA的检测与两组的OS较差(HR2.55,95CI1.25-5.21,p=0.01)相关。治疗期间未检测到的变化并不能显着预测更好的OS。
    结论:INTERIM的发现与其他最近的临床试验一致,该临床试验报告称间歇给药不能提高BRAF+MEK抑制剂的疗效。
    BACKGROUND: BRAF+MEK inhibitors extend life expectancy of patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma. Acquired resistance limits duration of benefit, but preclinical and case studies suggest intermittent dosing could overcome this limitation. INTERIM was a phase 2 trial evaluating an intermittent dosing regimen.
    METHODS: Patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma due to start dabrafenib+trametinib were randomised to receive either continuous (CONT), or intermittent (INT; dabrafenib d1-21, trametinib d1-14 every 28 days) dosing. A composite primary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL). Secondary endpoints included response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). Mutant BRAFV600E ctDNA was measured by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), using mutant allele frequency of > 1 % as the detection threshold.
    RESULTS: 79 patients (39 INT, 40 CONT) were recruited; median age 67 years, 65 % AJCC (7th ed) stage IV M1c, 29 % had brain metastases. With 19 months median follow-up, INT was inferior in all efficacy measures: median PFS 8.5 vs 10.7mo (HR 1.39, 95 %CI 0.79-2.45, p = 0.255); median OS 18.1mo vs not reached (HR 1.69, 95 %CI 0.87-3.28, p = 0.121), ORR 57 % vs 77 %. INT patients experienced fewer treatment-related AEs (76 % vs 88 %), but more grade > 3 AEs (53 % vs 42 %). QoL favoured CONT. Detection of BRAFV600E ctDNA prior to treatment correlated with worse OS (HR 2.55, 95 %CI 1.25-5.21, p = 0.01) in both arms. A change to undetected during treatment did not significantly predict better OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: INTERIM findings are consistent with other recent clinical trials reporting that intermittent dosing does not improve efficacy of BRAF+MEK inhibitors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    联合的BRAF/MEK抑制构成了BRAF突变的晚期黑色素瘤的相关治疗选择。未来的,非介入性COMBI-r研究评估了BRAF抑制剂dabrafenib联合MEK抑制剂曲美替尼在常规临床条件下对晚期黑色素瘤患者的有效性和耐受性.无进展生存期(PFS)是主要目标,次要目标包括总生存期(OS),疾病控制率,治疗持续时间,以及不良事件的频率和严重程度。这项研究在55个德国地点招募了472名患者。中位PFS为8.3个月(95CI7.1-9.3),中位OS为18.3个月(14.9-21.3),在治疗前的患者中,两者都倾向于更长。在147例中枢神经系统转移患者中,需要皮质类固醇的患者的PFS相似(可能代表有症状的患者,5.6个月(3.9-7.2))与不需要皮质类固醇的人(5.9个月(4.8-6.9))相比;但是,与未接受糖皮质激素的患者(11.9个月(9.6-19.5))相比,接受糖皮质激素的脑转移患者的OS较短(7.8(6.3-11.6))。对肿瘤生长动力学的综合主观评估被证明有助于预测结果:研究人员的前期分类与事件发生时间结果密切相关。一起来看,COMBI-r反映了其他前瞻性的PFS结果,观察性研究以及关键III期COMBI-d/-v和COMBI-mb试验证实的疗效和安全性结果。
    Combined BRAF/MEK-inhibition constitutes a relevant treatment option for BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma. The prospective, non-interventional COMBI-r study assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of the BRAF-inhibitor dabrafenib combined with the MEK-inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced melanoma under routine clinical conditions. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary objective, and secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), disease control rate, duration of therapy, and the frequency and severity of adverse events. This study enrolled 472 patients at 55 German sites. The median PFS was 8.3 months (95%CI 7.1-9.3) and the median OS was 18.3 months (14.9-21.3), both tending to be longer in pre-treated patients. In the 147 patients with CNS metastases, PFS was similar in those requiring corticosteroids (probably representing symptomatic patients, 5.6 months (3.9-7.2)) compared with those not requiring corticosteroids (5.9 months (4.8-6.9)); however, OS was shorter in patients with brain metastases who received corticosteroids (7.8 (6.3-11.6)) compared to those who did not (11.9 months (9.6-19.5)). The integrated subjective assessment of tumor growth dynamics proved helpful to predict outcome: investigators\' upfront categorization correlated well with time-to-event outcomes. Taken together, COMBI-r mirrored PFS outcomes from other prospective, observational studies and confirmed efficacy and safety findings from the pivotal phase III COMBI-d/-v and COMBI-mb trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:基于改善的无复发生存期,辅助疗法已被批准用于切除的黑素瘤。我们提出了黑色素瘤辅助治疗的真实世界研究的早期发现。
    方法:对接受切除的高危III期和IV期黑色素瘤辅助全身治疗的患者进行了全面的图表回顾。进行统计分析以评估无复发生存率和亚组差异。
    结果:共有149名患者(中位年龄=58.0岁,61.1%的男性,49.7%的BRAFV600E/K基因型)包括在内,94.6%切除了III期黑色素瘤。86.5%的患者接受了抗PD-1免疫治疗,13.4%接受BRAF靶向治疗.中位随访时间为22.4个月,复发率为31.5%,1年和2年无复发生存率分别为79%和62%,分别。在抗PD-1免疫疗法和BRAF靶向疗法之间观察到相似的复发率。长期毒性影响了27.4%的患者,内分泌疾病和晚期出现的免疫相关不良事件很常见。
    结论:真实世界的辅助全身治疗与临床试验实践一致。尽管治疗,复发率仍然很高,和长期毒性,包括内分泌疾病和慢性炎症,并不罕见。
    BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapies have been approved for resected melanoma based on improved recurrence-free survival. We present early findings from a real-world study on adjuvant treatments for melanoma.
    METHODS: A comprehensive chart review was conducted for patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy for resected high-risk stages III and IV melanoma. Statistical analysis was performed to assess recurrence-free survival and subgroup differences.
    RESULTS: A total of 149 patients (median age = 58.0 years, 61.1% men, 49.7% with BRAF V600E/K genotypes) were included, with 94.6% having resected stage III melanoma. Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy was received by 86.5% of patients, while 13.4% received BRAF-targeted therapy. At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, the recurrence rate was 31.5%, with 1-year and 2-year recurrence-free survival rates of 79% and 62%, respectively. Similar recurrence rates were observed between anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and BRAF-targeted therapy. Long-term toxicity affected 27.4% of patients, with endocrinopathies and late-emergent immune-related adverse events being common.
    CONCLUSIONS: Real-world adjuvant systemic therapy aligns with clinical trial practice. Recurrence rates remain high despite treatment, and long-term toxicities, including endocrinopathies and chronic inflammatory conditions, are not uncommon.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在B-RAF突变的皮肤黑色素瘤患者中,靶向治疗是获得快速反应的首选治疗方法.在这个多中心中,prospective,观察性研究,根据乳酸脱氢酶水平将接受达拉非尼和曲美替尼治疗的B-RAF突变皮肤黑色素瘤患者分为两个队列(队列A:局限性疾病(n=104)和队列B:大体积疾病(n=97)).主要终点是进展模式;次要终点是总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),和安全数据。从基线到进展时间,在队列A中,从淋巴结到其他疾病部位的进展以及在队列B中从皮肤和淋巴结到其他部位的进展。各部位受累器官数量和转移灶数量减少.队列A的中位OS为32.4个月(95%CI:20.1个月(不可估计)),队列B为10.5个月(95%CI:8.3-14.4个月);队列A的中位PFS为12.4个月(95%CI:10.9-17.0个月),队列B为8.1个月(95%CI:6.3-9.4个月),未报告新的安全性信号。这项研究描述了在意大利临床实践中使用达拉非尼和曲美替尼的一线治疗进展模式。有效性和安全性数据与先前的试验一致,并扩展到现实世界的异质人群。
    In patients with B-RAF-mutated cutaneous melanoma, targeted therapies are the treatment of choice to achieve a rapid response. In this multicentric, prospective, observational study, patients with B-RAF-mutated cutaneous melanoma who were treated with dabrafenib and trametinib were categorized in two cohorts (cohort A: limited disease (n = 104) and cohort B: bulky disease (n = 97)) according to lactate dehydrogenase levels. The primary endpoint was the progression pattern; the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety data. From baseline to time of progression, there was a progression from nodal to other sites of disease in cohort A and from skin and nodal to other sites in cohort B. In both the cohorts, the number of involved organs and metastases at each location decreased. The median OS was 32.4 months (95% CI: 20.1 months (not estimable)) for cohort A, and 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.3-14.4 months) for cohort B; median PFS was 12.4 months (95% CI: 10.9-17.0 months) for cohort A, and 8.1 months (95% CI: 6.3-9.4 months) for cohort B. No new safety signals were reported. This study describes the patterns of first-line treatment progression with dabrafenib and trametinib in Italian clinical practice. The effectiveness and safety data were consistent with previous trials and extended to a real-world heterogeneous population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:BRAFV600突变是黑色素瘤中最常见的致癌变异,在约50%的皮肤和10%-15%的肢端或粘膜亚型中可见。目前,抗PD-1阻断的免疫治疗和Dabrafenib联合曲美替尼(D+T)靶向治疗的双靶向治疗已被批准作为具有BRAFV600突变的III期黑色素瘤的辅助治疗.根据他们的III期临床试验,两种治疗的3年无复发生存率(RFS)约为60%。然而,与免疫治疗相比,靶向治疗的早期疾病控制效果略好.随着中国药品审批期限的不同,抗PD1单药治疗,D+T组合,和Vemurafenib(V)单药治疗近年来都已在实际临床实践中用作III期BRAF-mut黑色素瘤的辅助治疗。我们进行了这项回顾性研究,以评估不同治疗方法在中国黑色素瘤人群中的疗效。
    方法:对2017年1月至2021年12月复旦大学附属上海肿瘤中心行根治性手术并经病理报告诊断为携带BRAFV600突变的Ⅲ期黑色素瘤患者进行回顾性分析。粘膜黑色素瘤患者,或随访<6个月,或接受其他辅助治疗被排除。进行Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验以用于不同佐剂组的单变量分析。Log-rank分析用于确定无复发生存(RFS)的预后因素。
    结果:在我们的研究中发现了93例切除的III期黑色素瘤患者BRAFV600E突变,包括25名接受辅助抗PD-1免疫疗法(PD-1)的患者,25接受佐剂D+T,23接收V,和20例患者仅观察(OBS)。治疗组之间的基线特征,包括年龄,性别,亚型,一次厚度,溃疡,节点参与。D+T组未达到中位无复发生存期(RFS),V组15个月,PD-1组15个月,在OBS组工作10个月,分别。与OBS相比,所有其他三组都显示出从RFS中受益的趋势,而只有D+T达到统计学差异(p=0.002)。然而,与D+T相比,抗PD-1单药治疗也显示出明显更差的复发控制(p=0.032).
    结论:对于具有BRAF突变的中国人III期黑色素瘤,与仅观察相比,新型靶向治疗和免疫疗法在无复发生存期方面均显示出潜在益处.双靶向D+T疗法可能仍然是辅助疗法的最佳选择,因为抗PD-1单一疗法在现实世界实践中未能报告等效疗效。
    BRAF V600 mutation is the most common oncogenic alternation in melanoma and is visible in around 50% of cutaneous and 10%-15% of acral or mucosal subtypes. Currently, immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 blockade and dual-targeted therapy with Dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T) target therapy have been approved as adjuvant therapies for Stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation. According to their phase III clinical trials, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) is around 60% for both types of treatment. However, early disease control was slightly more effective with targeted therapy than immunotherapy. With different drug approval deadlines in China, anti-PD1 monotherapy, D + T combination, and Vemurafenib (V) monotherapy have all been used in real clinical practice as adjuvant settings for stage III BRAF-mut melanoma in recent years. We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of different treatments in the Chinese melanoma population.
    Patients who underwent radical surgery and were diagnosed as Stage III melanoma harboring BRAF V600 mutation by pathological report were retrospectively identified at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients with mucosal melanoma, or with follow-up of <6 months, or receiving other adjuvant treatment were excluded. Pearson\'s chi-squared test or Fisher\'s exact test was performed for univariable analysis of the different adjuvant groups. Log-rank analysis was used to identify prognostic factors for relapse-free survival (RFS).
    Ninety-three patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation were identified in our study, including 25 patients receiving adjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (PD-1), 25 receiving adjuvant D + T, 23 receiving V, and 20 patients with observation-only (OBS). There were no statistical differences between treatment groups in baseline characteristics including age, gender, subtypes, primary thickness, ulceration, and nodal involvement. Median relapse-free survival (RFS) time was not reached in the D + T group, 15 months in the V group, 15 months in the PD-1 group, and 10 months in the OBS group, respectively. Compared to OBS, all three other groups showed a tendency to benefit from RFS, while only D + T achieved a statistical difference (p = 0.002). However, compared to D + T, anti-PD-1 monotherapy also showed significantly worse relapse control (p = 0.032).
    For Chinese stage III melanoma with BRAF mutation, both novel targeted therapy and immunotherapy showed potential benefits in relapse-free survival compared to observation only. Dual-targeted D + T therapy may still be the best choice for adjuvant therapy because anti-PD-1 monotherapy has failed to report equivalent efficacy in real-world practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    In this randomized, open-label, 2-part, 2 × 2 crossover, phase 1 study, the effect of a low-fat low-calorie (LFLC) meal on the relative bioavailability of a trametinib 2-mg tablet or dabrafenib 150-mg capsule was evaluated in healthy participants. Trametinib adjusted geometric mean ratios (90%CI) of fed : fasted for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 0.76 (0.71-0.82) and 0.82 (0.77-0.88), respectively. For dabrafenib, the adjusted geometric mean ratios of AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration and AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (90%CI) for fed:fasted were 0.85 (0.79-0.91) and 0.86 (0.80-0.92), respectively. Consumption of an LFLC meal delayed trametinib and dabrafenib absorption, with an increase in time to maximum concentration of ≈15 and ≈30 minutes, respectively, compared to the fasted state. These findings indicate that consumption of an LFLC meal reduced the bioavailability and delayed the absorption of trametinib and dabrafenib, supporting current recommendations to administer both drugs in the fasting state; however, an occasional LFLC meal is unlikely to affect the pharmacokinetics of the drugs once steady state is reached and, by consequence, not likely to alter the overall intended efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)的生存率很低。Dabrafenib联合曲美替尼(DT)对BRAFp.V600E患者的生存率有显著影响。然而,持久的反应可能会受到阻力的影响。我们旨在介绍我们在BRAF阳性ATC患者中使用DT的经验,并将其结果与常规治疗进行比较。并研究DT组的肿瘤分子改变。
    方法:2018年5月至2022年4月在三级转诊中心接受治疗的患者,包括评估的BRAF状态。患者分为三组:接受DT治疗的BRAFp.V600E,多模式治疗(MT)下的BRAF野生型(WT),和BRAFWT在同情护理(CC)下。前6个月每月评估一次,之后每3个月评估一次。由RECIST1.1。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),并与对数秩检验进行比较。
    结果:纳入27例ATC患者(DT=9,MT=8,CC=10)。DT的中位OS为475天,MT为156天,CC为39天(P<.001)。12个月时,DT组只有患者存活(71%).PFS中位数为270天,在DT组中,与BRAFWT中少于32天相比(P<.001)。未报告严重不良事件。分子谱分析显示,在四个临床进展之一中,发现了致病性NRAS突变。
    结论:我们的结果表明,与标准治疗相比,达拉非尼联合曲美替尼在生存和复发方面均具有显著的真实世界疗效。具有良好的安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) has a poor survival. The combination of Dabrafenib plus Trametinib (DT) had a significant impact in survival of BRAF p.V600E patients. However, durable responses may be compromised by resistance. We aim to present our experience with DT in BRAF positive ATC patients and compare the outcomes with usual therapy, and to study tumor molecular alterations in the DT group.
    METHODS: Patients treated between May 2018 and April 2022 in a tertiary referral center, assessed for BRAF status were included. Patients were divided in three groups: BRAF p.V600E treated with DT, BRAF wild type (WT) under multimodal therapy (MT), and BRAF WT under compassionate care (CC). Response was assessed monthly in the first 6 months and every 3 months afterwards, by RECIST 1.1. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.
    RESULTS: Twenty-seven ATC patients were included (DT = 9, MT = 8, and CC = 10). Median OS was 475 days for DT, 156 days for MT, and 39 days for CC (P < .001). At 12 months, only patients in the DT group were alive (71%). Median PFS was 270 days, in the DT group, compared with less than 32 days in BRAF WT (P < .001). No severe adverse events were reported. Molecular profiling showed that in one of the four clinical progressions, a pathogenic NRAS mutation was found.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a significant real-world efficacy of Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in both survival and recurrence compared with standard treatment, with a good safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    间变性甲状腺癌(ATC)是一种罕见但致命的甲状腺癌。根据II期研究,Dabrafenib和trametinib已成为BRAF突变患者的标准治疗方法。本研究旨在检查达拉非尼和曲美替尼对ATC患者的影响。回顾性回顾了在台湾三个机构接受治疗的ATC患者。临床特征,BRAF状态,并收集了幸存者。进行多因素分析以确定独立的预后因素。本研究共纳入44例ATC患者。检测到的24例患者中有12例(50%)具有BRAFV600E突变,11例接受了dabrafenib和trametinib治疗。接受达拉非尼和曲美替尼治疗的患者总生存期(OS)长于未接受达拉非尼和曲美替尼治疗的患者(中位OS:10.4个月vs.3.3个月,P=0.05)。客观有效率为81.8%,无进展生存期为7.4个月。多变量分析确定了先前的手术,达布拉非尼和曲美替尼治疗和肺转移,大脑,骨和骨是OS的重要预后因素。在接受达拉非尼和曲美替尼(P=0.017)的患者中,先前手术的益处是显着的,而不是没有达拉非尼和曲美替尼的患者(P=0.067)。目前的研究提供了真实世界的证据,证明达拉非尼和曲美替尼的靶向治疗是有效的,并且显着改善了ATC患者的OS。在靶向治疗时代,先前手术的作用变得很重要。未来的研究应关注ATC患者的耐药机制及其与免疫治疗的结合。
    Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare but lethal thyroid cancer. Dabrafenib and trametinib has been the standard treatment for the patients with BRAF mutation based on phase II study. This study aimed to exam the impact of dabrafenib and trametinib in ATC patients. ATC patients treated in three institutes in Taiwan were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical features, BRAF status, and survivals were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent prognostic factors. A total of 44 ATC patients were enrolled in current study. Twelve (50%) out of 24 detected patients had BRAF V600E mutation and eleven received dabrafenib and trametinib treatment. Patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib had longer overall survival (OS) than the patients without treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib (median OS: 10.4 months vs. 3.3 months, P=0.05). The objective response rate was 81.8% and progress-free survival was 7.4 months. Multivariate analysis identified prior surgery, treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib and metastasis to lung, brain, and bone were significant prognostic factors for OS. The benefit of prior surgery was significant in patients receiving dabrafenib and trametinib (P=0.017) rather than those without dabrafenib and trametinib (P=0.067). The current study provides the real-world evidence that targeted therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib was effective and significantly improved the OS for ATC patients. The role of prior surgery became important in the era of targeted therapy. Future studies should focus on resistance mechanisms and combination with immunotherapy for ATC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管黑色素瘤脑转移(BM)预后不良,有关这些患者及其纳入临床试验的数据仍然很少.我们在此报告了BRAFV600突变黑色素瘤和BM患者接受BRAF和MEK抑制剂dabrafenib(D)和曲美替尼(T)治疗的亚组分析的疗效结果。
    方法:此阶段IIIb单臂,开放标签,多中心,法国研究包括患有不可切除的IIIc或IV期BRAFV600突变黑色素瘤伴或不伴BM的患者。本分析的重点是BM患者。响应率根据标准临床实践在临床和/或放射学上确定。使用KaplanMeier分析估计无进展生存期(PFS),并用多变量Cox回归模型建模。使用指数回归树分析确定风险亚组。显著性设定为p<0.05。
    结果:在2015年3月至2016年11月之间,纳入了856例患者,其中275例(32%)患者患有BM。PFS中位数为5.68个月(95%置信区间[CI],5.29-6.87)。与PFS较短相关的独立因素有ECOG≥1、血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高、≥3个转移部位,和非天真的身份。二元分裂分类和回归树模型将基线LDH和ECOG状态确定为主要预后因素。
    结论:这是迄今为止最大的,接近现实世界,用D+T.治疗的晚期BRAFV600突变黑色素瘤BM患者的研究ECOG>1,≥3转移部位和LDH升高与PFS较短相关,以前仅在没有BM的患者中证明了这一发现。需要进一步研究以确定该人群的最佳治疗顺序。
    BACKGROUND: Despite the poor prognosis associated with melanoma brain metastases (BM), data concerning these patients and their inclusion in clinical trials remains scarce. We report here the efficacy results of a subgroup analysis in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and BM treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T).
    METHODS: This phase IIIb single-arm, open-label, multicenter, French study included patients with unresectable stage IIIc or IV BRAFV600-mutant melanoma with or without BM. The present analysis focuses on patients with BM. Response rates were determined clinically and/or radiologically as per standard clinical practice. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan Meier analysis and modelled with multivariate Cox regression model. Risk subgroups were identified using an exponential regression tree analysis. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
    RESULTS: Between March 2015 and November 2016, 856 patients were included and 275 (32%) patients had BM. Median PFS was 5.68 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.29-6.87). Significant independent factors associated with shorter PFS were ECOG ≥1, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ≥3 metastatic sites, and non-naïve status. The binary-split classification and regression tree modelling identified baseline LDH and ECOG status as major prognostic factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is to date the largest, close to real-world, study in advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma patients with BM treated with D+T. ECOG >1, ≥3 metastatic sites and elevated LDH were associated with shorter PFS, a finding previously demonstrated only in patients without BM. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal treatment sequence in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号