方法:这些建议适用于进行性或复发性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的成年患者。
目的:对于患有进展性胶质母细胞瘤的成年患者,异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)1或2突变的检测是否提供了新的额外管理或预后信息,除了最初出现的肿瘤外?
结论:III级:如果肿瘤在组织学上与原发性肿瘤相似且患者的临床病程与预期相似,则不需要重复IDH突变检测。
目的:对于患有进展性胶质母细胞瘤的成年患者,重复检测MGMT启动子甲基化是否提供了新的或额外的治疗或预后信息,除了最初出现的肿瘤外,还有什么检测方法是最佳的?
结论:III级:不推荐重复MGMT启动子甲基化。
目的:对于患有进展性胶质母细胞瘤的成年患者,EGFR扩增或突变检测是否提供了超出组织学分析提供的治疗或预后信息,如果对以前的组织样本进行检测,
结论:III级:对于组织学特征难以分类为胶质母细胞瘤的病例,EGFR扩增检测可能有助于分类。如果以前检测到EGFR扩增,重复测试是不必要的。在考虑靶向治疗的患者中,可能建议重复EGFR扩增或突变检测。
目的:对于患有进行性胶质母细胞瘤的成年患者,大小组或全基因组测序是否提供了组织学分析以外的管理或预后信息?
结论:III级:对于符合分子指导治疗或临床试验条件或有兴趣的患者,可以考虑初次或重复的大小组或全基因组测序。
目的:对于患有进行性胶质母细胞瘤的成年患者,是否应该进行免疫检查点生物标志物测试以提供超出组织学分析获得的管理和预后信息?
结论:III级:当前证据不支持将PD-L1或错配修复(MMR)酶活性作为标准测试的组成部分。
目的:对于患有进行性胶质母细胞瘤的成年患者,是否存在贝伐单抗反应性的有意义的生物标志物,其评估是否为标准组织学分析所了解的肿瘤管理和预后提供了更多信息?
结论:III级:根据本指南的纳入标准,目前尚无确定的贝伐单抗生物标志物。
METHODS: These recommendations apply to adult patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (GBM).
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does testing for Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 mutations provide new additional management or prognostic information beyond that derived from the tumor at initial presentation?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: Repeat IDH mutation testing is not necessary if the tumor is histologically similar to the primary tumor and the patient\'s clinical course is as expected.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does repeat testing for MGMT promoter methylation provide new or additional management or prognostic information beyond that derived from the tumor at initial presentation and what methods of detection are optimal?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: Repeat MGMT promoter methylation is not recommended.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does EGFR amplification or mutation testing provide management or prognostic information beyond that provided by histologic analysis and if performed on previous tissue samples, does it need to be repeated?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: In cases that are difficult to classify as glioblastoma on histologic features EGFR amplification testing may help in classification. If a previous EGFR amplification was detected, repeat testing is not necessary. Repeat EGFR amplification or mutational testing may be recommended in patients in which target therapy is being considered.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma does large panel or whole genome sequencing provide management or prognostic information beyond that derived from histologic analysis?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: Primary or repeat large panel or whole genome sequencing may be considered in patients who are eligible or interested in molecularly guided therapy or clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma should immune checkpoint biomarker testing be performed to provide management and prognostic information beyond that obtained from histologic analysis?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: The current evidence does not support making PD-L1 or mismatch repair (MMR) enzyme activity a component of standard testing.
OBJECTIVE: For adult patients with progressive glioblastoma are there meaningful biomarkers for bevacizumab responsiveness and does their assessment provide additional information for tumor management and prognosis beyond that learned by standard histologic analysis?
CONCLUSIONS: Level III: No established Bevacizumab biomarkers are currently available based upon the inclusion criteria of this
guideline.