目的:治愈性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)治疗的主要目标是减少或灭活肝内病毒共价闭合环状DNA(cccDNA)。因此,精确的cccDNA定量在临床前和临床研究中是必不可少的。Southern印迹(SB)允许cccDNA可视化,但缺乏敏感性,并且非常费力。定量PCR(qPCR)没有这样的限制,但由于病毒复制中间体(RI)的共检测可能发生不准确的定量。使用不同的样品,保存条件,DNA提取,核酸酶消化方法和qPCR策略阻碍了标准化。在ICE-HBV联盟内,在六个实验室中比较了cccDNA分离和qPCR定量在肝组织和细胞培养物中的可用和新颖的方案,以开发最佳实践的循证指导。
方法:将参考材料(HBV感染的人源化小鼠肝脏和HepG2-NTCP细胞)交换为交叉验证。各组比较不同的DNA提取方法(Hirt提取,有或没有蛋白酶K处理的总DNA提取(PK/-PK)和核酸酶消化方案(质粒安全的ATP依赖性DNase(PSD),T5外切核酸酶,核酸外切酶I/III)。通过qPCR和SB分析样品。
结果:Hirt和-PK提取降低了共存的RI形式。然而,通过qPCR检测cccDNA和无蛋白松弛环状HBVDNA(pf-rcDNA)形式。T5和ExoI/III核酸酶有效去除所有RI形式。相比之下,PSD没有消化pf-rcDNA,但较不容易诱导cccDNA过度消化。在稳定的组织中(例如,Allprotect),核酸酶对cccDNA有不利影响。
结论:我们在此提供全面的基于证据的优化指导,使用可用的qPCR测定控制和验证cccDNA测量。
A major goal of curative hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatments is the reduction or inactivation of intrahepatic viral covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). Hence, precise cccDNA quantification is essential in preclinical and clinical studies. Southern blot (SB) permits cccDNA visualisation but lacks sensitivity and is very laborious. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) has no such limitations but inaccurate quantification due to codetection of viral replicative intermediates (RI) can occur. The use of different samples, preservation conditions, DNA extraction, nuclease digestion methods and qPCR strategies has hindered standardisation. Within the ICE-HBV consortium, available and novel protocols for cccDNA isolation and qPCR quantification in liver tissues and cell cultures were compared in six laboratories to develop evidence-based guidance for best practices.
Reference material (HBV-infected humanised mouse livers and HepG2-NTCP cells) was exchanged for cross-validation. Each group compared different DNA extraction methods (Hirt extraction, total DNA extraction with or without proteinase K treatment (+PK/-PK)) and nuclease digestion protocols (plasmid-safe ATP-dependent DNase (PSD), T5 exonuclease, exonucleases I/III). Samples were analysed by qPCR and SB.
Hirt and -PK extraction reduced coexisting RI forms. However, both cccDNA and the protein-free relaxed circular HBV DNA (pf-rcDNA) form were detected by qPCR. T5 and Exo I/III nucleases efficiently removed all RI forms. In contrast, PSD did not digest pf-rcDNA, but was less prone to induce cccDNA overdigestion. In stabilised tissues (eg, Allprotect), nucleases had detrimental effects on cccDNA.
We present here a comprehensive evidence-based guidance for optimising, controlling and validating cccDNA measurements using available qPCR assays.