Background: Ictal bradycardia (IB) and asystole (IA) represent a rare but potentially harmful feature of epileptic seizures. The aim of this study was to study IB/IA in patients with sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE). Methods: We retrospectively included cases with video-EEG-confirmed SHE who attended our Institute up to January 2021. We reviewed the ictal polysomnography recordings focusing on ECG and identified cases with IB (R-R interval ≥ 2 s or a ≥10% decrease of baseline heart rate) and IA (R-R interval ≥ 4 s). Results: We included 200 patients (123 males, 61.5%), with a mean age of 42 ± 16 years. Twenty patients (20%) had focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) on brain MRI. Eighteen (out of 104 tested, 17.3%) carried pathogenic variants (mTOR pathway, n = 10, nAchR subunits, n = 4, KCNT1, n = 4). We identified IB/IA in four cases (2%): three had IA (mean 10 s) and one had IB. Three patients had FCD (left fronto-insular region, left amygdala, right mid-temporal gyrus) and two had pathogenic variants in DEPDC5; both features were more prevalent in patients with IB/IA than those without (p = 0.003 and p = 0.037, respectively). Conclusions: We identified IB/IA in 2% of patients with SHE and showed that this subgroup more frequently had FCD on brain MRI and pathogenic variants in genes related to the mTOR pathway.

OBJECTIVE: Dishevelled EGL-10 and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 5 (DEPDC5) mutations are found in a wide spectrum of focal epilepsies ranging from epilepsy caused by malformation of cortical development to non-lesional epilepsy, including sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy (SHE). A surgical approach has been anecdotally reported in patients with DEPDC5 mutations, but most of these cases had a lesional etiology.
METHODS: We describe a stereo-EEG (SEEG) study in a patient with drug-resistant/non-lesional SHE. Patient was screened for known mutations associated with SHE.
RESULTS: SEEG disclosed bilateral synchronous and independent activity prevailing on the right central-anterior cingulate cortex, without a clear spatially defined epileptogenic zone. Due to the lack of a clear epileptogenic zone, surgery was contraindicated. Years later a DEPDC5 mutation was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that genetic analysis should be considered before performing SEEG study in a patient with drug resistant non-lesional SHE, in the presence of seizures in wakefulness and unclear anatomo-electroclinical correlation. If DEPDC5 mutations are identified, the presurgical evaluation should be tailored to look for MRI-negative focal cortical dysplasia and a wide epileptogenic network. The appropriate management and potential benefit of surgery for genetic non-lesional epilepsy have yet to be clarified.