Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) related to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has better survival outcomes compared to non-HPV-related OPSCC, leading to efforts to de-escalate the intensity of treatment to reduce associated morbidity. This article reviews recent clinical efforts to explore different de-escalation frameworks with a particular emphasis on the emergence of transoral robotic surgery and surgically driven de-escalation approaches. It discusses the current evidence for incorporating surgery into an evolving treatment paradigm for HPV-related OPSCC.

BACKGROUND: Axillary management after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is evolving but axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard of care for patients with residual nodal disease. The results of the Alliance A011202 trial evaluating the oncologic safety of ALND omission in this cohort are pending but we hypothesize that ALND omission is already increasing.
METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with cT1-3N1M0 breast cancer who underwent NAC and had residual nodal disease (ypN1mi-2) from 2012 to 2021. Temporal trends in omission of completion ALND were assessed annually. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify factors associated with ALND omission and overall survival (OS), respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 6101 patients were included; the majority presented with cT2 disease (57%), with 69% HER2+, 23% triple-negative, and 8% hormone receptor-positive/HER2-. Overall, 34% underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone. Rates of ALND were the lowest in the last 4 years of observation. After adjustment, treatment at community centers (vs. academic) and lower pathologic nodal burden were associated with omission of ALND. ALND omission was associated with a higher unadjusted OS (5-year OS: 86% SLNB alone vs. 84% ALND; log-rank p = 0.03), however this association was not maintained after adjustment.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the impending release of the Alliance A011202 results, omission of ALND in patients with residual nodal disease after NAC is increasing. This practice appears more prominent in community centers and in patients with a lower burden of residual nodal disease. No association with OS was noted.

The standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ became well established through the results of several valuable clinical trials, and its therapeutic benefits have now come to be taken for granted. Ductal carcinoma in situ has an extremely good prognosis with the current treatment approach, with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of 97-98%. According to one retrospective cohort study, the breast cancer-specific survival rate of patients with low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ does not differ significantly between patients undergoing and not undergoing surgery. Some patients with ductal carcinoma in situ are not at a risk of progression to invasive cancer, but the predictors of such progression have not yet been clearly identified. Therefore, the same therapeutic strategies have been used to treat ductal carcinoma in situ and under the assumption that they have risks of invasive breast cancer, and a well-balanced risk/benefit ratio in respect of treatment has not yet been achieved. Based on the results of several recent clinical trials aimed at ensuring provision of a well-balanced treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ which carries a good prognosis, de-escalation of postoperative adjuvant therapy has now begun. Currently, not only is the optimization of postoperative adjuvant therapy accelerating, but also clinical trials to de-escalate basic surgical treatments are under way. There is a possibility of achieving individualized treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with reduced treatment intervention. In this review, we present an overview of the current treatment approaches and potential future management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

The incidence of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancers has increased in recent decades. While cure rates exceed those of HPV-negative head and neck cancers, both acute and long-term sequelae of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery have led to clinical investigation into de-escalation of treatment. De-escalation trials have sought to reduce long-term treatment-related morbidity by altering or omitting chemotherapy, reducing radiation, or incorporating less invasive surgical resection through transoral surgery. More recent approaches include the use of novel agents such as immunotherapy in place of cisplatin. With the advent of tumor-tissue-modified HPV DNA detection and monitoring in blood, new strategies incorporating this biomarker are being developed.

BACKGROUND: De-escalation is often advocated to reduce harm associated with violence and use of restrictive interventions, but there is insufficient understanding of factors that influence de-escalation behaviour in practice. For the first time, using behaviour change and implementation science methodology, this paper aims to identify the drivers that will enhance de-escalation in acute inpatient and psychiatric intensive care mental health settings.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of 46 qualitative interviews with ward staff (n = 20) and patients (n = 26) informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.
RESULTS: Capabilities for de-escalation included knowledge (impact of trauma on memory and self-regulation and the aetiology and experience of voice hearing) and skills (emotional self-regulation, distress validation, reducing social distance, confirming autonomy, setting limits and problem-solving). Opportunities for de-escalation were limited by dysfunctional risk management cultures/ relationships between ward staff and clinical leadership, and a lack of patient involvement in safety maintenance. Motivation to engage in de-escalation was limited by negative emotion associated with moral formulations of patients and internal attributions for behaviour.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to training that enhances knowledge and skills, interventions to enhance de-escalation should target ward and organisational cultures, as well as making fundamental changes to the social and physical structure of inpatient mental health wards. Psychological interventions targeting negative emotion in staff are needed to increase motivation. This paper provides a new evidence-based framework of indicative changes that will enhance de-escalation in adult acute mental health inpatient and PICU settings.

BACKGROUND: Workplace violence disproportionately affects healthcare workers and verbal aggression from patients frequently occurs. While verbal de-escalation is the first-line approach to defusing anger, there is a lack of consistent curricula or robust evaluation in undergraduate medical education.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a medical school curriculum focused on de-escalation skills for adult patients and evaluate effectiveness with surveys and an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE).
METHODS: We implemented this curriculum in the \"Get Ready for Residency Bootcamp\" of a single large academic institution in 2023.
METHODS: Forty-four fourth-year medical students PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The curriculum consisted of an interactive didactic focused on our novel CALMER framework that prioritized six evidence-based de-escalation skills and a separate standardized patient practice session.
RESULTS: The post-curriculum survey (82% response rate) found a significant increase from 2.79 to 4.11 out of 5 (p ≤ 0.001) in confidence using verbal de-escalation. Preparedness improved with every skill and curriculum satisfaction averaged 4.79 out of 5. The OSCE found no differences in skill level between students who received the curriculum and those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: This evidence-based and replicable de-escalation skill curriculum improves medical student confidence and preparedness in managing agitated patients.

Almost all currently licensed disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS treatment require prolonged if not lifelong administration. Yet, as people age, the immune system has increasingly reduced responsiveness, known as immunosenescence. Many MS DMTs reduce the responsiveness of the immune system, increasing the risks for infections and possibly cancers. As people with MS (pwMS) age, it is recognized that inflammatory MS activity declines. Several studies have addressed de-escalation of DMTs for relapsing MS under special circumstances. Here, we review evidence for de-escalating DMTs as a strategy that is particularly relevant to pwMS of older age. Treatment de-escalation can involve various strategies, such as extended or reduced dosing, switching from high-efficacy DMTs having higher risks to moderately effective DMTs with lesser risks, or treatment discontinuation. Studies have suggested that for natalizumab extended dosing maintained clinical efficacy while reducing the risk of PML. Extended interval dosing of ocrelizumab mitigated the decline of Ig levels. Retrospective and observational discontinuation studies demonstrate that age is an essential modifier of drug efficacy. Discontinuation of MS treatment in older patients has been associated with a stable disease course, while younger patients who discontinued treatment were more likely to experience new clinical activity. A recently completed 2-year randomized-controlled discontinuation study in 260 stable pwMS > 55 years found stable clinical multiple sclerosis with only a small increased risk of new MRI activity upon discontinuation. DMT de-escalation or discontinuation in MS patients older than 55 years may be non-inferior to continued treatment with immunosuppressive agents having higher health risks. However, despite several small studies, a definite conclusion about treatment de-escalation in older pwMS will require larger and longer studies. Ideally, comparison of de-escalation versus continuation versus discontinuation of DMTs should be done by prospective randomized-controlled trials enrolling sufficient numbers of subjects to allow comparisons for MS patients of both sexes within age groups, such as 55-59, 60-65, 66-69, etc. Optimally, such studies should be 3 years or longer and should incorporate testing for specific markers of immunosenescence (such as T-cell receptor excision circles) to account for differential aging of individuals.

Judicious use of antibiotics in the critically ill starts with the evaluation for suspected infection, including close consideration of the patient\'s history. If infection is present or strongly suspected, empiric antibiotics should be promptly initiated and selected based on the source of infection, patient factors, and local resistance patterns. If the surgeon decides source control is indicated, they must determine the optimal approach and timing. As soon as culture and sensitivity data are available, de-escalation to narrower spectrum agents is essential to decrease the risks of antibiotic toxicity and resistance. Importantly, surgeons should participate in antibiotic stewardship in their patients.

UNASSIGNED: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with potent P2Y12 inhibitor is the cornerstone of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management. Balancing the effects of different strategies of antiplatelet therapy including DAPT de-escalation, potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, and conventional DAPT is a hot topic.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted from the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase through October 2021 to identify various DAPT strategies in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for treatment of ACS patients after undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES). The network meta-analysis was performed to investigate the net clinic benefit of the DAPT de-escalation, potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, as well as conventional DAPT. The primary outcome was net adverse clinical events, defined as a composite of major bleeding and cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or target-vessel revascularization. The secondary outcomes include major adverse cardiac events and trial-defined major or minor bleeding.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 14 RCTs with 63,982 patients were included. The DAPT de-escalation was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome compared with potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy (De-escalation vs monotherapy odds ratio (OR): 0.72 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55-0.96), and other antiplatelet strategies (De-escalation vs clopidogrel + aspirin OR: 0.49 95% CI: 0.39-0.63; De-escalation vs prasugrel + aspirin OR: 0.76 95% CI: 0.59-0.98; De-escalation vs ticagrelor + aspirin OR: 0.76 95% CI: 0.55-0.90). There were no statistical differences in the incidence of bleeding (DAPT de-escalation vs P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy OR: 0.73 95% CI: 0.47-1.12) and major adverse cardiac events (DAPT de-escalation vs P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy OR: 0.79 95% CI: 0.59-1.08) between DAPT de-escalation and potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: This network meta-analysis showed that DAPT de-escalation would reduce the net adverse clinical events, compared with potent P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, for ACS patients undergone PCI treatment.

BACKGROUND: P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may balance ischemic and bleeding risks in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it remains uncertain how different P2Y12 inhibitors used as monotherapy affect outcomes.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT (≤3 months) versus 12-month DAPT in ACS were included. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). All analyses included an interaction term for the P2Y12 inhibitor used as monotherapy. Trial sequential analysis were run to explore whether the effect estimate of each outcomes may be affected by further studies.
RESULTS: Seven trials encompassing 27,284 ACS patients were included. Compared with 12-month DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT was associated with no difference in MACE (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.12) and a significant reduction in net adverse clinical events (NACE) (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94), any bleeding (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66) and major bleeding (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.60). Significant interactions for subgroup difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel monotherapy were found for MACE (pint=0.016), all-cause death (pint=0.042), NACE (pint=0.018), and myocardial infarction (pint=0.028). Trial sequential analysis showed conclusive evidence of improved NACE with ticagrelor, but not with clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with standard DAPT.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT halves bleeding without increasing ischemic events compared with standard DAPT. Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel monotherapy, reduced MACE, NACE and mortality compared with standard DAPT, supporting its use after aspirin discontinuation. Protocol registration: This study is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023494797).