Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19

细胞色素 P - 450 CYP2C19
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估使用临床决策支持(CDS)算法的基因型指导选择口服抗血小板药物是否可以降低加勒比海西班牙裔患者的主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs)的发生率,六个月后。
    方法:开放标签,多中心,非随机临床试验。
    方法:波多黎各的八家二级和三级医院(公立和私立)。
    方法:300名加勒比西班牙裔患者服用氯吡格雷,两种性别,接受了急性冠状动脉综合征的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),稳定的缺血性心脏病和记录的心外血管疾病。
    方法:将患者分为标准治疗(SoC)和基因型指导(药物遗传学(PGx)-CDS)组(每组150个),并通过风险评分进行分层。根据先前开发的CDS风险预测算法计算风险评分,该算法旨在为每位患者提供可行的治疗建议。个体血小板功能,基因型,纳入了临床和人口统计学数据.仅PGx-CDS组中高风险评分≥2的患者推荐使用替格瑞洛,其余的保留或降低至氯吡格雷。干预在PCI后3-5天内进行。还测量了依从性药物评分。
    方法:MACCE的发生率(原发性)和出血事件(继发性)。患者无事件时间与预测变量之间的统计关联(即,治疗组,风险评分)使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox比例风险回归模型进行检验.
    结果:与SoC组相比,基因型指导组的MACCE的临床风险较低,但没有显着差异(8.7%vs10.7%,p=0.56;HR=0.56)。在高风险评分的患者中,基因型驱动的抗血小板治疗指导在冠状动脉支架置入术后6个月降低MACCE发生率方面优于SoC(校正后HR=0.104;p<0.0001).
    结论:实施我们的PGx-CDS算法以显著降低接受氯吡格雷治疗后加勒比海西班牙裔患者MACCEs发生率的潜在益处仅在高危患者中观察到,在其他患者组中没有明显的效果。
    背景:NCT03419325。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess whether genotype-guided selection of oral antiplatelet drugs using a clinical decision support (CDS) algorithm reduces the rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) among Caribbean Hispanic patients, after 6 months.
    METHODS: An open-label, multicentre, non-randomised clinical trial.
    METHODS: Eight secondary and tertiary care hospitals (public and private) in Puerto Rico.
    METHODS: 300 Caribbean Hispanic patients on clopidogrel, both genders, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes, stable ischaemic heart disease and documented extracardiac vascular diseases.
    METHODS: Patients were separated into standard-of-care (SoC) and genotype-guided (pharmacogenetic (PGx)-CDS) groups (150 each) and stratified by risk scores. Risk scores were calculated based on a previously developed CDS risk prediction algorithm designed to make actionable treatment recommendations for each patient. Individual platelet function, genotypes, clinical and demographic data were included. Ticagrelor was recommended for patients with a high-risk score ≥2 in the PGx-CDS group only, the rest were kept or de-escalated to clopidogrel. The intervention took place within 3-5 days after PCI. Adherence medication score was also measured.
    METHODS: The occurrence rate of MACCEs (primary) and bleeding episodes (secondary). Statistical associations between patient time free of events and predictor variables (ie, treatment groups, risk scores) were tested using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional-hazards regression models.
    RESULTS: The genotype-guided group had a clinically lower but not significantly different risk of MACCEs compared with the SoC group (8.7% vs 10.7%, p=0.56; HR=0.56). Among high-risk score patients, genotype-driven guidance of antiplatelet therapy showed superiority over SoC in reducing MACCE incidence 6 months postcoronary stenting (adjusted HR=0.104; p< 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The potential benefit of implementing our PGx-CDS algorithm to significantly reduce the incidence rate of MACCEs in post-PCI Caribbean Hispanic patients on clopidogrel was observed exclusively among high-risk patients, with apparently no evident effect in other patient groups.
    BACKGROUND: NCT03419325.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在探讨P2Y12抑制剂方案对细胞色素P450家族2亚家族C成员19功能缺失等位基因携带者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后房颤(POAF)发生的影响。
    结果:从2019年5月至2023年11月,含有细胞色素P450家族2亚家族Cmember19*2或*3等位基因的患者接受选择性的首次非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术,包括阿司匹林100mg/d和替格瑞洛180mg/d(AT组;n=95)与氯吡格雷75mg/d(前瞻性和氯吡格雷组;n=95)主要终点是一周内POAF的累积发生率。次要终点是POAF负荷,血小板聚集性,全身免疫炎症指数和心率变异性。AT组的POAF发生率为21.1%,阿司匹林和氯吡格雷组为41.1%(风险比,0.46[95%CI,0.27-0.76];P=0.003)。POAF负担,AT组ADP诱导的血小板聚集和全身免疫炎症指数明显低于阿司匹林和氯吡格雷组。心率变异性数据显示,AT组正常-正常RR间期的高频和SD均增加,低频/高频比降低,表明交感神经/副交感神经激活是平衡的。
    结论:在携带细胞色素P450家族2亚家族C成员19功能缺失等位基因的患者中,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后的AT方案与较低的POAF发生率相关,伴随着较低的心房颤动负担,ADP诱导的血小板聚集,降低全身免疫-炎症指数反应,与阿司匹林和氯吡格雷方案相比,自动神经系统平衡。通过有效的抗血小板组合,抑制全身性免疫炎症反应并维持自主神经平衡可能是POAF治疗效果的基础。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the effect of a P2Y12 inhibitor regimen on the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery in carriers with the cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member19 loss-of-function allele.
    RESULTS: From May 2019 to November 2023, patients containing the cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member19*2 or *3 allele undergoing elective first-time off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery including aspirin 100 mg/d and ticagrelor 180 mg/d (AT group; n=95) versus clopidogrel 75 mg/d (aspirin and clopidogrel group; n=95) were prospectively followed. The primary end point was the cumulative incidence of POAF in a week. The secondary end points were POAF burden, platelet aggregability, systemic immune-inflammation index and heart rate variability. The incidence of POAF was 21.1% in the AT group versus 41.1% in the aspirin and clopidogrel group (hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.27-0.76]; P=0.003). POAF burden, ADP-induced platelet aggregation and systemic immune-inflammation index was notably lower in the AT group than the aspirin and clopidogrel group. Heart rate variability data showed an increase in both high-frequency and SD of normal-to-normal RR intervals in the AT group with a decreased low-frequency/high-frequency ratio, suggesting that the sympathetic/parasympathetic activation was balanced.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients carrying the cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member19 loss-of-function allele, an AT regimen after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with a lower incidence of POAF, paralleled by lower atrial fibrillation burden, ADP-induced platelet aggregation, lower systemic immune-inflammation index reaction, and a balanced automatic nerve system compared with an aspirin and clopidogrel regimen. Inhibiting the systemic immune-inflammation response and sustaining automatic nerve balance may underlie the therapeutic effect of POAF by a potent antiplatelet combination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在了解替格瑞洛在中国急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者体内的药代动力学。确定影响因素,并告知替格瑞洛治疗优化。
    方法:来自195名ACS患者的数据,包括491个替格瑞洛血浆浓度时间点和临床信息,使用NONMEN分析药代动力学(PK)参数因素。该模型用Bootstrap方法进行了内部验证。
    结果:使用具有一阶吸收速率常数的单处置室模型很好地描绘了替格瑞洛的PK曲线,0.67/h。当直接胆红素水平和白细胞计数增加时,女性患者肾小球滤过率下降,替格瑞洛清除率降低,增加曝光。当直接胆红素水平升高,体重和血红蛋白降低时,rs6787801是GG,与AA和GA相比,替格瑞洛代谢物清除率降低,暴露量增加.
    结论:该研究为ACS患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后替格瑞洛的剂量-暴露关系提供了关键见解,突出个性化治疗策略的关键因素。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor in Chinese patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), identify influencing factors, and inform ticagrelor treatment optimization.
    METHODS: Data from 195 ACS patients, including 491 plasma ticagrelor concentration timepoints and clinical information, were analyzed using NONMEN for pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter factors. The model underwent internal validation with bootstrap methodology.
    RESULTS: The PK curve of ticagrelor was well delineated using a one disposition compartment model with first-order absorption rate constant, 0.67/h. When the direct bilirubin levels and white plasma cell counts increased, female patients showed decreased glomerular filtration rate, decreased ticagrelor clearance rate, and increased exposure. When the direct bilirubin levels increased and body weight and hemoglobin decreased, rs6787801 was GG compared with AA and GA, the ticagrelor metabolite clearance rate decreased and exposure increased.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study offers key insights into ticagrelor\'s dose-exposure relationship post-percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS patients, highlighting factors critical for personalized treatment strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管抗血小板治疗(APT),接受血运重建的心血管患者仍有发生血栓事件的高风险.个体对APT的反应差异很大,由于治疗中血小板反应性(HTPR)较高,在≤40%的患者中,导致对血栓事件的保护不足。血小板反应的个体差异会损害单个患者水平的APT指导。不幸的是,随着时间的推移,人们对个体血小板对APT的反应知之甚少,准确测量残余血小板反应性的时机,或监测残余血小板反应性的最佳测试。
    目的:研究接受氯吡格雷治疗的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)患者随时间的残余血小板反应性变异性。
    方法:在接受CEA的患者中,单中心,使用VerifyNow的观察性研究(ADP诱导的与纤维蛋白原包被的珠子结合的浊度变化),VASP测定(血管扩张剂刺激的磷蛋白磷酸化的定量),和四个围手术期时间点的基于流式细胞术的检测(PACT)。基因分型鉴定了慢代谢物(CYP2C19*2和CYP2C19*3)和快代谢物(CYP2C19*17)。
    结果:在2017年12月至2019年11月之间,纳入了50例接受CEA的患者。用VerifyNow(p=<.001)和VASP(p=.029)测量的血小板反应性随时间变化,而PACT没有。VerifyNow确定了手术后改变HTRP状态的患者。VASP确定了8周后改变HTPR状态的患者(p=.018)。CYP2C19基因分型鉴定出13个慢代谢者。
    结论:在接受CEA的患者中,围手术期血小板反应性测量值随着时间的推移而波动,血小板反应性测定之间几乎不一致.因此,用VerifyNow和VASP测定测量的个体患者的HTPR状态随时间变化。因此,通常使用的围手术期血小板反应性测量对于调整围手术期APT策略似乎不可靠.
    BACKGROUND: Despite Antiplatelet therapy (APT), cardiovascular patients undergoing revascularisation remain at high risk for thrombotic events. Individual response to APT varies substantially, resulting in insufficient protection from thrombotic events due to high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in ≤40% of patients. Individual variation in platelet response impairs APT guidance on a single patient level. Unfortunately, little is known about individual platelet response to APT over time, timing for accurate residual platelet reactivity measurement, or the optimal test to monitor residual platelet reactivity.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate residual platelet reactivity variability over time in individual patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) treated with clopidogrel.
    METHODS: Platelet reactivity was determined in patients undergoing CEA in a prospective, single-centre, observational study using the VerifyNow (change in turbidity from ADP-induced binding to fibrinogen-coated beads), the VASP assay (quantification of phosphorylation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein), and a flow-cytometry-based assay (PACT) at four perioperative time points. Genotyping identified slow (CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3) and fast (CYP2C19*17) metabolisers.
    RESULTS: Between December 2017 and November 2019, 50 patients undergoing CEA were included. Platelet reactivity measured with the VerifyNow (p = < .001) and VASP (p = .029) changed over time, while the PACT did not. The VerifyNow identified patients changing HTRP status after surgery. The VASP identified patients changing HTPR status after eight weeks (p = .018). CYP2C19 genotyping identified 13 slow metabolisers.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CEA, perioperative platelet reactivity measurements fluctuate over time with little agreement between platelet reactivity assays. Consequently, HTPR status of individual patients measured with the VerifyNow and VASP assay changed over time. Therefore, generally used perioperative platelet reactivity measurements seem unreliable for adjusting perioperative APT strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于遗传学和表观遗传学对抗抑郁治疗(1)反应和缓解之间的相互作用知之甚少,(2)副作用,和(3)血清水平。本研究探索了单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)之间的关系,DNA甲基化(DNAm),和四个药代动力学基因的mRNA水平,CYP2C19、CYP2D6、CYP3A4和ABCB1及其对这些结果的影响。
    方法:加拿大抑郁症生物标志物整合网络-1数据集包括177名重度抑郁症患者,接受艾司西酞普兰(ESC)治疗8周,随后接受ESC单药治疗或阿立哌唑增强治疗8周。DNAm数量性状基因座(mQTL),通过全血中20个SNP和60个CpG位点之间的SNP-CpG关联鉴定,测试了与我们结果的关联,随后进行因果推断测试(CITs)以鉴定甲基化介导的遗传效应。
    结果:鉴定了构成4个独特SNP的11个顺式-SNP-CpG对(q<0.05)。尽管mQTL和应答/缓解之间没有观察到显著的关联,CYP2C19rs4244285与治疗相关的体重增加(q=0.027)和ESCadj的血清浓度(q<0.001)相关。在第2-4周之间,具有*1/*1(正常代谢者)和*1/*2(中间代谢者)基因型的人的6.7%和14.9%,分别,报告体重增加≥2磅。相比之下,*2/*2基因型(代谢不良者)在此期间未报告体重增加,并且ESCadj浓度最高.CITs没有表明这些作用是表观遗传介导的。
    结论:这些结果阐明了CYP2C19rs4244285与ESC药代动力学之间既定关联的潜在功能机制。这种mQTLSNP作为抗抑郁药相关体重增加的标志物需要进一步探索。
    BACKGROUND: Little is known about the interplay between genetics and epigenetics on antidepressant treatment (1) response and remission, (2) side effects, and (3) serum levels. This study explored the relationship among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), DNA methylation (DNAm), and mRNA levels of four pharmacokinetic genes, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and ABCB1, and its effect on these outcomes.
    METHODS: The Canadian Biomarker Integration Network for Depression-1 dataset consisted of 177 individuals with major depressive disorder treated for 8 weeks with escitalopram (ESC) followed by 8 weeks with ESC monotherapy or augmentation with aripiprazole. DNAm quantitative trait loci (mQTL), identified by SNP-CpG associations between 20 SNPs and 60 CpG sites in whole blood, were tested for associations with our outcomes, followed by causal inference tests (CITs) to identify methylation-mediated genetic effects.
    RESULTS: Eleven cis-SNP-CpG pairs (q<0.05) constituting four unique SNPs were identified. Although no significant associations were observed between mQTLs and response/remission, CYP2C19 rs4244285 was associated with treatment-related weight gain (q=0.027) and serum concentrations of ESCadj (q<0.001). Between weeks 2-4, 6.7% and 14.9% of those with *1/*1 (normal metabolizers) and *1/*2 (intermediate metabolizers) genotypes, respectively, reported ≥2 lbs of weight gain. In contrast, the *2/*2 genotype (poor metabolizers) did not report weight gain during this period and demonstrated the highest ESCadj concentrations. CITs did not indicate that these effects were epigenetically mediated.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results elucidate functional mechanisms underlying the established associations between CYP2C19 rs4244285 and ESC pharmacokinetics. This mQTL SNP as a marker for antidepressant-related weight gain needs to be further explored.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特异性选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)代谢受到两种药物的强烈影响,CYP2D6和CYP2C19。然而,在常规临床实践中,前瞻性使用药物遗传学变异体选择或给药SSRIs治疗抑郁症的有效性尚不确定.这个前景的目标,多中心,实用性随机对照试验旨在确定8岁或以上且有≥3个月抑郁症状需要新治疗或修订治疗的参与者的基因型指导选择和抗抑郁药给药剂量对控制抑郁的有效性.那些随机分配到干预组的人在基线时接受药物遗传学测试,并根据可操作的表型接受药房咨询和/或自动临床决策支持干预。而那些随机分配到对照组的人在6个月结束时进行药物遗传学测试。在这两组中,抑郁和药物耐受性结果在基线时评估,1个月,3个月(主要),和6个月。主要终点由3个月时与基线相比评估的患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)抑郁评分的变化来定义。次要终点包括抑郁症严重程度的住院患者健康问卷(PHQ-8)测量,由PROMIS评分<16定义的缓解率,药物依从性,和药物副作用。主要分析将比较具有可操作的CYP2D6或CYP2C19遗传结果或CYP2D6药物-药物相互作用的试验组之间的PROMIS评分差异。该试验已经完成了1461名参与者的应计,迄今为止,其中562个被发现具有可操作的表型,后续行动将于2024年4月完成。
    Specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) metabolism is strongly influenced by two pharmacogenes, CYP2D6 and CYP2C19. However, the effectiveness of prospectively using pharmacogenetic variants to select or dose SSRIs for depression is uncertain in routine clinical practice. The objective of this prospective, multicenter, pragmatic randomized controlled trial is to determine the effectiveness of genotype-guided selection and dosing of antidepressants on control of depression in participants who are 8 years or older with ≥3 months of depressive symptoms who require new or revised therapy. Those randomized to the intervention arm undergo pharmacogenetic testing at baseline and receive a pharmacy consult and/or automated clinical decision support intervention based on an actionable phenotype, while those randomized to the control arm have pharmacogenetic testing at the end of 6-months. In both groups, depression and drug tolerability outcomes are assessed at baseline, 1 month, 3 months (primary), and 6 months. The primary end point is defined by change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression score assessed at 3 months versus baseline. Secondary end points include change inpatient health questionnaire (PHQ-8) measure of depression severity, remission rates defined by PROMIS score < 16, medication adherence, and medication side effects. The primary analysis will compare the PROMIS score difference between trial arms among those with an actionable CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 genetic result or a CYP2D6 drug-drug interaction. The trial has completed accrual of 1461 participants, of which 562 were found to have an actionable phenotype to date, and follow-up will be complete in April of 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    栓塞的动脉粥样硬化来源是不明来源的栓塞性中风(ESUS)的重要原因。然而,强化双联抗血小板治疗对ESUS疗效的证据有限.我们进行了一项研究,以确定基因导向的双重抗血小板治疗是否可以降低ESUS患者复发性卒中的风险。
    CHANCE-2(氯吡格雷在急性非致残性脑血管事件-II高危患者中的应用)是研究者发起的,多中心,随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照试验,客观比较了中国携带CYP2C19功能丧失等位基因的轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的替格瑞洛加阿司匹林和氯吡格雷加阿司匹林。所有研究参与者被分为ESUS和非ESUS组,用于预设的探索性分析。Cox比例风险模型用于评估ESUS状态与替格瑞洛-阿司匹林和氯吡格雷-阿司匹林双重抗血小板治疗效果的相互作用。调整社会人口统计学和临床因素。
    亚组分析包括CHANCE-2试验中的5796名参与者(占6412名参与者的90.4%),平均年龄为64.9岁(范围,57.0-71.4年),其中1964年(33.9%)为女性。作为研究方案的一部分,这些参与者接受了弥散加权成像。经过系统评价,15.2%的患者(881/5796)被认为患有ESUS。ESUS患者卒中复发的发生率在替格瑞洛-阿司匹林组为5.6%,氯吡格雷-阿司匹林组为9.2%(风险比,0.57[95%CI,0.33-0.99];P=0.04)。在没有ESUS的患者中,各自的发病率分别为5.6%和7.5%(危险比,0.72[95%CI,0.58-0.90];P<0.01)。治疗×ESUS状态交互效应的P值为0.56。
    在这个预设的探索性分析中,在携带CYP2C19功能丧失等位基因并被分类为ESUS的急性缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者中,替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林在90天预防卒中方面优于氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林。
    URL:http://www。临床试验.gov.唯一标识符:NCT04078737。
    UNASSIGNED: The atherosclerotic sources of embolism are a significant contributor to embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). However, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of intensive dual antiplatelet therapy for ESUS. We conducted an investigation to determine whether gene-directed dual antiplatelet therapy could reduce the risk of recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS.
    UNASSIGNED: CHANCE-2 (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that objectively compared ticagrelor plus aspirin and clopidogrel plus aspirin in patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles in China. All study participants were classified into ESUS and non-ESUS groups for the prespecified exploratory analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the interaction of the state of ESUS with the effects of dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors.
    UNASSIGNED: The subgroup analysis comprised 5796 participants (90.4% of the total 6412 participants) in the CHANCE-2 trial, with a median age of 64.9 years (range, 57.0-71.4 years), of whom 1964 (33.9%) were female. These participants underwent diffusion-weighted imaging as part of the study protocol. After systematic evaluation, 15.2% of patients (881/5796) were deemed to have ESUS. The incidence of stroke recurrence in patients with ESUS was found to be 5.6% in the ticagrelor-aspirin group and 9.2% in the clopidogrel-aspirin group (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.33-0.99]; P=0.04). In patients without ESUS, the respective incidence rates were 5.6% and 7.5% (hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.58-0.90]; P<0.01). The P value was 0.56 for the treatment × ESUS status interaction effect.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prespecified exploratory analysis, ticagrelor with aspirin was superior to clopidogrel with aspirin for preventing stroke at 90 days in patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack who carried CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles and were classified as ESUS.
    UNASSIGNED: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为患者调整抗抑郁药(AD)的遗传药物代谢谱是有希望的。然而,关于ADs治疗效果和/或副作用与药物代谢基因CYP2D6和CYP2C19的相关性的文献得出的结果不一致。因此,我们的目的是纵向调查CYP2D6(差,中间,和正常)和CYP2C19(差,中间,正常,和超短)代谢者状态,以及AD的切换/中断。接下来,我们调查了不同代谢状态下的感知副作用数量是否不同.
    方法:数据来自多站点自然纵向队列荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)。我们选择了抑郁症和/或焦虑症患者,在9年随访期间的某个时间点使用AD(n=928)。随后使用药物来评估AD随时间的转换/停药模式。CYP2D6和CYP2C19等位基因使用NESDA样品的全基因组数据和来自PharmGKB数据库的单倍型数据衍生。进行Logistic回归分析以研究代谢状态与转换/中断AD的关联。进行了Mann-WhitneyU测试,以比较患者在代谢状态之间感知到的副作用的数量。
    结果:未观察到CYP代谢状态与ADs的转换/中断有显著关联,也没有感知到的副作用的数量。
    结论:我们没有发现CYP代谢状态和转换/停止AD之间关联的证据,也没有广告的副作用,这表明代谢者状态在AD的转换/中断中仅起着有限的作用。需要对更多PM和UM患者进行其他研究,以进一步确定药物遗传学的潜在附加值,以指导药物治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Tailoring antidepressant drugs (AD) to patients\' genetic drug-metabolism profile is promising. However, literature regarding associations of ADs\' treatment effect and/or side effects with drug metabolizing genes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 has yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, our aim was to longitudinally investigate associations between CYP2D6 (poor, intermediate, and normal) and CYP2C19 (poor, intermediate, normal, and ultrarapid) metabolizer-status, and switching/discontinuing of ADs. Next, we investigated whether the number of perceived side effects differed between metabolizer statuses.
    METHODS: Data came from the multi-site naturalistic longitudinal cohort Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). We selected depression- and/or anxiety patients, who used AD at some point in the course of the 9 years follow-up period (n = 928). Medication use was followed to assess patterns of AD switching/discontinuation over time. CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 alleles were derived using genome-wide data of the NESDA samples and haplotype data from the PharmGKB database. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the association of metabolizer status with switching/discontinuing ADs. Mann-Whitney U-tests were conducted to compare the number of patient-perceived side effects between metabolizer statuses.
    RESULTS: No significant associations were observed of CYP metabolizer status with switching/discontinuing ADs, nor with the number of perceived side effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence for associations between CYP metabolizer statuses and switching/discontinuing AD, nor with side effects of ADs, suggesting that metabolizer status only plays a limited role in switching/discontinuing ADs. Additional studies with larger numbers of PM and UM patients are needed to further determine the potential added value of pharmacogenetics to guide pharmacotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:氯吡格雷抵抗可能导致脑血管疾病的复发。我们旨在确定与氯吡格雷抵抗相关的潜在因素,并评估患者的临床结局。
    方法:在这项回顾性研究中,纳入接受氯吡格雷治疗的缺血性脑血管病患者,根据二磷酸腺苷(ADP)诱导的血小板聚集将其分为2组.ADP抑制率<30%的患者纳入氯吡格雷抵抗组,其他均纳入氯吡格雷敏感组。分析CYP2C19基因型和其他临床数据,以确定多变量分析中的因素和临床特征。结果为6个月内的血管事件。
    结果:总计,139例患者,其中氯吡格雷敏感组81例(58.27%),氯吡格雷抵抗组58例(41.73%)。女性和CYP2C19*2*3携带是氯吡格雷抵抗的危险因素,女性为独立危险因素(OR2.481,95%CI1.066~5.771,P=0.035)。氯吡格雷抵抗组阿加曲班使用率较高(P=0.030),花生四烯酸对血小板聚集的抑制作用较低(P=0.036)。氯吡格雷抵抗与脑卒中进展相关(HR3.521,95%CI1.352-9.170,P=0.010),但对出血事件无影响(P>0.05)。
    结论:女性患者发生氯吡格雷抵抗的风险显著增加。氯吡格雷抵抗的患者在急性期卒中进展的发生率可能增加。
    OBJECTIVE: Clopidogrel resistance may lead to the recurrence of cerebrovascular diseases. We aimed to identify potential factors associated with clopidogrel resistance and evaluate the clinical outcomes of the patients.
    METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease treated with clopidogrel were included and classified into 2 groups according to the adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation. Patients with the ADP inhibition rate of <30 % were included in clopidogrel resistance group, otherwise were included in clopidogrel sensitive group. CYP2C19 genotype and other clinical data were analyzed to identify factors and clinical features in the multivariate analysis. The outcomes were vascular events in 6 months.
    RESULTS: In total, 139 patients were enrolled with 81 (58.27 %) in clopidogrel sensitive group and 58 (41.73 %) in clopidogrel resistance group. Female and CYP2C19 *2*3 carrying were risk factors for clopidogrel resistance, and female was an independent risk factor (OR 2.481, 95 % CI 1.066-5.771, P=0.035). The clopidogrel resistance group showed a higher use rate of argatroban (P=0.030) and a lower arachidonic acid-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation (P=0.036). Clopidogrel resistance was related to the progressing stroke (HR 3.521, 95 % CI 1.352-9.170, P=0.010), but had no influence on the bleeding events (P>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The risk of clopidogrel resistance increased significantly in female patients. Patients with clopidogrel resistance may have an increased incidence of stroke progression in the acute phase.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号