UNASSIGNED: This study aims to provide an overview of the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up management of vulvar and vaginal leiomyomas through the presentation of two rare cases.
UNASSIGNED: Detailed clinical presentations, surgical procedures, histopathological examinations, and follow-up outcomes of two cases of vulvar and vaginal leiomyomas are described. Relevant literature is also reviewed to contextualize the findings.
UNASSIGNED: Both patients underwent successful surgical excision of the leiomyomas with no perioperative or postoperative complications. Histopathological examinations confirmed the diagnosis of leiomyoma based on characteristic microscopic features and immunohistochemical analyses.
UNASSIGNED: Vulvar and vaginal leiomyomas are rare benign tumors that require careful evaluation for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Surgical excision remains the primary treatment modality, and long-term follow-up is essential for monitoring recurrence and ensuring favorable outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: Large Anterior vaginal cysts can manifest as symptomatic genital prolapse, posing a diagnostic challenge due to their uncommon clinical presentation.
METHODS: A 22-year-old primiparous woman with no previous medical history is admitted for delivery. Examination revealed a cystic mass on the anterior vaginal wall. Perineal ultrasound confirmed an independent cyst measuring 45x40x35 mm. The cyst was successfully aspirated, and the patient delivered without complications. At 12 months, the cyst reappeared, requiring vaginal surgical excision. Histological examination identified a Gartner cyst. During follow-up at 6 and 12 months, the patient remained asymptomatic.
UNASSIGNED: Vaginal cysts typically present as small, solitary, and symptomless. However, they can grow in size, mimicking other conditions and often being misdiagnosed as cystoceles. Consequently, surgical excision of the vaginal cysts is the preferred treatment option, yielding positive anatomical outcomes and high patient satisfaction levels.
CONCLUSIONS: In this report, we describe a rare case of a Gartner cyst found on the anterior vaginal wall. The report also underscores the crucial role of imaging in accurately identifying the cyst\'s location, assessing its association with adjacent tissues, and guiding the surgeon in devising an effective operative plan.

The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare native tissue repair (NTR) against transvaginal mesh augmentation for the repair of anterior vaginal prolapse. A total of 2289 articles were found but only 27 (24.8 %) were included in the review. Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) were followed to guide the process of the systematic review and meta-analysis. The quality of the observational studies was evaluated according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, whereas the quality of randomized control trials (RCT) was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias scale. The mesh repair intervention was associated with a higher anatomical cure rate in comparison with NTR repair when the follow-up was ≤24 months [pooled risk difference (95 % CI): -0.18 % (-0.22 %; 0.13 %); p-value: <0.0001; I2: 36.0 %]. Studies reporting anatomical failure had similar findings [pooled risk difference (95 % CI): 0.17 % (0.01 %; 0.33 %); p-value: 0.03; I2: 88.6 %]. No differences in the risk of re-operation were observed between NTR repair and mesh augmentation. Pooled risk differences in the incidence of post-surgical and late complications were higher for the mesh repair intervention [-0.05 % (95 % CI: -0.10 %; 0.00 %) p-value: 0.05; I2: 68.3 %] [-0.05 % (95 % CI: -0.14 %; 0.03 %) p-value: 0.25; I2: 82.0 %]. Women who underwent mesh repair reported greater satisfaction than women who underwent NTR [pooled risk difference (95 % CI): -0.07 % (-0.16 %; 0.02 %); p-value: 0.15; I2: 65.3 %]. In conclusion, mesh repair surgery had higher anatomical cure and satisfaction rates, with no differences in re-operation rate, but had higher post-surgical and late complications in comparison with NTR.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a defect of the female pelvic floor. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI), and obstructive symptoms may occur in these patients. The objective of surgical treatment is to restore the anatomy and function of the pelvic floor; however, it may prompt urinary symptoms not present previously. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine urodynamic changes in patients undergoing surgical correction for POP.
PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for studies that contained data from urodynamic evaluation before and after vaginal surgery for POP. The main urodynamic data collected were free uroflowmetry (maximum flow [Qmax], voided volume, and post-void residual volume [PVR]), cystometry (bladder capacity, presence of detrusor overactivity [DO], SUI or UUI, and Valsalva leak point pressure), and pressure × flow study (detrusor pressure at maximum flow [PdetQmax], Qmax, and PVR).
A total of 22 studies were included (1,549 women). Patients had a significantly higher prevalence of DO before surgery (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.06-2.29), and surgeries without sling placement demonstrated a tendency to ameliorate DO. Patients who did not receive a sling were more incontinent after surgery. Bladder-emptying parameters improved after surgery, with higher PdetQmax before surgery (IV = 3.23; 95% CI = 0.45-1.18). Patients who did not receive MUS presented a lower Qmax (IV = -3.19; 95%CI = -4.09 to -2.30) and a higher PVR (IV = 27.89; 95%CI = 15.68-40.1) before surgery.
Correction surgery for POP yields better urodynamic emptying parameters, with a reduction in the prevalence of DO. In contrast, sling placement enhances obstructive parameters.

Bladder herniation in the inguinal canal is a rare occurrence, reported for the first time in 1951 as Scrotal Cystocele. Most cases are incidental intraoperative findings, with no particular manifestation. Few reports of symptomatic patients have been documented in literature. We report a case of a patient who presented with urinary obstruction and left sided scrotal hernia. MRI was performed and revealed a complete bladder herniation in the scrotal sac.

Chaotic lipomas are an extremely rare variant of spinal lipomas. This entity was first defined in 2009 by Pang and colleagues. Not much has been written about this variant. Its characteristic is the haphazard distribution of DREZ (Dorsal root entry zone), nerve roots and placode-lipoma interface. Thus complete/near-total excision of this lesion is quite difficult. We describe a case of chaotic spinal lipoma and elucidate the challenges faced in the management of this entity and review the literature. We performed a thorough systematic review with the keyword \'chaotic\', \'Lipomyelomeningocele\', \'Complex Lipomyelomeningocele\', \'LMMC\', \'Lumbar lipoma\', \'spinal lipoma\' in the google scholar and PUBMED data system for indexed literature on the above topic with no particular time frame. The studies quoted range earliest from 1970 till currently. Additional potential relevant articles were further retrieved through a manual search of references from original reports. Out of 42 studies, a total of 21 publications were selected which could have encountered a chaotic variant, but due to the term introduced only recently in 2009, may have been described differently. Studies encompassing true lipomeningomyelocele were excluded from our review. What we found out? Chaotic lipoma may not be a new entity. The scarce description in literature may be in part due to non-introduction and unclear description of this term earlier. The management of this variant is particularly challenging with basic principles remaining the same. Meticulous near-total excision and placode-lipoma construct are the major obstacles.

This systematic review aimed to assess the completeness of exercise reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, CINHAL, Embase, SCOPUS, and PEDro databases were searched up to October 2020. Full-text RCTs comparing PFMT to any type of intervention among women with any type and stage of POP were eligible for inclusion. Completeness of intervention was evaluated with t20he template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) and the consensus on exercise reporting template (CERT). Inter-rater agreement for each item of the tools was calculated.
Twenty-six RCTs were included. None of the studies completely reported all intervention descriptors. On average 57.1% (6.8 ± 2.4; out of 12) of the overall TIDieR items and 35.3% (6.7 ± 2.9; out of 19) of the CERT were well described. In particular, 7 and 5 items were completely reported more than 50% of the time for the TIDieR and CERT, respectively. Frequent shortcomings were the undetailed reporting of information regarding tailoring and modifications of exercises and their adherence. Detailed descriptions of exercise repetitions to enable replication were missing in 53.8%. According to the CERT, only 11.5% of the RCTs sufficiently described the main providers\' characteristics.
The completeness of PFMT reporting for women with POP is still below desirable standards and it is insufficient to ensure transferability into practice. The present results may add relevant knowledge and contribute to improving adequate reporting of exercise.

BACKGROUND: We assessed outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse and explored the relationships between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor, year of publication, and methodological quality.
METHODS: We searched the bibliographical databases from inception to October 2017. Two researchers independently selected studies and assessed study characteristics, methodological quality (Jadad criteria; range 1-5), and outcome reporting quality Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate (MOMENT) criteria; range 1-6], and extracted relevant data. We used a multivariate linear regression to assess associations between outcome reporting quality and other variables.
RESULTS: Eighty publications reporting data from 10,924 participants were included. Seventeen different surgical interventions were evaluated. One hundred different outcomes and 112 outcome measures were reported. Outcomes were inconsistently reported across trials; for example, 43 trials reported anatomical treatment success rates (12 outcome measures), 25 trials reported quality of life (15 outcome measures) and eight trials reported postoperative pain (seven outcome measures). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated a relationship between outcome reporting quality with methodological quality (β = 0.412; P = 0.018). No relationship was demonstrated between outcome reporting quality with impact factor (β = 0.078; P = 0.306), year of publication (β = 0.149; P = 0.295), study size (β = 0.008; P = 0.961) and commercial funding (β = -0.013; P = 0.918).
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse trials report many different outcomes and outcome measures and often neglect to report important safety outcomes. Developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set will help address these issues.

BACKGROUND: Anterior colporrhaphy (AC) is considered a standard procedure and is performed all over the world. However, not a single step of the procedure has ever been truly standardized and the rates of failure show a wide range in the literature from 0% up to 92%. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the differences in technique and procedure worldwide.
METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search up to March 2016 using the MeSH terms \"(anterior AND (colporrhaph* or colporhaph* or repair* or cystocel*)\" using Preferred Reporting Items for Sytematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) were included in the systematic review. A 14-point checklist was used to assess the quality of surgery undertaken in each RCT.
RESULTS: Forty RCTs from all over the world were included in the review. The indication for AC was urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. A detailed description of colporrhaphy was not provided even in the well-conducted RCTs. The review showed differences in each step of the procedure, in perioperative care, in anesthesia and in surgeon\' experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the problems concerning AC with the great range in postoperative outcomes. There is diversity in the anatomical structures used in the repair, in perioperative care and in the procedure itself.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) allows for dynamic visualisation of the pelvic floor compartments when assessing for pelvic floor dysfunction. Additional benefits over traditional techniques are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to compare detection and miss rates of pelvic floor abnormalities with MRD versus clinical examination and traditional fluoroscopic techniques.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with recommendations from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were accessed. Studies were included if they reported detection rates of at least one outcome of interest with MRD versus EITHER clinical examination AND/OR fluoroscopic techniques within the same cohort of patients.
RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included: 14 studies compared clinical examination to MRD, and 16 compared fluoroscopic techniques to MRD. Detection and miss rates with MRD were not significantly different from clinical examination findings for any outcome except enterocele, where MRD had a higher detection rate (37.16% with MRD vs 25.08%; OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.21-4.11, p = 0.010) and lower miss rates (1.20 vs 37.35%; OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.20, p = 0.0001) compared to clinical examination. However, compared to fluoroscopy, MRD had a lower detection rate for rectoceles (61.84 vs 73.68%; OR 0.48 95% CI 0.30-0.76, p = 0.002) rectoanal intussusception (37.91 vs 57.14%; OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.66, p = 0.002) and perineal descent (52.29 vs 74.51%; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.74, p = 0.006). Miss rates of MRD were also higher compared to fluoroscopy for rectoceles (15.96 vs 0%; OR 15.74, 95% CI 5.34-46.40, p < 0.00001), intussusception (36.11 vs 3.70%; OR 10.52, 95% CI 3.25-34.03, p = 0.0001) and perineal descent (32.11 vs 0.92%; OR 12.30, 95% CI 3.38-44.76, p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: MRD has a role in the assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction. However, clinicians need to be mindful of the risk of underdiagnosis and consider the use of additional imaging.