在处理涉嫌精神健康的警察事件时,警察精神健康街头分诊是一种越来越普遍的干预措施。我们对街道分诊干预措施进行了系统评价,有三个目的。首先,确定报告共同应对警察心理健康街头分诊模型的论文。第二,以确定与这些分诊服务联系的服务用户的特征。第三,评估共同反应分诊服务的有效性。
我们进行了系统评价。我们搜索了以下数据库:OvidMEDLINE,Embase,PsycINFO,EBSCOCINAHL,Scopus,ThompsonReutersWebofScience核心合集,科克伦图书馆,ProQuest国家刑事司法参考服务摘要,ProQuest论文&论文,EThos,OpenGrey我们搜索了参考文献和引文列表。我们还通过谷歌搜索了其他灰色文献,筛选我们每个搜索词的前100个PDF。我们对我们的结果进行了叙述性综合。
我们的搜索确定了11,553项研究。筛选后,26人是合格的。超过三分之二(69%)在过去3年内发表。我们没有发现任何随机对照试验。结果表明,根据《精神卫生法》S136,在存在该权力的地方,街道分诊可能会减少被带到安全地点的人数,或减少在其他司法管辖区使用警方拘留。
目前仍然缺乏证据来评估街道分诊的有效性和特点,经验,以及服务用户的结果。协同反应模型的实施也存在很大差异,操作时间的差异,人员配备,和事件响应。
Police mental health street triage is an increasingly common intervention when dealing with police incidents in which there is a suspected mental health component. We conducted a systematic
review of street triage interventions with three aims. First, to identify papers reporting on models of co-response police mental health street triage. Second, to identify the characteristics of service users who come in to contact with these triage services. Third, to evaluate the effectiveness of co-response triage services.
We conducted a systematic
review. We searched the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Thompson Reuters Web of Science Core Collection, The Cochrane Library, ProQuest National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, EThoS, and OpenGrey. We searched reference and citation lists. We also searched for other grey literature through Google, screening the first 100 PDFs of each of our search terms. We performed a narrative synthesis of our results.
Our search identified 11,553 studies. After screening, 26 were eligible. Over two-thirds (69%) had been published within the last 3 years. We did not identify any randomised control trials. Results indicated that street triage might reduce the number of people taken to a place of safety under S136 of the Mental Health Act where that power exists, or reduce the use of police custody in other jurisdictions.
There remains a lack of evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of street triage and the characteristics, experience, and outcomes of service users. There is also wide variation in the implementation of the co-response model, with differences in hours of operation, staffing, and incident response.