Craniofacial pain

颅面疼痛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:头痛(HA)和颞下颌关节功能障碍(TMD)是常见的合并症,其中一种在患者体内的存在会增加另一种的发病率。这两种情况之间的关系可能涉及共同的病理生理过程。考虑到问题的话题性,在这个领域进行研究是合理的。在这项研究中,我们评估了TMD患者的HA类型和严重程度。
    目的:本研究的目的是对颞下颌关节(TMJ)疾病患者的HAs进行定性和定量评估。
    方法:研究组由51名男女受试者组成,使用颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)测试诊断为TMD。使用自我报告问卷来自我评估TMD症状的存在,而麦吉尔疼痛问卷的标准化简表用于定性和定量评估HAs。
    结果:TMD患者更有可能报告HA发生(p<0.001)。与没有TMD症状的患者相比,TMD患者的疼痛强度在统计学上明显更高(p<0.001)。大多数情况下,HA与压迫性疼痛相关(r=0.82),最不常见,它被描述为切割(r=0.30)。在宣布HA的患者中,颈部和肩带痛(p=0.059;82.9%)和咬紧和/或磨牙(p=0.021;92.7%)明显比没有HA的患者更常见。到目前为止获得的结果可能表明HA和TMD之间存在显着关系。
    结论:我们已经描述了HAs的发生与TMD之间的关系。在患有TMD的人中头痛更频繁和更严重。
    BACKGROUND: Headaches (HAs) and temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) are common comorbidities, and the presence of one of them in a patient increases the incidence of the other. The relationship between these 2 conditions may involve common pathophysiological processes. Considering the topicality of the problem, it is justified to conduct research in this field. In this study, we assessed HA type and severity in people with TMD.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to conduct qualitative and quantitative assessments of HAs in people with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders.
    METHODS: The study group consisted of 51 subjects of both sexes with a TMD diagnosed using the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) test. A self-report questionnaire was utilized to self-assess the presence of TMD symptoms, while the standardized Short-Form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire was used to qualitatively and quantitatively assess HAs.
    RESULTS: People with TMD were significantly more likely to report HA occurrences (p < 0.001). Pain intensity was statistically significantly higher among individuals with TMD compared to those without TMD symptoms (p < 0.001). Most often, the HA was associated with a pressing pain (r = 0.82) and least often, it was described as cutting (r = 0.30). Neck and shoulder girdle pain (p = 0.059; 82.9%) and clenching and/or grinding of teeth (p = 0.021; 92.7%) were significantly more common among patients who declared HAs than among those without HAs. The results obtained so far may indicate a significant relationship between HA and TMD.
    CONCLUSIONS: We have described the relationship between the occurrence of HAs and TMD. Headaches are more frequent and more severe in people with TMD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:当怀疑继发性头痛并将患者转诊至急诊科或门诊神经科诊所时,重要的是要知道哪些是合适的补充检查,以及患者遵循的合适转诊途径。为了就此事提出建议,西班牙神经病学会头痛研究小组(GECSEN)已决定发布一系列一致建议,构成头痛和/或颅面部神经痛患者的转诊方案.
    方法:邀请对头痛有兴趣和经验的年轻神经科医师与GECSEN执行委员会合作起草一系列实用指南。出于实际原因,该文件分为两篇:第一篇侧重于原发性头痛和颅面神经痛,第二篇侧重于继发性头痛和其他颅面疼痛。为了使建议对日常练习有所帮助,他们遵循实用的方法,带有总结推荐标准的表格,要进行的考试,并推荐给其他专家。
    结论:我们希望提供一个指南和工具来改善头痛患者的决策,确定互补测试的优先级和转诊途径要遵循,以避免重复咨询和延误诊断和治疗。
    BACKGROUND: When secondary headache is suspected and the patient is referred to the emergency department or to the outpatient neurology clinic, it is important to know which are the appropriate complementary examinations to perform and the suitable referral pathway for patients to follow. In order to establish recommendations on this matter, the Spanish Society of Neurology\'s Headache Study Group (GECSEN) has decided to issue a series of agreed recommendations constituting a referral protocol for patients with headache and/or craniofacial neuralgias.
    METHODS: Young neurologists with an interest and experience in headache were invited to draft a series of practical guidelines in collaboration with GECSEN\'s Executive Committee. For practical reasons, the document was divided into 2 articles: the first focuses on primary headaches and craniofacial neuralgias and this second article on secondary headaches and other craniofacial pain. In order for the recommendations to be helpful for daily practice, they follow a practical approach, with tables summarising referral criteria, examinations to be performed, and referral to other specialists.
    CONCLUSIONS: We hope to offer a guide and tools to improve decision-making regarding patients with headache, identifying complementary tests to prioritise and referral pathways to be followed, in order to avoid duplicated consultations and delayed diagnosis and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Determinants for orofacial pain, headache, morning headache and painful signs of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) were investigated in prepubertal children.
    METHODS: The participants were a population sample of 439 children aged 6-8 years. Craniofacial pains, eating meals and snacks, sleep bruxism, sleep quality, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), psychological well-being, parental education and household income were assessed by questionnaires filled out by the parents. Sleep duration was assessed using a combined heart rate and movement sensor and clinical signs of TMD and dental occlusion by a dentist. The determinants of pain conditions were analyzed using logistic regression.
    RESULTS: Of all 439 children, 26% had experienced orofacial pain and 31% headache during the past 3 months, 17% had suffered morning headache weekly and 13% had painful signs of TMD in a clinical examination. Restless sleep was associated with increased risk of orofacial pain, the painful signs of TMD and restless sleep with increased risk of headache and restless sleep, sleep bruxism and skipping meals with increased risk of morning headache after adjustment for other independent determinants of these pain conditions. Headache was associated with increased risk for painful signs of TMD.
    CONCLUSIONS: Craniofacial pains are common among prepubertal children. Prepubertal children with sleep bruxism, restless sleep and skipping meals have increased likelihood of craniofacial pains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are the most common non-dental cause of orofacial pain with a multifactorial aetiology.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the head and craniocervical posture between individuals with and without TMD and its sub types by photographic and radiographic method.
    METHODS: Thirty four TMD patients diagnosed according to Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD\'s (RDC/TMD) and were divided into 2 groups: Group I (muscle disorder), Group II (disc displacement). Control group comprised of 34 age and sex matched subjects without TMD. Lateral view photographs were taken and the head posture angle was measured. Craniocervical posture was assessed on lateral skull radiograph with two angles (Craniocervical Angle, Cervical Curvature Angle) and two distances (Suboccipital Space, Atlas-Axis Distance). To compare the results, t-test was used with significance level of 0.05.
    RESULTS: Head posture showed no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05) between Group I, II and control group in both photographic and radiographic methods. The cervical curvature angle showed significant difference (p = 0.045) in Group I only. Atlas-Axis Distance was statistically significant in Group II (p = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirmed that there is a negative association of head posture and TMD whereas, cervical lordosis was present in Group I only.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号