The transition from the second to the third millennium happened to be a turning point in the history of myocardial revascularization on a beating heart, which moved from technical development to critical evaluation. This article describes how the initial acceptance and spread of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) was followed by the general perception that the technique could not fulfill the expectations placed in it and provides some insight on what should we do with the know-how of OPCABG in the present and the future of coronary surgical revascularization.

The number of individuals referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) is reported to be 8% to 20%. Atrial fibrillation is a known marker of high-risk patients as it was repeatedly found to negatively influence survival. Therefore, when performing surgical revascularization, consideration should be given to the concomitant treatment of the arrhythmia, the clinical consequences of the arrhythmia itself, and the selection of adequate surgical techniques. This state-of-the-art review aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current understanding of, advancements in, and optimal strategies for CABG in patients with underlying AF. The following topics are considered: stroke prevention, prophylaxis and occurrence of postoperative AF, the role of surgical ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion, and an on-pump vs off-pump strategy. Multiple acute complications can occur in patients with preexisting AF undergoing CABG, each of which can have a significant effect on patient outcomes. Long-term results in these patients and the future perspectives of this scientific area were also addressed. Preoperative arrhythmia should always be considered for surgical ablation because such an approach improves prognosis without increasing perioperative risk. While planning a revascularization strategy, it should be noted that although off-pump coronary artery bypass provides better short-term outcomes, conventional on-pump approach may be beneficial at long-term follow-up. By collecting the current evidence, addressing knowledge gaps, and offering practical recommendations, this state-of-the-art review serves as a valuable resource for clinicians involved in the management of patients with AF undergoing CABG, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes and enhanced patient care.

The longstanding debate on off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCAB) has primarily focused on short-term and mid-term outcomes, with limited attention to long-term survival. This study aims to address this gap by providing an updated analysis of 10-year mortality rates after OPCAB versus ONCAB. We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, incorporating 22 studies comprising 69,449 patients. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at 10 years. Meta-regression analysis explored sources of heterogeneity. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in long-term all-cause mortality between OPCAB and ONCAB (hazard ratio 1.000, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.08, p = 0.95). Although substantial heterogeneity existed across studies, meta-regression identified older age as a significant factor favoring OPCAB. However, patient characteristics like gender, co-morbidities, and graft numbers did not significantly influence the choice of surgical technique. In conclusion, this study challenges historical concerns regarding OPCAB\'s quality of revascularization and long-term survival demonstrating comparable outcomes to ONCAB in well-selected patients when performed by experienced surgeons. The results emphasize the importance of surgeon proficiency and advocate for recognizing surgical revascularization as a subspecialty.

BACKGROUND: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) was introduced many years ago aiming to reduce the known complications of conventional on-pump coronary surgeries. Heparin is required during the procedures, but the available protocols have diverse dosage regimens. The primary objective of this systematic review is to examine the effect of different heparin doses on the outcomes of OPCABG.
METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Four reviewers identified eligible clinical trials. Two reviewers extracted data and independently assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane tool. The primary outcome was the activated clotting time (ACT) at three minutes. The secondary outcomes were proportion of patients requiring blood products and the length of hospital stay. An aggregate data approach was used.
RESULTS: Three single-center randomized studies recruiting 256 patients were included. The studies compared low-dose (1.5-2 mg/kg) and high-dose (3 mg/kg) heparin boluses. The overall mean difference for ACT after three minutes between low- and high-dose heparin is - 126.16 (95% CI: - 142.19, - 110.14). The proportion of patients requiring blood products after surgery [odd ratio 1.27 (95% CI: 0.69, 2.32)] or the overall length of stay [mean difference -0.15 (95% CI: -0.84, 0.53)] did not differ between the heparin doses.
CONCLUSIONS: In OPCABG, high-dose compared with low-dose heparin did not affect the utilization of more blood products or increased the overall length of stay. Unsurprisingly, ACT values were higher in the high-dose heparin group. Larger and adequately powered randomized clinical trials are indicated to resolve the uncertainty.

Off-pump coronary surgery requires mechanical cardiac displacement, which results in bi-ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Although transient, subsequent hemodynamic deterioration can be associated with poor prognosis and, in extreme cases, emergency conversion to on-pump surgery, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Thus, appropriate decision-making regarding whether the surgery can be proceeded based on objective hemodynamic targets is essential before coronary arteriotomy. For adequate hemodynamic management, avoiding myocardial oxygen supply-demand imbalance, which includes maintaining mean arterial pressure above 70 mmHg and preventing an increase in oxygen demand beyond the patient\'s coronary reserve, must be prioritized. Maintaining mixed venous oxygen saturation above 60%, which reflects the lower limit of adequate global oxygen supply-demand balance, is also essential. Above all, severe mechanical cardiac displacement incurring compressive syndromes, which cannot be overcome by adjusting major determinants of cardiac output, should be avoided. An uncompromising form of cardiac constraint can be ruled out as long as the central venous pressure is not equal to or greater than the pulmonary artery diastolic (or occlusion) pressure, as this would reflect tamponade physiology. In addition, transesophageal echocardiography should be conducted to rule out mechanical cardiac displacement-induced ventricular interdependence, dyskinesia, severe mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with or without systolic motion of the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve, which cannot be tolerated during grafting. Finally, the ascending aorta should be carefully inspected for gas bubbles to prevent hemodynamic collapse caused by a massive gas embolism obstructing the right coronary ostium.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent risk factor for developing coronary artery disease which worsens the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes and non-diabetic patients who underwent off-pump CABG surgery.
METHODS: Medline, Scopus, Proquest, Embase, Web of Science, and Google scholar were searched until September 10, 2021. The effect sizes including unstandardized mean difference and odds ratio with 95% confidence interval were calculated using \"Metan\" package. The Cochran\'s Q-test and I2 statistic were used to assess heterogeneity, a random-effects model was applied to estimate the pooled effect sizes, and meta-regression was used to investigate the factors affecting heterogeneity between studies.
RESULTS: 10 studies with 6200 sample sizes were included in the study. In groups with diabetes, Summary odds ratio (SOR) and 95% confidence interval of infection was 2.18 more than non-diabetic groups. Also, odds renal complication was 1.74 more than non-diabetic groups, and the odds cardiovascular complication in groups with diabetes was 1.30 more than non-diabetics. There were no differences in mortality, neurologic, respiratory and surgical complications between groups with diabetes and non-diabetics. Based on meta-regression results, age (Coefficient: 0.942; p = 0.009) had a significant direct relationship and sample size (Coefficient: 0.001; p = 0.009) had an indirect significant relationship with heterogeneity of neurologic outcomes. There was no significant publication bias in our results.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that off-pump CABG led to some significant outcomes in patients with diabetes compared to non-diabetics. Renal and infection complications were higher in patients with diabetes but no significant differences were seen in most of other postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

This review aims to compare outcomes of males and females undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), off-pump CABG (OPCAB), minimally invasive direct CABG (MIDCAB), and robotic total endoscopic CABG (TECAB).
Females demonstrated increased rates of morbidity and mortality post PCI and CABG. In studies that performed risk adjustments, these differences were reduced. Although inferior outcomes were observed for females in some measures, generally outcomes between males and females were comparable post OPCAB, MIDCAB, and TECAB.
Previous literature has demonstrated that females undergoing coronary revascularization experience inferior postoperative outcomes when compared to their male counterparts. The discrepancies between males and females narrow, but do not disappear when preoperative risks are accounted for and when considering minimally invasive approaches such as MIDCAB, OPCAB, and TECAB. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has demonstrated numerous benefits with reduced morbidity, mortality, and shorter recovery times. In patients with increased comorbidities, minimally invasive approaches confer a greater advantage. As females often fall within this category, it is paramount that the diagnosis and referral process be optimized to account for preoperative differences to provide the most beneficial approach if the disparity between the sexes is to be addressed.

OBJECTIVE: The apprentice model has been traditionally used to train cardiac surgery and cardiology learners the techniques for revascularization with the use of simulators recently becoming more prevalent in these training programs. This review aims to summarize research conducted on the use of simulation-based teaching (SBT) for trainees learning percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and off-pump CABG (OPCAB).
RESULTS: Prior literature evaluating the utility of SBT has demonstrated remarkable results including reduced procedural times, use of fluoroscopy, incidence of mistakes, improved stent placement, and confidence with PCI simulators. Similarly, the use of CABG and OPCAB simulators demonstrated improvement in forceps use, needle angles, Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill, and reduced completion times. The apprentice model has undoubtedly been successful as the most successful cardiac surgeons and cardiologists have been produced through this training model. Even so, many shortcomings have been identified including insufficient time to teach all relevant technical skills, inadequate exposure to rare adverse events, high-cost, and often unstructured format while being time-consuming and resource-intensive with little objective assessment of proficiency. SBT has been pursued as a potential adjunct to fill the gaps left by the traditional apprentice model. While simulations have been demonstrated to be successful in teaching both experienced and inexperienced learners complex techniques, it is unlikely that training will ever solely rely on simulations. The most efficient method of training learners for revascularization in the future will likely involve a combination of hands-on learning and SBT.

UNASSIGNED: Redo coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the evidence comparing the outcomes of off-pump with on-pump redo CABG.
UNASSIGNED: Studies were systematically searched and identified using PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) by two researchers independently. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, post-operative complications, completeness of revascularization, blood transfusion rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stays.
UNASSIGNED: The 21 studies including 4,889 patients were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Compared with on-pump, the off-pump technique was associated with significantly reduced 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26-0.72, p = 0.001). Moreover, a notably decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.39-0.76, p = 0.0004) and incidence of post-operative new-onset atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, low cardiac output state, blood transfusion rate (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.35-0.60, p < 0.00001; OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.38-0.78, p = 0.0007; OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.37-0.70, p < 0.0001; OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.20-0.47, p < 0.00001; OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.14-0.61, p = 0.001) and significantly shortened duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stays (mean difference [MD] = -8.21 h, 95% CI = -11.74 to -4.68, p < 0.00001; MD = -0.77 d, 95% CI = -0.81 to -0.73, p < 0.00001; MD = -2.24 d, 95% CI = -3.17 to -1.32, p < 0.00001) could be observed when comparing the outcomes of off-pump with on-pump redo CABG. There was nonsignificant difference between off-pump and on-pump redo CABG in completeness of revascularization.
UNASSIGNED: In patients undergoing redo CABG surgery, the off-pump technique was associated with decreased mortality, less post-operative complications when compared to on-pump.

BACKGROUND: Operative technique for surgical myocardial revascularization in high-risk patients remains an argument of debate. On-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with cardioplegic arrest and off-pump CABG have intrinsic limitations. The hybrid approach of on-pump beating-heart CABG (OPBHC) has been proposed over the years with conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis intends to summarize the contemporary literature.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted through major electronic databases. The systematic review provided a total of 279 articles, of those 17 studies were included in the present study.
RESULTS: Compared with on-pump CABG, OPBHC patients showed a preoperative higher risk profile but had reduced early mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.97) and reduced postoperative stroke (RR, 0.60, 95% CI, 0.39-0.91). Also, interesting trends towards reduced postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use (RR, 0.56, 95% CI, 0.31-1.01) and myocardial infarction (RR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.22-1.07) were observed. Baseline characteristics and postoperative complications were similar between OPBHC and off-pump CABG, but limited data are available. The risk of incomplete revascularization in OPBHC is lower than off-pump CABG (RR, 0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.87) but higher than conventional on-pump CABG (RR, 1.71, 95% CI, 1.23-2.39).
CONCLUSIONS: OPBHC is an effective technique to perform surgical revascularization in high-risk patients as preventing haemodynamic deterioration and guaranteeing adequate end-organ perfusion. OPBHC represents an alternative technique to on-pump and off-pump CABG, in those cases in which complications deriving from cardioplegic arrest or manipulation of the heart are more likely. For these reasons, OPBHC might be useful in patients with recent myocardial infarction or with left ventricular dysfunction.