Conventional chemotherapy

常规化疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    节制化学疗法是指以较低剂量频繁施用化学治疗剂,并以令人鼓舞的反应率提供了常规化学疗法的有吸引力的替代方案。然而,治疗的时间表,包括药物的剂量,通常基于经验主义。肿瘤-内皮-免疫相互作用在药物节律给药过程中的混杂效应尚未被详细探讨。导致对药物剂量和频率评估的评估不完整。本研究旨在使用数学模型对节拍化疗的不同作用进行机械理解。我们已经建立了一种分析条件,用于确定药物的剂量和频率,这取决于其完全消除肿瘤的清除率。该模型还提出了在化学治疗剂的节拍给药期间免疫介导的肿瘤清除。全局敏感性分析的结果表明,在节拍计划期间,药物和免疫介导的杀伤因子对肿瘤人群的敏感性增加。我们的结果强调了最大耐受剂量(MTD)的节拍计划,并定义了一种基于模型的方法,用于近似最佳的药物给药计划,以消除肿瘤,同时最大程度地减少对免疫细胞和患者身体的伤害。
    Metronomic chemotherapy refers to the frequent administration of chemotherapeutic agents at a lower dose and presents an attractive alternative to conventional chemotherapy with encouraging response rates. However, the schedule of the therapy, including the dosage of the drug, is usually based on empiricism. The confounding effects of tumor-endothelial-immune interactions during metronomic administration of drugs have not yet been explored in detail, resulting in an incomplete assessment of drug dose and frequency evaluations. The present study aimed to gain a mechanistic understanding of different actions of metronomic chemotherapy using a mathematical model. We have established an analytical condition for determining the dosage and frequency of the drug depending on its clearance rate for complete tumor elimination. The model also brings forward the immune-mediated clearance of the tumor during the metronomic administration of the chemotherapeutic agent. The results from the global sensitivity analysis showed an increase in the sensitivity of drug and immune-mediated killing factors toward the tumor population during metronomic scheduling. Our results emphasize metronomic scheduling over the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and define a model-based approach for approximating the optimal schedule of drug administration to eliminate tumors while minimizing harm to the immune cells and the patient\'s body.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是导致癌症相关死亡的第二大常见原因,并且在世界上发病率排名第三。几乎一半的CRC患者在诊断时具有转移。然而,对于经批准的常规化疗后进展的转移性CRC患者的治疗仍存在争议.中医药治疗转移性CRC具有独特的特点和优势。
    目的:评估CM在常规化疗失败后转移性CRC患者中的有效性和安全性。
    方法:本研究为多中心前瞻性队列研究。将从北京的9家医院纳入384例常规化疗失败后有记录的转移性CRC患者,上海,南京,贵州,根据患者的意愿分为三组:(1)中西医结合(ICM)组,接受中药治疗联合西药(WM)抗肿瘤治疗,(2)中药(CM)组只接受CM中药治疗,和(3)仅接受WM抗肿瘤治疗的WM组。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS),通过癌症治疗-结直肠功能评估(FACT-C)问卷评估生活质量(QOL),肿瘤控制,和CM症状评分。
    结论:这项前瞻性研究将评估常规化疗失败后CM治疗转移性CRC的有效性和安全性。将ICM组的患者与WM组和CM组的患者进行比较。如果被证明是有效的,可能会建议在转移性CRC中国家提供CM治疗.(登记号NCT02923622onClinicalTrials.gov).
    BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths and has the third highest incidence in the world. Almost half of the patients with CRC have metastases at the time of diagnosis. However, the treatment for patients with metastatic CRC that progresses after approved conventional chemotherapy is still controversial. Chinese medicine (CM) has unique characteristics and advantages in treating metastatic CRC.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of CM in patients with metastatic CRC after failure of conventional chemotherapy.
    METHODS: The study is a multicenter prospective cohort study. A total of 384 patients with documented metastatic CRC after failure of conventional chemotherapy will be included from 9 hospitals among Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing, and Guizhou, and assigned to three groups according to paitents\' wishes: (1) integrated Chinese and Western medicine (ICM) group receiving CM herbal treatment combined with Western medicine (WM) anti-tumor therapy, (2) Chinese medicine (CM) group receiving only CM herbal treatment, and (3) WM group receiving only WM anti-tumor therapy. The primary endpoint is the overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include the progression free survival (PFS), quality of life (QOL) assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) questionnaire, tumor control, and CM symptom score.
    CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study will assess the effectiveness and safety of CM in treating metastatic CRC after conventional chemotherapy failure. Patients in the ICM group will be compared with those in the WM group and CM group. If certified to be effective, national provision of CM treatment in metastatic CRC will probably be advised. (Registration No. NCT02923622 on ClinicalTrials.gov).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase III
    背景:原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)是一种高度侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL),在过去30年中在免疫功能正常的患者中发病率不断上升。虽然结果有所改善,与全身性NHL相比,PCNSL的预后仍然较差。关于最佳治疗方法的许多问题仍然没有答案。
    方法:这是一个随机的,开放标签,两个平行臂的国际III期试验。我们将从德国合作PCNSL研究组和国际结外淋巴瘤研究组网络内的约35个中心招募250名新诊断的PCNSL患者。所有入选患者将接受由4个周期的利妥昔单抗375mg/m(2)/d(第0天和第5天)组成的诱导化疗,甲氨蝶呤3.5g/m(2)(d1),阿糖胞苷2×2g/m(2)/d(d2-3),和噻替帕30毫克/米(2)(d4)每21天。所有患者将在第二个周期后进行干细胞收获。经过4个周期的诱导化疗,达到部分或完全缓解的患者将被集中随机分为2种不同的巩固治疗:(A)利妥昔单抗375mg/m的常规剂量免疫化疗(2)(d0),地塞米松40mg/d(d1-3),依托泊苷100mg/m(2)/d(d1-3),异环磷酰胺1500mg/m(2)/d(d1-3)和卡铂300mg/m(2)(d1)(R-DeVIC)或(B)大剂量化疗BCNU(或白消安)和噻替帕后自体干细胞移植(HCT-ASCT)。目的是证明与R-DeVIC相比,HCT-ASCT在无进展生存期方面的优越性(PFS,主要终点)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS),治疗反应和治疗相关的发病率。治疗完成后的最小随访时间为24个月。
    结论:在PCNSL中进行巩固治疗的理由是消除残留的淋巴瘤细胞并降低复发风险。这可以通过以常规剂量或以需要自体干细胞支持的高剂量施用穿过血脑屏障的药剂来实现。HCT-ASCT已被证明对新诊断的PCNSL患者是可行且高效的。然而,目前尚不清楚,在新诊断的PCNSL患者中,强化抗代谢物免疫化疗后,HCT-ASCT是否真的优于常规剂量化疗.为了回答这个问题,我们设计了这项研究者发起的随机III期试验.
    背景:德国临床试验注册中心DRKS00005503于2014年4月22日注册,ClinicalTrials.govNCT02531841于2015年8月24日注册。
    BACKGROUND: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a highly aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with rising incidence over the past 30 years in immunocompetent patients. Although outcomes have improved, PCNSL is still associated with inferior prognosis compared to systemic NHL. Many questions regarding the optimal therapeutic approach remain unanswered.
    METHODS: This is a randomized, open-label, international phase III trial with two parallel arms. We will recruit 250 patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL from approximately 35 centers within the networks of the German Cooperative PCNSL study group and the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group. All enrolled patients will undergo induction chemotherapy consisting of 4 cycles of rituximab 375 mg/m(2)/d (days 0 & 5), methotrexate 3.5 g/m(2) (d1), cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m(2)/d (d2-3), and thiotepa 30 mg/m(2) (d4) every 21 days. All patients will undergo stem-cell harvest after the second cycle. After 4 cycles of induction chemotherapy, patients achieving partial or complete response will be centrally randomized to 2 different consolidation treatments: (A) conventional-dose immuno chemotherapy with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) (d0), dexamethasone 40 mg/d (d1-3), etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/d (d1-3), ifosfamide 1500 mg/m(2)/d (d1-3) and carboplatin 300 mg/m(2) (d1) (R-DeVIC) or (B) high-dose chemotherapy with BCNU (or busulfan) and thiotepa followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT). The objective is to demonstrate superiority of HCT-ASCT compared to R-DeVIC with respect to progression-free survival (PFS, primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), treatment response and treatment-related morbidities. Minimal follow-up after treatment completion is 24 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: The rationale for consolidation treatment in PCNSL is to eliminate residual lymphoma cells and to decrease the risk for relapse. This can be achieved by agents crossing the blood brain barrier either applied at conventional doses or at high doses requiring autologous stem cell support. HCT-ASCT has been shown to be feasible and highly effective in patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL. However, it is unclear whether HCT-ASCT is really superior compared to conventional-dose chemotherapy after an intensified antimetabolites-based immunochemotherapy in patients with newly-diagnosed PCNSL. To answer this question, we designed this investigator initiated randomized phase III trial.
    BACKGROUND: German clinical trials registry DRKS00005503 registered 22 April 2014 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02531841 registered 24 August 2015.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase III
    BACKGROUND: In children older than 1 year with localised unresectable neuroblastoma (NB), treatment strategies are heterogeneous according to the national groups. The objective of this phase III non-randomised study was to evaluate the efficacy of conventional chemotherapy followed by surgery.
    METHODS: In the presence of surgical risk factors (SRF), six courses of chemotherapy alternating Carboplatin-Etoposide and Vincristin-Cyclophosphamide-Doxorubicin were given, and surgical resection was attempted after four. Survival analyses were performed using an intention-to-treat approach. The main objective was to achieve a 5-year survival over 80%.
    RESULTS: Out of 191 registered children, 160 were evaluable. There were 62.5% older than 18 months and 52.5% had unfavourable histology according to International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC). Chemotherapy reduced the number of SRFs by one third. Delayed surgery was attempted in 86.3% of patients and was complete or nearly complete in 74%. The 5-year EFS and OS were 76.4% and 87.6% respectively, with significant better results for patients younger than 18 months or with favourable histology.
    CONCLUSIONS: This strategy provides encouraging results in children older than 1 year or 12 months with localised unresectable NB without MYCN amplification. However, in children older than 18 months and with unfavourable histology, additional treatment is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号