Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    先天性鼻梨状孔狭窄(CNPAS)是一种罕见的疾病,可导致新生儿呼吸困难。本系统评价的目的是比较钻孔与扩张技术治疗CNPAS的手术效果。
    已发布,Embase,和Cochrane临床试验数据库在2010年至2021年间搜索术语“先天性鼻梨状孔狭窄”或“梨状孔狭窄”。纳入了25项研究,评估了接受CNPAS手术治疗的儿科患者,其结果数据包括并发症,修订,和逗留时间的长短。
    共51例CNPAS患者纳入纳入研究。中位年龄为29天,56.9%为女性,54.9%是足月出生。术前梨形孔宽度中位数为5.00mm(IQR=4.10,6.45)。40名(78.4%)患者接受了唇下钻孔,当6人使用Hegar宫颈扩张器进行扩张手术时,2有一个气球扩张,还有3个是用丙烯酸装置扩张的,气管导管,或者Bougie.76.5%的患者无术后并发症,而9例(17.6%)患者需要第二次手术。中位住院时间为11天(IQR=4,26)。在并发症方面,阴唇下钻孔和手术扩张技术之间没有观察到统计学上的显着差异。需要翻修手术,或逗留时间。
    当前文献不足以确定钻孔或扩张在CNPAS的治疗中是否更有效。
    UNASSIGNED: Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS) is a rare condition that results in neonatal respiratory difficulty. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare surgical outcomes of drilling versus dilation techniques in the treatment of CNPAS.
    UNASSIGNED: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Clinical Trials databases were searched for terms \"congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis\" or \"pyriform aperture stenosis\" from 2010 to 2021. Twenty-five studies were included that evaluated pediatric patients treated surgically for CNPAS with available outcomes data including complications, revisions, and length of stay.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 51 patients with CNPAS were pooled from included studies. The median age was 29 days, 56.9% were female, and 54.9% were born full-term. The median pyriform aperture width before surgery was 5.00 mm (IQR = 4.10, 6.45). Forty (78.4%) patients underwent sublabial drilling, while 6 had a dilation procedure performed with hegar cervical dilators, 2 had a balloon dilation, and 3 were dilated with either an acrylic device, endotracheal tube, or bougie. There were no post-operative complications for 76.5% of patients, while a second surgery was required in 9 (17.6%) patients. The median length of stay was 11 days (IQR = 4, 26). No statistically significant difference was observed between sublabial drilling and surgical dilation techniques with respect to complications, need for revision surgery, or length of stay.
    UNASSIGNED: Current literature is insufficient to determine if drilling or dilation is more effective in the treatment of CNPAS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Congenital bony nasal cavity stenosis is caused by alterations of the normal embryological development of the nasal cavity. Depending on the site of the obstruction, the most important types of stenosis are: choanal atresia and stenosis, congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis, congenital midnasal stenosis, arhinia and nasal septum deviation. Although they are uncommon, they could be potentially life-threatening conditions that require early diagnosis and proper treatment. In case of neonatal nasal obstruction, appropriate differential diagnosis with other causes, such as rhinitis and sinonasal masses, are performed by nasal endoscopy and radiological exams. Treatment strategy consisting of medical nasal therapies and endoscopic or open nasal surgery should be tailored according to the types and the degree of the stenosis. When indicated, endoscopic endonasal approach is considered the most effective technique in neonates warranting minimal surgical invasiveness and maximum effect. In order to promote the management of these rare yet clinically relevant neonatal nasal breath disorders, we review the current trends in diagnosis and treatment of congenital bony nasal cavity stenosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号