Congenital hearing loss

先天性听力损失
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鉴于听力损失(HL)的个性化管理和治疗的关键作用,早期进行病因调查,和遗传分析显着有助于确定大多数综合征和非综合征HL病例。知道数百个与HL的综合征关联,关于由于连续基因的微缺失或微重复而导致的基因组疾病中HL的全面数据很少。结合对新患者的描述,该患者具有新的3.7Mb的Xq21关键基因座缺失,我们建议对Xq21缺失综合征患者及其家庭成员的临床发现进行未报道的文献综述.最后,我们提出了连续基因综合征中HL的全面综述,以确认细胞基因组微阵列分析在研究无法解释的HL病因中的作用。
    Given the crucial role of the personalized management and treatment of hearing loss (HL), etiological investigations are performed early on, and genetic analysis significantly contributes to the determination of most syndromic and nonsyndromic HL cases. Knowing hundreds of syndromic associations with HL, little comprehensive data about HL in genomic disorders due to microdeletion or microduplications of contiguous genes is available. Together with the description of a new patient with a novel 3.7 Mb deletion of the Xq21 critical locus, we propose an unreported literature review about clinical findings in patients and their family members with Xq21 deletion syndrome. We finally propose a comprehensive review of HL in contiguous gene syndromes in order to confirm the role of cytogenomic microarray analysis to investigate the etiology of unexplained HL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:听力损失(HL)是一个全球性的健康问题。新生儿听力筛查改善了早期发现和管理,以减轻HL对个人和社会的损害。尽管如此,HL在童年,超越婴儿期,调查不足,尤其是在发展中国家。本研究旨在探讨具有HL危险因素的约旦儿童中HL的患病率,并调查相关危险因素。
    方法:对三级公立和教学医院的听力学记录进行回顾性横断面回顾。纳入2000年至2016年接受听力学评估的1307名0-15岁儿童的数据。对诊断性听力学和医疗记录进行了审查,以调查高风险(HR)儿童的感音神经性HL的患病率以及最重要的危险因素。
    结果:描述性统计分析显示,在研究样本中,感音神经性HL的患病率为29.2%。95%为双侧HL,73%为轻度至中度HL。诊断时的平均年龄约为4.5岁。最常见的风险因素是父母对孩子听力的担忧,使用耳毒性药物,发育和语言延迟。卡方测试表明,父母的关注和耳毒性药物的使用与患有HL的可能性增加有关。
    结论:约旦高危儿童中HL的患病率相对较高,而诊断延迟了.结果强调了在有风险的儿童中实施听力筛查计划的重要性。这需要从出生开始,并包括连续随访以检测延迟发作的HL病例。
    OBJECTIVE: Hearing loss (HL) constitutes an increasing worldwide health problem. Neonatal hearing screening improved early detection and management to alleviate HL detriments on the person and society. Still, HL in childhood, beyond infancy, is under-investigated, especially in developing countries. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of HL in childhood amongst Jordanian children with HL risk factors and investigate the associated risk factors.
    METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional review of audiological records in a tertiary public and teaching hospital. The data of 1307 children aged 0-15 years who underwent audiological assessment from 2000 to 2016 were included. A review of diagnostic audiological and medical records was conducted to investigate the prevalence of sensorineural HL in high-risk (HR) children and the most contributing risk factors.
    RESULTS: Descriptive statistical analysis showed that the prevalence of sensorineural HL was 29.2% in the study sample. The HL was bilateral in 95% and mild to moderate HL in 73%. The mean age at the diagnosis was around 4.5 years. The most common risk factors were parental concern about their child\'s hearing, ototoxic drug use, and developmental and speech delay. The Chi-squared test showed that parental concern and ototoxic drug use were associated with an increased probability of having HL.
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HL amongst at-risk children in Jordan is relatively high, and the diagnosis is delayed. The results highlight the importance of implementing a hearing screening program in at-risk children. This needs to start from birth and include a serial follow-up to detect cases of delayed-onset HL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    听力损失被认为是最常见的出生缺陷。估计正常新生儿中重度听力损失的患病率为0.1%-0.3%,而在新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿中,患病率为2%-4%。新生儿听力损失可以是先天性的(综合征性或非综合征性)或获得性的,例如耳毒性。此外,听力损失的类型可以是传导性的,感觉神经性,或混合。听力对于语言和学习的习得至关重要。因此,早期发现和及时治疗对于防止不必要的听力损失后果至关重要。在许多国家,听力筛查计划是强制性的,尤其是高危新生儿。自动听觉脑干反应测试被用作进入新生儿重症监护病房的新生儿的筛查工具。此外,新生儿巨细胞病毒的基因检测和筛查对于确定听力损失的原因至关重要,特别是,轻度和迟发性听力损失类型。我们旨在更新有关新生儿听力损失的各个方面的流行病学知识,危险因素,原因,筛选程序,调查,和不同的治疗方式。
    Hearing loss is considered the most common birth defect. The estimated prevalence of moderate and severe hearing loss in a normal newborn is 0.1%-0.3%, while the prevalence is 2%-4% in newborns admitted to the newborn intensive care unit. Neonatal hearing loss can be congenital (syndromic or non-syndromic) or acquired such as ototoxicity. In addition, the types of hearing loss can be conductive, sensorineural, or mixed. Hearing is vital for the acquisition of language and learning. Therefore, early detection and prompt treatment are of utmost importance in preventing the unwanted sequel of hearing loss. The hearing screening program is mandatory in many nations, especially for high-risk newborns. An automated auditory brainstem response test is used as a screening tool in newborns admitted to the newborn intensive care unit. Moreover, genetic testing and screening for cytomegalovirus in newborns are essential in identifying the cause of hearing loss, particularly, mild and delayed onset types of hearing loss. We aimed to update the knowledge on the various aspects of hearing loss in newborns with regard to the epidemiology, risk factors, causes, screening program, investigations, and different modalities of treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Hearing loss is the most frequent sensory disorder, with an incidence of 1:1500 live newborns. In more than 50% of patients, it is associated with a genetic cause, while in up to 30% of cases, it is related to syndromic entities. We performed a literature review of studies on congenital hearing loss of genetic origin in the Mexican population. We identified eight reports that showed that the pathogenic variants most frequently associated with hearing loss are related to the GJB2 gene, although in a low percentage (3%). Other mutations were identified in the GJB6, SLC26A4, or CHD23 genes. On this basis, a possible diagnostic strategy in Mexican patients with hearing loss is to consider an initial screening of these three genes. If these genes were negative for pathogenic variants, the following steps would be to consider second-generation sequencing analysis focused on panels of genes associated with hearing loss, isolated or syndromic, and if necessary, to perform exome or whole-genome analysis. Establishing an etiologic cause is critical in clinically evaluating patients with congenital hearing loss and their families. It can help determine rehabilitation strategies, such as hearing aids or cochlear implants and provide information on disease progression and genetic counseling in this population.
    La pérdida auditiva es la alteración sensorial más frecuente, con una incidencia de 1:1500 recién nacidos vivos. En más del 50% de los pacientes se asocia con una causa genética, mientras que en más del 30% de los casos se asocia con entidades sindrómicas. Se llevó a cabo una revisión de la literatura de las investigaciones sobre la pérdida auditiva congénita de origen genético en la población mexicana. Se identificaron ocho reportes en los que se demostró que las variantes patogénicas más frecuentemente asociadas con pérdida auditiva se encuentran en el gen GJB2, aunque en un porcentaje bajo (3%). Se identificaron otras mutaciones en los genes GJB6, SLC26A4 o CHD23. Con base en esta información, una posible estrategia diagnóstica en pacientes mexicanos con pérdida auditiva es considerar un primer paso en el tamiz diagnóstico con los tres genes mencionados. Si estos genes fueran negativos para variantes patogénicas, el siguiente paso sería considerar el análisis por secuenciación de segunda generación enfocado en paneles de genes asociados con pérdida auditiva, tanto aislada como sindrómica, y en caso necesario, realizar el análisis del exoma o del genoma completo. Establecer una causa etiológica es un componente crítico en la evaluación clínica de los pacientes con pérdida auditiva congénita, ya que puede ayudar a determinar las estrategias de manejo y rehabilitación, como el uso de auxiliares auditivos o implantes cocleares, proporcionar información sobre la progresión de la enfermedad y dar asesoramiento genético en esta población.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov\'t
    A review of published data regarding binaural hearing after treatment of congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL) due to aural atresia. Treatment options concern atresia surgery (reconstructive surgery), application of a bone conduction device (BCD), or application of a middle ear implant (MEI).
    Database PubMed was searched for articles published in English and German between January 1, 1994, and January 1, 2019.
    The initial search identified 52 studies, of which 9 met the inclusion criteria.
    Comparison of studies was based on a structured review. Meta-analysis was not feasible because of the heterogeneity of outcome measures, the limited number of relevant papers (9), and diverse types of treatment (5).
    Treatment of UCHL results in bilateral hearing instead of binaural hearing. The large intersubject variability in benefit of treatment is unexplained with a clear improvement in the minority of listeners and a limited improvement or binaural interference in most listeners after atresia repair or amplification with a BCD or MEI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新生儿和儿童的听力损失是一个公共卫生问题,由于高患病率和对其发展的负面影响。早期发现和干预儿童听力损失可能会减轻这些负面影响。全球已经建立了基于人群的新生儿听力筛查计划,以识别有先天性听力损失风险的儿童,并跟踪有迟发性或进行性听力损失风险的儿童。本文提出了系统评价方案,旨在审查与儿童永久性听力损失相关的风险因素,包括先天性的,早期,或迟发性。与进行性听力损失相关的风险因素将作为次要目标进行研究。
    将调查来自以下数据库的科学文献:MEDLINE,OvidMEDLINE(R)每日和OvidMEDLINE(R),Embase,和CINAHL。主要结果是永久性双侧或单侧听力损失,先天性发作或儿童期发作(出生至18岁)。次要结果是进行性听力损失。研究必须报告与永久性听力损失相关的危险因素的数据;危险因素可能在出生时或以后出现,并导致立即或延迟的听力损失。随机对照试验,准实验研究,非随机比较和非比较研究,和案例系列将包括在内。将使用定量研究的定性评估工具(麦克马斯特大学)评估偏倚的风险。如果可以对某一小节的研究进行数据汇总,我们将使用荟萃分析技术汇集数据。如果无法聚合数据,将进行定性综合。我们将使用建议等级评估来评估整体证据的质量和强度,开发和评估(等级)。系统审查遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)建议的首选报告项目。
    由此产生的信息将为安大略省婴儿听力计划的省级听力学监测协议的更新提供信息,并将适用于全球范围内的早期听力检测和干预(EHDI)计划。
    我们已经在国际前瞻性系统审查登记册(PROSPERO)中注册了该协议,注册号CRD42018104121。
    Hearing loss in newborns and children is a public health concern, due to high prevalence and negative effects on their development. Early detection and intervention of childhood hearing loss may mitigate these negative effects. Population-based newborn hearing screening programs have been established worldwide to identify children at risk for congenital hearing loss and to follow children at risk for late onset or progressive hearing loss. This article presents the protocol for a systematic review that aims to review the risk factors associated with permanent hearing loss in children, including congenital, early, or late onset. Risk factors associated with progressive hearing loss will be investigated as a secondary aim.
    Scientific literature from the following databases will be investigated: MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily and Ovid MEDLINE(R), Embase, and CINAHL. The primary outcome is a permanent bilateral or unilateral hearing loss with congenital onset or onset during childhood (birth to 18 years). The secondary outcome is progressive hearing loss. Studies must report data on risk factors associated with permanent hearing loss; risk factors may be present at birth or later and result in immediate or delayed hearing loss. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, nonrandomized comparative and non-comparative studies, and case series will be included. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Qualitative Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies (McMaster University). If aggregation of data is possible for a subsection of studies, we will pool data using meta-analysis techniques. If aggregation of data is not possible, a qualitative synthesis will be presented. We will assess the quality and strength of the overall body of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). The systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations.
    The resulting information will inform the update of a provincial audiological surveillance protocol for the Ontario Infant Hearing Program and will be applicable to early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) programs worldwide.
    We have registered the protocol in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration number CRD42018104121.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective: Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) uses otoacoustic emissions testing (OAE) and auditory brainstem response testing (ABR) to screen all newborn infants for hearing loss (HL), but may not identify infants with mild HL at birth or delayed onset HL. The purpose of this review is to examine the role of genetic screening to diagnose children with pre-lingual HL that is not detected at birth by determining the rate of children who pass UNHS but have a positive genetic screening. This includes a summary of the current UNHS and its limitations and a review of genetic mutations and screening technologies used to detect patients with an increased risk of undiagnosed pre-lingual HL.Design: Literature review of studies that compare UNHS with concurrent genetic screening.Study sample: Infants and children with HLResults: Sixteen studies were included encompassing 137,895 infants. Pathogenic mutations were detected in 8.66% of patients. In total, 545 patients passed the UNHS but had a positive genetic screening. The average percentage of patients who passed UNHS but had a positive genetic screening was 1.4%.Conclusions: This review demonstrates the positive impact of concurrent genetic screening with UNHS to identify patients with pre-lingual HL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Similar to amblyopia in the visual system, \"amblyaudia\" is a term used to describe persistent hearing difficulty experienced by individuals with a history of asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) during a critical window of brain development. Few clinical reports have described this phenomenon and its consequent effects on central auditory processing. We aim to (1) define the concept of amblyaudia and (2) review contemporary research on its pathophysiology and emerging clinical relevance.
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed with combinations of search terms: \"amblyaudia,\" \"conductive hearing loss,\" \"sensorineural hearing loss,\" \"asymmetric,\" \"pediatric,\" \"auditory deprivation,\" and \"auditory development.\" Relevant articles were considered for inclusion, including basic and clinical studies, case series, and major reviews.
    CONCLUSIONS: During critical periods of infant brain development, imbalanced auditory input associated with AHL may lead to abnormalities in binaural processing. Patients with amblyaudia can demonstrate long-term deficits in auditory perception even with correction or resolution of AHL. The greatest impact is in sound localization and hearing in noisy environments, both of which rely on bilateral auditory cues. Diagnosis and quantification of amblyaudia remain controversial and poorly defined. Prevention of amblyaudia may be possible through early identification and timely management of reversible causes of AHL.
    CONCLUSIONS: Otolaryngologists, audiologists, and pediatricians should be aware of emerging data supporting amblyaudia as a diagnostic entity and be cognizant of the potential for lasting consequences of AHL. Prevention of long-term auditory deficits may be possible through rapid identification and correction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To share our experience in cochlear implanted patients with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS), to review the literature results and to disclose precautions which have to be taken dealing with these patients.
    METHODS: Electrocardiograms (ECG) of 503 children with congenital bilateral profound hearing loss which were cochlear implanted in cochlear implant center of a tertiary hospital were evaluated for long QT syndrome. Clinical reports of the patients with JLNS were evaluated and a review of literature performed.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of disease was 0.79% (four cases) in our center which is in the range of literature reports (0-2.6%). None of our patients had a history of syncopal attack. Two patients (50%) were born from parents with consanguineous marriage. Considering all precautions their cochlear implant surgeries were done uneventfully. A review of the literature has identified sixteen reports on cochlear implantation in a total of 38 children with JLNS. Similar to our cases none of the authors reported cardiac events during device switch-on. Nine available reports about the outcome of cochlear implantation in these patients indicated good auditory outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that all congenitally deaf patients have an ECG taken as a part of the evaluation. As auditory stimuli is reported to be a specific trigger, it is prudent to activate the processor with continuous heart monitoring even though there is no reported cardiac event during device switch-on. Cochlear implantation can be performed relatively safely in these patients if necessary precautions have been taken appropriately and their auditory outcome is good. Triggers of the cardiac events should be avoided throughout their life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Enlarged vestibular aqueduct is the most common radiographically identified cause of congenital sensorineural hearing loss and is frequently progressive. Imaging is often ordered during the workup of children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss in part to identify enlarged vestibular aqueduct given concern for progression with head trauma. However, this association has not been systematically evaluated. We aimed to determine the rate of progression and association with head trauma in individuals with enlarged vestibular aqueduct.
    METHODS: Systematic review of primary studies identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science.
    METHODS: Meta-analysis was performed on patient-level data describing enlarged vestibular aqueduct, progressive sensorineural hearing loss, and head trauma extracted from articles identified on systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines.
    RESULTS: Twenty-three studies (1115 ears with enlarged vestibular aqueduct) met inclusion criteria. Progressive sensorineural hearing loss was found in 39.6% of ears, with trauma-associated progression in 12%. Limited case-control data show no difference in the incidence of progression between patients with and without head trauma.
    CONCLUSIONS: Long-term progressive sensorineural hearing loss is common in enlarged vestibular aqueduct, but its association with head trauma is not strongly supported.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号