Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) presents as persistent regional pain, both spontaneous and triggered. The demand persists for innovative treatments that patients can endure with minimal adverse effects. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) emerges as a possible intervention in this regard. Methods: The main objective of this work is to retrospectively analyse a case series of patients diagnosed with CRPS treated in the Centre of Hyperbaric Medicine Ostrava over two years (period 2018-2019). The HBOT was applied at 2.0-2.4 absolute atmosphere (ATA) once a day. Results: A total of 83 patients with CRPS were treated with HBOT. 98% of cases reported pain, 92% reported limitation of movement of the affected limb, 87% had swelling of the limb, 41% had lividity and 70% had sensory problems. The mean number of HBOT exposures was 22.0 ± 7.1. At the end of HBOT treatment, 86% of cases had symptoms relief. The mean VAS value of pain at rest before the start of HBOT was 3.2±3.0, after treatment it was 1.6±1.9 (p<0.001). In a pain at activity it was 6.1±2.4 and 3.7±2.4 (p<0.001), respectively, at the end of HBOT. The value of the functional assessment of the limb was 7.0±2.0 and 4.3±2.4 (p<0.001), respectively, at the end of treatment. 79 cases were included in the end-of-treatment assessment. 23 cases (29%) were evaluated as large clinically significant response, 48 cases (61%) were evaluated as partial response with minimally important difference. The results showed larger clinical HBOT effect in cases of disease duration up to 3 and 6 months (p=0.029). Conclusions: The majority of patients improved pain and functional state of the affected limb. Our data also suggests the sooner after diagnosis of CRPS is HBOT started, the treatment has larger clinical effect. There was no serious HBOT-related complication or injury.

UNASSIGNED: A 59-year-old woman was presented to the outpatient clinic with persistent pain after a hyperextension/inversion trauma of the ankle. Six months after the incident, a 3-phase bone scan was performed. A second patient, a 54-year-old man, was referred for a 3-phase bone scan 2 months after his right hand was twisted while using a drill. In both patients, scintigraphy showed diffuse increased uptake in the affected limb in all 3 phases. The x-rays of the affected limbs showed osteopenia. These findings are consistent with (early phase) complex regional pain syndrome.

UNASSIGNED: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) represents a rare complication following injury to a limb. The DASH questionnaire (disability of arm, shoulder, and hand) evaluates everyday arm function. We assessed the DASH and its subitems in comparison to patients with brachial plexus lesions or fracture controls, analysed it over time, and in relation to active range of motion (ROM), to determine patients\' impairment and trajectory.
UNASSIGNED: The dataset included 193 patients with upper extremity CRPS from the noncoding RNA (ncRNA) Pain cohort, 36 fracture controls, and 12 patients with traumatic brachial plexus lesions. For the clinical and psychological characterisation, questionnaires and a goniometer for the measurement of ROM were utilized. Thirty-three patients were followed up after approximately 2.5 years of guideline treatment.
UNASSIGNED: CRPS patients had a similar mean DASH of 54.7 (standard deviation (S.D.) ±21) as brachial plexus lesion patients (M = 51.4, S.D. ± 16.1) but different significantly from fracture controls (M = 21.2, S.D. ± 21.1). Pain and older age were predictors of the DASH. Activities requiring force or impact on the arm, shoulder, or hand were mostly affected in patients with CRPS. After 2.5 years of standard treatment, the mean DASH score fell to 41.3 (S.D. ± 25.2), weakness in leisure activities was recuperated, pain feelings were lessened, and ROM, e.g., wrist flexion, recovered by 36°. Two-thirds of patients improved in both the DASH and the ROM.
UNASSIGNED: CRPS is as disabling as a complete loss of arm function in brachial plexus lesions and exhibits only partial recovery. Developing QuickDASH versions for CRPS patients could reduce the load of questions in clinical studies. It would be prudent to consider the unexpected age dependency of the DASH in future studies. This trial is registered with DRKS00008964.

A 50-year-old woman develops chronic pain and functional limitations in the left arm following a painful venipuncture. A complex regional pain syndrome is assumed. Was this the cause of a medical malpractice by the general practitioner?

Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is classified into two subtypes based on clinical presentation: warm or cold.Methods: We examined the distribution of warm and cold subtypes in CRPS patients before they received lumbar sympathetic block. We retrospectively analyzed 81 prelumbar sympathetic block Forward Looking InfraRed images obtained from 30 patients to study temperature asymmetry between affected and unaffected limbs.Results: In 23 of the 30 patients (77%), the temperature difference between the affected and affected limbs was within the normal range (<0.6°C difference). Of the remaining seven cases, six (20%) were diagnosed with cold-CRPS and one (3%) with warm-CRPS. During subsequent interventions, 74% of the patients maintained a temperature difference within the normal range (<0.6°C difference).Conclusion: Retrospective analysis of Forward Looking InfraRed thermal camera images in CRPS patients showed that 77% of patients did not exhibit significant temperature asymmetry (<0.6°C difference) between affected and unaffected limbs.
What is the article about? The article discusses a condition called complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), a type of chronic pain that affects arms or legs. CRPS can potentially make the affected limb colder or warmer compared with the other limb. This study investigated temperature differences between the affected and nonaffected limbs in CRPS patients to be treated with a procedure called lumbar sympathetic nerve blocks. Researchers used an infrared thermal camera to take pictures of the patients’ feet to measure these temperature differences.What were the results? The study found that 77% of the patients, who were about to have their initial nerve block treatments, did not show a significant (greater than 0.6°C) temperature difference between their affected and nonaffected limbs.What do the results mean? The study suggests that most CRPS patients demonstrated only a small temperature difference between their affected and nonaffected limbs. This result is different from earlier studies, which suggested that warm CRPS occurs in about 70% and cold CRPS in about 30% of cases at the time of diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of treatment of complex regional pain syndrome is to relieve pain and restore function in the affected limb. The aim of this study is to evaluate spinal cord stimulation as a therapy for patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome, for whom adequate pain control could not be achieved with other previous treatments.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted from 2018 to 2020. We included patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome refractory to other treatments or techniques, classified by demographic data. Efficacy, functionality and opioid dependence in each patient were subsequently monitored for one year.
RESULTS: Seven of the 13 patients (53.84%) included in the study achieved significant pain relief with spinal cord stimulation. Improvements in pain and functionality were obtained, and both were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). Improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index/Neck Disability Index (ODI/NDI) was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.011) and was lower as BMI increased.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that spinal cord stimulation is an effective therapeutic option for patients with CRPS refractory to other treatments. BMI and ODI/NDI also showed a significant correlation.
BACKGROUND: Estimulación medular en el síndrome de dolor regional complejo refractario. Un estudio prospectivo.
Introducción y objetivos. En el tratamiento del síndrome de dolor regional complejo se pretende aliviar el dolor y restaurar la función de la extremidad afectada. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la estimulación de la médula espinal como terapia para pacientes a quienes se les diagnosticó síndrome de dolor regional complejo, en los que no se ha podido conseguir un control adecuado del dolor con otros tratamientos previos. Pacientes y métodos. Se realizó un estudio prospectivo de 2018 a 2020. Se incluyó a pacientes diagnosticados de síndrome de dolor regional complejo refractario a otros tratamientos o técnicas, clasificados por datos demográficos. Posteriormente, se hizo seguimiento de la eficacia, la funcionalidad y la dependencia de opioides de cada paciente durante un año. Resultados. Siete de los 13 (53,84%) pacientes incluidos en el estudio consiguieron un alivio significativo de su dolor con la estimulación medular. Se obtuvo mejoría del dolor y de la funcionalidad, y ambas fueron estadísticamente significativas (p < 0,001 y p = 0,003, respectivamente). La mejoría en el Oswestry Disability Index/Neck Disability Index (ODI/NDI) se asoció significativamente con el índice de masa corporal (IMC) (p = 0,011) y fue menor cuanto mayor era el IMC. Conclusiones. Los resultados sugieren que la estimulación de la médula espinal es una opción terapéutica eficaz para pacientes con SDRC refractario a otros tratamientos. Además, el IMC y el ODI/NDI mostraron una correlación significativa.

UNASSIGNED: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) presents postinjury with disproportionate pain and neuropathic, autonomic, motor symptoms, and skin texture affection. However, the origin of these multiplex changes is unclear. Skin biopsies offer a window to analyze the somatosensory and vascular system as well as skin trophicity with their protecting barriers. In previous studies, barrier-protective exosomal microRNAs were altered in CRPS. We here postulated that tissue architecture and barrier proteins are already altered at the beginning of CRPS. We analyzed ipsilateral and contralateral skin biopsies of 20 fully phenotyped early CRPS patients compared with 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We established several automated unbiased methods to comprehensively analyze microvessels and somatosensory receptors as well as barrier proteins, including claudin-1, claudin-5, and claudin-19. Meissner corpuscles in the skin were bilaterally reduced in acute CRPS patients with some of them lacking these completely. The number of Merkel cells and the intraepidermal nerve fiber density were not different between the groups. Dermal papillary microvessels were bilaterally less abundant in CRPS, especially in patients with allodynia. Barrier proteins in keratinocytes, perineurium of dermal nerves, Schwann cells, and papillary microvessels were not affected in early CRPS. Bilateral changes in the tissue architecture in early CRPS might indicate a predisposition for CRPS that manifests after injury. Further studies should evaluate whether these changes might be used to identify risk patients for CRPS after trauma and as biomarkers for outcome.

We present a case of deep surgical site infection (SSI) at a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial implantation site, resulting from an allergic reaction to an unknown agent. A 38-year-old female with complex regional pain syndrome began an SCS trial, noting 100% pain relief for 5 days. Fluid drainage from the surgical site was reported on POD6 and trial leads were removed the following day. The patient was hospitalized with sepsis. Blood cultures revealed Staphylococcus aureus. MRIs showed skin breakdown and cellulitis of the paraspinal musculature extending into the epidural space. The patient was maintained with antibiotics and rigorous wound care for 9 days and the surgical site infection resolved. The patient proceeded to SCS implantation, and reported good pain relief with the implanted device.
This case report describes the treatment of an infection developed during a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial period. SCS are medical devices used to treat pain, they work by applying electrical current to the areas of the spinal cord that cause patients’ pain. Before patients get an SCS device implanted, they often undergo a trial period first. During a trial, the stimulator device stays outside the body, and only the wires carrying electricity to the spinal cord are implanted. Typically, SCS trial and implantation procedures are safe and result in effective pain relief. However, infections are a dangerous potential complication that can result from these procedures. In our case, the patient developed an infection during an SCS trial period, likely resulting from an allergic reaction to their surgical dressings. The infection traveled down the wires and nearly reached the spinal cord. Since the infection was quickly identified and managed, devastating complications were avoided. The patient was able to get a permanent SCS after the infection was resolved, and had effective pain relief. Our report emphasizes the importance of using strict infection prevention techniques, and monitoring patients for signs of infection throughout SCS trials.

To explore serum levels of some bone turnover markers and the involvement of the Wnt signaling in CRPS-1. Query ID=\"Q1\" Text=\"Please check and confirm whether the edit made to the article title is in order.\" We conducted an observational study on patients with early CRPS-1 recruited before any treatment. Clinical measures were assessed together with biochemical evaluation. Values of sclerostin, DKK1, CTX-I, and P1NP were compared with sex-age-matched healthy controls (HCs). We enrolled 34 patients diagnosed with CRPS-1 (mean age 59.3 ± 10.6 years, Male/Female 10/24), median disease duration = 2 weeks (IQR 1-5); median VAS score = 76 (IQR 68-80). Foot localization was slightly more frequent than hand localization (18/16). No statistically significant difference was found between CRPS-1 patients and HCs for CTX-I (0.3 ± 0.1 ng/ml vs 0.3 ± 0.1, p = 0.140), while mean serum values of P1NP were significantly higher in CRPS-1 patients compared to HCs (70.0 ± 38.8 ng/ml vs 50.1 ± 13.6, p = 0.005). Mean levels of sclerostin and DKK1 were lower in CRPS-1 patients vs HCs (sclerostin 28.4 ± 10.8 pmol/l vs 34.1 ± 11.6, p = 0.004; DKK1 12.9 ± 10.8 pmol/l vs 24.1 ± 11.9, p = 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found for all biochemical assessments in a subgroup of fracture-induced CRPS-1. No statistically significant differences were observed according to disease localization, disease duration, presence of hyperalgesia, allodynia, sudomotor alterations, and mild or moderate/severe swelling. No significant correlation emerged between sclerostin, DKK1 levels, baseline VAS score, or McGill Pain Questionnaire score. Bone involvement in early CRPS-1 does not seem to rely on increased osteoclast activity. Conversely, a serum marker of bone formation resulted increased. Both Sclerostin and DKK1 showed decreased values, probably suggesting a widespread osteocyte loss of function.Trial registration number: Eudract Number: 2014-001156-28.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in chronic pain studies is traditionally assessed by pain scores, which do not reflect the multidimensional nature of pain perception. Despite the evidence of SCS\'s influence on emotional functioning comprehensive assessments of its effect remain lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in emotional and psychosocial functioning in patients who underwent SCS implantation for chronic pain.
METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched for original peer-reviewed publications reporting emotional functioning after SCS. The primary outcomes were a pooled mean difference (MD) in anxiety, depression, global functioning, mental well-being and pain catastrophizing at 12 months. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to determine the quality of evidence.
RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included in the primary analysis. Statistically significant improvements were observed in anxiety (MD -2.16; 95% CI -2.84 to -1.49; p<0.001), depression (MD -4.66; 95% CI -6.26 to -3.06; p<0.001), global functioning (MD 20.30; 95% CI 14.69 to 25.90; p<0.001), mental well-being (MD 4.95; 95% CI 3.60 to 6.31; p<0.001), and pain catastrophizing (MD -12.09; 95% CI -14.94 to -9.23; p<0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed differences in Global Assessment of Functioning and mental well-being based on study design and in depression based on waveform paradigm.
CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight the statistically and clinically significant improvements in emotional and psychosocial outcomes in patients with chronic pain undergoing SCS therapy. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution due to the very low certainty of evidence per the GRADE criteria.
UNASSIGNED: CRD42023446326.