We examined the impact of exposure to a signed language (American Sign Language, or ASL) at different ages on the neural systems that support spoken language phonemic discrimination in deaf individuals with cochlear implants (CIs). Deaf CI users (N = 18, age = 18-24 yrs) who were exposed to a signed language at different ages and hearing individuals (N = 18, age = 18-21 yrs) completed a phonemic discrimination task in a spoken native (English) and non-native (Hindi) language while undergoing functional near-infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging. Behaviorally, deaf CI users who received a CI early versus later in life showed better English phonemic discrimination, albeit phonemic discrimination was poor relative to hearing individuals. Importantly, the age of exposure to ASL was not related to phonemic discrimination. Neurally, early-life language exposure, irrespective of modality, was associated with greater neural activation of left-hemisphere language areas critically involved in phonological processing during the phonemic discrimination task in deaf CI users. In particular, early exposure to ASL was associated with increased activation in the left hemisphere\'s classic language regions for native versus non-native language phonemic contrasts for deaf CI users who received a CI later in life. For deaf CI users who received a CI early in life, the age of exposure to ASL was not related to neural activation during phonemic discrimination. Together, the findings suggest that early signed language exposure does not negatively impact spoken language processing in deaf CI users, but may instead potentially offset the negative effects of language deprivation that deaf children without any signed language exposure experience prior to implantation. This empirical evidence aligns with and lends support to recent perspectives regarding the impact of ASL exposure in the context of CI usage.

OBJECTIVE: The analysis of different language domains and exploration of variables that affect the outcomes of cochlear implantation would help to document the efficacy of cochlear implantation and intervention programs. The aim of this work was to examine the language profile of children with Cochlear Implants (CI) and to assess the effect of age at the time of cochlear implantation and the impact of duration of rehabilitation on the development of linguistic abilities for cochlear implanted children.
METHODS: The study was conducted on 46 Arabic speaking children using unilateral CI who are receiving regular post-cochlear auditory and language rehabilitation in the phoniatrics unit, Kasr Alaini hospital. A Proficient Preschooler Language Evaluation (APPEL TOOL) was applied for the assessment of different language domains.
RESULTS: Children who received post implant rehabilitation for ≥ 2 years showed significant improvement in all subtests\' scores of APPEL tool than children who received same rehabilitation for ≤ 1 year. There was no significant difference of language scores between children who have received CI before age of 3 years and those who have been implanted after age of 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the language profile of CI children was beneficially affected by the longer duration of therapy post implantation.

Limited auditory input, whether caused by hearing loss or by electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant (CI), can be compensated by the remaining senses. Specifically for CI users, previous studies reported not only improved visual skills, but also altered cortical processing of unisensory visual and auditory stimuli. However, in multisensory scenarios, it is still unclear how auditory deprivation (before implantation) and electrical hearing experience (after implantation) affect cortical audiovisual speech processing. Here, we present a prospective longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) study which systematically examined the deprivation- and CI-induced alterations of cortical processing of audiovisual words by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in postlingually deafened CI users before and after implantation (five weeks and six months of CI use). A group of matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners served as controls. The participants performed a word-identification task with congruent and incongruent audiovisual words, focusing their attention on either the visual (lip movement) or the auditory speech signal. This allowed us to study the (top-down) attention effect on the (bottom-up) sensory cortical processing of audiovisual speech. When compared to the NH listeners, the CI candidates (before implantation) and the CI users (after implantation) exhibited enhanced lipreading abilities and an altered cortical response at the N1 latency range (90-150 ms) that was characterized by a decreased theta oscillation power (4-8 Hz) and a smaller amplitude in the auditory cortex. After implantation, however, the auditory-cortex response gradually increased and developed a stronger intra-modal connectivity. Nevertheless, task efficiency and activation in the visual cortex was significantly modulated in both groups by focusing attention on the visual as compared to the auditory speech signal, with the NH listeners additionally showing an attention-dependent decrease in beta oscillation power (13-30 Hz). In sum, these results suggest remarkable deprivation effects on audiovisual speech processing in the auditory cortex, which partially reverse after implantation. Although even experienced CI users still show distinct audiovisual speech processing compared to NH listeners, pronounced effects of (top-down) direction of attention on (bottom-up) audiovisual processing can be observed in both groups. However, NH listeners but not CI users appear to show enhanced allocation of cognitive resources in visually as compared to auditory attended audiovisual speech conditions, which supports our behavioural observations of poorer lipreading abilities and reduced visual influence on audition in NH listeners as compared to CI users.

OBJECTIVE: To study outcome after cochlear implantation using the Cochlear Implant (CI) outcome assessment protocol based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model (CI-ICF).
METHODS: Raw data of a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study was analyzed. Seventy-two CI candidates were assessed preoperatively and six months postoperatively using the CI-ICF protocol. Following tools were used: (1) Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ), (2) Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), (3) Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ), (4) Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12), (5) Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19), (6) Nijmegen CI Questionnaire (NCIQ) (7) pure tone audiometry, (8) speech audiometry, (9) sound localization.
RESULTS: There was a significant improvement of speech discrimination in quiet (p = 0.015; p < 0.001) and in noise (p = 0.041; p < 0.001), sound detection (p < 0.001), tinnitus (p = 0.026), listening (p < 0.001), communicating with-receiving-spoken messages (p < 0.001), conversation (p < 0.001), family relationships (p < 0.001), community life (p = 0.019), NCIQ total score and all subdomain scores (p < 0.001). Subjective sound localization significantly improved (p < 0.001), while psychometric sound localization did not. There was no significant subjective deterioration of vestibular functioning and no substantial change in sound aversiveness. CI users reported a high level of implant satisfaction postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the positive impact of cochlear implantation on auditory performance, communication, and subjective well-being. The CI-ICF protocol provides a holistic and comprehensive view of the evolution of CI outcomes.

Cochlear implant surgery is the standard of care for severe sensorineural hearing loss. Infection followed by implant extrusion is an infrequent complication of this surgery. The ideal treatment is explantation of the implant. However, implant removal and reimplantation is a challenging surgery and may have poor speech reception outcomes. The cost of a new implant especially in developing countries is also a deterrent. Our study dwells on the feasibility of salvaging exposed cochlear implants by a combination of pericranial flaps followed by a scalp flap cover. The study was done in a tertiary care hospital over a period of six years. Out of 303 cochlear implant surgeries, 12 patients had implant exposure and extrusion. Patients having meningitis and sepsis were excluded from the study. All patients underwent debridement and cover with double flap (Pericranial flaps and scalp rotation flap). The average operating time was 2.17 h. The surgery is technically simple with a short learning curve. It brings in rich blood supply and there is fair amount of tissue mobility. In 11 patients we were able to salvage the implant. Patients were followed for a period of 01 year post operatively. Our study suggests that salvage of infected implant should be attempted as it is feasible, durable and effective in appropriate patients.

UNASSIGNED: Currently preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain and High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scanning of temporal bones form part of routine Cochlear implantation (CI) assessment. Pre- operative imaging demonstrates anatomic details or anomalies if any, that prove essential in pre-surgical evaluation of patients. These form a road map for the surgeon to anticipate any difficulty during surgery, to aid in decision making to implant the most appropriate ear, plan surgical technique, or select electrode arrays.
UNASSIGNED: A descriptive observational pilot study was conducted at tertiary care hospital involving 51 paediatric patients worked-up for CI. Patients after detailed clinical evaluation and MRI Brain, a tentative surgical plan was formulated by a candidacy CI screening committee. Patients selected for surgery underwent HRCT temporal bones and surgical plan was modified after analysing the same. Percentage of cases in which surgical plan changed (in terms of laterality of surgery) after correlating with HRCT findings were determined and data analysed.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 51 patients worked up for CI were included in the study. In 37.3% cases, there were unfavourable MRI findings. HRCT scan was used to aid the surgical road map in these patients, which based on MRI findings would have had suboptimal outcome.
UNASSIGNED: With this understanding, we recommend that, MRI with precise interpretation would be sufficient to furnish all necessary information in preoperative assessment of CI patients, and a HRCT temporal bones maybe indicated only in difficult cases or those with unfavourable MRI findings, may aid predict surgical events.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation is a critical surgical intervention for patients with severe hearing loss. Postoperative care is essential for successful rehabilitation, yet access to timely medical advice can be challenging, especially in remote or resource-limited settings. Integrating advanced artificial intelligence (AI) tools like Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT)-4 in post-surgical care could bridge the patient education and support gap.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT-4 as a supplementary information resource for postoperative cochlear implant patients. The focus was on evaluating the AI chatbot\'s ability to provide accurate, clear, and relevant information, particularly in scenarios where access to healthcare professionals is limited.
METHODS: Five common postoperative questions related to cochlear implant care were posed to ChatGPT-4. The AI chatbot\'s responses were analyzed for accuracy, response time, clarity, and relevance. The aim was to determine whether ChatGPT-4 could serve as a reliable source of information for patients in need, especially if the patients could not reach out to the hospital or the specialists at that moment.
RESULTS: ChatGPT-4 provided responses aligned with current medical guidelines, demonstrating accuracy and relevance. The AI chatbot responded to each query within seconds, indicating its potential as a timely resource. Additionally, the responses were clear and understandable, making complex medical information accessible to non-medical audiences. These findings suggest that ChatGPT-4 could effectively supplement traditional patient education, providing valuable support in postoperative care.
CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that ChatGPT-4 has significant potential as a supportive tool for cochlear implant patients post surgery. While it cannot replace professional medical advice, ChatGPT-4 can provide immediate, accessible, and understandable information, which is particularly beneficial in special moments. This underscores the utility of AI in enhancing patient care and supporting cochlear implantation.

To determine the prevalence of non-use and limited use of cochlear implants. To find out the reasons for the same. This study was carried out among the paediatric patients who underwent cochlear implantation under the SHP* scheme in Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad between 2013 and 2020.
METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: Civil Hospital Ahmedabad.
METHODS: 150 paediatric patients. Patients were selected based on a random number generator. The data was collected through a telephonic interview based upon a preformed questionnaire. The study indicates that out of a total 150 participants, 109 (72.7%) used their cochlear implant regularly while 41 (27.3%) did not. Major issue faced by the participants was in the external device -damage to the device and monetary issues for its repair. The participants who have dropped the usage of their implants faced issues mostly after 2 years of usage. The age group of less than 3 years showed 15.6% of non-usage, while the age group of 3-6 years showed an increase to 34.5% of non-users. The age group of more than 6 years showed an even higher proportion (41.3%) of non-users. It is recommended that the government ensures the follow-up of the patients undergoing cochlear implantation for at least 2 years after the surgery. The proportion of non-users in the consecutive increasing age groups saw a rise in number. Therefore, it is recommended to divert the resources towards lower age groups to facilitate a better outcome.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate speech production outcomes and auditory performance in children with post-meningitis deafness who were treated with cochlear implants. Additionally, the study assesses the impact of electrode insertion depth on surgical outcomes.\".
METHODS: We conducted a study on 66 pediatric patients with bilateral postmeningitis hearing loss who were being prepared for cochlear implantation at four tertiary referral academic institutions. The speech intelligibility rating (SIR) and categories of auditory performance (CAP) were evaluated after the first and second years following implantation. The patients were divided into two groups based on electrode insertion depth: one group had full electrode insertion (more than two-thirds), while the other had partial electrode insertion (less than two-thirds). We compared the SIR and CAP scores between the two groups to assess the impact of electrode insertion depth on outcomes.
RESULTS: Before implantation, the median CAP score was one, but it improved significantly to six within two years after the procedure (P-value < 0.001). Similarly, the median SIR score before implantation was one, but it improved significantly to three within two years after surgery (P-value < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the partial and full electrode insertion groups in terms of CAP and SIR scores during the follow-up evaluations conducted after the first and second years.
CONCLUSIONS: The study found that cochlear implantation significantly improved speech production skills and auditory performance in children with postmeningitis deafness. Importantly, the amount of electrode insertion at the time of implantation did not have a significant impact on the outcomes.

BACKGROUND: It is known that subjects with a cochlear implant (CI) need to exert more listening effort to achieve adequate speech recognition compared to normal hearing subjects. One tool for assessing listening effort is pupillometry. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive directional microphones in reducing listening effort for CI recipients.
METHODS: We evaluated listening in noise and listening effort degree (by pupillometry) in eight bimodal subjects with three types of CI microphones and in three sound configurations.
RESULTS: We found a correlation only between sound configurations and listening in noise score (p-value 0.0095). The evaluation of the microphone types shows worse scores in listening in noise with Opti Omni (+3.15 dB SNR) microphone than with Split Dir (+1.89 dB SNR) and Speech Omni (+1.43 dB SNR). No correlation was found between microphones and sound configurations and within the pupillometric data.
CONCLUSIONS: Different types of microphones have different effects on the listening of CI patients. The difference in the orientation of the sound source is a factor that has an impact on the listening effort results. However, the pupillometry measurements do not significantly correlate with the different microphone types.