UNASSIGNED: To investigate the relationship between sagittal alignment and coronal deformity in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) through analysis of the spinal imaging data.
UNASSIGNED: Four hundred and fifty-four AIS patients who underwent anteroposterior and lateral radiography of the while spine were enrolled, and the spinal parameters of Cobb angle, cervical lordosis, C1-C2 angle, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and spinal SVA were analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: The patients were divided into two groups according to the size of the Cobb angle: group A (Cobb angle ≤45°, n=414) and group B (Cobb angle >45°, n=40). In group A, the Cobb angle was in a medium negative correlation with the cervical lordosis angle (r=-0.637, P<0.001), a weak positive correlation (|r|<0.3, P<0.05) with C1-C2 angle, T1 slope and thoracic kyphosis. In group B, the Cobb angle was in a mild positive correlation (P<0.05) with PT (r=0.398) and PI (r=0.360). The cervical lordosis angle was significantly (P<0.05) different between male and female patients in both groups. In Group A, the cervical lordosis angle was in a significantly (P<0.01) positive correlation with the T1 slope (r=0.586), thoracic kyphosis (r=0.490), and sagittal vertical axis (r=0.135), and a significantly (P<0.01) negative correlation with cervical sagittal vertical axis (r=-0.128) and C1-C2 angle (r=-0.155). In group B, the cervical lordosis angle was in a significantly (P<0.05) positive correlation with T1 slope (r=0.661), thoracic kyphosis (r=0.608), lumbar lordosis (r=0.425), sacral slope (r=0.434), and sagittal vertical axis (r=0.335).
UNASSIGNED: In AIS patients with the Cobb angle ≤45º, a significant negative correlation exists between the cervical lordosis and the Cobb angle. The sagittal morphology of the cervical spine in AIS patients is affected by the spinal coronal deformity, which plays an important role in the treatment of AIS.

Scoliosis is a condition of abnormal lateral spinal curvature affecting an estimated 2 to 3% of the US population, or seven million people. The Cobb angle is the standard measurement of spinal curvature in scoliosis but is known to have high interobserver and intraobserver variability. Thus, the objective of this study was to build and validate a system for automatic quantitative evaluation of the Cobb angle and to compare AI generated and human reports in the clinical setting. After IRB was obtained, we retrospectively collected 2150 frontal view scoliosis radiographs at a tertiary referral center (January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2021, ≥ 16 years old, no hardware). The dataset was partitioned into 1505 train (70%), 215 validation (10%), and 430 test images (20%). All thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies were segmented with bounding boxes, generating approximately 36,550 object annotations that were used to train a Faster R-CNN Resnet-101 object detection model. A controller algorithm was written to localize vertebral centroid coordinates and derive the Cobb properties (angle and endplate) of dominant and secondary curves. AI-derived Cobb angle measurements were compared to the clinical report measurements, and the Spearman rank-order demonstrated significant correlation (0.89, p < 0.001). Mean difference between AI and clinical report angle measurements was 7.34° (95% CI: 5.90-8.78°), which is similar to published literature (up to 10°). We demonstrate the feasibility of an AI system to automate measurement of level-by-level spinal angulation with performance comparable to radiologists.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis (DS) always remains a challenge and often necessitates complex multilevel surgery via traditional open approaches. However, the severity of the procedure, in association with the fact that many of these patients are at an advanced age with several comorbidities, results in high rate of complications. Therefore, during the last decade, minimally invasive procedures have gained a place in the treatment of this pathology. Our aim is to determine the safety and efficacy of extra lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) with or without supplemented instrumentation in the treatment of DS.
METHODS: In a retrospective case series study, we reviewed the files of patients who underwent XLIF in our Hospital between 2008 and 2017. We recorded the patients\' demographic characteristics, clinical parameters such as back-pain [visual analogue scale (VAS)] and back-related disability [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)], as well as radiological parameters including the Cobb angle. Comparison of the before and after results were performed with the t-test and Chi-square test, where appropriate.
RESULTS: Twelve patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria of our study. All patients were female, with a mean age of 64.5 years (SD =7.8 years) and 28 months (SD =13 months) follow-up. The XLIF decreased the pain intensity by 4.66 cm (SD =1.23 cm), and improved the back-related disability by 26% (SD =8.35%) in the ODI scale at the 6-month follow-up. Similarly, scoliosis improved by an average of 11.5° (SD =7°) and lordosis changed by an average of 13.5° (SD =10.86°). All changes were statistically significant. There were three complications, two patients presented meralgia paresthetica, which resolved spontaneously in 3 months, and in one patient occurred an intraoperative bowel perforation treated with bowel anastomosis.
CONCLUSIONS: XLIF is a feasible and efficient alternative in the treatment of DS. It can be the treatment of choice in elderly patients in whom comorbidities increase the perioperative risk of complications.

METHODS: Multicenter matched case analysis.
OBJECTIVE: Compare patients with Lenke 5C scoliosis surgically treated with anterior spinal fusion with dual rod instrumentation and anterior column support versus posterior release and pedicle screw instrumentation.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of single, structural, lumbar and thoracolumbar curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has been the subject of some debate. Previous papers directly comparing these approaches are problematic because of heterogeneity of the groups, nonrandomized protocols, and surgeon bias and variation of instrumentation (upper instrumented vertebrae and lower instrumented vertebrae) in relation to the defined Cobb angle (upper end vertebra and lower end vertebrae). This report sought to remedy these flaws by analyzing a database of Lenke 5C AIS and performing matched cases.
METHODS: We analyzed 96 patients with Lenke 5C AIS curves based on radiographic and clinical data at 3 institutions, surgically treated between 2001 and 2005 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Case matched criteria (age within 1 year, sex, curve within 5°, lower end vertebrae, and lower instrumented vertebrae) yielded 21 matched patient pairs. We evaluated and compared multiple clinical and radiographic parameters.
RESULTS: We observed no significant statistical differences between groups in any preoperative clinical or radiographic parameters. At final follow-up, the major curve measured 8° (83%) in the posterior spinal fusion group, compared with 13° (72%) in the anterior spinal fusion group (p = .002). Estimated blood loss was similar in both groups. Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the posterior spinal fusion group. There were no differences in radiographic complications, such as proximal junctional kyphosis.
CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum of 2 years\' follow-up in a multicenter, matched case analysis, adolescents with Lenke 5C curves demonstrated statistically significantly better curve correction and shorter hospital stays when treated with a posterior release with pedicle screw instrumented fusion compared with an anterior instrumented fusion with dual rods for similar patient populations.