Clostridium Infections

梭菌感染
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Gastrointestinal infections are still responsible for around 60% of the infectious diseases that must be reported in Germany and are probably among the most common gastroenterological diseases. The main therapy for gastrointestinal infections remains oral fluid replacement. The recommendations for Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) have been adapted according to the current data and based on international guidelines; vancomycin or, especially if there is an increased risk of recurrence, fidaxomicin should now be used primarily in CDI. In the case of febrile diarrhea and/or bloody diarrhea, malaria diagnosis should be carried out immediately.
    UNASSIGNED: Bei Auftreten einer gastrointestinalen Durchfallerkrankung soll eine Diagnostik gezielt und nur in bestimmten Fällen durchgeführt werden; ein wichtiges Ziel ist die Vermeidung der Überdiagnostik durch Identifizierung bedrohlicher Fälle, in denen eine rasche und zielgerichtete Diagnostik erfolgen soll. Eine PCR-Diagnostik in Form von sogenannten „Gastroenteritis-Panels“ sollte nur bei speziellen Fragestellungen genutzt werden. THERAPIE DER INFEKTIöSEN GASTROENTERITIS: Der Hauptpfeiler der Therapie bei gastrointestinalen Infektionen bleibt die orale Flüssigkeitssubstitution, auch im stationären Bereich. In Ausnahmefällen kann eine empirische Antibiose nach Probengewinnung für die mikrobiologische Diagnostik erfolgen; dann sollten in keinem Fall mehr Fluorchinolone eingesetzt werden.
    UNASSIGNED: Die Empfehlungen zur Clostridioides-difficile-Infektion (CDI) wurden gemäß der aktuellen Datenlage und angelehnt an internationale Leitlinien angepasst, primär soll jetzt Vancomycin oder, insbesondere bei erhöhtem Rezidivrisiko, Fidaxomicin bei einer CDI eingesetzt werden. In der Rezidivtherapie ist Fidaxomicin die Therapie der Wahl, alternativ kann das Vancomycin-Ausschleichschema verwendet werden. Die effektivste Therapie des Rezidivs stellt zwar der fäkale Mikrobiota-Transfer (FMT) dar, dieser ist allerdings in Deutschland nicht standardisiert verfügbar und sollte nur in Zentren durchgeführt werden. THERAPIE DER REISEDIARRHö: Bei fieberhafter Diarrhö und/oder blutiger Diarrhö sollte eine sofortige Malariadiagnostik erfolgen, da die fieberhafte Diarrhö das einzige Symptom einer Malaria sein kann. Generell sollte primär eine ausreichende Flüssigkeitszufuhr erfolgen. Bei Patienten mit fieberhafter Diarrhö und/oder Blutabgängen empfiehlt sich die Gabe von 1-malig Azithromycin 1000mg.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2018年发布了首个英国胃肠病学会(BSG)和医疗保健感染学会(HIS)认可的粪便微生物群移植(FMT)指南。在过去的5年里,证据基础有了相当大的增长(包括来自大型国家FMT登记册的结果的公布),需要对文献进行更新的批判性审查和BSG/HISFMT指南的第二版。这些是根据国家卫生与护理卓越研究所认可的方法制作的,因此对英国的临床医生特别有意义,但旨在在国际上具有针对性。该指南的第二版已分为建议,针对某些做法的良好做法要点和建议。关于艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的FMT,重点关注领域围绕行政时机,增加封装的FMT制剂的临床经验和优化供体筛选。考虑到COVID-19大流行,后一个话题特别相关,以及FMT相关病原体传播导致的患者发病率和死亡率的病例。该指南还考虑了在非CDI环境中使用FMT(包括胃肠道和非胃肠道适应症)的最新文献,回顾相关随机对照试验。提供有关特殊领域的建议(包括富有同情心的FMT使用),以及关于FMT和微生物组疗法不断发展的景观的考虑。
    The first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2018年发布了首个英国胃肠病学会(BSG)和医疗保健感染学会(HIS)认可的粪便微生物群移植(FMT)指南。在过去的5年里,证据基础有了相当大的增长(包括来自大型国家FMT登记册的结果的公布),需要对文献进行更新的批判性审查和BSG/HISFMT指南的第二版。这些是根据国家卫生与护理卓越研究所认可的方法制作的,因此对英国的临床医生特别有意义,但旨在在国际上具有针对性。该指南的第二版已分为建议,针对某些做法的良好做法要点和建议。关于艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的FMT,重点关注领域围绕行政时机,增加封装的FMT制剂的临床经验和优化供体筛选。考虑到COVID-19大流行,后一个话题特别相关,以及FMT相关病原体传播导致的患者发病率和死亡率的病例。该指南还考虑了在非CDI环境中使用FMT(包括胃肠道和非胃肠道适应症)的最新文献,回顾相关随机对照试验。提供有关特殊领域的建议(包括富有同情心的FMT使用),以及关于FMT和微生物组疗法不断发展的景观的考虑。
    The first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    目的:基于粪便微生物群的疗法包括常规粪便微生物群移植和美国食品和药物管理局批准的疗法,粪便微生物群live-jslm和粪便微生物群孢子live-brpk。美国胃肠病学协会(AGA)制定了该指南,以提供有关在复发性艰难梭菌感染的成人中使用基于粪便微生物群的疗法的建议;严重至暴发性艰难梭菌感染;炎症性肠病,包括囊炎和肠易激综合征。
    方法:该指南是使用等级(建议的等级,评估,发展,和评估)确定临床问题优先次序的框架,确定以患者为中心的结果,并进行证据综合。指南小组使用证据到决策框架来制定在特定胃肠道条件下使用基于粪便微生物群的疗法的建议,并为临床实践提供实施考虑因素。
    结果:指南小组提出了7项建议。在反复感染艰难梭菌的免疫功能正常的成年人中,AGA建议在完成标准治疗抗生素预防复发后,选择使用基于粪便微生物群的疗法.在患有复发性艰难梭菌感染的轻度或中度免疫功能低下的成年人中,AGA建议选择使用常规粪便微生物群移植。在严重免疫功能低下的成年人中,AGA建议反对使用任何基于粪便微生物群的疗法来预防艰难梭菌复发.在严重或暴发性艰难梭菌住院的成年人中,对标准护理抗生素没有反应,AGA建议选择使用常规粪便微生物群移植。AGA建议反对使用常规粪便微生物移植作为炎症性肠病或肠易激综合征的治疗方法,除了在临床试验中。
    结论:基于粪便菌群的治疗是预防部分患者艰难梭菌复发的有效治疗方法。常规粪便微生物群移植是对患有严重或暴发性艰难梭菌感染的住院成年人的辅助治疗,对标准护理抗生素没有反应。在其他胃肠道疾病中,尚不建议进行粪便微生物移植。
    Fecal microbiota-based therapies include conventional fecal microbiota transplant and US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, fecal microbiota live-jslm and fecal microbiota spores live-brpk. The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) developed this guideline to provide recommendations on the use of fecal microbiota-based therapies in adults with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection; severe to fulminant C difficile infection; inflammatory bowel diseases, including pouchitis; and irritable bowel syndrome.
    The guideline was developed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, and conduct an evidence synthesis. The guideline panel used the Evidence-to-Decision framework to develop recommendations for the use of fecal microbiota-based therapies in the specified gastrointestinal conditions and provided implementation considerations for clinical practice.
    The guideline panel made 7 recommendations. In immunocompetent adults with recurrent C difficile infection, the AGA suggests select use of fecal microbiota-based therapies on completion of standard of care antibiotics to prevent recurrence. In mildly or moderately immunocompromised adults with recurrent C difficile infection, the AGA suggests select use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant. In severely immunocompromised adults, the AGA suggests against the use of any fecal microbiota-based therapies to prevent recurrent C difficile. In adults hospitalized with severe or fulminant C difficile not responding to standard of care antibiotics, the AGA suggests select use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant. The AGA suggests against the use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant as treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases or irritable bowel syndrome, except in the context of clinical trials.
    Fecal microbiota-based therapies are effective therapy to prevent recurrent C difficile in select patients. Conventional fecal microbiota transplant is an adjuvant treatment for select adults hospitalized with severe or fulminant C difficile infection not responding to standard of care antibiotics. Fecal microbiota transplant cannot yet be recommended in other gastrointestinal conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:治疗指南是艰难梭菌感染(CDI)处方实践的关键驱动因素,但是关于最佳实践的建议可能会有所不同。我们进行了成本效用分析,以比较欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会(ESCMID)指南推荐的治疗途径与美国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)指南提出的途径。从英国国民健康服务(NHS)的角度来看。
    方法:采用决策树建模方法来反映ESCMID和NICE指南中概述的CDI治疗途径。经历CDI感染的患者每次感染接受多达三种治疗以实现应答,并且随后可能经历多达两次复发。患者人口统计数据,治疗反应,复发,公用事业,CDI相关的死亡率和费用取自已发表的文献。
    结果:与NICE治疗途径相比,ESCMID治疗途径具有成本效益,每获得质量调整生命年(QALY)阈值为20,000英镑,增量成本效益比(ICER)为4931英镑。成本效益由指标感染建议的差异驱动(ESCMID建议非达霉素作为一线治疗,而NICE建议万古霉素)。模型结果对情景和敏感性分析中调查的输入变化具有鲁棒性,和概率敏感性分析(PSA)表明,与NICE治疗策略相比,ESCMID指南治疗策略具有100%的成本效益可能性.
    结论:与NICE指南相比,从英国NHS的角度来看,ESCMID指南中关于CDI指数治疗的建议代表了最具成本效益的医疗资源使用.
    OBJECTIVE: Treatment guidelines are key drivers of prescribing practice in the management of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), but recommendations on best practice can vary. We conducted a cost-utility analysis to compare the treatment pathway recommended by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) guideline with the pathway proposed by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service.
    METHODS: A decision tree modelling approach was adopted to reflect the treatment pathway for CDI as outlined in ESCMID and NICE guidelines. Patients experiencing a CDI infection received up to three treatments per infection to achieve a response and could subsequently experience up to two recurrences. Data on patient demographics, treatment response, recurrence, utilities, CDI-related mortality, and costs were taken from published literature.
    RESULTS: The ESCMID treatment pathway was cost-effective versus the NICE treatment pathway at a threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £4931. Cost-effectiveness was driven by differences in index infection recommendations (ESCMID recommends fidaxomicin as first-line treatment whereas NICE recommends vancomycin). The model results were robust to variations in inputs investigated in scenarios and sensitivity analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the ESCMID guideline treatment strategy had a 100% likelihood of being cost-effective versus the NICE treatment strategy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the NICE guideline, the ESCMID guideline recommendations for treating an index CDI represent the most cost-effective use of healthcare resources from the perspective of the UK National Health Service.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    最新的捷克指南在某些方面与ESCMID研究小组发布的艰难梭菌2021年指南有所不同。这些捷克建议的要点可以总结如下:•住院患者的选择药物是口服非达霉素或万古霉素。在初次出现艰难梭菌感染的门诊患者中,也可以使用甲硝唑。•如果患者对治疗的反应良好且没有并发症,例如,抗生素治疗的持续时间可以减少(例如,在非达霉素的情况下减少至5天,或在万古霉素的情况下减少至6-7天)。•如果口服治疗是不可能的,选择的药物是替加环素,100mg静脉注射,b.i.d.,最初缩短第一剂量和第二剂量之间的间隔,以实现更快的饱和。如果在这种抗生素治疗期间疾病的严重程度有所进展,有必要进入回肠或盲肠,即进行双回肠造口术或经皮内镜下盲肠造口术,并注入万古霉素或非达霉素灌洗液。如果蠕动停止,非达霉素应如上所述给予回肠或盲肠。如果出现脓毒症,广谱β-内酰胺抗生素(哌拉西林/他唑巴坦,碳青霉烯)i.v.被添加到局部给药的非达霉素而不是替加环素i.v.;同时,结肠切除术应被视为最后的手段。•治疗首次复发,非达霉素或万古霉素与来自健康供体的随后粪便微生物群移植(FMT)一起施用。对于第二次或随后的复发,非达霉素的给药几乎没有益处;选择的治疗是口服万古霉素和随后的FMT。只有当不能进行FMT时,延长万古霉素或非达霉素锥度和脉冲治疗才是合适的。
    The updated Czech guidelines differ in some aspects from the 2021 guidelines issued by the ESCMID Study Group for Clostridium difficile. The key points of these Czech recommendations may be summarized as follows: • The drug of choice for hospitalized patients is orally administered fidaxomicin or vancomycin. In outpatients with a mild first episode of C. difficile infection, metronidazole can also be used. • If the patient\'s response to treatment is good and there are no complications, the duration of antibiotic treatment can be reduced (e.g. to 5 days in case of fidaxomicin or to 6-7 days in case of vancomycin). • If oral therapy is impossible, the drug of choice is tigecycline, 100 mg i.v., b.i.d., with initial shortening of the interval between the first and second doses for faster saturation. If the severity of the disease progresses during this antibiotic treatment, it is necessary to access the ileum or cecum, i.e. to perform double ileostomy or percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy, and to instill vancomycin or fidaxomicin lavages. • Fulminant C. difficile colitis should be treated with oral fidaxomicin ± tigecycline i.v. If peristalsis ceases, fidaxomicin should be administered into the ileum or cecum as described above. If sepsis develops, a broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic (piperacillin/tazobactam, carbapenem) i.v. is added to topically administered fidaxomicin instead of tigecycline i.v.; at the same time, colectomy should be considered as the last resort. • To treat first recurrence, fidaxomicin or vancomycin is administered with a subsequent fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) from a healthy donor. For second or subsequent recurrence, administration of fidaxomicin is of little benefit; the therapy of choice is oral vancomycin and subsequent FMT. Prolonged vancomycin or fidaxomicin taper and pulse treatment is appropriate only when FMT cannot be performed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对艰难梭菌感染(CDI)诊断和临床治疗的国际指南的认识和遵守情况尚不清楚。
    目的:比较2018-2019年欧洲CDI诊断和临床管理推荐策略的认知和依从性。
    方法:12个欧洲国家的医院及其相关社区实践在2018-2019年完成了一项在线调查,以报告其在监测方面的实践。预防,诊断,和CDI的治疗。从105家医院和39名社区全科医生(GP)收集了答复。
    结果:有11个国家的医院站点报告参与了国家监测计划,而有6个国家参与了国际监测计划。欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会(ESCMID)推荐的CDI测试方法被82%(86/105)的医院使用。然而,报告CDI发生率最高的国家使用了非推荐的检测.超过75%(80/105)的医院在本次调查时知道最新的欧洲CDI治疗指南,而接受调查的全科医生只有26%(10/39)。然而,高达15%(16/105)的医院报告使用非推荐的甲硝唑治疗复发性CDI病例,对CDI治疗指南认识较低的国家的网站。只有37%(39/105)的医院在怀疑CDI的情况下采取了接触隔离预防措施。
    结论:在接受调查的欧洲医院站点中观察到对CDI管理指南的良好认识。然而,低符合诊断测试指南,疑似CDI的感染控制措施,一些国家继续报告对治疗指南的认识不足。
    BACKGROUND: Awareness and compliance with international guidelines for diagnosis and clinical management of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) are unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the awareness and compliance with the recommended strategies for diagnosis and clinical management of CDI across Europe in 2018-2019.
    METHODS: Hospital sites and their associated community practices across 12 European countries completed an online survey in 2018-2019, to report on their practices in terms of surveillance, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CDI. Responses were collected from 105 hospitals and 39 community general practitioners (GPs).
    RESULTS: Hospital sites of 11 countries reported participation in national surveillance schemes compared with six countries for international schemes. The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID)-recommended CDI testing methodologies were used by 82% (86/105) of hospitals, however countries reporting the highest incidence of CDI used non-recommended tests. Over 75% (80/105) of hospitals were aware of the most recent European CDI treatment guidelines at the time of this survey compared with only 26% (10/39) of surveyed GPs. However, up to 15% (16/105) of hospitals reported using the non-recommended metronidazole for recurrent CDI cases, sites in countries with lower awareness of CDI treatment guidelines. Only 37% (39/105) of hospitals adopted contact isolation precautions in case of suspected CDI.
    CONCLUSIONS: Good awareness of guidelines for the management of CDI was observed across the surveyed European hospital sites. However, low compliance with diagnostic testing guidelines, infection control measures for suspected CDI, and insufficient awareness of treatment guidelines continued to be reported in some countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    艰难梭菌感染(CDI)在治疗严重和严重复杂的疾病以及预防复发方面仍然是重要的临床挑战。美国传染病学会和美国医疗保健流行病学学会(IDSA/SHEA)和ESCMID发布的指南在疾病严重程度分类和治疗建议方面达成了一些共识,也存在一些差异。我们回顾并比较了更新的IDSA/SHEA的关键临床策略,ESCMID和当前的澳大利亚成人CDI管理指南,并讨论临床医生的相关问题,特别是在严重复杂感染的管理中。更新的IDSA/SHEA和ESCMID指南现在反映了非达霉素在预防复发方面的功效增强,并且在非严重和严重疾病中均促进了非达霉素在初始CDI发作时的一线治疗,并认可了bezlotoxumab在预防复发感染中的作用。万古霉素仍然是可接受的治疗,甲硝唑不是优选的。对于严重复杂的感染,IDSA/SHEA建议大剂量口服±直肠万古霉素和静脉注射甲硝唑,在一个重要的发展中,ESCMID已认可非达霉素和替加环素作为抗CDI联合治疗的一部分,第一次。粪便微生物移植(FMT)在第二次CDI复发中的作用现在更加清晰,但FMT在重症难治性疾病中的时机和模式仍需进一步研究。
    Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a significant clinical challenge both in the management of severe and severe-complicated disease and the prevention of recurrence. Guidelines released by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) and ESCMID had some consensus as well as some discrepancies in disease severity classification and treatment recommendations. We review and compare the key clinical strategies from updated IDSA/SHEA, ESCMID and current Australasian guidelines for CDI management in adults and discuss relevant issues for clinicians, particularly in the management of severe-complicated infection. Updated IDSA/SHEA and ESCMID guidelines now reflect the increased efficacy of fidaxomicin in preventing recurrence and have both promoted fidaxomicin to first-line therapy with an initial CDI episode in both non-severe and severe disease and endorsed the role of bezlotoxumab in the prevention of recurrent infection. Vancomycin remains acceptable therapy and metronidazole is not preferred. For severe-complicated infection the IDSA/SHEA recommends high-dose oral ± rectal vancomycin and IV metronidazole, whilst in an important development, ESCMID has endorsed fidaxomicin and tigecycline as part of combination anti-CDI therapy, for the first time. The role of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in second CDI recurrence is now clearer, but timing and mode of FMT in severe-complicated refractory disease still requires further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号