Closed-loop

闭环
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:一项单中心随机临床试验表明,在心脏手术后患者的通气质量方面,INTELLiVENT适应性支持通气(ASV)优于常规通气。其他研究表明,这种自动通气模式减少了各种类型的危重病人的呼吸机人工干预次数。在这项针对心脏手术后患者的多中心研究中,我们检验了以下假设:在通风质量方面,INTELLiVENT-ASV优于常规通风。
    方法:\“心脏手术患者II(POSITIVEII)的自适应INTELLiVENT后支持VEntlation”是一种国际性,多中心,两组随机临床优势试验。总的来说,328名心脏手术患者将被随机分配。调查人员对年龄>18岁的患者进行筛查,计划进行心脏择期手术,并且预计在ICU接受术后通气时间超过2小时。患者要么通过INTELLiVENT-ASV接受自动通气,要么通过常规通气模式不自动通气。主要终点是通气质量,定义为以暴露于预定义的最佳状态为特征的术后通气时间的比例,可接受,以及术后前两个小时的关键(有害)通气参数。一个主要的次要终点是ICU团队员工工作量,由呼吸机软件收集警报的手动设置捕获。以患者为中心的终点包括术后通气时间和ICU住院时间。
    结论:POSITIVEII是第一个国际,多中心,随机临床试验旨在确认POStoperativeINTELLiVENT-ASV优于非自动常规通气,并且是确定这种闭环通气模式是否减少ICU团队工作人员工作量的次要试验.POSITIVEII的结果将支持重症监护团队选择在简单的心脏手术患者的术后护理中使用自动通气。
    背景:Clinicaltrials.govNCT06178510。2023年12月4日注册。
    BACKGROUND: One single-center randomized clinical trial showed that INTELLiVENT-adaptive support ventilation (ASV) is superior to conventional ventilation with respect to the quality of ventilation in post-cardiac surgery patients. Other studies showed that this automated ventilation mode reduces the number of manual interventions at the ventilator in various types of critically ill patients. In this multicenter study in patients post-cardiac surgery, we test the hypothesis that INTELLiVENT-ASV is superior to conventional ventilation with respect to the quality of ventilation.
    METHODS: \"POStoperative INTELLiVENT-adaptive support VEntilation in cardiac surgery patients II (POSITiVE II)\" is an international, multicenter, two-group randomized clinical superiority trial. In total, 328 cardiac surgery patients will be randomized. Investigators screen patients aged > 18 years of age, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery, and expected to receive postoperative ventilation in the ICU for longer than 2 h. Patients either receive automated ventilation by means of INTELLiVENT-ASV or ventilation that is not automated by means of a conventional ventilation mode. The primary endpoint is quality of ventilation, defined as the proportion of postoperative ventilation time characterized by exposure to predefined optimal, acceptable, and critical (injurious) ventilatory parameters in the first two postoperative hours. One major secondary endpoint is ICU team staff workload, captured by the ventilator software collecting manual settings on alarms. Patient-centered endpoints include duration of postoperative ventilation and length of stay in ICU.
    CONCLUSIONS: POSITiVE II is the first international, multicenter, randomized clinical trial designed to confirm that POStoperative INTELLiVENT-ASV is superior to non-automated conventional ventilation and secondary to determine if this closed-loop ventilation mode reduces ICU team staff workload. The results of POSITiVE II will support intensive care teams in their choices regarding the use of automated ventilation in postoperative care of uncomplicated cardiac surgery patients.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06178510 . Registered on December 4, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)引起了中风康复的关注,研究表明,当与运动康复训练结合或在运动训练前交付时,它的好处。尚不清楚将taVNS与运动训练同时应用于中风后运动康复的必要性。我们旨在研究通过肌电图(EMG)触发的闭环系统与运动训练同时应用taVNS进行中风后康复的必要性和优势。
    我们提出了一种双盲,随机临床试验涉及150名中风患者,分为三组:并发taVNS,顺序taVNS,或假控制条件。在并发组中,在康复训练期间,taVNS爆发将通过EMG触发的闭环系统与上肢运动同步,而在顺序组中,运动康复训练之前将进行taVNS课程。TaVNS强度将被设定为低于同时和顺序条件的疼痛阈值,并且对于对照条件为零。主要结果测量是上肢的Fugl-Meyer评估(FMA-UE)。次要措施包括标准的上肢功能评估,以及EMG和心电图(ECG)特征。
    已获得医学伦理委员会的伦理批准,附属南方医科大学珠江医院临床研究(2023-QX-012-01)。本研究已在临床试验(NCT05943431)上注册。签署的知情同意书将从所有参与者获得。研究结果将发表在同行评审的期刊上,并在相关的利益相关者会议上发表。
    这项研究代表了一项开创性的工作,直接比较了并发taVNS与运动训练与顺序taVNS与运动训练对中风康复的影响。其次,EMG触发的闭环taVNS系统的整合使taVNS和多种运动训练任务的自动化和个性化成为可能-这是先前研究中未探索的新颖方法。这项技术进步有望为中风患者提供更精确和量身定制的培训干预措施。然而,必须承认这项研究的局限性,因为它没有深入研究卒中后康复背景下taVNS的神经机制。
    UNASSIGNED: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has garnered attention for stroke rehabilitation, with studies demonstrating its benefits when combined with motor rehabilitative training or delivered before motor training. The necessity of concurrently applying taVNS with motor training for post-stroke motor rehabilitation remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the necessity and advantages of applying the taVNS concurrently with motor training by an electromyography (EMG)-triggered closed-loop system for post-stroke rehabilitation.
    UNASSIGNED: We propose a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial involving 150 stroke patients assigned to one of three groups: concurrent taVNS, sequential taVNS, or sham control condition. In the concurrent group, taVNS bursts will synchronize with upper extremity motor movements with EMG-triggered closed-loop system during the rehabilitative training, while in the sequential group, a taVNS session will precede the motor rehabilitative training. TaVNS intensity will be set below the pain threshold for both concurrent and sequential conditions and at zero for the control condition. The primary outcome measure is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Secondary measures include standard upper limb function assessments, as well as EMG and electrocardiogram (ECG) features.
    UNASSIGNED: Ethical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee, affiliated with Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University for Clinical Studies (2023-QX-012-01). This study has been registered on ClinicalTrials (NCT05943431). Signed informed consent will be obtained from all included participants. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant stakeholder conferences and meetings.
    UNASSIGNED: This study represents a pioneering effort in directly comparing the impact of concurrent taVNS with motor training to that of sequential taVNS with motor training on stroke rehabilitation. Secondly, the incorporation of an EMG-triggered closed-loop taVNS system has enabled the automation and individualization of both taVNS and diverse motor training tasks-a novel approach not explored in previous research. This technological advancement holds promise for delivering more precise and tailored training interventions for stroke patients. However, it is essential to acknowledge a limitation of this study, as it does not delve into examining the neural mechanisms underlying taVNS in the context of post-stroke rehabilitation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    这项研究的目的是评估混合闭环(HCL)系统用于1型糖尿病(T1D)儿童和青少年胰岛素输送的有效性和安全性。我们搜查了Embase,PubMed,和CochraneLibrary在2023年3月之前发表的随机对照试验(RCT)中,比较了HCL治疗与对照治疗的儿童和青少年T1D。我们计算了连续结果的加权平均差(WMD)和二元终点的风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。纳入4例RCT和501例患者,其中323人随机接受HCL治疗。与对照疗法相比,HCL显着改善了葡萄糖水平为70-180mg/dL的时期(WMD10.89%,95%CI8.22-13.56%)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平<7%的参与者人数(RR2.61,95%CI1.29-5.28)。此外,HCL显着降低了葡萄糖浓度>180mg/dL的时间(WMD-10.46%,95%CI-13.99至-6.93%)和葡萄糖的平均水平(WMD-16.67mg/dL,95%CI-22.25至-11.09mg/dL)和HbA1c(WMD-0.50%,95%CI-0.68至-0.31)。关于血糖水平<70mg/dL或<54mg/dL的时间或酮症酸中毒的发作次数,治疗之间没有显着差异。高血糖症,和低血糖。在这个荟萃分析中,与对照治疗相比,HCL与T1D儿童和青少年的范围和HbA1c控制时间改善相关,副作用相似。这些发现支持HCL在该人群中治疗T1D的功效。
    The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems for insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). We searched Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until March 2023 comparing the HCL therapy with control therapies for children and adolescents with T1D. We computed weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for binary endpoints. Four RCTs and 501 patients were included, of whom 323 were randomized to HCL therapy. Compared with control therapies, HCL significantly improved the period during which glucose level was 70-180 mg/dL (WMD 10.89%, 95% CI 8.22-13.56%) and the number of participants with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level < 7% (RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.29-5.28). Also, HCL significantly reduced the time during which glucoselevel was > 180 mg/dL (WMD-10.46%, 95% CI-13.99 to-6.93%) and the mean levels of glucose (WMD-16.67 mg/dL, 95% CI-22.25 to-11.09 mg/dL) and HbA1c (WMD-0.50%, 95% CI-0.68 to-0.31). There were no significant differences between therapies regarding time during which glucose level was < 70 mg/dL or <54 mg/dL or number of episodes of ketoacidosis, hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia. In this meta-analysis, HCL compared with control therapies was associated with improved time in range and HbA1c control in children and adolescents with T1D and a similar profile of side effects. These findings support the efficacy of HCL in the treatment of T1D in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多发性硬化症(MS)患者被诊断为抑郁症的可能性高于普通人群。尽管存在许多低成本的筛查工具和基于证据的干预措施,MS患者的抑郁症被低估了,未被临床医生确定,和未得到充分的对待。
    目的:本研究旨在设计一种闭环工具来改善这些患者的抑郁症护理。它将支持定期的抑郁症筛查,联系到护理点,并支持共同决策和全面后续行动。经过最初的发展阶段,这项研究包括概念验证试点随机对照试验(RCT)验证阶段和详细的以人为中心的设计(HCD)阶段.
    方法:在最初的开发阶段,利用面向临床医生的MS管理现场护理临床仪表板(BRIDGE)的技术基础设施来整合支持抑郁症筛查和全面护理的功能(CareTechnologytoAscertain,治疗,并让社区参与治愈患有MS[MSCATCH]的人的抑郁症)。这与患者调查有关,入篮消息,和临床医生仪表板。在飞行员RCT阶段,我们从一个由9项患者健康问卷评分为5~19分(轻度至中度重度抑郁症)的MS中心招募了50名MS成人的便利样本.在例行MS访问期间,他们的临床医生被要求或不要求使用MSCATCH检查他们的评分,并收集护理结果.在HCD阶段,MSCATCH组件根据利益相关者的反馈进行了迭代修改:与MS生活在一起的人,MS临床医生,和跨专业专家。
    结果:MSCATCH链接了3个功能,旨在支持情绪报告和确定,全面的循证管理,和临床医生和患者的自我管理行为可能导致持续抑郁缓解。在试点RCT(n=50次访问)中,与未使用MSCATCH的患者相比,临床医师被随机分配使用MSCATCH的患者有更多记录抑郁症状讨论的记录(75%vs34.6%;χ21=8.2;P=.004).在HCD阶段,45人患有MS,临床医生,和其他专家参与了设计和改进。最后一轮测试包括20名MS患者和10名临床医生,其中5名与我们的卫生系统无关。最喜欢和可用性的评分目标,包括感知的易用性和感知的有效性,遇见了。患者的净启动子量表为50,临床医生为40。
    结论:由广泛的利益相关者反馈创建,MSCATCH是一个闭环系统,旨在增加MS患者与其临床医生之间关于抑郁症的交流,并最终改善抑郁症护理。试点调查结果显示了加强沟通的证据。利益相关者还就国防部资助的为期一年的可行性和有效性试验的试验设计特征提供建议,现在正在进行中。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05865405;http://tinyurl.com/4zkvru9x。
    BACKGROUND: People living with multiple sclerosis (MS) face a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with a depressive disorder than the general population. Although many low-cost screening tools and evidence-based interventions exist, depression in people living with MS is underreported, underascertained by clinicians, and undertreated.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to design a closed-loop tool to improve depression care for these patients. It would support regular depression screening, tie into the point of care, and support shared decision-making and comprehensive follow-up. After an initial development phase, this study involved a proof-of-concept pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) validation phase and a detailed human-centered design (HCD) phase.
    METHODS: During the initial development phase, the technological infrastructure of a clinician-facing point-of-care clinical dashboard for MS management (BRIDGE) was leveraged to incorporate features that would support depression screening and comprehensive care (Care Technology to Ascertain, Treat, and Engage the Community to Heal Depression in people living with MS [MS CATCH]). This linked a patient survey, in-basket messages, and a clinician dashboard. During the pilot RCT phase, a convenience sample of 50 adults with MS was recruited from a single MS center with 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores of 5-19 (mild to moderately severe depression). During the routine MS visit, their clinicians were either asked or not to use MS CATCH to review their scores and care outcomes were collected. During the HCD phase, the MS CATCH components were iteratively modified based on feedback from stakeholders: people living with MS, MS clinicians, and interprofessional experts.
    RESULTS: MS CATCH links 3 features designed to support mood reporting and ascertainment, comprehensive evidence-based management, and clinician and patient self-management behaviors likely to lead to sustained depression relief. In the pilot RCT (n=50 visits), visits in which the clinician was randomized to use MS CATCH had more notes documenting a discussion of depressive symptoms than those in which MS CATCH was not used (75% vs 34.6%; χ21=8.2; P=.004). During the HCD phase, 45 people living with MS, clinicians, and other experts participated in the design and refinement. The final testing round included 20 people living with MS and 10 clinicians including 5 not affiliated with our health system. Most scoring targets for likeability and usability, including perceived ease of use and perceived effectiveness, were met. Net Promoter Scale was 50 for patients and 40 for clinicians.
    CONCLUSIONS: Created with extensive stakeholder feedback, MS CATCH is a closed-loop system aimed to increase communication about depression between people living with MS and their clinicians, and ultimately improve depression care. The pilot findings showed evidence of enhanced communication. Stakeholders also advised on trial design features of a full year long Department of Defense-funded feasibility and efficacy trial, which is now underway.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05865405; http://tinyurl.com/4zkvru9x.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Control-IQ技术版本1.5允许更广泛的体重和每日总胰岛素(TDI)输入,此外,还进行了其他更改,以增强具有高基础费率的用户的性能。本研究评估了更新的Control-IQ系统的安全性和性能,适用于多中心基础费率>3单位/小时和高TDI的用户,单臂,前瞻性研究。
    使用连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)并在3个单位/小时内至少进行一次基础率的1型糖尿病(T1D)成人(N=34,平均年龄=39.9岁,41.2%女性,糖尿病持续时间=21.8年)使用t:slimX2胰岛素泵和Control-IQ技术1.5版,持续13周。主要结局是安全性事件(严重低血糖和糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA))。在系统启动和13周时测量中心实验室血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)。参与者继续使用胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂,钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白2(SGLT-2)抑制剂,或其他用于血糖控制和/或体重减轻的药物,如果在稳定剂量。
    所有34名参与者完成了研究。15名参与者在一天的所有24小时内使用>3单位/小时的基础率。9名参与者在研究期间至少一天使用了>300单位TDI。无严重低血糖或DKA事件发生。在13周内,70-180毫克/分升的时间为64.8%,1.0%时间<70mg/dL。血红蛋白A1c从基线时的7.69%下降到13周时的6.87%(-0.82%,P<.001)。
    Control-IQ技术版本1.5,具有更广泛的重量和TDI输入范围,并为胰岛素要求高的用户提供增强功能,在这项研究中,T1D患者是安全的。
    UNASSIGNED: Control-IQ technology version 1.5 allows for a wider range of weight and total daily insulin (TDI) entry, in addition to other changes to enhance performance for users with high basal rates. This study evaluated the safety and performance of the updated Control-IQ system for users with basal rates >3 units/h and high TDI in a multicenter, single arm, prospective study.
    UNASSIGNED: Adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and at least one basal rate over 3 units/h (N = 34, mean age = 39.9 years, 41.2% female, diabetes duration = 21.8 years) used the t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology version 1.5 for 13 weeks. Primary outcome was safety events (severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)). Central laboratory hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured at system initiation and 13 weeks. Participants continued using glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, or other medications for glycemic control and/or weight loss if on a stable dose.
    UNASSIGNED: All 34 participants completed the study. Fifteen participants used a basal rate >3 units/h for all 24 hours of the day. Nine participants used >300 units TDI on at least one day during the study. There were no severe hypoglycemia or DKA events. Time in range 70-180 mg/dL was 64.8% over the 13 weeks, with 1.0% time <70 mg/dL. Hemoglobin A1c decreased from 7.69% at baseline to 6.87% at 13 weeks (-0.82%, P < .001).
    UNASSIGNED: Control-IQ technology version 1.5, with wider range of weight and TDI input and enhancements for users with high insulin requirements, was safe in individuals with T1D in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established chronic pain treatment, but the effectiveness of traditional, open-loop paradigms has been plagued by variable sustainability in a real-world setting. A new approach, utilizing evoked compound action potential (ECAP) controlled closed-loop (CL) SCS, continuously monitors spinal cord activation and automatically adjusts the stimulation amplitude of every pulse, maintaining stimulation at the prescribed ECAP level through this continual feedback mechanism. Recent studies demonstrated the long-term safety and efficacy of ECAP-controlled CL-SCS. Here, we report the design of a prospective, multicenter, single-arm feasibility study to characterize clinical outcomes in a real-world chronic pain population utilizing ECAP-controlled CL-SCS. Objective neurophysiological measurements such as device performance and patient therapy compliance, will be analyzed against baseline biopsychosocial assessments, to explore the clinical utility of these objective physiologic biomarkers in patient phenotyping.
    UNASSIGNED: This study will enroll up to 300 subjects with chronic, intractable trunk and/or limb pain in up to 25 United States investigation sites. Subjects meeting eligibility criteria will undergo a trial procedure and a permanent implant following a successful trial. Neurophysiological measurements (measured in-clinic and continuously during home use) and clinical outcomes including pain, quality-of-life, psychological, emotional, and functional assessments will be collected at baseline, trial end, and up to 24-months post-implantation.
    UNASSIGNED: Associations between objective neurophysiological data, clinical evaluation and patient-reported outcomes may have important clinical and scientific implications. They may provide novel insights about the chronic pain pathophysiology, its modulation during CL-SCS, and identification of pain phenotypes and/or mechanisms associated with treatment response during SCS trials and long-term therapy. Data from the ECAP study could lead to improvements in diagnosis, assessment, patient identification and management of chronic pain. It could also provide the foundation for development of a new SCS treatment approach customized by the patient\'s pain phenotype, unique neurophysiology, and disease severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神障碍是世界范围内最严峻的挑战之一。大量的精神障碍表现出病理节律,作为疾病特征性生物标志物。这些节律是神经刺激技术的目标。开环神经刺激采用刺激协议,这与患者在治疗时的健康状况和大脑状态无关。大多数替代闭环刺激协议考虑实时大脑活动观察,但表现为自适应开环协议,其中,例如,如果观察结果符合预定义的标准,则设置预定义的刺激。本理论工作提出了一种完全自适应的闭环神经刺激设置,根据用户定义的PSD调整大脑活动功率谱密度(PSD)。所利用的脑模型是非参数的,并且在预刺激设置阶段中经由幅度拟合从观察来估计。此外,该算法考虑了观察电极和刺激电极之间的反馈连接中可能的传导延迟。所有涉及的特征均在精神病中已知的病理性α和γ节律上进行了说明。为此,我们用数值模拟了一个线性神经群体大脑模型和一个非线性皮质-丘脑反馈回路模型,该模型最近被用来解释精神病患者的大脑活动。
    Mental disorders are among the top most demanding challenges in world-wide health. A large number of mental disorders exhibit pathological rhythms, which serve as the disorders characteristic biomarkers. These rhythms are the targets for neurostimulation techniques. Open-loop neurostimulation employs stimulation protocols, which are rather independent of the patients health and brain state in the moment of treatment. Most alternative closed-loop stimulation protocols consider real-time brain activity observations but appear as adaptive open-loop protocols, where e.g., pre-defined stimulation sets in if observations fulfil pre-defined criteria. The present theoretical work proposes a fully-adaptive closed-loop neurostimulation setup, that tunes the brain activities power spectral density (PSD) according to a user-defined PSD. The utilized brain model is non-parametric and estimated from the observations via magnitude fitting in a pre-stimulus setup phase. Moreover, the algorithm takes into account possible conduction delays in the feedback connection between observation and stimulation electrode. All involved features are illustrated on pathological α- and γ-rhythms known from psychosis. To this end, we simulate numerically a linear neural population brain model and a non-linear cortico-thalamic feedback loop model recently derived to explain brain activity in psychosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:这项随机和对照的前瞻性研究验证了以下假设:与开环控制的丙泊酚相比,丙泊酚的闭环靶控输注(TCI)与更好的系统性能相关。
    方法:将择期乳房手术的患者随机分为两组:闭环组,通过闭环TCI系统进行丙泊酚输注,该系统使用双频指数(BIS)作为反馈参数来滴定丙泊酚输注速率,和一个开环组,其中丙泊酚输注是手动进行的,并由双频指数指导。
    结果:本研究共招募了156名患者(闭环组n=79;开环组n=77)。闭环组的全局评分(GS)低于开环组(34.3和42.2)(p=0.044)。BIS值在40和60之间的时间比例在闭环组和开环组中几乎相同(68.7±10.6%和66.7±13.3%)(p=0.318)。与开环组相比,闭环组的个体消耗更多的异丙酚(7.20±1.65mg。kg-1.h-1vs.6.03±1.31mg。kg-1.h-1,p<0.001)。没有术中召回,躯体事件或不良事件发生。两组之间的心率没有显着差异(p=0.169)。
    结论:闭环方案与较低的BIS变异性和较低的超出范围BIS值相关,与开环组相比,丙泊酚的消耗量更大。
    ChiCTR-INR-17010399。
    BACKGROUND: This randomized and controlled prospective study tested the hypothesis that closed-loop Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) of propofol would be associated with better system performance when compared with open-loop controlled delivery of propofol.
    METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective breast surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: a closed-loop group, in which propofol infusion was performed by a closed-loop TCI system that used the Bispectral Index (BIS) as a feedback parameter to titrate the rate of propofol infusion, and an open-loop group, in which propofol infusion was performed manually and guided by the bispectral index.
    RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were recruited for this study (closed-loop group n = 79; open-loop group n = 77). The Global Score (GS) of the closed-loop group was lower than that of the open-loop group (34.3 and 42.2) (p = 0.044). The proportions of time with a BIS value between 40 and 60 were almost identical in the closed-loop group and the open-loop group (68.7 ± 10.6% and 66.7 ± 13.3%) (p = 0.318). The individuals in the closed-loop group consumed more propofol compared with those in the open-loop group (7.20 ± 1.65 mg.kg-1.h-1 vs. 6.03 ± 1.31 mg.kg-1.h-1, p < 0.001). No intraoperative recall, somatic events or adverse events occurred. No significant difference in heart rate was observed between the two groups (p = 0.169).
    CONCLUSIONS: The closed-loop protocol was associated with lower BIS variability and lower out-of-range BIS values, at the cost of a greater consumption of propofol when compared to the open loop group.
    UNASSIGNED: ChiCTR-INR-17010399.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    早产儿低氧血症或高氧血症事件的更快解决可能会减少长期神经发育障碍。吸入氧气的自动滴定增加了在氧饱和度目标范围内的时间,并且可以提供对缺氧和高氧事件的更迅速的响应。我们评估了实施自动氧气控制(AOC)作为标准护理后2岁时的常规随访,并将其与历史队列进行了比较。比较了在实施AOC作为护理标准之前(2012-2015年)和之后(2015-2018年)出生在24-29周胎龄的婴儿在2岁时的神经发育结果。主要结局是死亡率或严重神经发育障碍(NDI)的复合结局。其他评估结果为轻度-中度NDI,Bayley-III综合得分,脑瘫GMFCS,和CBCL问题行为得分。AOC前时代共有289名婴儿,AOC后时代共有292名婴儿。基线特征没有显著差异。51名婴儿失去随访(AOC前6.9%(20/289),实施后10.6%(31/292)。在17.9%前AOC(41/229)与17.9%观察到死亡率或严重NDI的复合结局。AOC后24.0%(47/196)(p=0.12)。次要结局没有发现显著差异,如轻-中度NDI,Bayley-III综合得分,脑瘫GMFCS,和问题行为得分,除了家长报告的再入院,直到随访时刻,AOC后的频率低于AOC前。
    结论:在这项队列研究中,在我们的NICU中实施自动氧控制作为早产儿护理标准,导致2岁时神经发育结局无统计学差异.
    背景:•神经发育结果与低氧血症有关,高氧血症和SpO2目标范围的选择。•吸入氧的自动滴定可以提供低氧血症和高氧血症事件的更快解决。
    背景:•这项队列研究在实施自动氧气控制作为护理标准后,在两岁时的神经发育结局没有发现显着差异。
    Faster resolution of hypoxaemic or hyperoxaemic events in preterm infants may reduce long-term neurodevelopmental impairment. Automatic titration of inspiratory oxygen increases time within the oxygen saturation target range and may provide a more prompt response to hypoxic and hyperoxic events. We assessed routinely performed follow-up at 2 years of age after the implementation of automated oxygen control (AOC) as standard care and compared this with a historical cohort. Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age were compared for infants born at 24-29 weeks gestational age before (2012-2015) and after (2015-2018) the implementation of AOC as standard of care. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of either mortality or severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), and other outcomes assessed were mild-moderate NDI, Bayley-III composite scores, cerebral palsy GMFCS, and CBCL problem behaviour scores. A total of 289 infants were included in the pre-AOC epoch and 292 in the post-AOC epoch. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different. Fifty-one infants were lost to follow-up (pre-AOC 6.9% (20/289), post-implementation 10.6% (31/292). The composite outcome of mortality or severe NDI was observed in 17.9% pre-AOC (41/229) vs. 24.0% (47/196) post-AOC (p = 0.12). No significant differences were found for the secondary outcomes such as mild-moderate NDI, Bayley-III composite scores, cerebral palsy GMFCS, and problem behaviour scores, with the exception of parent-reported readmissions until the moment of follow-up which was less frequent post-AOC than pre-AOC.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, the implementation of automated oxygen control in our NICU as standard of care for preterm infants led to no statistically significant difference in neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age.
    BACKGROUND: • Neurodevelopmental outcome is linked to hypoxemia, hyperoxaemia and choice of SpO2 target range. • Automated titration of inspired oxygen may provide a faster resolution of hypoxaemic and hyperoxaemic events.
    BACKGROUND: • This cohort study did not find a significant difference in neurodevelopmental outcome at two years of age after implementing automated oxygen control as standard of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:我们评估了闭环氧气控制系统在接受高流量鼻氧治疗(HFNO)的儿科患者中的作用。
    未经批准:多中心,单盲,随机化,和交叉学习。年龄在1个月至18岁之间的因急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(AHRF)接受HFNO的患者被随机分配开始进行2小时的闭环氧气控制或2小时的手动氧气滴定。之后,患者切换到替代疗法。终点是在预定义的SpO2范围(主要)中花费的时间百分比,FiO2、SpO2/FiO2和手动调整次数。
    未经批准:我们纳入了23名患者,年龄中位数为18(3-26)个月。与手动氧气滴定相比,当激活闭环氧气控制器时,患者在预定义的最佳SpO2范围内花费的时间更多[91·3%(IQR78·4-95·1%)与63·0%(IQR44·4-70·7%)],平均差[28·2%(95%-CI20·6-37·8%);P<0.001]。FiO2中位数较低[33·3%(IQR26·6-44·6%)与42·6%(IQR33·6-49·9%);P=0.07],但中位数SpO2/FiO2较高[289(IQR207-348)与194(IQR98-317);P=0.023],具有闭环氧气控制。在闭环氧气控制下,手动调整的中位数较低[0·0(IQR0·0-0·0)与0·5(IQR0·0-1·0);P<0.001]。
    UASSIGNED:闭环氧控制可改善接受HFNO治疗AHRF的儿科患者的氧合治疗,并可能导致更有效的氧气使用。它减少了手动调整的次数,这可能会导致医疗保健提供者的工作量减少。
    未经批准:[www.ClinicalTrials.gov],标识符[NCT05032365]。
    UNASSIGNED: We assessed the effect of a closed-loop oxygen control system in pediatric patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO).
    UNASSIGNED: A multicentre, single-blinded, randomized, and cross-over study. Patients aged between 1 month and 18 years of age receiving HFNO for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) were randomly assigned to start with a 2-h period of closed-loop oxygen control or a 2-h period of manual oxygen titrations, after which the patient switched to the alternative therapy. The endpoints were the percentage of time spent in predefined SpO2 ranges (primary), FiO2, SpO2/FiO2, and the number of manual adjustments.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 23 patients, aged a median of 18 (3-26) months. Patients spent more time in a predefined optimal SpO2 range when the closed-loop oxygen controller was activated compared to manual oxygen titrations [91⋅3% (IQR 78⋅4-95⋅1%) vs. 63⋅0% (IQR 44⋅4-70⋅7%)], mean difference [28⋅2% (95%-CI 20⋅6-37⋅8%); P < 0.001]. Median FiO2 was lower [33⋅3% (IQR 26⋅6-44⋅6%) vs. 42⋅6% (IQR 33⋅6-49⋅9%); P = 0.07], but median SpO2/FiO2 was higher [289 (IQR 207-348) vs. 194 (IQR 98-317); P = 0.023] with closed-loop oxygen control. The median number of manual adjustments was lower with closed-loop oxygen control [0⋅0 (IQR 0⋅0-0⋅0) vs. 0⋅5 (IQR 0⋅0-1⋅0); P < 0.001].
    UNASSIGNED: Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygenation therapy in pediatric patients receiving HFNO for AHRF and potentially leads to more efficient oxygen use. It reduces the number of manual adjustments, which may translate into decreased workloads of healthcare providers.
    UNASSIGNED: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT05032365].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号