Clonazepam

氯硝西泮
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:三己苯基和氯硝西泮通常用于治疗脑瘫(CP)儿童的肌张力障碍。然而,在结合这些一线药物治疗肌张力障碍的研究方面,文献中存在显著差距.
    方法:这个开放标签,随机对照试验旨在比较口服氯硝西泮与三己苯基(THP+CLZ)与单用三己苯基(THP)在减轻肌张力障碍严重程度方面的疗效,根据Barry-Albright肌张力障碍(BAD)评分。这项研究是在2至14岁的肌张力障碍性CP儿童中进行的,为期12周的治疗期。
    结果:每组共纳入51名参与者。与单独使用THP组相比,THP+CLZ组在12周时的肌张力障碍严重程度显着改善(-4.5±2.9vs-3.4±1.7,P=0.02)。此外,THP+CLZ组表现出较好的改善,上肢功能,孩子的疼痛感知,和生活质量,P值分别为0.02、0.009、0.01和0.01。两组中出现治疗紧急不良事件的参与者数量相当(P=0.67)。重要的是,任何组的参与者均未报告任何严重不良事件.
    结论:在减轻肌张力障碍严重程度方面,口服THP+CLZ的组合被证明比单独使用THP治疗2至14岁儿童的肌张力障碍CP更有效。
    BACKGROUND: Trihexyphenidyl and clonazepam are commonly used to treat dystonia in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, there is a notable gap in the literature when it comes to studies that combine these first-line agents for the management of dystonia.
    METHODS: This open-label, randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy of adding oral clonazepam to trihexyphenidyl (THP + CLZ) versus using trihexyphenidyl alone (THP) in reducing the severity of dystonia, as measured by the Barry-Albright Dystonia (BAD) score. The study was conducted over a 12-week therapy period in children with dystonic CP aged two to 14 years.
    RESULTS: Each group enrolled 51 participants. The THP + CLZ group showed significantly better improvement in dystonia severity at 12 weeks compared with the THP group alone (-4.5 ± 2.9 vs -3.4 ± 1.7, P = 0.02). Furthermore, the THP + CLZ group exhibited superior improvement in the severity of choreoathetosis, upper limb function, pain perception by the child, and quality of life, with P values of 0.02, 0.009, 0.01, and 0.01, respectively. The number of participants experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable in both groups (P = 0.67). Importantly, none of the participants in any of the groups reported any serious adverse events.
    CONCLUSIONS: A combination of oral THP + CLZ proves to be more efficacious than using THP alone for the treatment of dystonic CP in children aged two to 14 years in terms of reducing the severity of dystonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:燃烧口综合征(BMS)是一种慢性疼痛障碍,其特征是口腔内灼热或美感障碍,没有任何可识别的病变。已经研究了许多BMS的治疗方法,虽然没有决定性的结果。对BMS患者使用低强度二极管激光和氯硝西泮治疗的疗效进行分析,并对治疗前后不同唾液生物标志物水平进行了研究。
    方法:随机,进行了单盲临床试验,涉及89例患者,分为以下组:第1组(激光,Helbo®Theralite激光3D袖珍探头+氯硝西泮(n=20),第2组(假激光安慰剂)(n=19),第3组(激光)(n=21)和第4组(氯硝西泮)(n=18)。根据视觉模拟量表(VAS)对症状强度进行评分。在治疗前和治疗后进行唾液酸测定,和口干症清单,进行了口腔健康影响概况-14(OHIP-14)和迷你营养评估(MNA)问卷。在唾液样品中测量了以下标记:白介素(IL2,IL4,IL5,IL6,IL7,IL8,IL1β,IL10、IL12、IL13、IL17、IL21和IL23),蛋白质(MIP-3α,MIP-1α和MIP-1β),GM-CSF,干扰素γ(IFNγ),干扰素诱导的T细胞α化学引诱物(ITAC),Fractalkine和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)。
    结果:治疗后,第1组(激光氯硝西泮)(p=0.029)和第3组(激光)(p=0.005)的VAS评分显着降低。反过来,第3组(激光)显示fractalkine的唾液浓度降低(p=0.025);白细胞介素IL12(p=0.048),IL17(p=0.020),IL21(p=0.008),与基线相比,IL7(p=0.001)和IL8(p=0.007);蛋白质MIP1α(p=0.048)和MIP1β(p=0.047);和TNFα(p=0.047)。治疗后,第1组(激光+氯硝西泮)与基线相比,IL21(p=0.045)和IL7(p=0.009)有显著差异,而第4组(氯硝西泮)在IL13中显示出显着差异(p=0.036),IL2(p=0.020)和IL4(p=0.001)。在第2组(假激光安慰剂)中没有记录到显著差异。
    结论:低能级二极管激光是BMS的良好治疗选择,导致患者症状和唾液生物标志物的减少。然而,需要对干预协议和激光强度参数进行标准化,以得出更可靠的结论。
    OBJECTIVE: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic pain disorder characterized by intraoral burning or dysaesthetic sensation, with the absence of any identifiable lesions. Numerous treatments for BMS have been investigated, though without conclusive results. An analysis was conducted of the efficacy of treatment with a low-level diode laser and clonazepam in patients with BMS, and a study was carried out on the levels of different salivary biomarkers before and after treatment.
    METHODS: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial was carried out involving 89 patients divided into the following groups: group 1 (laser, The Helbo® Theralite Laser 3D Pocket Probe + clonazepam) (n = 20), group 2 (sham laser placebo) (n = 19), group 3 (laser) (n = 21) and group 4 (clonazepam) (n = 18). Symptom intensity was scored based on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Sialometry was performed before and after treatment, and the Xerostomia Inventory, Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) and Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaires were administered. The following markers were measured in saliva samples: interleukins (IL2, IL4, IL5, IL6, IL7, IL8, IL1β, IL10, IL12, IL13, IL17, IL21 and IL23), proteins (MIP-3α, MIP-1α and MIP-1β), GM-CSF, interferon gamma (IFNγ), interferon-inducible T-cell alpha chemoattractant (ITAC), fractalkine and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα).
    RESULTS: A significant decrease in the VAS scores was observed after treatment in group 1 (laser + clonazepam) (p = 0.029) and group 3 (laser) (p = 0.005). In turn, group 3 (laser) showed a decrease in the salivary concentration of fractalkine (p = 0.025); interleukins IL12 (p = 0.048), IL17 (p = 0.020), IL21 (p = 0.008), IL7 (p = 0.001) and IL8 (p = 0.007); proteins MIP1α (p = 0.048) and MIP1β (p = 0.047); and TNFα (p = 0.047) versus baseline. Following treatment, group 1 (laser + clonazepam) showed significant differences in IL21 (p = 0.045) and IL7 (p = 0.009) versus baseline, while group 4 (clonazepam) showed significant differences in IL13 (p = 0.036), IL2 (p = 0.020) and IL4 (p = 0.001). No significant differences were recorded in group 2 (sham laser placebo).
    CONCLUSIONS: The low-level diode laser is a good treatment option in BMS, resulting in a decrease in patient symptoms and in salivary biomarkers. However, standardization of the intervention protocols and laser intensity parameters is needed in order to draw more firm conclusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:墨西哥人群中神经系统疾病的患病率很高。氯硝西泮主要用于治疗惊恐障碍,某些类型的癫痫,如癫痫持续状态,儿童运动性癫痫发作(小缺失,Lennox-Gastaut综合征,和婴儿痉挛),焦虑,肌肉痉挛.进行这项研究是为了比较禁食条件下健康墨西哥志愿者中两种口服氯硝西泮2mg片剂之间的生物等效性。
    方法:第一阶段,随机化,开放标签,两种治疗,交叉研究包括30名健康志愿者。将受试者随机分配给2mg氯硝西泮的测试或参考制剂。每个研究期以21天的清除期分开。在给药前和给药后72小时收集血样。使用经过验证的超流动液相色谱-串联质谱方法确定氯硝西泮浓度。使用非房室方法测定药代动力学参数。如果几何平均比率(测试/参考)在80%和125%之间,则认为两种制剂是生物等效的。通过记录不良事件评估安全性。
    结果:在测试制剂和参考制剂之间的药代动力学参数是相当的。平均最大血浆浓度(Cmax)为13ng/mL,从时间0到最后可测量浓度(AUC0-t)的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积为≈360ngh/mL,达到最大血浆浓度(Tmax)的时间约为3小时,消除半衰期(t1/2)为≈43h。Cmax(99.2-115.3%)的几何平均比(90%置信区间),AUC0-t(100.6-110.6%),AUC0-∞(98.5-111.6%)在生物等效性范围内。记录了7例非严重不良事件(主要是无症状性低血压)。
    结论:在禁食条件下,健康的墨西哥志愿者中,氯硝西泮2mg的测试和参考制剂具有生物等效性和良好的耐受性。
    213301410B0051(2021年4月13日批准)。
    BACKGROUND: The prevalence of neurological disorders is high among the Mexican population. Clonazepam is primarily indicated to treat panic disorders, certain kinds of epilepsy such as status epilepticus, childhood motor seizures (petit mal absence, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and infantile spasms), anxiety, and muscle spasm. This study was performed to compare bioequivalence between two oral tablet formulations of clonazepam 2 mg in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.
    METHODS: This phase I, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, crossover study included 30 healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to either test or reference formulation of clonazepam 2 mg. Each study period was separated by 21-day washout period. Blood samples were collected at pre-dose and up to 72 h after drug administration. Clonazepam concentrations were determined using a validated ultra-flow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a non-compartmental method. Two formulations were considered bioequivalent if geometric mean ratios (test/reference) were between 80% and 125%. Safety was evaluated by recording adverse events.
    RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between test and reference formulations. The mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was ≈ 13 ng/mL, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) was ≈ 360 ng h/mL, time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) was ≈ 3 h, and elimination half-life (t1/2) was ≈ 43 h. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of Cmax (99.2-115.3%), AUC0-t (100.6-110.6%), and AUC0-∞ (98.5-111.6%) were within the bioequivalence range. Seven non-serious adverse events (mostly asymptomatic hypotension) were recorded.
    CONCLUSIONS: The test and reference formulations of clonazepam 2 mg were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Mexican volunteers under fasting conditions.
    UNASSIGNED: 213301410B0051 (Approved on April 13, 2021).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估高剂量氯硝西泮(1mg)与低剂量氯硝西泮(0.5mg)联合认知行为疗法治疗中重度失眠老年人失眠(CBT-i)的有效性。
    方法:对低剂量氯硝西泮治疗慢性疾病继发失眠症的患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。开始服用0.25毫克氯硝西泮后,他们的剂量增加到0.5毫克,然后是1毫克(A组),或与额外的CBT-i相同的剂量(B组)。他们被跟踪了24周,记录失眠严重程度指数(ISI)和主观痛苦量表(SUDS)的评分。记录患者药物不良反应(ADR)并评估其因果关系。ISI和SUDS评分被认为是主要结果指标。
    结果:组间分析显示,与A组相比,B组在第16周的ISI(P<0.05)和第20周的SUDS(P<0.05)的平均得分显着下降。同样,组内分析还显示,两组在第4周和第8周时,ISI和SUDS评分的平均评分均显著降低(P<0.05).A组(14%)的ADR发生率高于B组(5%)。因果关系评估表明,大多数情况是可能的。
    结论:对于对0.5mg氯硝西泮耐药的个体,与低剂量氯硝西泮一起添加CBT-i是将剂量增加至1mg的可行替代方法。
    To evaluate the effectiveness of high-dose clonazepam (1 mg) versus low-dose clonazepam (0.5 mg) with cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-i) in older adults with moderately severe insomnia.
    A prospective cohort study was conducted in patients who did not respond to low-dose clonazepam for insomnia secondary to chronic medical conditions. After starting with 0.25 mg of clonazepam, their dose was increased to 0.5 mg, then to 1 mg (Group A), or to the same dose with additional CBT-i (Group B). They were followed for 24 weeks, and scores of the insomnia severity index (ISI) and subjective units of distress scale (SUDS) were recorded. Patient adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were documented and assessed for their causality. ISI and SUDS scores were considered primary outcome measures.
    Between-group analysis revealed a significant decline in the mean score of ISI at week 16 (P < 0.05) and for SUDS at week 20 (P < 0.05) in group B compared to group A. Similarly, within-group analysis also revealed a statistically significant reduction of the mean score in ISI and SUDS scores at week 4 and 8 (P < 0.05) in both groups. ADRs occurred more frequently in group A (14%) than in group B (5%). Assessments of causality showed that the majority of cases were possible.
    For individuals who were resistant to 0.5 mg of clonazepam, adding CBT-i with low-dose clonazepam is a viable alternative to increasing the dose to 1 mg.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患病率上升的情况下,比较穴位按压和氯硝西泮对血液透析患者睡眠质量的影响。这些患者的睡眠障碍患病率很高,以及催眠药物的副作用.方法:随机抽取60例患者,对照临床试验,并随机分配到两组。在研究员晚班的两个星期里,一组接受穴位按摩(每天3分钟,双侧6点).对组给予氯硝西泮片剂(0.5mg)两周。匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)用来衡量睡眠质量,比较两组干预前后的睡眠情况。结果:两组在干预前的PSQI平均评分方面无统计学差异(P=0.75),分别为15.83±1.51和16.17±0.91。然而,氯硝西泮和穴位按压组干预后平均PSQI评分分别为13.25±2.88和8.97±4.29,差异有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。穴位按压和氯硝西泮组均显示出患者干预后睡眠质量的改善。然而,当计算每个组的总分和所有PSQI分量的平均得分的百分比变化时,很明显,穴位按摩比氯硝西泮片剂更有效地增强睡眠。结论:本调查结果表明,与氯硝西泮相比,穴位按摩对患者睡眠质量的影响更大。视情况而定,指压可以作为一个简单的,安全,和非药物方式提高血液透析患者的睡眠质量。
    Objective: The current study aimed to compare the impact of acupressure and clonazepam tablets on the quality of sleep in hemodialysis patients in light of the rising prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the high prevalence of sleep disturbance in these patients, and the side effects of hypnotic drugs. Method : A total of 60 patients were selected for this randomized, controlled clinical trial and randomly assigned to two groups. For two weeks during the researcher\'s evening shift, one group received acupressure (six spots bilaterally for three minutes each day). The opposing group was administered clonazepam tablets (0.5 mg) for two weeks. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which measures sleep quality, was used to compare sleep in the two groups before and after the intervention. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups prior to the intervention (P = 0.75) in terms of the mean pre-intervention PSQI scores for the acupressure and clonazepam groups, which were 15.83 ± 1.51 and 16.17 ± 0.91, respectively. However, the average PSQI scores after the intervention in the clonazepam and acupressure groups were 13.25 ± 2.88 and 8.97 ± 4.29, respectively, indicating a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001). Both the acupressure and the clonazepam groups showed improvements in their post-intervention sleep quality among the patients. However, when the percentage changed in the mean scores of the total score and all of the PSQI components were calculated for each group, it became clear that acupressure was more effective at enhancing sleep than clonazepam tablets. Conclusion: The findings of the present investigation demonstrate that acupressure has a greater impact on patients\' sleep quality compared to clonazepam tablets. Depending on the circumstances, acupressure can be used as a simple, safe, and non-drug way to enhance hemodialysis patients\' quality of sleep.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:本报告描述了一名摄入大量氯硝西泮片剂的12岁女孩的成功抢救。
    方法:患者及时给予氟马西尼和血液灌流治疗,以减轻中心性抑郁症的症状。治疗药物监测用于评估解毒效果。作者根据病理生理学分析了氯硝西泮中毒的抢救方案,临床表现,和氯硝西泮过量的药代动力学。
    结果:患者对治疗反应良好,出院,无不良事件。
    结论:本病例研究证明了氟马西尼联合血液灌流治疗氯硝西泮中毒的有效性和安全性。这项研究旨在提供更有效的方法来治疗氯硝西泮过量的见解,并有助于管理这种情况的持续问题。
    BACKGROUND: This report describes the successful rescue of a 12-year-old girl who ingested large quantities of clonazepam tablets.
    METHODS: The patient was promptly treated with flumazenil and hemoperfusion to alleviate the symptoms of central depression. Therapeutic drug monitoring was used to evaluate detoxification efficacy. The authors analyzed the rescue protocol for clonazepam poisoning based on the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and pharmacokinetics of clonazepam overdose.
    RESULTS: The patient responded well to the treatment and was discharged from the hospital without adverse events.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case study demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of combining flumazenil with hemoperfusion as a treatment for clonazepam poisoning. This study aimed to provide insights into more effective methods for treating clonazepam overdose and contribute to the ongoing issue of managing this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:抗癫痫药物(ASM)是育龄妇女最常用的致畸药物之一。关于该人群中不同治疗适应症和新一代ASM的利用模式的数据有限。因此,我们评估了有癫痫和非癫痫适应症(疼痛和精神疾病)的育龄妇女使用ASM的模式.
    方法:我们对提交给Optum临床形式学数据库的去识别的管理数据进行了回顾性分析。符合条件的参与者包括12-50岁的女性,她们在2011年至2017年之间填补了ASM。从填写索引处方到研究结束或保险退出之日,对参与者进行随访,以先到者为准。对于整体队列和潜在的治疗适应症,我们评估了ASM填充的类型和频率;单药治疗的参与者比例,综合疗法,或治疗切换;以及连续使用的持续时间。使用从研究开始到研究结束的年度百分比变化来表征趋势。
    结果:我们的分析包括465,131名参与者,他们填写了603,916种不同的ASM处方。在基线,大多数参与者患有慢性疼痛(51.0%)和精神疾病(32.7%),癫痫最不常见(0.9%)。最常分配的是地西泮(24.3%),劳拉西泮(20.1%),加巴喷丁(17.4%),氯硝西泮(12.7%),托吡酯(11.3%),和拉莫三嗪(4.6%)。加巴喷丁(年度百分比变化[95%CI]:8.4[7.3-9.4];p<0.001)和左乙拉西坦(3.4[0.7-6.2];p=0.022)趋势呈线性增加趋势,地西泮(-3.5[-2.4至4.5];p<0.001)和氯硝西泮(-3.4[-2.3至4.5];p=0.001)呈下降趋势。丙戊酸盐没有观察到趋势的显着变化(-0.4[-2.7至1.9];p=0.651),而劳拉西泮观察到趋势的非线性变化,托吡酯,拉莫三嗪,还有普瑞巴林.
    结论:在整个队列和潜在的治疗适应症中,年龄较大的ASM患者观察到趋势下降。相反,增加的趋势与较新的ASM。考虑到与较新的药物相关的致畸风险,在为育龄妇女开处方ASM时,除了仔细考虑获益与潜在风险外,咨询和教育仍将是关键.
    Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are among the most commonly prescribed teratogenic drugs in women of childbearing age. Limited data exist on utilization patterns across different indications for therapy and for the newer-generation ASMs in this population. Thus, we assessed the pattern of ASM use in women of childbearing age with epilepsy and nonepilepsy indications (pain and psychiatric disorders).
    We conducted a retrospective analysis of deidentified administrative data submitted to the Optum Clinformatics database. Eligible participants included women aged 12-50 years who filled ASMs between year 2011 and 2017. Participants were followed from date of index prescription filled to study end or insurance disenrollment, whichever came first. For the overall cohort and potential therapy indications, we assessed the type and frequency of ASMs filled; proportion of participants on monotherapy, polytherapy, or treatment switching; and duration of continuous use. Trends were characterized using annual percent change from study start to study end.
    Our analysis included 465,131 participants who filled 603,916 distinct ASM prescriptions. At baseline, most of the participants had chronic pain (51.0%) and psychiatric disorders (32.7%), with epilepsy the least common (0.9%). The most frequently dispensed were diazepam (24.3%), lorazepam (20.1%), gabapentin (17.4%), clonazepam (12.7%), topiramate (11.3%), and lamotrigine (4.6%). Significant linear increase in trends were observed with gabapentin (annual percent change [95% CI]: 8.4 [7.3-9.4]; p < 0.001) and levetiracetam (3.4 [0.7-6.2]; p = 0.022) and decreasing trends for diazepam (-3.5 [-2.4 to 4.5]; p < 0.001) and clonazepam (-3.4 [-2.3 to 4.5]; p = 0.001). No significant change in trend was observed with valproate (-0.4 [-2.7 to 1.9]; p = 0.651), while nonlinear changes in trends were observed with lorazepam, topiramate, lamotrigine, and pregabalin.
    Decreasing trends were observed with older ASMs in the overall cohort and across the potential indications for therapy. Conversely, increasing trends were seen with the newer ASMs. Considering the risk of teratogenicity associated with the newer medications largely unknown, counseling and education in addition to a careful consideration of the benefits vs potential risks should remain pivotal when prescribing ASMs for women of childbearing age.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究探讨了苯二氮卓(BZD)药物与2-羟丙基-β-环糊精(2HPβCD)之间的相互作用,已知环糊精(CD)可改善药物递送并增强治疗效果。我们发现,2HPβCD的原子在氯氮卓(CDP)的存在下变得更加刚性,氯硝西泮(CLZ),和地西泮(DZM),而在存在去甲地西泮(NDM)和硝西泮(NZP)的情况下,它们变得更加灵活。我们还研究了2HPβCD的结构,发现加载这些药物会增加2HPβCD腔的面积和体积,使其更适合给药。此外,这项研究发现,所有药物的结合自由能都表现出负值,表明热力学有利性和改善的溶解度。BZD的结合自由能顺序在分子动力学和蒙特卡罗方法中都是一致的,CDP和DZM具有最高的结合亲和力。我们还分析了不同相互作用能在载体与药物之间的结合中的贡献,发现范德华能是主要成分。我们的结果表明,在BZD的存在下,2HPβCD/水之间的氢键数量略有减少,但氢键的质量保持不变。
    This study delves into the interaction between benzodiazepine (BZD) drugs and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (2HPβCD), a cyclodextrin (CD) known to improve drug delivery and enhance therapeutic outcomes. We find that the 2HPβCD\'s atoms become more rigid in the presence of chlordiazepoxide (CDP), clonazepam (CLZ), and diazepam (DZM), whereas they become more flexible in the presence of nordazepam (NDM) and nitrazepam (NZP). We also investigated the structure of 2HPβCD and found that loading these drugs increases both the area and volume of the 2HPβCD cavity, making it more suitable for drug delivery. Moreover, this research found that all drugs exhibited negative values for the binding free energy, indicating thermodynamic favorability and improved solubility. The binding free energy order of the BZDs was consistent in both molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo methods, with CDP and DZM having the highest affinity for binding. We also analyzed the contribution of different interaction energies in binding between the carrier and the drugs and found that Van der Waals energy is the primary component. Our results indicate that the number of hydrogen bonds between 2HPβCD/water slightly decreases in the presence of BZDs, but the hydrogen bond\'s quality remains constant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:面肌痉挛(HFS)是面部肌肉的非自愿间歇性抽搐。可以考虑对HFS进行医学和手术治疗。在医学治疗中,氯硝西泮是一种苯二氮卓类药物,用于治疗癫痫,精神症状,和运动障碍。本研究旨在探讨氯硝西泮治疗HFS的疗效和安全性。
    方法:这项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验前瞻性招募了20-79岁的HFS患者。患者以1:1的比例随机分配,接受氯硝西泮(0.5mg,每日两次)或安慰剂4周。所有参与者在基线和访视2时接受临床评估和实验室测试。主要终点是第2次访问时的临床总体印象改善(CGI-I)评分。
    结果:在2015年4月至2016年11月期间,共纳入34例评估合格的HFS患者。其中,2例患者在随机化前退出.因此,意向治疗分析包括32例HFS患者.第2次访视时的CGI-I评分中位数在氯硝西泮(3;范围1-6)和安慰剂(3.5;范围3-5)组之间没有显着差异。在安全分析中,仅观察到轻度或无严重不良事件.
    结论:本研究结果证明氯硝西泮在HFS患者中的安全性。然而,氯硝西泮对HFS无统计学意义.需要进一步的研究来提供HFS患者临床获益的证据。
    BACKGROUND: Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is an involuntary intermittent twitching of the facial muscles. Medical and surgical treatments can be considered for HFS. Among medical treatments, clonazepam is a benzodiazepine used to treat epilepsy, psychiatric symptoms, and movement disorders. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of clonazepam for the treatment of HFS.
    METHODS: This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial prospectively enrolled patients with HFS aged 20-79 years. The patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either clonazepam (0.5 mg twice daily) or a placebo for 4 weeks. All participants underwent clinical assessment and laboratory tests at baseline and visit 2. The primary endpoint was the clinical global impression-improvement (CGI-I) score at visit 2.
    RESULTS: A total of 34 patients with HFS assessed for eligibility were enrolled between April 2015 and November 2016. Among them, two patients were withdrawn before randomization. Thus, the intention-to-treat analysis included 32 patients with HFS. The median CGI-I scores at visit 2 did not differ significantly between the clonazepam (3; range 1-6) and placebo (3.5; range 3-5) groups. In the safety analysis, only mild or no serious adverse events were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated the safety of clonazepam in patients with HFS. However, clonazepam did not show a statistically significant effect on HFS. Further studies are needed to provide evidence of the clinical benefits in patients with HFS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:睡眠障碍是帕金森病(PD)常见的非运动症状。我们旨在比较曲唑酮与褪黑素和氯硝西泮在PD和睡眠不适患者中的安全性和有效性。
    方法:这种单中心,双盲,对有主观睡眠主诉的PD患者进行了随机临床试验.符合条件的患者被随机分为1:1:1,接受褪黑激素3mg/天,氯硝西泮1毫克/天,或曲唑酮50毫克/天,持续4周。主要结果指标是匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分的变化。Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS)和RBD筛查问卷(RBDSQ)的平均变化被认为是次要结果指标。
    结果:共有112名符合条件的患者被随机分组,93名参与者,褪黑激素(n=31),曲唑酮(n=31),氯硝西泮(n=31),完成研究。治疗4周后,所有组的PSQI评分均显着降低。PSQI相对于基线的平均变化在治疗组之间相似(P=0.325)。研究组之间RBDSQ和ESS相对于基线的平均变化有显着差异(P<0.05)。与曲唑酮(P=0.011)和氯硝西泮(P=0.004)相比,褪黑素摄入与RBDSQ评分下降幅度更大相关。与氯硝西泮相比,曲唑酮的摄入量与ESS评分的降低更高(P=0.010)。氯硝西泮的3名患者报告了轻度不良事件,曲唑酮组的两名患者,褪黑激素组中没有。
    结论:曲唑酮50毫克/天,氯硝西泮1毫克/天,褪黑素3mg/d对改善PD患者睡眠质量均可耐受和有效。
    背景:伊朗临床试验注册(注册号;IRCT20170821035819N2)。
    BACKGROUND: Sleep disturbances are common non-motor symptoms of Parkinson\'s disease (PD). We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of trazodone with melatonin and clonazepam in patients with PD and sleep complaints.
    METHODS: This single-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on PD patients with subjective sleep complaints. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive melatonin 3 mg/day, clonazepam 1 mg/day, or trazodone 50 mg/day for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the changes in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores. The mean change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and RBD screening questionnaire (RBDSQ) was considered as the secondary outcome measures.
    RESULTS: A total of 112 eligible patients were randomized and 93 participants, melatonin (n = 31), trazodone (n = 31), and clonazepam (n = 31), completed the study. There was a significant decrease in PSQI scores after 4 weeks of treatment in all groups. The mean changes of PSQI from baseline were similar among the treatment arms (P = 0.325). Mean changes of RBDSQ and ESS from baseline were significantly different between study arms (P < 0.05). Melatonin intake was associated with a higher decrease in RBDSQ score compared to trazodone (P = 0.011) and clonazepam (P = 0.004). Trazodone intake was associated with a higher decrease in ESS score compared to clonazepam (P = 0.010). Mild adverse events were reported in three patients in the clonazepam, two patients in the trazodone group, and none in the melatonin group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Trazodone 50 mg/day, clonazepam 1 mg/day, and melatonin 3 mg/day were all tolerable and effective in improving sleep quality in patients with PD.
    BACKGROUND: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (registration number; IRCT20170821035819N2).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号