The purpose of this guideline update is to reassess and update recommendations in the prior guideline from 2016 on the appropriate management of patients with uveal melanoma.
In 2021, a multidisciplinary working group from the Provincial Cutaneous Tumour Team, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services was convened to update the guideline. A comprehensive review of new research evidence in PubMed as well as new clinical practice guidelines from prominent oncology groups informed the update. An enhancement in methodology included adding levels of evidence and strength of recommendations. The updated guideline was circulated to all members of the Provincial Cutaneous Tumour Team for review and endorsement.
New and modified recommendations address provider training requirements, diagnostic imaging for the detection of metastases, neo-adjuvant pre-enucleation radiotherapy, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for radiation retinopathy, genetic prognostic testing, surveillance following definitive local therapy, and systemic therapy for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.
The recommendations represent evidence-based standards of care agreed to by a large multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals.

To assess outcomes of small and medium choroidal melanoma (less than 5.0 mm in height) following Iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy.
Patients with small and medium choroidal melanoma that underwent Iodine-125 brachytherapy with apical height of 1.0 mm to 5.0 mm and largest basal diameter of ≤16.0 mm were included. Data were extracted from the original dosimetry plans to determine doses to vision critical structures with the prescription point to the apical height (actual dose, ABS guidelines) and, after simulation, with the prescription point to the height of 5.0 mm (simulated dose, COMS protocol). Visual acuity (VA) outcomes with actual dose and that predicted with the simulated dose were estimated along with local recurrence, ocular survival, and survival at 5 years.
A total of 339 patients with a mean age of 61.5 years with a mean follow up duration of 43.4 months were included. The mean dose reduction for lens, optic disc, and fovea was 34%, 39.4%, and 41.4%, respectively with actual dose when compared with simulated dose. The Kaplan-Meier estimations for 3 year event free rate of VA of 20/50 or better were 56% and 31% for actual dose and simulated dose, respectively. Only 3 events of local recurrence were observed (enucleated) yielding 5 year local control and ocular survival rate of 98%. Overall survival (OS) and metastasis free survival (MFS) were 95% and 87.5% at 5 years, respectively.
Small and medium choroidal melanoma treated according to ABS has excellent outcomes. Brachytherapy planning using ABS guidelines as compared to COMS protocol may be associated with lower rates of radiation toxicity and vision loss.

Eye plaque brachytherapy represents a safe and effective therapeutic approach for choroidal melanoma, combining clinical outcomes with an eye and visual preservation. As it represents a complex procedure, a specific quality assurance program is strongly suggested to improve patients and operators safety, and to reduce possible complications linked to surgical procedure and radiation exposure. The aim of this paper is to describe the INTERACTS (Interventional Radiotherapy Active Teaching School) guidelines for quality assurance in choroidal melanoma interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) used in our institution.

BACKGROUND: Survival in uveal melanoma has remained unchanged since the early 1970s. Because outcomes are highly related to the size of the tumour, timely and accurate diagnosis can increase the chance for cure.
METHODS: A consensus-based guideline was developed to inform practitioners. PubMed was searched for publications related to this topic. Reference lists of key publications were hand-searched. The National Guidelines Clearinghouse and individual guideline organizations were searched for relevant guidelines. Consensus discussions by a group of content experts from medical, radiation, and surgical oncology were used to formulate the recommendations.
RESULTS: Eighty-four publications, including five existing guidelines, formed the evidence base.
CONCLUSIONS: Key recommendations highlight that, for uveal melanoma and its indeterminate melanocytic lesions in the uveal tract, management is complex and requires experienced specialists with training in ophthalmologic oncology. Staging examinations include serum and radiologic investigations. Large lesions are still most often treated with enucleation, and yet radiotherapy is the most common treatment for tumours that qualify. Adjuvant therapy has yet to demonstrate efficacy in reducing the risk of metastasis, and no systemic therapy clearly improves outcomes in metastatic disease. Where available, enrolment in clinical trials is encouraged for patients with metastatic disease. Highly selected patients might benefit from surgical resection of liver metastases.