BACKGROUND: Encephaloceles are neural tube defects characterized by herniation of meninges, neural tissue and cerebrospinal fluid, while atretic cephaloceles denote a rudimentary connection to the intracranial space with absence of herniated neural tissue and represent an infrequent dermatopathologic diagnosis. Limited reports of these entities confound the challenge in their histopathologic distinction. Accurate classification is important given associated anomalies and neurologic manifestations that impact prognosis.
METHODS: We describe the clinicopathological and immunohistochemical [glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), S100, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), and somatostatin receptor subtype 2A (SSTR2A)] features in a retrospective series encountered at a single institution between 1994 and 2020.
RESULTS: We identified 13 cases classified as atretic cephalocele (n = 11) and encephalocele (n = 2). Hamartomatous changes and multinucleated cells were unique to atretic cephaloceles while myxoid areas were unique to encephaloceles. At least focal staining for SSTRA was seen in all atretic cephaloceles with the majority (87.5%) staining for EMA; negative staining for GFAP and S100 confirmed absence of neural tissue. Encephaloceles were GFAP and S100 positive, and negative for SSTR2 and EMA. Atretic cephaloceles had a favorable prognosis compared to encephaloceles, with severe morbidity present in both encephalocele cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study raises awareness of atretic cephalocele and encephalocele among dermatopathologists and reveals a mutually exclusive immunophenotype that facilitates their distinction for prognostication and management.

BACKGROUND: Hair collar sign (HCS) and hair tuft of the scalp (HTS) are cutaneous signs of an underlying neuroectodermal defect, but most available data are based on case reports.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to define the clinical spectrum of HCS and HTS, clarify the risk for underlying neurovascular anomalies, and provide imaging recommendations.
METHODS: A 10-year multicenter retrospective and prospective analysis of clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic features of HCS and HTS in pediatric patients was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 78 patients included in the study, 56 underwent cranial and brain imaging. Twenty-three of the 56 patients (41%) had abnormal findings, including the following: (1) cranial/bone defect (30.4%), with direct communication with the central nervous system in 28.6%; (2) venous malformations (25%); or (3) central nervous system abnormalities (12.5%). Meningeal heterotopia in 34.6% (9/26) was the most common neuroectodermal association. Sinus pericranii, paraganglioma, and combined nevus were also identified.
CONCLUSIONS: The partial retrospective design and predominant recruitment from the dermatology department are limitations of this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Infants with HCS or HTS are at high risk for underlying neurovascular anomalies. Magnetic resonance imaging scans should be performed in order to refer the infant to the appropriate specialist for management.

BACKGROUND: Cephaloceles are congenital malformations characterized by externalization of the meninges and/or brain tissue through a congenital skull bone defect. In developed countries, this malformation is rare but in our developing countries, this pathology remains one of our concerns.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic aspects of the cephaloceles.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from 2007 to 2013 on all cases of cephalocele supported in the department of neurosurgery of the Yalgado Ouédraogo University Teaching Hospital of Ouagadougou. The malformations were supplemented by CT scan. All patients were operated. The surgical procedure in cephaloceles of the convexity consisted of a direct approach. Sincipital cephaloceles were operated by transcranial approach or combined approach associating transcranial and transnasal approaches.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were gathered during the 7-year period. There were 18 boys and 32 girls. The ages ranged from 1 day to 11 years. The cephaloceles were located on the vault of the skull in 78%; the lesion was sincipital in 22%. The malformation was covered with normal skin in 92%; it was pediculated in 78%. CT scan allowed the classification of cases as meningo-encephaloceles in 31 cases (62%) and meningoceles in 18 cases (36%) and one pure encephalocele. The immediate postoperative course was uneventful in 42 cases (84%); 8 postoperative deaths were recorded. At medium and long term, 4 patients (8%) developed complications of psychomotor deficiency in 3 cases and hydrocephalus in 1 case. The main reasons for the poor prognosis were superinfection, hydrocephalus and/or other brain malformations.
CONCLUSIONS: Cephaloceles remain relatively frequent in our practice. After surgery, mental failure and hydrocephalus can occur impairing the prognosis. The most suitable solution is a policy of prevention with folic acid treatment before and during pregnancy and following up adequate pregnancies.