Accumulating evidence has shown that cell dedifferentiation or reprogramming is a pivotal procedure for animals to deal with injury and promote endogenous tissue repair. Tissue damage is a critical factor that triggers cell dedifferentiation or reprogramming in vivo. By contrast, microenvironmental changes, including the loss of stem cells, hypoxia, cell senescence, inflammation and immunity, caused by tissue damage can return cells to an unstable state. If the wound persists in the long‑term due to chronic damage, then dedifferentiation or reprogramming of the surrounding cells may lead to carcinogenesis. In recent years, extensive research has been performed investigating cell dedifferentiation or reprogramming in vivo, which can have significant implications for wound repair, treatment and prevention of cancer in the future. The current review summarizes the molecular events that are known to drive cell dedifferentiation directly following tissue injury and the effects of epigenetic modification on dedifferentiation or reprogramming in vivo. In addition, the present review explores the intracellular mechanism of endogenous tissue repair and its relationship with cancer, which is essential for balancing the risk between tissue repair and malignant transformation after injury.

Diabetes is a metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. Over 90% of patients with diabetes have type 2 diabetes. Pancreatic β-cells are endocrine cells that produce and secrete insulin, an essential endocrine hormone that regulates blood glucose levels. Deficits in β-cell function and mass play key roles in the onset and progression of type 2 diabetes. Apoptosis has been considered as the main contributor of β-cell dysfunction and decrease in β-cell mass for a long time. However, recent studies suggest that β-cell failure occurs mainly due to increased β-cell dedifferentiation rather than limited β-cell proliferation or increased β-cell death. In this review, we summarize the current advances in the understanding of the pancreatic β-cell dedifferentiation process including potential mechanisms. A better understanding of β-cell dedifferentiation process will help to identify novel therapeutic targets to prevent and/or reverse β-cell loss in type 2 diabetes.

Transdifferentiation of follicular lymphoma to a Langerhans cell neoplasm is rarely reported and not well understood. Here we present a case, review the literature and discuss some of the biological underpinnings of lineage switch of B cells to histiocytes/Langerhans cells. A 31-year-old woman had follicular lymphoma (FL) and Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS) co-localized above and below diaphragm. The FL was low-grade, had typical morphologic features, and was positive for CD10, BCL-2, and BCL-6. The LCS was cytologically atypical with necrosis and a high mitotic rate, and the immunophenotype supported Langerhans cell lineage positive for CD1a, CD207/langerin, and S-100 protein. Both tumors carried IGH-BCL2 and the LCS cells had immunophenotypic evidence of a residual B cell program, supporting the notion that these neoplasms are clonally related. The case reported is unusual because the patient was young and both diseases presented simultaneously, before any therapy. In addition, immunohistochemical analysis showed that the LCS was negative for BRAF V600E and phospho-ERK, suggesting that the LCS belongs to the known subset of Langerhans cell tumors lacking BRAF V600E and MAP2K1 mutations. Concurrent occurrence of FL and Langerhans cell neoplasm is an unusual phenomenon, with 10 cases reported previously: 4 Langerhans cell histiocytosis and 6 Langerhans cell sarcoma, including this case.

Dedifferentiated melanoma (DM) and undifferentiated melanoma (UM) is defined as a primary or metastatic melanoma showing transition between conventional and undifferentiated components (DM) or lacking histologic and immunophenotypic features of melanoma altogether (UM). The latter is impossible to verify as melanoma by conventional diagnostic tools alone. We herein describe our experience with 35 unpublished cases to expand on their morphologic, phenotypic, and genotypic spectrum, along with a review of 50 previously reported cases (total: 85) to establish the diagnostic criteria. By definition, the dedifferentiated/undifferentiated component lacked expression of 5 routinely used melanoma markers (S100, SOX10, Melan-A, HMB45, Pan-melanoma). Initial diagnoses (known in 66 cases) were undifferentiated/unclassified pleomorphic sarcoma (n=30), unclassified epithelioid malignancy (n=7), pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (n=5), other specific sarcoma types (n=6), poorly differentiated carcinoma (n=2), collision tumor (n=2), atypical fibroxanthoma (n=2), and reactive osteochondromatous lesion (n=1). In only 11 cases (16.6%) was a diagnosis of melanoma considered. Three main categories were identified: The largest group (n=56) comprised patients with a history of verified previous melanoma who presented with metastatic DM or UM. Axillary or inguinal lymph nodes, soft tissue, bone, and lung were mainly affected. A melanoma-compatible mutation was detected in 35 of 48 (73%) evaluable cases: BRAF (n=20; 40.8%), and NRAS (n=15; 30.6%). The second group (n=15) had clinicopathologic features similar to group 1, but a melanoma history was lacking. Axillary lymph nodes (n=6) was the major site in this group followed by the lung, soft tissue, and multiple site involvement. For this group, NRAS mutation was much more frequent (n=9; 60%) than BRAF (n=3; 20%) and NF1 (n=1; 6.6%). The third category (n=14) comprised primary DM (12) or UM (2). A melanoma-compatible mutation was detected in only 7 cases: BRAF (n=2), NF1 (n=2), NRAS (n=2), and KIT exon 11 (n=1). This extended follow-up study highlights the high phenotypic plasticity of DM/UM and indicates significant underrecognition of this aggressive disease among general surgical pathologists. The major clues to the diagnosis of DM and UM are: (1) presence of minimal differentiated clone in DM, (2) earlier history of melanoma, (3) undifferentiated histology that does not fit any defined entity, (4) locations at sites that are unusual for undifferentiated/unclassified pleomorphic sarcoma (axilla, inguinal, neck, digestive system, etc.), (5) unusual multifocal disease typical of melanoma spread, (6) detection of a melanoma-compatible gene mutation, and (7) absence of another genuine primary (eg, anaplastic carcinoma) in other organs.

Molecular profiling was performed in 50 problematic ovarian sex cord-stromal tumours (SCSTs) most of which were seen in consultation. Following analysis, 17 were classified as adult granulosa cell tumour (AGCT), 16 of which showed a FOXL2 sequence variant (mutation); the initial favoured diagnosis in five of the cases was benign thecoma/fibrothecoma. Thirteen tumours ultimately classified as cellular fibroma or thecoma were FOXL2 sequence variant negative which was helpful in excluding AGCT. All six Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours (SLCTs) demonstrated DICER1 \'hot spot\' sequence variants, and one case each of AGCT and SLCT showed high grade histological transformation associated with a concurrent TP53 sequence variant. All eight unclassified SCSTs were negative for FOXL2 mutations and the six tested cases were DICER1 wild type; however, three tumours demonstrated MET, CTNNB1 or TP53 sequence variants. Four cases were classified as juvenile granulosa cell tumour, and one of these harboured a GNAS sequence variant. The single gynandroblastoma and microcystic stromal tumours in the series demonstrated FOXL2 and CTNNB1 alterations, respectively. In summary, molecular analysis aids in accurate classification of challenging ovarian SCSTs and sometimes leads to revision of the favoured provisional diagnosis. TP53 sequence variants may be associated with dedifferentiation in both SLCTs and AGCTs.

The clinical evolution of solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) remains unclear. Although various clinical, morphological and molecular criteria may indicate increased risk of malignancy, some SFT can still progress despite having a clearly benign appearance. Various risk stratification systems have been proposed, but unfortunately they are not sufficient to precisely determine the malignant potential. In this review, we discuss current knowledge on SFT, focusing on the following controversial issues: (i) the diverse morphologic spectrum: \'the great simulator;\' (ii) malignant transformation or dedifferentiation; (iii) current risk stratification systems; and (iv) molecular factors associated with clinical evolution. The morphological spectrum of SFT and the list of differential diagnoses continue to expand. Both have increased considerably since the first descriptions of specific molecular alterations. A classification of malignant SFT should not be based on histology alone. The correlation of all pathological and molecular factors is recommended; its inclusion in risk stratification systems may help to improve diagnosis and prognosis.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) comprises of less than 1% of all head and neck cancers and less than 10% of all salivary gland neoplasms. Dedifferentiation/high-grade transformation (HGT) in AdCC is a rare but well known phenomenon which is associated with aggressive clinical behaviour and poor prognosis. We herein report the clinical, cytologic, histologic and immunohistochemical findings of a left submandibular gland AdCC with transformation to high grade carcinomatous and probable dedifferentiation to sarcomatoid component, occurring in a 64 year old male patient. To the author\'s best knowledge, this is the first case report of such dual transformation occurring in adenoid cystic carcinoma.

BACKGROUND Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma is not a distinct histologic entity transformed from different subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. The sarcomatoid transformation was accepted as the result of dedifferentiation of the primary tumor. Here we present a case of sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and review the clinicopathological characteristics of sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. CASE REPORT A 63-year-old female complained of painless gross hematuria for 3 months. Routine urine test showed that urinary protein was ++ and white blood cells were +++; serum CA153 was moderately elevated at 71.08 U/mL (normal <28 U/mL). Ultrasonography and a computed tomography scan showed a mass in the lower pole of the right kidney, measuring 13.4×15.4×11.4 cm. She underwent a right radical nephrectomy with lymph nodes dissection under general anesthetic. There was no evidence of recurrence and lymphadenopathy 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is an uncommon tumor characterized by a biphasic tumor with both classical epithelial components and sarcomatoid components. The prognosis of sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is worse than classical chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. It is important to recognize that sarcomatoid change of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma has the potential to behave aggressively and to metastasize.

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a soft-tissue neoplasm of intermediate malignant potential, presenting a wide histopathological spectrum. Poorer prognosis of hemangiopericytoma of the central nervous system (CNS), hypoglycemic SFT, and dedifferentiation are well-known characters of SFT, but their clinical significance were not demonstrated enough by large-sized study. Here, the clinicopathological features of SFTs are reviewed and the relationship between genetics and clinicopathological features is examined using 145 SFT cases. All cases were STAT6 IHC-positive and/or NAB2-STAT6 fusion gene-positive. Tumor location was classified into three categories: 30 pleuropulmonary, 96 non-pleuropulmonary/non-central nervous system (CNS), and 18 CNS tumors. The tumor developed recurrence in 21 of 93 available cases (22.5%), metastasis in 11 of 93 (11.8%), and tumor death in 9 of 93 (9.6%). Hypoglycemia occurred in 2 primary tumors and 1 metastatic tumor among 63 reviewable cases, and dedifferentiation occurred in 10 cases (6.8%) including 6 primary tumors, 2 recurrent tumors, and 2 metastatic tumors. Recurrence was positively associated with CNS location (p = 0.0109) and hypoglycemia (p = 0.001); metastasis was positively associated with CNS location (p = 0.0231), hypoglycemia (p < 0.0001), and dedifferentiation (p < 0.0001), while metastasis was negatively correlated with pleural location (p = 0.0471). Tumor death was positively associated with male sex (p = 0.0154), larger size (p = 0.0455), hypoglycemia (p < 0.0001), and dedifferentiation (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed independent statistical significance of dedifferentiation for overall survival (p = 0.0467). Exon variant of the fusion gene had no statistical correlation with clinical outcome. In conclusion, dedifferentiation is a major prognostic factor of SFT, and specific location such as cerebromeningeal and intra-abdominal site and hypoglycemia also had a high risk for unfavorable prognosis.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is caused by an inherited predisposition to pancreatic islet β-cell failure, which is manifested under cellular stress induced by metabolic overload. The decrease in the functional β-cell mass associated with T2D has been attributed primarily to β-cell death; however, studies in recent years suggested that β-cell dedifferentiation may contribute to this decline. The mechanisms linking genetic factors and cellular stress to β-cell dedifferentiation remain largely unknown. This study evaluated the evidence for β-cell dedifferentiation in T2D, and T2D and examined experimental systems in which its mechanisms may be studied. Understanding these mechanisms may allow prevention of β-cell dedifferentiation or induction of cell redifferentiation for restoration of the functional β-cell mass. Stem Cells 2019;37:1267-1272.