Opioid prescribing after carpal tunnel release (CTR) is not well understood. We assessed CTR opioid prescribing within a quality collaborative after the dissemination of guidelines. Post guidelines, the odds of receiving a prescription decreased by 67%. Quality collaboratives can change practice patterns.Level of evidence: III.

The expert consensus is aimed to develop an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of mononeuropathies for outpatient neurologists. Leading experts in the field of neurology have suggested workup options for certain types of tunnel mononeuropathies based on current data on the effectiveness and safety of various types of conservative and surgical treatment.
Консенсус экспертов посвящен созданию алгоритма диагностики и лечения мононейропатий для врачей-неврологов амбулаторного звена. На основании актуальных данных об эффективности и безопасности различных вариантов консервативного и хирургического лечения ведущими специалистами в области неврологии были сформированы предложения по тактике ведения пациентов с некоторыми видами туннельных мононейропатий.

UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are frequently used in creating recommendations contained within clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, investigations outside of hand surgery have reported that RCTs within CPGs infrequently report complications and harms-related data. Our purpose was to assess adherence to complication reporting and harms-related outcomes contained in the Consolidated Standards for Reporting (CONSORT) Extension of Harms and Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) reporting checklists for RCTs within the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) CPGs for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
UNASSIGNED: We identified all RCTs within the AAOS CTS CPGs. All therapeutic RCTs and diagnostic studies were included. We used the CONSORT Harms Checklist criteria to assess adherence to the reporting of adverse events for therapeutic RCTs and the STARD criteria to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the articles. We defined adequate compliance as adherence to ≥50% of the checklist items.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 82 therapeutic RCTs and 90 diagnostic accuracy articles within the AAOS CTS CPG. For therapeutic RCTs, we found that the average compliance with the published checklists was 19%. For diagnostic studies, the average compliance with checklists was found to be 55%. Eleven therapeutic RCTs (13%) and 60 diagnostic studies (67%) were determined to have adequate compliance for the CONSORT and STARD checklists, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Randomized controlled trials in the AAOS CPGs for CTS have low compliance with the CONSORT Extension for Harms Checklist. Although the overall adherence to the items published in the STARD statement for diagnostic accuracy evaluation remains higher, future efforts should be made to improve the adherence rates to both checklists.
UNASSIGNED: Improved standardization of complication reporting may aid in comparing outcomes across multiple clinical investigations of upper-extremity procedures.

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve compression disease. The early diagnosis and treatment are very necessary due to the high incidence rate, diverse hazard factors and the irreversible muscle atrophy caused by the late disease. Clinically, there are many treatments on CTS, both traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine treatment have their advantages and disadvantages. If we can combine them and complement each other, it will be more conducive to the diagnosis and treatment of CTS. Under the support of Professional Committee of Bone and Joint Diseases of the World Federation of Chinese Medicine Societies, in this consensus, we synthesized the opinions of experts in related fields of TCM and Western medicine and formed the recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of TCM and western medicine of CTS. The consensus also makes a brief CTS diagnosis and treatment flow chart, hoping to provide reference for academic community.
腕管综合征（CTS）是最常见的周围神经卡压性疾病。其发病率高，危险因素多，且疾病晚期导致的肌肉萎缩呈不可逆性，因此早期诊断和早期治疗十分必要。目前CTS的治疗方法众多，中医、西医治疗各有利弊，如能中西医结合，优势互补，将更有利于CTS的诊疗。本共识在世界中医药学会联合会骨关节疾病专业委员会的支持下，综合了中西医相关领域专家的意见，形成了CTS的中西医结合诊断和治疗的推荐意见，并制作了简要的CTS诊断流程图和治疗流程图，希望能为同道提供参考。.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) publishes clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Previous versions made controversial recommendations, which failed to yield universal endorsement. Updated guidelines were published in 2016, and we aimed to evaluate agreement with their highest-strength recommendations among members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. An online questionnaire was sent to American Society for Surgery of the Hand members. There were 22 questions that inquired about respondents\' specialty, experience level, and practice patterns. We sought to determine their level of agreement with 6 of the highest-strength recommendations in the guidelines. We also investigated their awareness of the guidelines and perceived barriers to their use in clinical practice. The response rate was 17%. The typical respondent was a private practice orthopedic surgeon with at least 10 years of practice. The majority of respondents were aware of the AAOS guidelines. Approximately half (55%) felt that there were no significant barriers to their implementation into clinical practice. Overall, our study demonstrated that nearly half of the respondents agreed with the highest-strength recommendations. There is an improved agreement with the current AAOS guidelines on CTS, perhaps because they reflect a more accurate role in assisting physicians with their independent medical judgment, rather than as fixed protocols. We believe that all surgeons managing CTS should be familiar with the AAOS guidelines. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):114-120.].

A 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) clinical practice guideline (CPG) de-emphasized the need for electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We tested the hypothesis that use of EDS decreased after the AAOS CPG.
Using a national administrative claims database, we measured the proportion of patients with a diagnosis of CTS who underwent EDS within 1 year after diagnosis between 2011 and 2019. Using an interrupted time series design, we defined 2 time periods (pre-CPG and post-CPG) and compared EDS usage between the periods using segmented regression analysis. We conducted a subgroup analysis of preoperative EDS usage in patients who underwent carpal tunnel release.
Of 2,081,829 patients with CTS, 315,449 (15.2%) underwent EDS within 1 year after diagnosis. The segmented regression analysis showed a decrease in the level of EDS usage after publication of the AAOS CPG (-11.50 per 1,000 patients [95% CI, -1.47 to -0.95 per 1,000 patients]); however, the rate of EDS usage increased in the post-CPG period (+1.75 per 1,000 patients per quarter [95% CI, 0.97-2.54 per 1,000 patients per quarter]). Of 473,753 eligible patients who underwent carpal tunnel release, 139,186 (29.4%) underwent EDS within 6 months before surgery. After publication of the AAOS CPG, preoperative EDS usage decreased by -23.57 per 1,000 patients (95% CI, -37.72 to -9.42 per 1,000 patients). However, these decreasing trends in EDS usage predated the 2016 AAOS CPG.
The overall and preoperative EDS usage for CTS has been decreasing since at least 2014, predating the 2016 AAOS CPG, reflecting the rapid implementation of evidence into practice. However, EDS usage has increased in the post-CPG period, and a considerable proportion of patients who underwent carpal tunnel release still received EDS.
Given its high costs and disputed value, routine EDS usage should be considered for further deimplementation initiatives.

In carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the median nerve is compressed at the level of the carpal tunnel in the wrist. This entrapment manifests as unpleasant symptoms, such as burning, tingling, or numbness in the palm that extends to the fingers. As the disease progresses, afflicted individuals also report decreased grip strength accompanied by hand weakness and restricted movement. The first half of this review elaborates on CTS pathology by providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of the etiology, relevant anatomy, and disease mechanism. CTS is considered the most common entrapment neuropathy, affecting around 3-6% of the adult population. Further, CTS prevalence has seen a dramatic increase in the last few decades paralleling the growth of everyday technology usage. Despite how common it is to have CTS, it can be quite challenging for physicians to make a definite diagnosis due to differentials that present with overlapping symptoms. Even more difficult can be deciding on a course of treatment that is the most effective and considerate of patient needs. Thus arises the need for clear clinical direction, and hence we end with a discussion around such guidelines that serve as a starting point toward effective diagnoses and patient treatment.

Workers\' compensation guidelines may reinforce unhelpful thoughts regarding symptoms that are known to increase symptom intensity and magnitude of incapability.
One guideline commonly used (the Official Disability Guidelines) was reviewed regarding carpal tunnel syndrome. For 15 statements, we created an alternative statement based on a set of consensus principles for health, value, and quality in care. One hundred eight upper extremity surgeons of the Science of Variation Group reviewed both versions of the statements to indicate their preference.
Surgeons preferred seven revised statements and five guideline statements and were neutral on three statements. Favored revisions related to more accurate discernment of symptoms that are clearly related to idiopathic median neuropathy and representative of severity of pathology.
There may be important mental health considerations for care under a work claim, such as unhelpful thoughts or distress regarding symptoms, which are not adequately considered by the Official Disability Guidelines.

Expert consensus was sought to guide clinicians on the use of electrodiagnostic tests (EDX) and neuromuscular ultrasound (NMUS) in the investigation of suspected carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method via three consecutive anonymised surveys of 15 experts and was defined as rating agreement ≥ 80%. The panel agreed that combining EDX and NMUS is more informative than using each modality alone. NMUS adds value in patients with clinically suspected CTS with non-localizing or normal EDX, atypical EDX, failed CTS surgery, polyneuropathy, and CTS suspected to be secondary to structural pathology. The median nerve cross-sectional area should be measured at the site of maximal nerve enlargement, and the nerve should be scanned from mid-forearm to the palm. The group also identified those situations where the wrist-to-forearm area ratio and longitudinal scans of the median nerve should also be obtained. EDX should always be performed to quantify CTS severity and in individuals over age 70. This document is an initial step to guide clinicians on the combined investigation of CTS using EDX and NMUS, to be updated regularly with the emergence of new research.

Background: In 2015, the American Association of Plastic Surgeons (AAPS) published a consensus statement against the routine use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent surgical site infection in clean hand surgery. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) similarly cited \"insufficient evidence\" in its Appropriate Use Criteria guidelines to support the use of antibiotics in carpal tunnel surgery. Nonetheless, its administration remains a common practice during clean hand surgery. We sought to evaluate the impact of the above guidelines on preoperative antibiotic administration. Methods: An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with carpal tunnel syndrome treated with open carpal tunnel release (CTR) at our institution was performed in the 2 years before and after publication of AAPS/AAOS guidelines. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were reviewed. Incidence of antibiotic administration, patient demographics, and surgeon factors were collected. Results: A total of 770 primary open CTR procedures were performed in the studied years. In 2013 and 2014, 83.9% of patients received preoperative antibiotics. In 2017 and 2018, 48.2% of patients received preoperative antibiotics. Of the variables analyzed, immunosuppression, history of diabetes, and poorly controlled diabetes (A1c > 7) were found to be statistically significant in its positive correlation to prophylactic preoperative antibiotic use. Diabetes was not associated with surgical site infections. Conclusion: Patients were more likely to receive preoperative antibiotics before the publication of the AAPS/AAOS clinical practice guidelines. Patients with diabetes regardless of their glycemic control are more likely to receive preoperative antibiotics.