Carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is a relatively rare pathology with a low incidence compared with other vascular pathologies. They can be classified based on hemodynamics as low- or high-flow fistulas, and anatomically as direct or indirect fistulas. Anatomy of the shunt somewhat dictates the selection of endovascular treatment, meaning the venous or arterial approach and selection of embolizing materials. Although there is general agreement as to when to access CCF transvenously or transarterialy, which depends on the shunt being direct or indirect, there is no uniform agreement on which occlusion method should be used. Herein, we report a case of an 80-year-old woman treated for indirect CCF using detachable coils. We also provide a brief review of the literature, including recent advances in treatment of said entities. In conclusion, selection of both the approach and material used depends on the operator\'s experience and preference.

暂无摘要。

Direct carotid cavernous fistulas (dCCF) involve pathologic shunting from the internal carotid artery into the cavernous sinus. We systematically reviewed the methods and outcomes of endovascular therapy for dCCF.
PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were used to identify studies that reported outcomes for patients undergoing embolization of dCCF. Outcomes included rates of occlusion, complications, symptom improvement, and recurrence. Pooled rates for each outcome were obtained with random effects models. The influence of embolization method on outcomes was assessed with meta-regressions.
There were 16 studies comprising 270 patients. The mean age was 39.6 years, there were 36.3% females, and the mean follow-up was 19.7 months. Coils were the most common method of embolization (69.3%), followed by Onyx (31.1%), covered stent (22.2%), N-butyl cyanoacrylate (6.7%), and flow diversion (4.8%). The pooled overall occlusion rate was 92.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.3-95.6; I2 = 29.2%). The pooled complication rate was 10.9% (95% CI, 7.3-16; I2 = 0%). Use of coils were associated with a slightly lower odds of overall complications (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) and cranial nerve palsy (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99). The pooled fistula recurrence rate was 8.3% (95% CI, 4.3-15.4; I2 = 30.9%).
Endovascular therapy for dCCF is associated with high occlusion and low complication rates. Recurrence is not uncommon, highlighting the need for close follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (TCCF) is a pathological shunt between the carotid arteries and cavernous sinus due to trauma. Imaging-guided (e.g., ultrasonic image and fluoroscopic roadmap image) direct puncture of the superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) for embolization of TCCF has been previously described in other studies.
METHODS: We report a case of TCCF in a 58-years-old male patient who was admitted to our hospital with a sustained head injury after falling from a high platform, resulting in rapidly progressive swelling, pain, diminishing vision for more than 6 months, and blindness in his left eye for 1 month.
RESULTS: The patient underwent digital subtraction angiography and endovascular embolization. After the failure of super-selection of the left cavernous sinus, an alternative approach to obliterating the TCCF by puncturing the SOV is directly guided by Dyna-CT. After embolization, the patient\'s clinical symptoms gradually disappeared and discharged from the hospital 5 days later. No recurrence or complications occurred during follow-up for 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that direct puncture of the SOV guided by Dyna-CT as an alternative approach to embolization of TCCF is safe, effective, and feasible.

Carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF) caused by a ruptured aneurysm of the persistent primitive trigeminal artery (PPTA) is rarely reported. A 69-year-old woman presented with progressive ptosis and pulsating tinnitus. Vertebral angiography under flow control of the internal carotid artery revealed CCF associated with a ruptured PPTA-trunk aneurysm, and PPTA was divided into Saltzman type 2. Endovascular treatment was performed by coil embolization of the aneurysm and parent artery occlusion of the PPTA, preserving the basilar artery (BA) side of PPTA, without complications. In the case of ruptured aneurysms originating from the Saltzman type 2 PPTA trunk, parent artery occlusion of the PPTA might be a treatment option and preservation of the BA side of PPTA is necessary to avoid ischemic complication of pons.

BACKGROUND: Carotid cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are rare, usually follow head trauma or aneurysmal rupture. Recent treatment options include endovascular techniques such as flow diversion devices (FDDs).
OBJECTIVE: To present our case treated with FDD application with transarterial cavernous-sinus coiling and present a systematic review on the use and effectiveness of FDDs in CCF treatment.
METHODS: We present our case of CCF treatment with FDD. A search was also conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane until November 2020. Reference lists were also cross-checked.
RESULTS: Including our case, thirty-eight patients were identified with a CCF that was treated with FDDs in sixteen studies. Twenty-two patients were females, nine were males and the rest unidentified. The mean age was 52,6 years (range 17-86, SD± 19.28). Thirty-six patients suffered from direct and two from indirect CCFs. Single FDD was used in four cases, single FDD with embolic materials in eleven cases, multiple overlapping FDDs were used in six cases and multiple overlapping FDDs with embolic materials were used in seventeen cases. Thirty-five patients (92,1%) had clinical improvement, immediate angiographic occlusion was seen in 44,7% of the cases, while long-term occlusion rate was 100% but with variable follow-up periods. One patient (2,6%) presented with a neurological deficit related to FDD deployment.
CONCLUSIONS: Targeted treatment of CCFs with single or overlapping FDDs with or without adjunct embolic agents offers a high success rate, both clinically and long-term angiographically compared to other endovascular methods alone. However, further research with multi-center prospective trials is warranted.

Carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is an abnormal communication - vascular connection between arteries and veins in the cavernous sinus. Classification according to etiology is traumatic vs spontaneous. According to blood flow rate per high flow vs low flow fistula. According to anatomy of direct vs indirect: Direct (direct) CCF arises through direct communication between the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the cavernous sinus. Indirect CCF originates through indirect communication through the meningeal branches of ICA, external carotid artery and cavernous sinus (not directly with ICA) and Barrow type A, B, C, D division. Patients subjective complaints depend on the type of CCF. Most often it is pulsating tinnitus, synchronous with blood pulse. Typical findings include protrusion and pulsation of the eyeball, corkscrew vessels - arterialization of conjunctival and episleral vessels, increased intraocular pressure, not responding to local antiglaucomatous therapy, keratopathy a lagophthalmo, corneal ulcers. In the later untreated stages of CCF, secondary, venous stasis or central retinal vein occlusion can occur. Diagnostic procedures include B-scan and color Doppler ultrasonography, digital ophthamodynamometry, computer tomography, nuclear magnetic resonance and digital subtraction angiography. CCF can simulate orbitopathy, conjunctivitis symptoms, carotid occlusion, scleritis or cavernous sinus thrombosis. The ophthalmologist should recognize and indicate the necessary examinations in a timely manner. The therapy is ophthalmological, neuroradiological, sterotactic, surgical and conservative.

Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are abnormal communications between the arterial and venous circulation within the cavernous sinus, manifesting in myriad neurological and ophthalmological sequalae. In rare circumstances patients\' unique vascular anatomies preclude standard endovascular treatment for this pathology, warranting combined surgical and endovascular approaches wherein the cavernous sinus is accessed via superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) exposure, cutdown, and cannulation.
We describe 3 cases of CCF treated at our quaternary neurovascular referral center between 2017 and 2019. The first is a 35-year-old man with symptomatic, traumatic, right-sided CCF, treated with endovascular therapy (transarterial detachable balloon placement). The other cases were treated with contrasting surgical and endovascular combined approaches because of unique vascular challenges. The second is a 71-year-old woman with spontaneous right-sided CCF whose carotid sinus was accessed and embolized through a transpalpebral cutdown of the SOV. The third case is a 70-year-old man with symptomatic, spontaneous bilateral CCF. After unsuccessful transarterial and transvenous endovascular approaches, transorbital (intracranial) SOV cutdown and cannulation were performed to embolize the shunting fistula.
Endovascular approaches are well described as the mainstay of treatment for CCF but are not possible for all patients. In circumstances where individual vascular anatomy is not amenable to transarterial or transvenous access or embolization, a combined surgical and endovascular approach may be appropriate. We describe 3 cases that illustrate the spectrum of interventions for CCF, as well as the technical aspects of treatment for 2 patients with complex, direct CCF, using an embolization approach reliant on SOV cutdown and cannulation.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Failure to recognize a carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) promptly may lead to worse prognosis due to a setback in providing proper treatment. To promote early diagnosis of non-traumatic CCF, we report a case with classic clinical symptoms and signs that was diagnosed and followed up with carotid Doppler sonography (CDS) and transcranial color-coded duplex (TCD).
METHODS: A 45-year-old woman developed an intermittent headache, pulsatile tinnitus, and double vision sequentially within ten days. Progressive left retro-orbital pain, continuous ringing in the left ear, sensory impairment of trigeminal nerve and abducens nerve palsy were also noted on examination. Despite insignificant findings on computed tomography (CT) of the brain, TCD revealed an aberrant flow pattern with high velocity and low resistance at the left carotid siphon. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) later confirmed a left direct type CCF by illustrating a quick opacification of left cavernous sinus via the internal carotid artery.
CONCLUSIONS: In addition to invasive DSA, non-invasive CDS and TCD may serve as useful apparatus during the initial evaluation and subsequent follow-ups. The positive sonographic clues, including abnormal turbulent and hemodynamic parameters, are quite exhibitive in the existence of CCFs.