Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:确定接受联合抗菌药物治疗的肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染(BSI)患者的死亡率是否低于接受单一药物治疗的患者。
    方法:两位作者在PubMed中独立搜索相关文章,Embase,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆数据库到2023年8月10日。使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。使用混合效应模型通过元回归评估可能的异质性来源。
    结果:在筛选的8044篇文章中,有23项研究(3443例患者)符合荟萃分析的条件.荟萃回归分析确定耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)BSI患者的比例是异质性的潜在来源。亚组分析显示,当CRKPBSI患者的比例≥50%时,单药治疗的死亡率显着升高(OR1.75,95%CI1.33-2.30),当该比例<50%时,单药治疗的死亡率显着降低(OR0.55,95%CI0.24-1.24)。替加环素单药治疗的总死亡率(OR2.86,95%CI1.46-5.59)明显高于含这两种药物的联合治疗。有趋势支持含粘菌素/多粘菌素B的联合治疗(OR1.37,95%CI0.83-2.28)。
    结论:联合抗菌治疗可以降低CRKP患者的死亡率,但当CRKPBSI患者的比例<50%时,与单药治疗相比可能没有生存优势。由于迄今为止进行的研究存在较高的偏倚风险和有限的数据,因此需要高质量的前瞻性观察研究。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mortality is lower in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection (BSI) who receive combination antimicrobial therapy than in those who receive monotherapy.
    METHODS: Two authors independently searched for relevant articles in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases through to August 10, 2023. Risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool. Possible sources of heterogeneity were evaluated by meta-regression using a mixed-effects model.
    RESULTS: Among 8044 articles screened, there were 23 studies (3443 patients) that were eligible for meta-analysis. Meta-regression analysis identified the proportion of patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) BSI to be a potential source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis showed that mortality on monotherapy was significantly higher when the proportion of patients with CRKP BSI was ≥50% (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.33-2.30) and significantly lower when this proportion was <50% (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.24). Overall mortality was significantly higher on tigecycline monotherapy (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.46-5.59) than on combination therapy containing both these agents. There was a trend in favor of colistin/polymyxin B-containing combination therapy (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.83-2.28).
    CONCLUSIONS: Combination antimicrobial therapy can lower mortality in patients with CRKP but may not show a survival advantage over monotherapy when the proportion of patients with CRKP BSI is <50%. High-quality prospective observational studies are needed because of the high risk of bias and limited data in the studies performed to date.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:肠道共生菌可介导对病原菌的耐药性。然而,接触抗生素和住院可能会促进多重耐药细菌的出现。我们旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以提供有关产肠杆菌科细菌的超广谱β-内酰胺酶和碳青霉烯酶定植率的综合证据。
    方法:我们使用PubMed,GoogleScholar和WebofScience数据库搜索2016年1月1日至2022年8月10日有关产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和碳青霉烯酶的定植率的研究。从符合条件的研究中提取数据,并使用Stata版本16软件进行分析。纳入研究的质量使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所批判性评估工具进行评估,发表偏倚采用漏斗图和蛋鸡试验进行评估。
    结果:我们从综合数据搜索中确定了342项研究,并从20项研究中提取了数据。产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科的汇总估计值分别为45.6%(95CI:34.11-57-10)和16.19%(95%CI:5.46-26.91)。主要的超广谱β-内酰胺酶生产者是大肠杆菌,32.99%(95%CI:23.28-42.69)和肺炎克雷伯菌,11.43%(95%CI:7.98-14.89)。长期住院与产生碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科细菌定植有关,入院时的几率为14.77(95%CI:-1.35-30.90),入院≥7天后的几率为45.63(95%CI:0.86-92.12)。
    结论:产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科细菌的合并估计值很高。这表明需要强有力的缓解策略,以最大程度地减少多重耐药细菌在医疗机构的传播。
    BACKGROUND: Gut commensal bacteria can mediate resistance against pathogenic bacteria. However, exposure to antibiotics and hospitalization may facilitate the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide comprehensive evidence about colonization rate of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemases producing Enterobacteriaceae.
    METHODS: We used PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science data bases to search studies from January 1, 2016 to August10, 2022 about colonization rate of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae. Data were extracted from eligible studies and analyzed using Stata version 16 software. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plot and eggers test.
    RESULTS: We identified 342 studies from the comprehensive data search and data were extracted from 20 studies. The pooled estimate of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae were 45.6%(95%CI: 34.11-57-10) and 16.19% (95% CI: 5.46-26.91) respectively. The predominant extended spectrum beta-lactamase producers were E. coli,32.99% (95% CI: 23.28-42.69) and K. pneumoniae, 11.43% (95% CI:7.98-14.89). Prolonged hospitalization was linked to carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae colonization with the odds of 14.77 (95% CI: -1.35-30.90) at admission and 45.63 (95% CI: 0.86-92.12) after ≥7 days of admission.
    CONCLUSIONS: The pooled estimate of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae were high. This indicates the need for strong mitigation strategies to minimize the spread of multidrug-resistant bacteria at the healthcare facilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)通常在全球范围内引起医院获得性感染和医院暴发,随着非洲惊人的增长,有必要审查区域CRE流行病学趋势。
    方法:使用PRISMA指南进行了系统评价,搜索PubMed,Scopus和WebofScience数据库用于描述CRE分布的研究,非洲CRE感染的获取和临床结局的危险因素。
    结果:纳入了一百六十九项研究,大多数来自北非(92/169,54.4%)。大多数研究(136/169;80.4%)只关注感染,共有15666株CRE分离株(97.4%的临床感染,2.6%的定殖)。主要细菌种类包括克雷伯菌(72.2%),大肠杆菌(13.5%),肠杆菌(8.3%)。最常见的碳青霉烯酶是NDM(43.1%)和OXA-48样(42.9%)。44项研究报告了序列类型,其中ST101和ST147在肺炎克雷伯菌中最常见,以及大肠杆菌中的ST410、ST167和ST38。以前使用抗生素,先前住院,外科手术,留置装置,重症监护室入院和住院时间延长,是与CRE感染/定植相关的最常见因素。CRE感染的粗死亡率为37%。
    结论:尽管肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌仍然是非洲最常见的CRE,观察到的序列类型不是通常报告的全球“高风险”克隆。物种和碳青霉烯酶的分布在非洲地区有所不同,而CRE定植/感染的危险因素,患者的结果与全球报告的结果相似。来自非洲部分地区的CRE数据有限,强调需要加强该区域的流行病监测方案。
    Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) commonly cause hospital-acquired infections and hospital outbreaks worldwide, with an alarming increase in Africa, necessitating review of regional CRE epidemiological trends.
    A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases for studies describing CRE distribution, risk factors for CRE acquisition and clinical outcome of CRE infections in Africa.
    One-hundred and sixty-nine studies were included, with the majority from North Africa (92/169, 54.4%). Most studies (136/169; 80.4%) focused only on infection, with a total of 15666 CRE isolates (97.4% clinical infection, 2.6% colonisation). The leading bacterial species included Klebsiella (72.2%), Escherichia coli (13.5%), and Enterobacter (8.3%). The most frequently detected carbapenemases were NDM (43.1%) and OXA-48-like (42.9%). Sequence types were reported in 44 studies, with ST101 and ST147 most commonly reported in K. pneumoniae, and ST410, ST167 and ST38 in E. coli. Previous antibiotic use, prior hospitalisation, surgical procedures, indwelling devices, intensive care unit admission and prolonged hospital stay, were the most frequent factors associated with CRE infection/colonisation. Crude mortality for CRE infection was 37%.
    Although K. pneumoniae and E. coli remain the most frequent CRE in Africa, observed sequence types are not the commonly reported global \'high-risk\' clones. The distribution of species and carbapenemases differs across African regions, while risk factors for CRE colonisation/infection, and patient outcomes are similar to those reported globally. There are limited data on CREs from parts of Africa, highlighting the need to strengthen epidemiologic surveillance programmes in the region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)对人类健康构成重大威胁,并已成为主要的公共卫生问题。我们旨在比较头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)和多粘菌素治疗CRE感染的疗效和安全性。
    方法:通过搜索EMBASE的数据库进行系统评价和荟萃分析,PubMed,还有Cochrane图书馆.从数据库开始到2023年3月,收集了关于使用CAZ-AVI和多粘菌素治疗CRE感染的已发表研究。两名研究者根据纳入和排除标准独立筛选文献,评价纳入研究的方法学质量并提取数据。Meta分析采用RevMan5.4软件进行。
    结果:纳入了10篇文章,共833例患者(CAZ-AVI325例患者与多粘菌素508例患者)。与接受多粘菌素治疗的患者相比,接受CAZ-AVI治疗的患者30天死亡率明显降低(RR=0.49;95%CI0.01-2.34;I2=22%;P<0.00001),临床治愈率较高(RR=2.70;95%CI1.67-4.38;I2=40%;P<0.00001),微生物清除率较高(RR=2.70;95%CI2.09-3.49;I2=0%;P<0.00001)。然而,接受CAZ-AVI和多粘菌素治疗的患者之间急性肾损伤的发生率无统计学差异(RR=1.38;95%CI0.69-2.77;I2=22%;P=0.36).此外,在CRE血流感染患者中,接受CAZ-AVI治疗的患者死亡率明显低于接受多粘菌素治疗的患者(RR=0.44;95%CI0.27-0.69,I2=26%,P<0.00004)。
    结论:与多粘菌素相比,CAZ-AVI在治疗CRE感染方面表现出优异的临床疗效,提示CAZ-AVI可能是CRE感染的较好选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a significant threat to human health and have emerged as a major public health concern. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Published studies on the use of CAZ-AVI and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections were collected from the inception of the database until March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.
    RESULTS: Ten articles with 833 patients were included (CAZ-AVI 325 patients vs Polymyxin 508 patients). Compared with the patients who received polymyxin-based therapy, the patients who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower 30-days mortality (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.01-2.34; I2 = 22%; P < 0.00001), higher clinical cure rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.67-4.38; I2 = 40%; P < 0.00001), and higher microbial clearance rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 2.09-3.49; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). However, there was no statistically difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between patients who received CAZ-AVI and polymyxin therapy (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 0.69-2.77; I2 = 22%; P = 0.36). In addition, among patients with CRE bloodstream infection, those who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower mortality than those who received polymyxin therapy (RR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.69, I2 = 26%, P < 0.00004).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared to polymyxin, CAZ-AVI demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRE infections, suggesting that CAZ-AVI may be a superior option for CRE infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在丹麦,产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌(CPE)的病例每年都在增加,而有旅行史的CPE阳性病例的比例在下降。一些流行病学联系显示在丹麦医疗机构中的传播,表明感染预防和控制挑战,并引发了有关丹麦CPE筛查方案的疑问。本综述的目的是确定丹麦CPE筛查方案中描述的其他风险因素,以检测丹麦CPE阳性患者,从而降低传播和暴发的风险。在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,Embase和Cochrane图书馆于2022年3月举行。共筛选1487篇,并纳入19项研究。检索到的研究涉及实验室确认的CPE(定植和/或感染)和相关危险因素的患者。抗菌治疗,尤其是广谱抗微生物剂,既往或目前在ICU住院约1周,在其他病房住院约20~28天,以及有或没有在国外住院的旅行史是与CPE获取相关的重要危险因素.合并症和侵入性手术被确定为危险因素,但没有确定与CPE获取风险相关的特定合并症或侵入性程序。这项研究表明,丹麦需要开发一种额外的CPE筛查算法。除了入院时基于风险的筛查,应考虑对住院患者进行筛查。筛查方案可能包括筛查在ICU住院>1周或在其他病房住院>3周并且先前接受或目前正在接受抗生素治疗的合并症住院患者。需要进一步研究以开发新的CPE筛选算法。
    Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) cases increases every year in Denmark and the proportion of CPE-positive cases with a travel history decreases. Several epidemiological links show transmission in Danish healthcare setting indicating infection prevention and control challenges and raising questions about the Danish CPE screening protocol. The aim of this review was to identify additional risk factors to those described in the Danish CPE-screening protocol in order to detect the Danish CPE-positive patients and thereby reduce the risk of transmission and outbreaks. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library during March 2022. A total of 1487 articles were screened, and 19 studies were included. Retrieved studies dealt with patients with laboratory-confirmed CPE (colonization and/or infection) and associated risk factors. Antimicrobial therapy, especially broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents, prior or current hospitalization of approximately one week in ICU and 20-28 days in other wards and travel history with or without hospitalization abroad were significant risk factors associated with CPE acquisition. Comorbidities and invasive procedures were identified as risk factors, but without identifying specific comorbidities or invasive procedures associated with risk for CPE-acquisition. This study suggests the need to develop an additional algorithm for CPE-screening in Denmark. In addition to risk-based screening on admission, screening of inpatients should be considered. The screening protocol might include screening of inpatients with comorbidities who are hospitalized >1 week in ICU or >3 weeks in other wards and who have previously received or currently are receiving antibiotic treatment. Further research is needed to develop a new CPE-screening algorithm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:肺炎克雷伯菌是引起新生儿感染的最常见病原体,导致全球高死亡率。随着新生儿抗菌药物使用的增加,耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)已成为感染控制和治疗的严峻挑战。然而,目前尚无全面的系统评价来描述新生儿CRKP感染的全球流行病学.因此,我们对全球现有数据进行了系统回顾,并结合基于基因组的分析来解决患病率问题。克隆多样性,引起新生儿感染的CRKP的碳青霉烯类耐药基因。
    结果:我们对报告由CRKP引起的以人群为基础的新生儿感染的研究进行了系统评价,并对所有公开的新生儿来源的CRKP基因组进行了基于基因组的分析。我们搜索了多个数据库(PubMed,WebofScience,Embase,OvidMEDLINE,科克伦,bioRxiv,和medRxiv),以确定报告截至2022年6月30日新生儿CRKP感染数据的研究。我们纳入了新生儿CRKP感染和定植患病率的研究,但排除了缺乏新生儿数量的研究。地理位置,或克雷伯菌或CRKP分离株的独立数据。我们使用JMP统计软件对数据进行叙述性综合。我们确定了8,558篇文章,排除了不符合纳入标准的文章。我们纳入了128项研究,这些都不是预印本,包括30个国家的127,583名新生儿,包括21个低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)进行分析。我们发现血流感染是报告数据中最常见的感染类型。我们估计住院新生儿CRKP感染的合并全球患病率为0.3%(95%置信区间[CI],0.2%至0.3%)。根据21项报告患者预后的研究,我们发现新生儿CRKP感染的合并死亡率为22.9%(95%CI,13.0%~32.9%).从GenBank中鉴定出总共535个新生儿CRKP基因组,包括序列阅读存档,其中204个与任何出版物无关。我们将204个基因组与文献综述相结合,以了解物种分布,克隆多样性,和碳青霉烯酶类型。我们确定了新生儿CRKP菌株的146种序列类型(STs),发现ST17,ST11和ST15是3种最常见的谱系。特别是,ST17CRKP在4大洲的8个国家的新生儿中出现。可用于分析碳青霉烯酶的1,592个新生儿CRKP菌株中的绝大多数(75.3%)具有编码金属-β-内酰胺酶的基因,而NDM(新德里金属-β-内酰胺酶)似乎是最常见的碳青霉烯酶(64.3%)。这项研究的主要局限性是缺乏或缺乏来自北美的数据,南美洲,和大洋洲。
    结论:CRKP导致相当数量的新生儿感染,并导致显著的新生儿死亡率。新生儿CRKP菌株高度多样化,而ST17在全球流行,值得早期发现用于治疗和预防。blaNDM碳青霉烯酶基因的优势对新生儿的治疗选择提出了挑战,并支持了持续的抑制剂相关药物发现。
    Klebsiella pneumoniae is the most common pathogen causing neonatal infections, leading to high mortality worldwide. Along with increasing antimicrobial use in neonates, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) has emerged as a severe challenge for infection control and treatment. However, no comprehensive systematic review is available to describe the global epidemiology of neonatal CRKP infections. We therefore performed a systematic review of available data worldwide and combined a genome-based analysis to address the prevalence, clonal diversity, and carbapenem resistance genes of CRKP causing neonatal infections.
    We performed a systematic review of studies reporting population-based neonatal infections caused by CRKP in combination with a genome-based analysis of all publicly available CRKP genomes with neonatal origins. We searched multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane, bioRxiv, and medRxiv) to identify studies that have reported data of neonatal CRKP infections up to June 30, 2022. We included studies addressing the prevalence of CRKP infections and colonization in neonates but excluded studies lacking the numbers of neonates, the geographical location, or independent data on Klebsiella or CRKP isolates. We used narrative synthesis for pooling data with JMP statistical software. We identified 8,558 articles and excluding those that did not meet inclusion criteria. We included 128 studies, none of which were preprints, comprising 127,583 neonates in 30 countries including 21 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for analysis. We found that bloodstream infection is the most common infection type in reported data. We estimated that the pooled global prevalence of CRKP infections in hospitalized neonates was 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2% to 0.3%). Based on 21 studies reporting patient outcomes, we found that the pooled mortality of neonatal CRKP infections was 22.9% (95% CI, 13.0% to 32.9%). A total of 535 neonatal CRKP genomes were identified from GenBank including Sequence Read Archive, of which 204 were not linked to any publications. We incorporated the 204 genomes with a literature review for understanding the species distribution, clonal diversity, and carbapenemase types. We identified 146 sequence types (STs) for neonatal CRKP strains and found that ST17, ST11, and ST15 were the 3 most common lineages. In particular, ST17 CRKP has been seen in neonates in 8 countries across 4 continents. The vast majority (75.3%) of the 1,592 neonatal CRKP strains available for analyzing carbapenemase have genes encoding metallo-β-lactamases and NDM (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase) appeared to be the most common carbapenemase (64.3%). The main limitation of this study is the absence or scarcity of data from North America, South America, and Oceania.
    CRKP contributes to a considerable number of neonatal infections and leads to significant neonatal mortality. Neonatal CRKP strains are highly diverse, while ST17 is globally prevalent and merits early detection for treatment and prevention. The dominance of blaNDM carbapenemase genes imposes challenges on therapeutic options in neonates and supports the continued inhibitor-related drug discovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:产生碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科是迄今为止最公共卫生和最紧迫的临床抗生素耐药性问题。它们导致住院时间延长,更昂贵的医疗,和更高的死亡率。这项系统评价和荟萃分析旨在表明埃塞俄比亚产生碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科细菌的患病率。
    方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析是根据系统综述和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行的。像PubMed这样的电子数据库,谷歌学者,CINAHL,Wiley在线图书馆,非洲在线杂志,科学直接,Embase,ResearchGate,Scopus,和WebofSciences被用来查找相关文章。此外,使用JoannaBriggs研究所质量评估工具对纳入研究的质量进行评估.采用Stata14.0进行统计分析。异质性评估采用Cochran的Q检验和I2统计量。此外,使用漏斗图和Egger检验评估发表偏倚。使用随机效应模型来估计合并的患病率。同时进行亚组和敏感性分析。
    结果:埃塞俄比亚产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科的总体合并患病率为5.44%(95%CI3.97,6.92)。埃塞俄比亚中部患病率最高[6.45%(95%CI3.88,9.02)],和最低[(1.65%(95%CI0.66,2.65)]在南方国家和民族地区。就出版年份而言,2017-2018年合并患病率最高[17.44(95%CI8.56,26.32)],2015-2016年最低[2.24%(95%CI0.87,3.60)]。
    结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析显示,产碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌科细菌的患病率很高。所以,改变抗生素的常规使用,定期进行药敏试验,加强感染预防方法,需要对碳青霉烯耐药谱及其在肠杆菌科临床分离株中的决定基因进行额外的国家监测。
    背景:PROSPERO(2022:CRD420223440181)。
    BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae are by far the most public health and urgent clinical problems with antibiotic resistance. They cause longer hospital stays, more expensive medical care, and greater mortality rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to indicate the prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Ethiopia.
    METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Electronic databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Wiley Online Library, African Journal Online, Science Direct, Embase, ResearchGate, Scopus, and the Web of Sciences were used to find relevant articles. In addition, the Joanna Briggs Institute quality appraisal tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Stata 14.0 was used for statistical analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed by using Cochran\'s Q test and I2 statistics. In addition, publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger\'s test. A random effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence. Sub-group and sensitivity analysis were also done.
    RESULTS: The overall pooled prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Ethiopia was 5.44% (95% CI 3.97, 6.92). The prevalence was highest [6.45% (95% CI 3.88, 9.02)] in Central Ethiopia, and lowest [(1.65% (95% CI 0.66, 2.65)] in the Southern Nations and Nationalities People Region. In terms of publication year, 2017-2018 had the highest pooled prevalence [17.44 (95% CI 8.56, 26.32)] and 2015-2016 had the lowest [2.24% (95% CI 0.87, 3.60)].
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed a high prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. So, to alter the routine use of antibiotics, regular drug susceptibility testing, strengthening the infection prevention approach, and additional national surveillance on the profile of carbapenem resistance and their determining genes among Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates are required.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO (2022: CRD42022340181).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌越来越被认为是一个重要的公共卫生问题。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)和多粘菌素被认为是世界上最后的治疗选择。这是对最近发表的数据进行的首次荟萃分析,以比较CAZ-AVI与多粘菌素治疗耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌感染的临床疗效和安全性。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:PubMed,系统搜索了Embase和Cochrane图书馆,对于任何语言的出版物,从数据库开始到2023年2月。
    方法:包括比较CAZ-AVI与多粘菌素的临床疗效和安全性的研究。死亡率,临床成功,微生物根除和肾毒性被评估为主要结局.
    方法:文献筛选,数据提取和研究质量评价由两名研究人员独立进行,另一位研究人员解决了分歧。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。审查经理V.5.3被用于荟萃分析。
    结果:荟萃分析包括7项回顾性和4项前瞻性队列研究,纳入1111例患者。CAZ-AVI组的30天死亡率较低(风险比(RR)=0.48,95%CI为0.37至0.63,I2=10%,p<0.0001)在9项研究中有766例患者;更高的临床成功率(RR=1.71,95%CI1.33至2.20,I2=35%,p<0.0001)在4项研究中有463名患者;在7项研究中有696名患者的肾毒性较低(RR=0.42,95%CI0.23至0.77,I2=35%,p<0.05)。然而,两项研究的249例患者微生物根除率无显著差异(RR=1.16,95%CI0.97~1.39,I2=0,p>0.05).
    结论:现有证据表明,与多粘菌素相比,CAZ-AVI治疗在耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌感染的疗效和安全性方面占据主导地位。然而,分析仅包括观察性研究,高质量,大规模,多中心,需要双盲随机对照试验来证实CAZ-AVI的优势.
    Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is increasingly recognised as a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxins are considered as the last therapeutic options worldwide. This is the first meta-analysis of recently published data to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.
    Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched, for publications in any language, from database inception to February 2023.
    Studies comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins were included. Mortality, clinical success, microbiological eradication and nephrotoxicity were assessed as the main outcomes.
    Literature screening, data extraction and the quality evaluation of studies were conducted by two researchers independently, with disagreements resolved by another researcher. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the bias risk for the included studies. Review Manager V.5.3 was employed for the meta-analysis.
    The meta-analysis included seven retrospective and four prospective cohort studies with 1111 patients enrolled. The CAZ-AVI groups demonstrated a lower 30-day mortality (risk ratio (RR)=0.48, 95% CI of 0.37 to 0.63, I2=10%, p<0.0001) in nine studies with 766 patients; higher clinical success (RR=1.71, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.20, I2=35%, p<0.0001) in four studies with 463 patients; and lower nephrotoxicity in seven studies with 696 patients (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.77, I2=35%, p<0.05). However, no significant difference in microbiological eradication rates was observed in 249 patients from two studies (RR=1.16, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.39, I2=0, p>0.05).
    Available evidence suggested that CAZ-AVI treatment held a dominant position with respect to efficacy and safety compared with polymyxins in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. However, the analysis included only observational studies, and high-quality, large-scale, multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the advantage of CAZ-AVI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:耐碳青霉烯肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染是一个重要的公共卫生问题。CRKP感染会增加重症住院患者的死亡率,并在全球范围内增加其住院的经济负担。粘菌素和替加环素是主要的抗菌药物,已广泛用于治疗CRKP感染。然而,最近推出了新型抗菌药物。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)似乎是最有效的药物之一。
    目的:本系统文献综述和荟萃分析的目的是评估CAZ-AVI与其他抗菌药物相比在成人CRKP感染患者(年龄>18岁)中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:所有数据均使用PubMed/Medline检索,WebofScience和Cochrane图书馆.主要结果是CRKP感染的有效治疗或生物样品培养中CRKP的微生物根除。次要结果包括对28天或30天死亡率和不良反应的影响,如果有的话。使用ReviewManagerv.5.4.1软件(RevMan)进行汇总分析。统计显著性水平设定为p<0.05。
    结果:CAZ-AVI被证明比其他抗微生物药物对CRKP感染和CRKP血流感染更有效(分别为p<0.00001和p<0.0001)。CAZ-AVI组的患者显示出统计学上较低的28天和30天死亡率(分别为p=0.002和p<0.00001)。关于微生物根除,由于高度异质性,没有荟萃分析是可行的.
    结论:CAZ-AVI用于治疗CRKP感染似乎优于其他抗菌药物。然而,要揭示更多的科学发现来进一步加强这一声明,还有很长的路要走。
    BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a significant public health issue. CRKP infections can increase the mortality of severely ill hospitalised patients and elevate the financial burden of their hospitalisation globally. Colistin and tigecycline are the main antimicrobials which have been widely used for the treatment of CRKP infections. However, novel antimicrobials have been recently launched. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) seems one of the most efficient ones.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI compared to other antimicrobials in adult patients (aged >18) with CRKP infection.
    METHODS: All data were retrieved using PubMed/Medline, the Web of Science and Cochrane library. The main outcome was the effective treatment of CRKP infection or the microbiological eradication of CRKP in the culture of biological samples. Secondary outcomes included the impact on 28- or 30-day mortality and adverse effects, if available. Pooled analysis was conducted using Review Manager v. 5.4.1 software (RevMan). The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
    RESULTS: CAZ-AVI was proved more effective than other antimicrobials against CRKP infections and CRKP bloodstream infections (p < 0.00001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Patients in the CAZ-AVI arm displayed statistically lower 28- and 30-day mortality rates (p = 0.002 and p < 0.00001, respectively). Concerning the microbiological eradication, no meta-analysis was feasible due to high heterogeneity.
    CONCLUSIONS: The promotion of CAZ-AVI for treating CRKP infections over other antimicrobials seems favourable. However, there is a long way ahead to reveal additional scientific findings to further strengthen this statement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:本研究试图确定抗生素暴露与碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染之间的关系。
    方法:选择抗生素暴露作为CRKP感染的危险因素,从PubMed索引的研究文章中提取,EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。直到2023年1月发表的相关研究进行了回顾,并对四种类型对照组的抗生素暴露进行了荟萃分析,由52项研究组成。
    结果:在四种类型的对照组中进行了荟萃分析:感染碳青霉烯类易感肺炎克雷伯菌的患者(比较1),其他感染,特别是没有CRKP感染(比较2),CRKP定植(比较3)和无感染(比较4)。根据碳青霉烯类和氨基糖苷类暴露,这两个危险因素在四个比较中是常见的。与碳青霉烯类敏感型肺炎克雷伯菌(CSKP)感染相比,血流感染中的四环霉素暴露和30天内的喹诺酮暴露与CRKP感染风险增加相关。然而,在MIX感染(MIX感染包括两个或多个不同的感染部位)和90天内的喹诺酮暴露中,Tegacyclin暴露具有相似的CRKP和CSKP感染风险。
    结论:碳青霉烯类和氨基糖苷类暴露可能是CRKP感染的危险因素。同时,与CSKP感染相比,抗生素暴露时间作为连续变量与CRKP感染无关.MIX感染中的替加环素暴露和90天内的喹诺酮暴露可能不会增加CRKP感染的风险。
    This study attempted to identify the relationship between antibiotic exposure and risk of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infection.
    Antibiotic exposure was analysed as a risk factor for CRKP infection, cases of which were extracted from research articles indexed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Relevant studies published until January 2023 were reviewed, and a meta-analysis was conducted on antibiotic exposure within four types of control groups, which comprised 52 studies.
    The four types of control groups included carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae infections (CSKP; comparison 1); other infections, especially without CRKP infection (comparison 2); CRKP colonisation (comparison 3); and no infection (comparison 4). Carbapenems exposure and Aminoglycosides exposure were two risk factors common to the four comparison groups. Compared with the risk of CSKP infection, tigecycline exposure in bloodstream infections and quinolone exposure within 30 days were associated with an increased risk of CRKP infection. However, the risk of CRKP infection associated with tigecycline exposure in mixed (MIX) infections (infections involving two or more different infection sites) and quinolone exposure within 90 days was similar to the risk of CSKP infection.
    Carbapenems and Aminoglycosides exposure are likely risk factors for CRKP infection. Antibiotic exposure time as a continuous variable was not associated with the risk of CRKP infection, compared with the risk of CSKP infection. Tigecycline exposure in MIX infections and quinolone exposure within 90 days may not increase the risk of CRKP infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号