Cannabinoid receptor agonists

大麻素受体激动剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    新精神活性物质(NPS)的管理,特别是合成大麻素受体激动剂(SCRAs),通过电子烟,监狱内的环境已经广为宣传。这项研究概述了2022年5月至2023年7月从苏格兰监狱缉获的五个电子烟盒样本,其中合成代谢-雄激素类固醇(AASs)在气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)分析后鉴定了甲甾烷酮和oxandrolone。这些电子烟样品占所有含有电子烟弹的样品的2.9%(n=170)和在同一时期内发现的含有AAS的所有样品的9.4%(n=53)。AAS与其他药物联合检测,包括可卡因,Δ9-四氢大麻酚(Δ9-THC),SCRAs和尼古丁。这代表了一种新的AAS给药途径。
    The administration of new psychoactive substances (NPS), in particular synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs), via e-cigarettes, within prison settings has been well publicized. This study provides an overview of five e-cigarette case samples seized from Scottish prisons between May 2022 and July 2023 where the anabolic-androgenic steroids (AASs) mestanolone and oxandrolone were identified following gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. These e-cigarette samples represented 2.9% of all samples containing e-cigarette cartridges (n = 170) and 9.4% of all samples found to contain AASs (n = 53) seized during the same time period. The AASs were detected in combination with other drugs, including cocaine, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), SCRAs and nicotine. This represents a new and novel route of administration for AASs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:临床前研究已经证明了大麻素的潜在抗癌活性,然而,很少有临床数据支持这一点。近40%的使用大麻的癌症患者相信,它将通过社交媒体平台在线分享大量的轶事报道来治疗他们的癌症。病例报告已发表在同行评审的期刊上,但往往缺乏关键的临床信息来验证抗癌的主张。方法:我们回顾了PubMed和EBSCO数据库中评估大麻或内源性大麻素系统与潜在抗癌活性之间关系的文献。我们还审查了在线资源,书籍,和ClinicalTrials.gov有关使用大麻作为癌症治疗的报告或研究。所有发表在同行评审期刊上的病例报告都被汇编和评估为薄弱的,中度,或者基于提供的支持抗癌作用的证据的质量。强有力的报告符合三个标准;(a)服用大麻时癌症活跃,(b)报告了经过验证的实验室或射线照相响应,和(c)未同时进行抗癌治疗的大麻。结果:在回顾的207篇临床前文章中,107(52%)是具有原始数据的临床前研究。共有77份独特的病例报告描述了患有各种癌症的患者(乳腺癌,中枢神经系统,妇科,白血病,肺,前列腺,和胰腺)使用大麻。我们的评估显示,14%的病例报告被认为是强有力的,5%适度,剩下的81%都很弱。10%的病例是儿科患者。大麻二酚的使用最常被报道为抗癌大麻素,每日剂量为10至800mg。六项研究报告了四氢大麻酚的使用,剂量范围为4.8至7.5毫克。两项小型试验发表了多形性胶质母细胞瘤复发患者生存数据。结论:对临床数据的回顾表明,大多数已发表的,同行评审的病例报告提供的数据不足以支持大麻作为抗癌剂的主张,并且不应该被用来代替基于证据的,临床试验之外的传统治疗方法。没有强有力的临床试验数据来证实表明大麻素可能具有抗癌益处的临床前研究。需要进一步研究探索大麻在对传统疗法没有反应的转移性癌症患者中的抗癌潜力。
    Background: Pre-clinical studies have demonstrated the potential anticancer activity of cannabinoids, yet little clinical data exist to support this. Nearly 40% of patients with cancer using cannabis believe it will treat their cancer with numerous anecdotal reports shared online through social media platforms. Case reports have been published in peer-reviewed journals, but often lack key clinical information to validate anticancer claims. Methods: We reviewed literature in PubMed and EBSCO databases that evaluated the relationship between cannabis or the endocannabinoid system and potential anticancer activity. We also reviewed online sources, books, and ClinicalTrials.gov for reports or studies on using cannabis as cancer treatment. All case reports published in peer-reviewed journals were compiled and appraised as weak, moderate, or strong based on the quality of evidence provided supporting an anticancer effect. Strong reports met three criteria; (a) active cancer at time of cannabis administration, (b) validated laboratory or radiographic responses were reported, and (c) cannabis used without concurrent anticancer treatments. Results: Of the 207 pre-clinical articles reviewed, 107 (52%) were pre-clinical studies with original data. A total of 77 unique case reports described patients with various cancers (breast, central nervous system, gynecological, leukemia, lung, prostate, and pancreatic) using cannabis. Our appraisal showed 14% of the case reports were considered strong, 5% moderate, and the remaining 81% were weak. Ten percent of cases were in pediatric patients. Cannabidiol use was most often reported as the anticancer cannabinoid with daily doses ranging from 10 to 800 mg. Tetrahydrocannabinol use was reported in six studies, with doses ranging from 4.8 to 7.5 mg. Two small trials published data on survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Conclusion: This review of clinical data suggests most published, peer-reviewed case reports provide insufficient data to support the claim for cannabis as an anticancer agent, and should not be used in place of evidence-based, traditional treatments outside of a clinical trial. No strong clinical trial data exist to confirm the pre-clinical studies that suggest cannabinoids may have an anticancer benefit. Future studies exploring anticancer potential of cannabis in patients with metastatic cancers who have not responded to traditional therapy are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    In Italy, medical grade cannabis (MGC) can be prescribed for different medical conditions, including drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), once standard and approved therapies have failed, or caused non-tolerable side effects. Here, we present a retrospective case series report of five patients with DRE who started therapy with MGC. Authorized ISO 9001:2008 pharmacies prepared MGC according to Italian laws. Olive oil extracts (OOEs) were prepared following standard extraction protocols, and cannabinoids were measured on each OOE to check for successful extraction.After treatment with MGC, all patients reported a reduction in seizure frequency and severity, and some reported improved mood, sleep quality, and general well-being without relevant side effects. Despite the small sample size and open-label nature of the data, we show that MGC may be successfully used to treat DRE. This is especially true when considering that no valid therapeutic option exists for these patients and that MGC was extremely well tolerated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在世界许多地方,娱乐性消费合成大麻素受体激动剂(SCRA)是公共卫生中日益严重的危机。AMB-FUBINACA是此类药物的成员,在新西兰和国际上都有很大比例的SCRA相关毒性。引人注目的是,目前对SCRA发挥毒性作用的机制以及它们通过CB1大麻素受体(大麻素相关精神活性的介体)的活性是否足以解释临床观察结果知之甚少.因此,当前的研究着手进行AMB-FUBINACA(与传统研究大麻素CP55,940,WIN55,212-2和Δ9-THC相比)在受体活性的基本途径的基本分子药理学表征,包括cAMP抑制,pERK激活,驱动CB1内化的能力,以及诱导β-arrestins-1和-2易位的能力。然后通过操作分析比较活性途径以指示AMB-FUBINACA是否可能是偏倚的配体。结果显示,AMB-FUBINACA在所测定的所有途径中是高度有效和有效的。然而,令人惊讶的是,偏倚分析表明,Δ9-THC,不是AMB-FUBINACA,可能是一个偏向的配体,它在两个抑制蛋白途径中的活性均低于测试的其他配体的活性所预测的。这些数据可能有助于预测SCRA的分子特征。然而,需要更多的研究来确定这些分子效应是否表现为组织/系统水平的毒性.
    Recreational consumption of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) is a growing crisis in public health in many parts of the world. AMB-FUBINACA is a member of this class of drugs and is responsible for a large proportion of SCRA-related toxicity both in New Zealand and internationally. Strikingly, little is currently known about the mechanisms by which SCRAs exert toxic effects or whether their activity through the CB1 cannabinoid receptor (the mediator of cannabinoid-related psychoactivity) is sufficient to explain clinical observations. The current study therefore set out to perform a basic molecular pharmacology characterization of AMB-FUBINACA (in comparison to traditional research cannabinoids CP55,940, WIN55,212-2, and Δ9-THC) in fundamental pathways of receptor activity, including cAMP inhibition, pERK activation, ability to drive CB1 internalization, and ability to induce translocation of β-arrestins-1 and -2. Activity pathways were then compared by operational analysis to indicate whether AMB-FUBINACA may be a biased ligand. Results revealed that AMB-FUBINACA is highly efficacious and potent in all pathways assayed. However, surprisingly, bias analysis suggested that Δ9-THC, not AMB-FUBINACA, may be a biased ligand, with it being less active in both arrestin pathways than predicted by the activity of the other ligands tested. These data may help predict molecular characteristics of SCRAs. However, more research is required to determine whether these molecular effects manifest in toxicity at tissue/system level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This article reviews the neurocognitive advantages and drawbacks of cannabinoid substances, and discusses the possible physiological mechanisms that underlie their dual activity. The article further reviews the neurocognitive effects of ultra-low doses of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC; 3-4 orders of magnitude lower than the conventional doses) in mice, and proposes such low doses of THC as a possible remedy for various brain injuries and for the treatment of age-related cognitive decline.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The high frequency of the synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) emergence renders this group of new psychoactive compounds particularly demanding in terms of detection, identification, and responding. Without the available reference material, one of the specific problems is differentiation and structure elucidation of constitutional isomers. Herein, we report a simple and efficient flow chart diagram applicable for a rapid nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) identification and differentiation between azaindoles, 4-, 5-, 6-, and 7-azaindole, which is a common structural motif of synthetic cannabinoids. The flow chart diagram is based on 1 H NMR and 1 H-15 N NMR spectra, and to prove the concept, it has been tested on 5F-MDMB-P7AICA (1). Spectral and analytical data including standard 1D and 2D NMR spectra, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflectant (FTIR-ATR), Raman, melting point, and combustion analysis are provided for compound 1.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号