Candesartan is an antihypertensive agent that acts on an angiotensin II receptor. Candesartan cilexetil is a prodrug that is converted into the active form of candesartan during intestinal absorption. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a reference and a test formulation of candesartan cilexetil tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study was conducted with two treatment periods. Forty-eight healthy Chinese volunteers participated under fasted conditions. Qualified subjects were randomly divided into two groups (1:1 ratio) to receive either the test or reference formulation first. A washout period of 14 days separated the administration of the two formulations. Blood samples were collected at specific time points and analyzed for candesartan concentration using Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). The maximum concentration (Cmax), the AUC from time zero to the last measured time point (AUC0-t) and the AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞) fell within the bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. These results suggest that the test and reference formulations of candesartan cilexetil tablets are bioequivalent, meaning they have similar rates and extents of absorption in healthy Chinese volunteers. No serious adverse events or side effects were reported throughout the study.

Imarikiren is a novel, potent, and selective direct renin inhibitor that has shown high oral availability during clinical development for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of imarikiren in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.
This was a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2, dose-finding trial. A total of 415 patients were randomized to imarikiren 5, 20, 40, or 80 mg; placebo; or candesartan cilexetil 8 mg treatment for 12 weeks. The primary end point was change in log-transformed urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to the end of treatment analyzed using analysis of covariance and a fixed sequence testing procedure. Secondary efficacy end points included urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio at each assessment point and remission and progression rates. Exploratory efficacy end points included eGFR and sitting BP before dosing.
Changes in the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to the end of treatment were 16% (placebo), -16% (imarikiren 5 mg), -27% (imarikiren 20 mg), -38% (imarikiren 40 mg), -39% (imarikiren 80 mg), and -31% (candesartan cilexetil 8 mg). Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio reductions from baseline were statistically significant in all imarikiren groups versus placebo (P<0.001 each) as well as for candesartan cilexetil 8 mg versus placebo (P<0.001). Remission rates (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio <30 mg/g creatinine and decreased ≥30% from baseline) were higher in all imarikiren groups versus the placebo group. Incidence of adverse events was higher in the imarikiren 80-mg group (52%) versus placebo (42%) and candesartan cilexetil (43%) groups. Incidence of adverse events for the other imarikiren groups ranged from 33% to 42%. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. All imarikiren doses were well tolerated.
Imarikiren resulted in a dose-dependent improvement in albuminuria compared with placebo, and it was well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria.

Angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor blockers are the newest class of antihypertensive drugs to be developed. No large-scale clinical trials have been performed to evaluate their efficacy alone, or in combination with other drugs. A large-scale, eight week, open-label, non-placebo-controlled, single-arm trial evaluated the efficacy, tolerability and dose-response of candesartan cilexetil, 16-32 mg once-daily, either as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy, in a diverse hypertensive population in actual practice settings. 6465 patients with high blood pressure, of whom 52% were female and 16% African American, with a mean age of 58 years, were included. 5446 patients had essential hypertension and 1014 patients had isolated systolic hypertension. In order to be included in this study, patients had either untreated or uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) 140-179 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90-109 mmHg inclusive at baseline), despite a variety of other antihypertensive drugs. Of the 5156 patients with essential hypertension and at least one post baseline efficacy measurement, the mean pretreatment blood pressure (BP) was 156/97 mmHg. Candesartan cilexetil monotherapy reduced mean SBP/DBP by 18.0/12.2 mmHg. Similarly, in the 964 patients with isolated systolic hypertension and at least one post baseline efficacy measurement, candesartan cilexetil monotherapy reduced SBP/DBP from 158/81 by 16.5/4.5 mmHg. Candesartan cilexetil was similarly effective when employed as add-on therapy. When added to baseline antihypertensive medication in 51% of the patients with essential hypertension not achieving BP control, additional reduction in BP was achieved regardless of the background therapy, including diuretics (17.8/11.7 mmHg) calcium antagonists (16.6/11.2 mmHg), beta-blockers (16.5/10.4 mmHg), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) (15.3/10.0 mmHg), and alpha blockers (16.4/10.4 mmHg). Likewise, when candesartan cilexetil was used as add-on therapy in patients with isolated systolic hypertension, there was a consistent further reduction of mean SBP/DBP, regardless of the background therapy. Moreover, these monotherapeutic or add-on efficacy benefits were seen regardless of age (<65 or >65 years), gender, or race. Despite the open-label design of the study which enhances efficacy owing to the placebo effect, the Ang II receptor blocker, candesartan cilexetil either alone, or as an add-on therapy, is highly effective for assisting in the control of systolic and diastolic hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS)/candesartan cilexetil (N/C) combination was demonstrated to be an effective, well-tolerated antihypertensive therapy in a short-term study. The current study investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of N/C therapy in moderate-to-severe essential hypertension.
METHODS: A multinational, 70-centre, open-label study of N/C treatment for 28 or 52 weeks at a target dose of N60 mg/C32 mg. The primary assessment included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy assessments included change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP).
CONCLUSIONS: A total of 508 patients were enrolled, with 417 (82·1%) completing week 28 of treatment. Of these, 200 patients continued treatment, as planned, to week 52, with 193 (96·5%) completing this period. At least one TEAE or drug-related TEAE were reported in 76·8% and 45·3% patients up to week 28, and in 80·7% and 46·9% up to week 52/end of study. Most TEAEs and drug-related TEAEs to week 52 (93·9% and 95·4%, respectively) were mild or moderate in intensity. Rates of drug-related serious AEs were low (0·6%). TEAE-related discontinuations occurred in 10% patients before week 28 and in no additional patients thereafter. N/C provided substantial, sustained reductions in mean systolic and diastolic BP from baseline: 30·1 ± 18·4 and 12·8 ± 10·7 mmHg, respectively, at week 52.
CONCLUSIONS: Nifedipine GITS/candesartan cilexetil FDC at the target dose of 60 mg/32 mg was well tolerated for a study duration up to 52 weeks and provided sustained reductions in systolic and diastolic BP.

DISTINCT was an 8-week, double-blind, randomized study to investigate the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of various nifedipine gastrointestinal treatment system (GITS)/candesartan cilexetil (N/C) dose combinations, vs respective monotherapies or placebo, in patients with diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥95 to <110 mm Hg. The current prespecified analysis compared BP reduction in participants with mild vs moderate baseline hypertension (ie, systolic [S]BP <160 mm Hg vs ≥160 mm Hg and DBP <100 mm Hg vs ≥100 mm Hg). A total of 1362 patients were analyzed by descriptive statistics. In all patient subgroups investigated, the NC combinations (ie, N: 20, 30, or 60 mg; C: 4, 8, 16, or 32 mg daily) provided greater SBP and DBP lowering and higher rates of BP control (defined as BP <140/90 mm Hg) than respective monotherapies or placebo, with greatest absolute BP reductions observed in the moderately elevated SBP or DBP subgroups. A trend to dose-response relationship was observed in each subgroup. In each SBP and DBP subgroup, treatment-related vasodilatory events (flushing, headache, or edema) were less frequent for patients receiving NC combination therapy than N monotherapy. These analyses support the use of calcium antagonist and angiotensin receptor blocker combination therapy in patients with both mild and moderate hypertension, for whom effective BP normalization and good drug tolerance would greatly reduce the risk of cardiovascular events.