UNASSIGNED: More than 50% of people with advanced cancer suffer from cancer-related cachexia (CC) - a major contributor to morbidity and mortality. Despite the lack of local guidelines on CC diagnosis and management in Uganda, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) developed guidelines on CC screening and management. However, the level of knowledge on CC and compliance with the available guidelines among Ugandan oncology health professionals is unknown. This study aimed to assess the level of awareness and knowledge of CC diagnosis and management and compliance with the ASCO/ESMO/GLIM guidelines on CC among healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the care of cancer patients.
UNASSIGNED: In this phase one, a self-administered structured questionnaire developed using the ASCO/ESMO and GLIM guidelines on diagnosis and management of CC was used to assess the level of awareness, and knowledge of 200 health professionals from three hospital settings on CC, and compliance with the ASCO/ESMO/GLIM guidelines on CC related core communication, barriers to communication, clinician training in communication, discussing goals of care, treatment options and meeting the needs of the underserved populations. The data were entered into Research Electronic Data Capture software analysed using STATA version 18.0 software.
UNASSIGNED: The overall objectively correct knowledge score of CC diagnosis criteria was 67.5% (n = 135), yet there was a much lower level of awareness about ASCO/ESMO/GLIM guidelines on CC at 30% (n = 60) and only 21% (n = 42) of the HCPs have ever assessed Quality of life of CC patients. The compliance with ASCO/ESMO/GLIM guidelines on nutritional interventions for patients with CC varied across the variables markedly, ranging from 25.1% (n = 50) to 81% (n = 162) for the specific ASCO/ESMO/GLIM guidelines\' recommendations. Whereas compliance with the guidelines on discussing goals of care, prognosis, treatment options and end-of-life care scored the highest in most variables, most HCPs exhibited low compliance with the discussion about patients\' end-of-life preferences early in the course of incurable illness (49.8%, n = 99). There were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of only two variables among the three hospitals in compliance with ASCO/ESMO/GLIM guidelines on the provision.
UNASSIGNED: This study indicated that the overall objectively correct knowledge of CC diagnosis criteria was inadequate, with a much lower level of awareness about the ASCO/ESMO/GLIM guidelines on CC and a handful of the HCPs have ever assessed the quality of life of CC patients. Quality improvement interventions on CC diagnosis and management should prioritize improving the level of knowledge on CC, diagnostic criteria and patient-clinician communication, including discussion about patients\' end-of-life care using standardised tools such as ASCO/ESMO or GLIM guidelines on CC using a multidisciplinary team approach.

Cancer cachexia (CC) syndrome and anorexia-cachexia syndrome are common terms used to describe changes in metabolism with increased inflammatory activity and can progressively develop through various stages such as pre-cachexia; cachexia; and refractory cachexia. Therefore in year 2007 Croatian guidelines for use of eicosapentaenoic acid and megestrol acetate in cancer cachexia syndrome were published. Aim of this study was to assess the awareness and implementation of Croatian guidelines for use of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and megestrol acetate (MA) into clinical practice among Croatian oncologists approximately 10 years after the publication, but also to point out the importance of adequate recognition and treatment of CC.
Survey with questions was designed to assess the awareness and implementation of Croatian guidelines for use of EPA and MA into clinical practice and was distributed among all Croatian oncologists in secondary and tertiary hospital centers. Survey was conducted in January 2011 (40 months following release of the guidelines), February 2013 and June 2018, and were formed in a way of yes/no answers. Additional multiple choice questions that focus on the implementation of guidelines were added in June 2018.
A total of 128 oncologists completed a questionnaire. There was no statistically significant difference in follow up period (2011-2018) of percentage of oncologists that are familiar with Croatian guidelines for use of EPA and MA in CC, percentage of oncologists in which Croatian national guidelines changed their approach in treating patients with CC syndrome and proportion of oncologists that are using MA, enteral nutrition formulas with EPA or their combination. Most of the oncologists 38% (N = 44) are using >2.2 g of EPA per day. Nutritional support is prescribed in 25-50% of patients by 42% (N = 48) of oncologists and most of the oncologists (35%, N = 41) start with nutritional support when a body mass loss is >5%. Oncologists mostly recommend patients to use nutritional support during 1 year or more (43%, N = 49) or two months to 1 year (42%, N = 48). Compliance of patients with malignant diseases for using nutritional support was mostly evaluated as medium (69%, N = 60).
Results have shown that majority of oncologists who filled the questionnaire believe that the Croatian national guidelines for use of EPA and MA in CC syndrome changed their approach in treating patients with CC, but also that there are several targeted issues that can be significantly improved. The awareness of and adherence to national guidelines was maintained at high level even 11 years after the guidelines were published.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is a common associate of cancer and has a negative impact on both patients\' quality of life and overall survival. Nonetheless its management remains suboptimal in clinical practice. Provision of medical recommendations in websites is of extreme importance for medical decision making and translating evidence into clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To scrutinize the magnitude, consistency and changes over time of cancer-cachexia recommendations for physicians on the Web among oncology related societies. Intercontinental, continental, national and socioeconomic variations were further analyzed.
METHODS: Web identification of oncology related societies and prospective analyses of relative Web guideline recommendations for physicians on cancer-cachexia at different time-points.
RESULTS: In June 2011, we scrutinized 144,000 Web pages. We identified 275 societies, of which 270 were eligible for analyses: 67 were international (African, American, Asian, European, Oceania and Intercontinental), 109 belonged to the top 10 countries with the highest development index and 94 pertained to 10 countries with a long lasting tradition in medical oncology.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cancer cachexia recommendations for physicians on the Web at a global level was scant both for coverage and consistency, and at any time-point considered: 3.7% (10/270) in 2011 and 8.1% (22/270) in 2018. The proportion of societies giving evidence-based and updated recommendations for cancer cachexia for physicians was only 1.1% (3/270) in 2011 and 2.96% (8/270) in 2018. Continent, national highest developmental index, oncology tradition and economic-geographic areas were not found to influence Web guideline provision.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the quality of clinical practice guidelines of cancer cachexia and identify gaps limiting knowledge.
METHODS: A systematic search of relevant guideline websites and literature databases (including PubMed, NCCN, NGC, SIGN, NICE, and google) was undertaken from inception to March 2017 to identify and select clinical guidelines related to cancer cachexia. Four independent reviewers assessed the eligible guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Agreement among reviewers of the guidelines was measured by using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The number of recommendations, strength of recommendation, and levels of evidence were determined.
RESULTS: Nine cancer cachexia guidelines published from 2006 to 2017 were identified. An overall high degree of agreement among reviewers to each domain was observed (ICC ranged from 0.75 to 0.91). The median scores and range for each AGREE II domain were as follows: (i) scope and purpose (median = 61.1%, range: 13.9% to 80.7%); (ii) stakeholder involvement (median = 26.4%, range: 8.3% to 81.9%); (iii) rigour of development (median = 35.9%, range: 3.6% to 84.4%); (iv) clarity and presentation (median = 56.9%, range: 30.6% to 76.4%); (v) applicability (median = 19.8%, range: 0% to 77.1%) and (vi) editorial independence (median = 27.1%, range: 0% to 85.4%). Two cancer cachexia guidelines (ESPEN, 2017 and University of Queensland, 2013) scored higher on all domains and were classified as recommended for clinical practice, among which, one was developed by European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and European Partnership for Action Against Cancer, and the other was developed by University of Queensland. In addition, more than a half recommendations were based on nonrandomized studies (Level C, 50.0%) and expert opinion (Level D, 8.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of cancer cachexia guidelines was highly heterogeneous among different domains even within the same guideline. There is significant room for improvement to develop high quality cancer cachexia guidelines, which urgently warrants first-class research to minimize the vital gaps in the evidence for formulation of cancer cachexia guidelines.