CTEV

CTEV
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经皮手术刀张力切开术经常作为先天性马蹄内翻足(CTEV)的一部分进行,以纠正马蹄畸形。手术刀的使用与并发症有关,例如神经血管束损伤和假性动脉瘤。在文学中,已发现经皮大口径针头是进行肌腱切开术的手术刀的更安全的替代方法。这项研究的目的是进行系统评价,并报告一个单中心病例系列,介绍经皮穿刺术在CTEV治疗中的应用。进行了符合系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)的文献检索的首选报告项目,以确定描述经皮穿刺肌腱切开术在特发性CTEV治疗中的应用的研究。还从一个中心进行了为期7年的回顾性病例系列特发性CTEV患者的经皮穿刺术。病人的人口统计学,马蹄足的位置,和皮拉尼评分都被记录下来。进行了描述性统计分析。连续数据以平均值和SD表示,而分类变量表示为绝对数和百分比(%).系统评价包括8篇论文,共1026英尺,平均年龄10.4周(SD5.9)。所有研究中有47例(0.04%)并发症,合并成功率为95%。11名患者(16英尺)被纳入单中心病例研究。患者最初的皮拉尼评分为4.8(SD1.5),最终得分为0。(SD为0)。患者队列中发生了4种并发症-1次轻微出血和3次复发,这是由于对肌腱切开术后足外展支具的依从性差。总之,使用大孔针对CTEV足进行经皮跟腱切开术是一种安全有效的替代方法。
    Percutaneous scalpel tenotomy is frequently performed as part of congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) to correct the equinus deformity. The use of a scalpel is associated with complications such as neurovascular bundle damage and pseudoaneurysms. In the literature, a percutaneous large-bore needle has been found to be a safer alternative to a scalpel for performing tenotomies. The goal of this study was to conduct a systematic review and report a single-center case series on the use of percutaneous needle tenotomy in the treatment of CTEV. A Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA)-compliant literature search was conducted to identify studies describing the use of a percutaneous needle tenotomy in the treatment of idiopathic CTEV. A retrospective case series of patients with idiopathic CTEV treated with percutaneous needle tenotomy over a seven-year period from a single center were also conducted. The patients\' demographics, the location of the clubfoot, and the Pirani score were all recorded. An analysis of descriptive statistics was carried out. Continuous data were expressed as mean and SD, whereas categorical variables were expressed as absolute numbers and percentages (%). The systematic review included eight papers with a total of 1026 feet and a mean age of 10.4 weeks (SD 5.9). There were 47 (0.04%) complications across all studies, with a pooled success rate of 95%. Eleven patients (16 feet) were included in the single-center case study. The patients\' initial Pirani score was 4.8 (SD 1.5), with a final score of 0. (SD 0). Four complications occurred in the patient\'s cohort - one minor bleeding and three recurrences as a result of poor compliance with the post-tenotomy foot abduction brace. In conclusion, the percutaneous Achilles tenotomy of a CTEV foot with a large bore needle is a safe and effective alternative.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先天性马蹄内翻足(CTEV)是一种先天性残疾,其特征是静脉中的腿部畸形,加合物,varus,和马。对CTEV的病因了解甚少,尽管在印度尼西亚,每1000例活产婴儿的发病率为0.76至3.49例。CTEV涉及将脚固定在加合物中,varus,和马蹄并伴有软组织异常。尽管在治疗方面取得了进展,残疾往往持续存在。已经提出了神经学的理论模型,血管,结缔组织,骨头,和肌肉的原因;然而,现有数据提示轻度病例与宫内位置相关.CTEV的病因似乎涉及遗传性成分,因为它的流行程度因种族而异。在24-50%的病例中已经确定了遗传因素,取决于所研究的社区。基于复杂的离析分析,最合理的遗传模式是与多基因背景相互作用的单个大效应基因。
    Congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV) is a congenital disability characterized by leg deformities in the cavus, adducts, varus, and equinus. The etiology of CTEV is poorly understood, despite its incidence ranging from 0.76 to 3.49 cases per 1000 live births in Indonesia. CTEV involves the fixation of the foot in the adducts, varus, and equinus with concurrent soft tissue anomalies. Despite advances in treatment, disability often persists. Theoretical models have been proposed for neurological, vascular, connective tissue, bone, and muscular causes; however, the currently available data suggests that mild cases are associated with intrauterine position. CTEV\'s etiology appears to involve a hereditary component, as its prevalence varies by ethnic group. Genetic factors have been identified in 24-50% of cases, depending on the community studied. Based on a complex segregation analysis, the most plausible inheritance pattern is a single large-effect gene interacting with a polygenic background.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:跟腱切开术(AT)是Ponseti铸造方法的重要方面,在80-90%的特发性马蹄足病例中进行,以纠正残余的后足马蹄。文献中描述了不同的技术,但不清楚哪种方法更优越。这篇综述旨在分析所描述的各种技术,麻醉偏好,以及AT的结果。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,Scopus,和OvidMEDLINE用于描述在Ponseti的铸造方法中接受原发性AT的特发性马蹄内翻足病例的文章。从符合条件的研究中提取数据进行定性和定量综合。重复肌腱切开术和并发症发生率作为结果参数。
    结果:19项研究纳入系统评价。在大多数情况下,使用手术刀或针头的经皮AT是足够的,并且显示出有希望的结果。局部麻醉(LA)下的门诊(OPD)和全身麻醉(GA)下的手术室(OR)的肌腱切开术与2.5%(95CI,0.4-5.4%)和0.8%(95CI,0-1.6%)的重复肌腱切开术(RT)相关。分别。OPD组和OR组之间的差别无统计学意义(p=0.875)。汇总分析显示,失败/复发率为4.2%(1.9-6.4%,p<0.001)。OPD和OR肌腱切开术的并发症发生率为1.6%(95CI,0.2-3.0%)和0.5%(95CI,0.1-0.8%)。分别,差异无统计学意义(p=0.807)。出血是最常见的并发症,在大多数情况下可以通过施加局部压力来控制。
    结论:在LA下进行OPD跟腱切开术是安全且具有成本效益的,与GA下进行的成功率相似。由于目前缺乏许多比较和更高层次的证据研究,我们不能断定一种技术是否比另一种更好。
    BACKGROUND: Achilles tenotomy (AT) forms an important aspect of Ponseti\'s casting method and is performed in 80-90% of idiopathic clubfoot cases to correct residual hindfoot equinus. Different techniques are described in the literature with no clarity on which method is superior. This review aims to analyse the various techniques described, anaesthesia preferences, and outcomes of AT.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid MEDLINE for articles describing idiopathic clubfoot cases undergoing primary AT during Ponseti\'s casting method. Data were extracted from eligible studies for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The repeat tenotomy and complication rates were taken as outcome parameters.
    RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included for systematic review. A percutaneous AT using a scalpel or needle is adequate in most cases and shows promising results. The out-patient department (OPD) tenotomies under local anaesthesia (LA) and operation room (OR) tenotomies under general anaesthesia (GA) were associated with a repeat tenotomy (RT) rate of 2.5% (95%CI, 0.4-5.4%) and 0.8% (95%CI, 0-1.6%), respectively. The difference between OPD and OR groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.875). The pooled analysis shows a failure/relapse rate of 4.2% (1.9-6.4%, p < 0.001) after AT. OPD and OR tenotomies were associated with a complication rate of 1.6% (95%CI, 0.2-3.0%) and 0.5% (95%CI, 0.1-0.8%), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.807). Bleeding is the most common complication and is controlled in most cases by applying local pressure.
    CONCLUSIONS: Performing Achilles tenotomy in OPD under LA is safe and cost-effective with similar success rates to those done under GA. With the lack of many comparative and higher-level evidence studies at present, we can\'t conclude if one technique is better than another.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The primary methods for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot are ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). An ultrasound is performed between the 1st trimester and the 28th week of pregnancy and it is reported to be used as a diagnostic method alone or in combination with MRI. So far, an international consensus on the most effective screening method has not been reached. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to establish the most effective and reliable exam for prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot. The literature search was conducted using a PIOS-approach from May 2021 to June 2021. Studies reporting cases of prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot made through US and MRI conducted from January 2010 to June 2021 were included in the study and reviewed by 2 authors. The 23 selected studies included 2318 patients. A total of 11 of the studies included details on the accuracy, while the rest were used to obtain information about the primary methodology utilized. In all the selected studies, US was used as the primary diagnostic instrument. Thirteen of the studies used the US exclusively, while three used MRI in addition to US and seven performed karyotyping after US diagnosis. The US has been shown to be the instrument of choice for the prenatal diagnosis of Clubfoot. International guidelines for an ultrasonography classification of congenital clubfoot are required to reduce the inter-variability accuracy of this procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    马蹄挛缩是马蹄内翻足复发时最常见的畸形,可引起疼痛和功能限制。这对整个童年时期的整形外科医生提出了挑战。根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。研究包括:(I)原创文章,(ii)研究复发性特发性马蹄内翻足的治疗,(iii)至少部分研究人群主要是马蹄畸形,和(iv)独立行走年龄的儿科研究人群。包括9项研究,共163名患者(207英尺)。研究提出了五种管理范式:腓肠肌-比目鱼复合体释放,广泛的后部软组织和关节松解术,胫骨远端前半上皮肌固定术,胫骨远端截骨术,和圆形框架分心。所有方法都报告了我们选择的至少一个结果领域的成功:平坦化状态,运动范围,临床结果评分,功能状态,射线照相结果,患者报告的结果,和并发症。年龄较小的儿童倾向于通过软组织释放来管理,而年龄较大的儿童倾向于需要更广泛的骨/关节手术。手术治疗的足部复发更难治疗。不同治疗方法的比较受到文献规模小、证据水平低的限制,以及缺乏一致的结果报告。因此,不可能推荐任何年龄组的任何一种治疗选择。这篇综述强调了需要一个经过验证的核心结果集,以便对马蹄畸形的管理进行高质量的研究。引用这篇文章:EFORTOpenRev2021;6:354-363。DOI:10.1302/2058-5241.6.200110。
    Equinus contracture is the most common deformity at clubfoot relapse and causes pain and functional limitation. It presents a challenge to the orthopaedic surgeon throughout childhood.A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies included were: (i) original articles, (ii) investigating management of relapsed idiopathic clubfoot, (iii) with at least a partial study population of primarily equinus deformity, and (iv) a paediatric study population of independent walking age.Nine studies were included with a total of 163 patients (207 feet). Studies presented five management paradigms: gastrocnemius-soleus complex release, extensive posterior soft tissue and joint release, anterior distal tibial hemi-epiphysiodesis, distal tibial osteotomy, and circular frame distraction.All approaches reported success in at least one of our selected outcome domains: plantigrade status, range of motion, clinical outcome scores, functional status, radiographic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. Younger children tend to be managed with soft tissue release while older children tend to require more extensive bone/joint procedures. Relapse in surgically treated feet is harder to treat.Comparison across treatment approaches is limited by the small size and low evidence level of the literature, as well as a lack of consistent outcome reporting. It is therefore not possible to recommend any one treatment option in any age group.This review highlights the need for a validated core outcome set to enable high-quality research into the management of equinus deformity. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:354-363. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200110.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The Ponseti method is the benchmark treatment for the correction of clubfoot. The primary rate of correction is very high, but outcome further down the treatment pathway is less predictable. Several methods of assessing severity at presentation have been reported. Classification later in the course of treatment is more challenging. This systematic review considers the outcome of the Ponseti method in terms of relapse and determines how clubfoot is assessed at presentation, correction, and relapse.
    A prospectively registered systematic review was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that reported idiopathic clubfoot treated by the Ponseti method between 1 January 2012 and 31 May 2017 were included. The data extracted included demographics, Ponseti methodology, assessment methods, and rates of relapse and surgery.
    A total of 84 studies were included (7335 patients, 10 535 clubfeet). The relapse rate varied between 1.9% and 45%. The rates of relapse and major surgery (1.4% to 53.3%) and minor surgery (0.6% to 48.8%) both increased with follow-up time. There was high variability in the assessment methods used across timepoints; only 57% of the studies defined relapse. Pirani scoring was the method most often used.
    Recurrence and further surgical intervention in idiopathic clubfoot increases with the duration of follow-up. The corrected and the relapsed foot are poorly defined, which contributes to variability in outcome. The results suggest that a consensus for a definition of relapse is needed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:639-645.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Congenital Talipes Equinovarus (CTEV), or club foot, is a common congenital orthopaedic abnormality of the foot, which is easily diagnosed but difficult to treat perfectly. Controversy in terms of its etiology, classification and management continues to exist. Delayed initial treatment in patients with clubfoot has a strong correlation with a poor outcome. The purpose of this study was to review the factors that influence the outcome in patients who get delayed initial treatment at Hasan Sadikin General Hospital so that poor outcome can be prevented. We reviewed the medical records of 15 patients (23 feet) during the period from January 2009 to December 2013 and analysed various factors including gender, age at time of first treatment, type of disorder, the level of success of non-surgical therapy, parent education level, family income and accessibility to health care centre. CTEV was more common in girls in our patients who were in the 6-12 months age group. The most common type of CTEV was the flexible type. Treatment with serial casting produced good results in most patients. The majority of parents\' educational level was junior high school and had 2-5 million/month income. The accessibility of patients to health care centre was difficult.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号